Through the news snarkly

Hypocrisy watch, part 65,341: Jordan is really big on accusing Israel of violating human rights laws every time men under 50 are prevented from worshipping at al Aqsa (because they’re going there with the intent of rioting, but I digress). Without even mentioning the fact that men who commit “honor killings” in Jordan get slap-on-the-wrist sentences, how’s about this one? An Arab-Israeli man was arrested in Jordan for “speaking ill” of the king. It’s against the law to insult King Abdullah. Or Jordan. Well. I think Abdullah is a monkey-faced moron. There. Now I can never go to Jordan. I’ve broken Jordanian law. Well, I think Jordan sucks, which means I’ve just broken two Jordanian laws. It’s against the law to insult the country, as well. Yeah, way to walk the walk, dudes.

Proof that winning a Nobel prize doesn’t mean you’re smart: The Israeli Nobel Laureate in chemistry should probably stick to talking about science when she’s interviewed. Telling the Israeli media that she thinks all Palestinian prisoners should be released, regardless of how many murders they’ve committed, doesn’t make her look all that bright.

We’re going to reconcile, but separately: Fatah and Hamas may be signing the reconciliation agreement on separate days. The sheer comedy gold of that concept appears to have utterly passed them by.

A Buddhist Sukkot: Not really. Just the Dalai Lama visiting Washington’s largest Conservative synagogue to speak to 400 of his followers. He took some time after the speech to celebrate Sukkot with the rabbi and congregants. Barack Obama was not in attendance. He was over in the Chinese sukka across town.

Posted in Israel, News Briefs | Comments Off on Through the news snarkly

Barry Rubin responds

In his post, Portraying Hamas, Soccer Dad referred to one of Barry Rubin’s articles. Here is Prof. Rubin’s response:

It’s rather strange that you wrote a piece criticizing a Washington Post piece mainly by pointing out I had praised it. It sort of looks as if you were going out of your way to criticize me whereas you could just have criticized the article in the Post.

What I said was that it was a good article. Of the last 100 pieces I have read on Hamas it is the only one that comes close to being both accurate and critical of them.

The cases you mention are the author making very careful “balanced” remarks. The author is not supposed to give his opinion so he says that the US considers Hamas a terrorist group. That is quiite proper for him to write.

He also provides one sentence giving the Hamas expressed opinion. This, too, is proper journalistic procedure. What we often see is the reporter associating himself with the viewpoint of a terrorist group, giving it far greater space, or misstating such groups’ positions to make them seem more moderate than they are. Again, he provided proper balance, not the usual phony balance which is the minimum needed to point to as “fair” when everything else in the article is an anti-Israel or anti-American, etc., polemic.

The same applies to the Mitchell point. The author states a fact. There has been no talk of changing the terms by which Hamas could enter negotiations. This is an important point to make because it shows that the standards demanded of Hamas are not being eroded and that U.S. policy is standing firm on this issue. There is no hint tha the author is advocating that these principles should be changed.

Have we gotten so used to blatant editorializing in an article that we demand it when a reporter does his job properly?

In short, the criticisms made of the article simply don’t stand up. Moreover to pick these minor points out of an otherwise good article–without mentioning at all the positive points–seems to me to be unfair to the journalist. Again having seen incredibly slanted articles on a daily basis it was refreshing to see one that was analytically good and even went far in pointing out the truth about Hamas.

I’m not angry but if we are going to be credible we must evaluate what is written fairly and also respect the standards of proper journalism, whose frequent violation is the bane of the contemporary media. When a reporter writes a good piece that should be appreciated rather than attacked because not every word is as one would like it, especially if one is suggesting professional journalists write a polemic in the opposite direction.

Fairness and balance is good enough for me.

Posted in Hamas | 1 Comment

SNN preview

I’m pretty happy with my contribution this week.

So you can all give a listen early if you promise to go to the SNN site and hear the podcast in full later. Remember, you don’t need an iPod to hear our podcast—just a computer that has a media player.

Posted in Podcasts | 1 Comment

The Miss America President wins the Miss America Peace Prize

I’ve decided that we have the Miss America President. He looks pretty, he speaks nicely on deep subjects (but not too deeply), and he has to pull out a bit of talent for the competition now and then, but ultimately, he’s just another smiling face trying to win the prize. And now he has. Barack Obama gave a speech, and the Nobel committee gave him first place.

