The Tiggerble Twos

On April 18th, 2008, I brought home an eight-week-old kitten.

Baby Tig

That makes today his second birthday.

He’s a lot bigger now.

He and Gracie got tunafish this morning.

Tig and Gracie with Tig's birthday tuna

And here are a few things Tig did during his birthday week.

He took a nap.

Tig snoozes

He thought about helping me write a post.

Tig blogs

He went where he’s not supposed to go.

Tig in the shower stall

And he did what he does best: Looked like a goofball.

Tig the goofball

Happy birthday, my Tig 3.0. Come June, there will have been an orange Tigger cat in my life for 27 years. May there be one for many years to come.

Posted in Cats | 10 Comments

The real reason for the Hamas hit

From the comments:

No one yet has pointed out the REAL reason this guy was ‘terminated’. The videos I’ve seen show him carrying a tennis racket. In DUBAI. And who is doing really well in the tournament now being held in DUBAI?

“Israeli tennis player Shahar Peer on Thursday advanced to the semifinals of the Dubai Championship, after beating 10th seed Na Li in the quarterfinal match.”

I surprised that there haven’t been calls for an investigation by the Israeli Tennis Federation and the World Tennis Federation. So WTF is going on here?

I have such smart readers. Mystery solved!

Posted in Hamas, Israel | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The Dubai sanction

While the apparent efficiency involved in killing Mahmoud al-Mabhouh has convinced many that Israel killed him, (via memeorandum) some others are raising doubts.

Tom Gross, for example, wonders:

* There seems a very real possibility that Israel is being set up. Airlines keep detailed passenger records these days and anyone could have got the flight manifestos of British and other passport holders who have flown to Israel in the past and then used these names in a deliberate attempt to point the finger of blame at Israel.

* The Dubai authorities have provided no forensic evidence that points to Israel, only a series of photos and videos of random hotel guests who may or may not all know each other. In any event, the persons shown in these photos and videos are not shown committing any crime. It would be very easy to frame Israel, using the identities of six randomly-chosen Israelis based on flight manifestos. This could have been done by anyone – and especially by persons who wanted to avoid being suspected of this action by blaming the Israelis and diverting attention from the real perpetrators.

The Washington, which has a main article working from the premise that it was done by israel, nonetheless carries an AP report that observes:

But the account quickly came under dispute. And other elements added to the scrutiny on Dubai, including how investigators pieced together the evidence or why such a well-planned operation would overlook Dubai’s wide-ranging security cameras.

It all adds up to something far less definitive than Tamim’s presentation, which included video surveillance clips of both the alleged killers and Mabhouh.

Obviously, al-Mabhouh was a bad guy who threatened Israel, but the circumstances of his death may be less certain.

Yaacov Lozowick links to dueling op-eds in Ha’aretz.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Dubai sanction

The all-Hamas hit snark news

Hey, terrorists are human, too! Why is it that the AP insists on writing hagiographies for dead terrorists, yet usually utterly ignores the biographies of their victims? I’m surprised they even mentioned the names of the two Israeli soldiers he killed.

The world is outraged, outraged! Let’s see, Paris demands clarification, the U.K. expects full cooperation from Israel, the Dubai hit may damage U.K.-Israel ties. Okay, that last one—really? Seriously? Damage ties between the nation that refuses to cancel its law that allows its citizens to charge Israeli politicians with war crimes, that refuses to sell Israel spare parts for weapons systems it already sold, and that has one of the most vocal anti-Israel boycott movements in the world? Relations are going to get worse? Don’t make me laugh.

Outrage for thee, but not for me: So, where’s the outrage that Pakistan is likely torturing the al Qaeda leader we snagged a few days ago? Just to compare and contrast, the world is freaking out because the Israeli spy agency (probably) took out a Hamas terrorist. I’m not hearing any complaints about how the ISI is getting Mullah Baradar to talk.

Just in case you thought they were kidding: Love the headline of this article. “Miliband denies going soft on Israel over ‘Mossad’ killing.” So, what was that about damaging relations between the U.K. and Israel again?

Posted in Hamas, Israeli Double Standard Time, News Briefs, Terrorism | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Mossad hit, or a blame-Israel team?

I have no background whatsoever in the analysis of secret agent hits, unless you count watching spy movies. And boy, this hit sure has all the marks of a great spy movie.