The Nobel Committee announced Friday that the annual peace prize was awarded to Barack Obama, just nine months into his presidency, “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”

The award cited in particular Mr. Obama’s effort to reduce the world’s nuclear arsenal. “He has created a new international climate,” the committee said.

In other words, Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for giving a speech.

Granted, the prize itself has become less and less meaningful as the years go on (cf: Giving Jimmy Carter a Nobel to taunt George W. Bush), but I think we can safely say now that the award is utterly devoid of meaning. It was given to a man who has done nothing, in the hopes that he will eventually do something.

Life imitates the Onion. Really. I couldn’t make this up if I tried.

And the truly frightening thing is: I’m betting Obama thinks he deserves it.

Update: In honor of the Miss America President winning the prize, comments are once again open.

Update 2: I just opened registration, because I’m lazy and want those of you who emailed me to register yourselves. Quick! Before I close it again. (I’ll hold it for the rest of the day, likely.)

Posted in The One | 19 Comments

Portraying Hamas

Barry Rubin writes about a recent Washington Post article about Hamas:

Here’s a good article on Hamas and how it’s a barrier to peace, with no illusions about the group moderating or being misunderstand. The article also points out how Hamas is responsible for continuing sanctions on Gaza and is uninterested in trying to improve the living standards of is own people.

Perhaps I’m nitpicking but I wasn’t so impressed with the article. There were two paragraphs that bugged me.

First, in the middle, there was this:

Hamas, which was founded as an Islamist alternative to the Palestine Liberation Organization and whose charter calls for Israel’s destruction, is considered a terrorist group by the United States for its sponsorship of suicide attacks and the launching of thousands of missiles and mortar shells from Gaza into Israel. The group draws financial and material support from Iran and Syria. Hamas says its attacks on Israel are defensive and a legitimate tactic in Palestinian efforts to establish a homeland.

“[I]s considered a terrorist group?” It is, by definition, a terrorist group for precisely the reasons stated. Second, when the reporter uses the term “legitimate tactic,” he allows that claim to stand unchallenged.

At the end of the article we read:

According to officials from Hamas and analysts of the group, those conditions are unlikely to be accepted, cutting as they do to the core of the group’s ideology and strategy. Just as there is no sense that the language of Hamas leaders has come close to meeting those requirements, despite talk of a possible compromise, there has been no obvious effort by Mitchell’s team to try to reshape the conditions.

What does “reshape the conditions” mean? And why does the article seem critical that Mitchell won’t? I’d understand the term to mean “water down the demands” and I see no reason for Mitchell to do so. And why should Mitchell “reshape the conditions?” So Israel will be forced to deal with an unrepentant terrorist organization?

Finally, the reporter, Howard Schneider compares Mitchell’s work here with his work with the IRA. There’s one important difference. The IRA wanted England gone from Northern Ireland; Hamas (and Fatah, for that matter) want Israel gone. Period.

I can’t disagree that Schneider hit on the points that Barry Rubin emphasized. I still find his packaging problematic.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad

Posted in Hamas, Israel, Media Bias | Tagged | Comments Off on Portraying Hamas

Gaddafi Jewish too now? Oh boy…

The ink on the latest “revelations” about Mahmoud the Mad’s Jewish roots has barely dried and evaporated (after all it was a canard, created, most probably, by his political rivals). And here we are on the brink of another scandal: the Maariv article (in Hebrew) tells a story about the Jewish mom who produced Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi, that unique, albeit a bit deranged, offspring.

Maariv received a corroboration by one of the female relatives that Qadaffi’s mother’s name was Rosella (Rosalla?) Tamas. When Rosella was 18, she acquainted and married a Muslim man. One of the offsprings of the marriage was Muammar.

The article goes into further details of the genealogy of Tamas family. Suffice to say that, according to it, Muammar has quite a few close relatives in Ramat Gan, where he will be warmly received, no doubt.

Well, I am not sure the King of Kings is considering repatriation at the moment, but the story clears up at least one of the question marks: the uncertainty about his name: Gaddafi, Qadaffi, Gadhaffi, etc. etc.

And, of course, Elders have lost a valuable agent, once his true identity was revealed, but his usefulness was in doubt lately anyway…

Jet lag my foot…

Cross-posted on SimplyJews.

Posted in Humor, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Comments Off on Gaddafi Jewish too now? Oh boy…

Kitty palate cleanser

I have an antique Chinese screen. Gracie respects it, mostly.

Gracie lying in front of the screen

But Tig does not.

Then again, I’m the one who encouraged him to play in the space under the screen. Because I was hoping for a picture like this.

Tig playing under the screen

Kitty pr0n.

Posted in Cats | 2 Comments

Comment posting is now registration-only

Okay, three straight days of anti-Semitic vitriol is about all I can stand at a time. So now, commenters must be registered in order to comment, and, well, sorry. Registration is closed to new users. If you are a regular reader of this blog and never got around to registering, email me and I’ll fit you in somehow.

You know which ones crack me up the most? The ones who accuse me of being a racist and then go on to tell me that all Jews are Nazis, or something like that. I figure most of those are the ones who have to wipe the spittle off their screen when they’re done reading my post.

Or they’re the ones with the little tiny dicks. Peabrains go without saying.

Then again, I do have a lot more fodder for my Freakmail folder. Time for another post of the lovely sentiments of the anti-Israel crowd, at least, when I can delve back down into the sewers again.

By the way, one thing I haven’t done in a while is invoke the Yourish.com mantra: Anti-semites of the world, just die already. That includes all the ones who left me the lovely, unapproved comments.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Site news | 3 Comments

The Goldstone Report Kangaroo Court

The UN-Israel follies continue, as the next act in the “Let’s give Israel a fair trial and then find her guilty” show moves from the Human Wrongs Commission to the UN Security Council, where America’s vote can be the difference between stopping this travesty or allowing the steamroller to continue.

Make no mistake, the Goldstone report is all about delegitimizing Israel as a nation of laws. The report is filled with lies, anti-Israel propaganda, and downplays or ignores Hamas crimes against Israel that caused the Gaza war.

Israel’s Minstry of Foreign Affairs had a press conference about the harm that this report is doing not only to the Israel’s legal system in the world, but to all nations’ laws, because if the UN can declare that a free and democratic nation’s legal system is illegitimate, well—it’s sort of a rerun of the rights of Jews being stripped away by the nations of Europe, isn’t it?

Elder of Zion has the most frightening aspects of what Goldstone is doing to Israel.

The second reason why I think this report has generated such a strong response is that it represents a full frontal attack on the Israeli legal system. And this is something that should worry not just Israel but also most Western and democratic countries that have very, very similar systems for actually investigating and checking their conduct in the course of military operations.

[…] I’ll just finish the legal aspect by saying that obviously all of the decisions along the way, whether it’s the decision of the Military Advocate General or the Attorney General whether to open criminal proceedings or not open criminal proceedings, are all subject to review by our Supreme Court, which, as you know, can be petitioned for judicial review by Israelis, Palestinians, human rights organizations.

So, really, the dismissive attitude of the report for this entire system is very, very troubling, very troubling for Israel, very troubling for other countries that have similar systems, and troubling for other countries that often rely on the jurisprudence of our Supreme Court. I actually just received through my e-mail today, a decision of a Canadian Court, a Superior Court in Montreal, which last week relied on the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. And so the attack on the legitimacy of this report is troubling from a legal point of view.

Read the rest. It’s very troubling.

Also troubling is this video for the astonishing—or perhaps, not really astoinishing—amount of conformity of anti-Israel comments on the report. They hit the same words, the same phrases, the same theme, over and over again. It is a coordinated effort to attack Israel in the world forum, since the Arabs failed time and time again by attacking Israel physically to destroy the Jewish state. What they cannot accomplish by arms, they think, they can accomplish by strategy.

And right now, their strategy is winning. Israel is being delegitimized in the eyes of the world. The comments that I get here every time Yahoo! News links my post bring the same themes: Israel “stole” the land. Israelis are “colonialists.” The Jews who moved to Israel aren’t really descendants of the Jews who lived there in Biblical times. And anyway, even if they are, the Palestinians are really the Philistines, so they trump Jewish ownership of the land, because the Jews found the Philistines there already. All of these are false, and yet, I see them over and over, here, and on every other internet site where Israel is discussed and comments are unmoderated.

The world’s delegitimization of Israel continues apace. It’s time to be very, very worried.

Posted in Gaza, Israel | 4 Comments

Israeli Jew wins a Nobel, world boycott movement in shock

Go ahead, world. Boycott Israeli academic institutions. It totally makes sense, because it’s not like Israeli students will grow up to do Nobel-prize winning work or anything like that.

Israeli scientist Ada Yonath, 70, was awarded the Nobel Prize for chemistry for showing how ribosomes function, work that has important implications for antibiotics, the prize committee said on Wednesday.

She’s a native-born Israeli, just the type we keep being told are the usurpers in the land. Funny, she’s older than the modern state of Israel. How did she manage to usurp the land?

A renowned scientist, Yonath serves as the director of the Helen and Milton A. Kimmelman Center for Biomolecular Structure and Assembly at the Weizmann Institute of Science.

She was a co-recipient of the 2006 Wolf Prize in Chemistry, along George Feher, and in 2008, became the first Israeli to win a lifetime’s achievement award from L’Oréal and UNESCO for her vital work identifying how bacteria become resistant to antibiotics.

Now she has become the first Israeli woman to win a Nobel Prize.

The would-be head of UNESCO from Egypt threatened to burn any Israeli books he found in Egyptian libraries. Ada was so poor as a child, she couldn’t even afford books.

I’ll have to readjust the Jewish Nobel count, but I think I’ll wait until they’re all in.

Update: Linked by Yahoo! News again. A typical comment (that I’m not approving): “Such hate…” Get it? Pointing out that Israelis are contributing to the world is hate. I think it’s safe to respond: Such idiots….

Posted in Israel, Jews | 20 Comments

Jews pray in Jerusalem; Arabs riot

What happens when Jews try to pray at their holy sites in Jerusalem on their holidays? Why, the tolerant Palestinian Muslims try to kill them. And the head of the Palestinian Authority, the ostensible Israeli peace partner, talks about not letting Jews “Judaize” Jerusalem.

The Jews’ role in Jerusalem? Well, that’s been played down by the two child religions since, well, since they grabbed a foothold in the area. Oh, you have people like Jimmy Carter referring to Israel as “the Holy Land,” paying lip service to the fact that his religion grew out of Judaism, but when push comes to shove, he jumps on the Palestinian bandwagon regarding the “Judaization” of Jerusalem. The 3,000-year history of Jews in Jerusalem? Meaningless, because the Jews left. Or at least, the Palestinians took it over. Or something. Jordan annexed it in 1949? Hey, nobody actually objected to the Jordanian destruction of Jewish synagogues, holy sites, and cemeteries. The eastern part of Jerusalem has been proclaimed “Arab east Jersulem” by all and sundry, in spite of the fact that the Jewish Quarter lies smack inside of “Arab” east Jerusalem. And now, the wire services are helping the Palestinians call for the Islamization of Jerusalem by denying the Jewish history of the city.

The Palestinian statement also took aim at controversy over Jerusalem, and condemned what it called a plan by Jews to “perform religious rituals” in a compound containing the al-Aqsa mosque, Islam’s third holiest site.

“The Palestinian cabinet calls on all international, Arab and Muslim elements to take responsibility for the developments in Israel and force it to put off its attempts to take over Jerusalem and Judaize it,” the statement read.

Reuters can barely bring itself to mention that Jerusalem houses Judaism’s Holy of Holies, or that it is the site of the First and Second Temples, or that it is the physical heart of Judaism, always was, and always will be. This is how Reuters describes Jews’ connection to Jerusalem:

Palestinians have warned that the tensions flaring over access to a holy compound housing the al-Aqsa mosque, an area also revered by Jews as the site of an ancient temple, could, on the background of stalled peace talks, ignite a third uprising.

And this:

Violence in Jerusalem flared on Sunday after Israel briefly shut gates leading to the compound around al-Aqsa, known to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary and to Jews as the Temple Mount, citing concerns for possible violence as hundreds of Jews held holiday prayers at the adjacent Western Wall.

The riots in Jerusalem over the last few days happened because Jews were exercising their right to pray at the Western Wall, and Palestinians decided that was cause to try to kill Jews. The Palestinians use the pretext of religious freedom by saying that they are prevented from praying at Al-Aqsa. But what they don’t mention are facts like these:

Earlier Monday, Jerusalem police explained their decision to allow only worshipers over the age of 50 into the Temple Mount, revealing that wheelbarrows filled with rocks had been discovered throughout the Aksa Mosque compound on Sunday.

Palestinians had filled the wheelbarrows with stones and bricks in preparation for riots in the Old City, police assessed.

The discovery of the wheelbarrows, in addition to intelligence information and the call on Palestinians to “come and defend” Al-Aksa, led the police to restrict entrance to the Temple Mount.

When you read about wheelbarrows full of stones, please don’t make the mistake of thinking these are gravel-sized rocks. They are brick-sized rocks, big enough to kill, and remember that the Arabs launch them from above, down on the Jews worshipping below. The missiles are potentially lethal.

And remember, if you will, why the Muslims are rioting: Because Jews dared to pray on their holy sites in Jerusalem. The Muslim narrative denies all Jewish ties to Jerusalem.

“No one has rights to the Al-Aqsa Mosque other than the Muslims. The mosque compound is Muslim, Palestinian and Arab, and Israel has no rights to the mosque or East Jerusalem,” he said

Archeological evidence notwithstanding, you’d think the morons would at least acknowledge that Islam is an offshoot of Judaism. But of course, that would be too much for Ra’ad Salah’s tiny little brain to handle.

I think Israel has the right leader, at the right time, for what is happening today. And then, of course, there’s the backing of a Certain Someone who is a bit more powerful than even the world media. I have three words for the Muslims: Am Yisrael chai.

Deal with it.

Update: Linked by Yahoo! News, 31 comments pending in the queue, and only 12 of them are anti-Jewish or anti-Israel. Must be a slow Jew-hate day.

Update two: I’m approving most of the comments, but I should like to point out to the stupidest of my commenters that when Yahoo! News links to something with the heading “Blogs about this story,” that means you’re on a blog. Not a newspaper. Not a magazine. I am not a journalist, nor do I play one on TV, so those of you whining that I’m not objective, let me ask you something my brother used to ask as a child: Are you dumb, stupid, or all three?

Update three: This is my favorite comment so far. You rock, Yectla. And are hereby designated an Apprentice of Juvenile Scorn.

Posted in Israel, Religion | 31 Comments

Why did Israel jail the pregnant woman?

The media likes to boast that they are the “first rough draft of history.” Part of that claim is that they are disinterested parties just reporting the facts as they are. Rafael Broch of Just Journalism had an excellent op-ed in Ha’aretz demonstrating the falseness of that claim.

But the media is more active than we may realize, and journalists profoundly affect what we understand about international law. One way is through the language that journalists popularise in their reports and broadcasts.

The first reference to war crimes by the British press in relation to the Gaza conflict came less than 48 hours into Israel’s operation. It was a quotation from a Hezbollah militant in Lebanon, claiming the assault was a “war crime and represents genocide”.

What is most interesting is not the readiness of the journalist to include war crimes allegations in his report so soon, but that the journalist saw it fit to quote the legal judgement of an avowed enemy. Somewhere in the mind of the journalist is the logic that these soundbytes convey drama and sell papers.

And so every Israeli self-defense is subject to a filter, which suggests that each such action might well be a violation worthy of condemnation if not punishment.

Consider the other side of the coin. On Friday Israel released twenty female security prisoners in exhange for a video of captured soldier, Gilad Schalit. Schalit has been held for three years and not allowed any visits by the Red Cross. How did the Associated Press orient its story? On the plight of the prisoners!

Women make up only a tiny minority of more than 7,000 Palestinians held in Israeli prisons, but they often pay a high personal price for what has largely been a supporting role in the Palestinian uprising.

Some have raised babies behind bars, and others have watched their families torn apart in their absence.

Now notice in these opening paragraphs there’s nothing about what the women may have done to deserve incarceration. It’s as if the Israelis arbitrarily picked the women off the street.

Fatima Ziq, 41, was pregnant when she was arrested in May 2007 as an alleged accomplice in a foiled suicide bombing. She returns to Gaza City with a toddler — her ninth child — who has known only prison life.

Zhour Hamdan, 45, was a married mother of eight when she was picked up in 2003, also as an accomplice in an aborted bombing. Her husband has remarried, and her children were forced to fend for themselves.

“Our mother was the heart of our family,” said one of her daughters, Neveen, 22. “When she was arrested, our entire life changed.”

“Alleged accomplice?” Was she not tried and convicted? And the only reason she’s being released is because the action she abetted was unsuccessful. Does the article ask what kind of society impels pregnant women to be actively involved in the destruction of innocents?

As far as Zhour Hamdan, was she abandoned by husband because of her absence or on account of her age? If her husband abandoned their children too, what does that say about her husband?

But if glossing over the crimes the women were involved in wasn’t bad enough, the AP goes further:

The release of prisoners is an emotional issue for both sides.

Palestinians view the prisoners as heroes fighting Israeli occupation at great personal cost, and virtually every Palestinian family has current or former detainees in its midst.

In contrast, many Israelis see the inmates as terrorists.

Israelis “see” these inmates as terrorists? Please. They are, by definition, terrorists. They attempted to kill civilians. Their success in doing so isn’t really relevant to what they are. It’s not a subjective judgment. That Palestinian society views them as heroes, says something about the society and about the apologists who glorify the terrorism.

The Israeli public is divided over whether to release large numbers of prisoners in exchange for Israeli captives. Some argue that such releases only drive up the cost of future exchanges and increase the dangers of future attacks.

“Some argue?” Well it’s more than an argument. It’s documented that a portion of those terrorists who are released early return to terrorism and innocents again pay the price.

As Meryl noted, there have been other articles of this ilk about Gilad Schalit or more generally.

The media may claim that they report the news, but what they report is a narrative, shaped by ideology. It has the effect of shaping opinion to fit the views of “journalists” and advocating for their preferred causes. It is generally not what we would consider “news.”

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Israeli Double Standard Time | Tagged | 14 Comments

Best of The Jewish/Israeli Blogosphere #237

Every week we run a blog carnival called Haveil Havalim. It is a collection of the Best Posts of The Jewish/Israeli Blogosphere.

I am pleased to let you know that the 237th edition of the carnival is now live.

As a point of information the carnival is a pluralistic exercise. It draws posts from all sides of the spectrum and thus offers readers a chance to read perspectives and postiions that they might not otherwise be exposed to.

Go read it and let us know what you think.

Posted in Israel, Jews | 1 Comment

The lightness of posting

It’s a sinus infection. I have antibiotics and other things. But I have no energy to post.

And I have to say, Sarah is a great friend. I am extremly crabby when I’m sick, and she just lets me gripe on the phone and doesn’t complain. I realized today how extremely crabby I was just before dinner, and I called her while I was cooking and said, “Bitchy Meryl has been banished for the rest of the day.” She laughed. (I did apologize.)

I can feel the antibiotics working already. Maybe one more good night’s sleep will get me back to being mostly human.

Posted in Life, Site news | 3 Comments

Once again on Mahmoud the Mad’s Jewish roots

The story is not, strictly speaking, new. The Jewish roots of so called Mr Ahmadinejad (Saburjian really) have been already discussed earlier this year. Of course, when The Telegraph gets on the subject, the waves are much higher than when it’s only Radio Free Europe. No matter, it’s all for the best. And there is no arguing with this suggestion:

Experts last night suggested Mr Ahmadinejad’s track record for hate-filled attacks on Jews could be an overcompensation to hide his past.

So, here’s looking at Mahmoud the Mad: we already know what he is so mad about, and the only thing to clear up is whether he is really Mahmoud.

Moshe would be my bet. But who knows…

Otherwise, some of the younger but aspiring candidates to the Elders’ outfit clamor for immediate acceptance of Moshe ( temporary name) Saburjian to the Elders’ HQ ranks. Which is a tall order. Usually we require one of the following achievements prior to signing up a candidate:

  • taking a leading role in some major political mayhem in country of residence
  • several disastrous anti-Semitic speeches in public forums
  • being such a major pain in the arse that even one’s allies get a turn-off
  • destroying economy of a Zionism-opposing nation
  • becoming so hated by own people that they may prefer embracing…

What, all of the above? Including… yes… yes… you don’t say… oh boy…

OK, Moishe Saburjian:

You are accepted, congratulations. Please apply to the local branch of the Elders for your orders as soon as the holidays are over. Meanwhile continue with your current activities. Yes, doing real good.

At ease, Elder.

Cross-posted on SimplyJews

Posted in Humor, Iran | 2 Comments