When al-Mabhouh returned to the hotel at 8.24pm his killers were in place. Police believe that he was asphyxiated. By 8.46pm, less than 20 minutes after their victim entered the hotel, the four killers are shown leaving the second floor, followed closely by their spotters in room 237. The surveillance team in the hotel lobby also disbands.

Less than two hours later Daveron and Folliard are shown boarding a flight to Paris. Others took flights to Hong Kong and South Africa before doubling back to Europe.

Al-Mabhouh’s body was not found until 1.30pm the following afternoon. His room showed no signs of forced entry. The cause of death was initially believed to be an increase of blood pressure in the brain.

The murder was only uncovered days later, when local security services were told who the victim was. Al-Mabhouh had also been travelling on a false passport.

What do I think? I don’t care who killed him. A Hamas murderer is dead, and the man who apparently was the lead planner of smuggling Iranian rockets into Gaza is an ex-terrorist. These videos that Allahpundit found are fascinating, but a bit skewed against Israel. I find myself wanting to read the close captioning to hear what they’re saying.

Did the Mossad use Israeli citizens’ passports? I don’t know. But it’s very interesting that two people arrested so far are Palestinians. Funny, I wasn’t aware that the Palestinians worked with the Mossad on Hamas hits in Arab nations. Fatah says they’re Hamas; Hamas says they’re Fatah. No surprise there.

As I said, I’m in no way an analyst of spy hits. So I’ll just be thankful that a major terrorist is no longer able to murder Israelis.

Posted in Hamas, Israel | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Misplaced honors

Recently there were a couple of items of how the United States is honoring (in different ways) people they shouldn’t be.

Martin Kramer on the American Ambassador to Afghanistan honoring a past Afghan hero.

No doubt it made diplomatic sense for the United States to help restore this Afghan national monument, and for its ambassador to praise Afghanistan’s national hero. At the same time, it is ironic in more ways than one can count.

First, Jamal al-Din al-Afghani is not exactly the sort of Muslim role model the United States usually promotes. He was what used to be called an agitator, someone who hated the great Western power of the era (Britain) not just for its materialism but for its imperialism, and who didn’t just criticize Muslim rulers but actively plotted against them. On both counts, Osama bin Laden could just as readily claim Afghani’s mantle.

The history is fascinating and it’s pretty clear that al-Afghani isn’t the sort of figure that America ought to be encouraging its allies to emulate.

Barry Rubin on the even more damaging tribute being paid to Syria.

So while President Barack Obama called Hariri’s son to say the United States wants to find the murderers and encourage the investigation his policies have been the exact opposite. The U.S. refusal to send a new ambassador to Syria has been a key sign of American anger over the murders and leverage to press Syria toward cooperation with the investigation.

Now, however, a high-ranking U.S. official on that very anniversary has leaked that the United States has now made a significant concession to Syria by naming its first ambassador to Syria since that envoy was withdrawn after Hariri’s murder. A State Department official said that the Syrian government has accepted the U.S. candidate though we don’t yet know who is the choice.

True, this was not an official public announcement. But the fact is that everyone now knows that the decision has been made and the arrangements all put in place. Nobody in Washington will notice that this timing sends a signal to independent-minded Lebanese that the United States wants to forget about Hariri’s murder, accept Syrian-Iranian-Hizballah as holding Lebanon hostage and moving closer to making it a satellite.

The outrage over Hariri’s murder and the independence of Lebanon continue to diminish every day.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Lebanon | Tagged , | Comments Off on Misplaced honors

Cohen pines for Palestine

Roger Cohen – the columnist who vouched for the moderation of Iran’s rulers – was off to such a promising start, in Hard Mideast Truths:

Here’s what I believe. Centuries of persecution culminating in the Holocaust created a moral imperative for a Jewish homeland, Israel, and demand of America that it safeguard that nation in the breach.

But then he takes a quick turn into nonsense.

But past persecution of the Jews cannot be a license to subjugate another people, the Palestinians. Nor can the solemn U.S. promise to stand by Israel be a blank check to the Jewish state when its policies undermine stated American aims.

Israel has made continual efforts since 1993 to reach some sort of accomodation with the Palestinians. But in the end the biggest efforts: Barak’s offer to Arafat at Camp David in 2000 and Olmert’s offer to Abbas in 2008, were rejected as insufficient. Yaacov Lozowick summarizes:

Since Rabin in the 90s, Israel has had the following prime ministers, who had the following take on how the conflict with the Palestinians might be either resolved, or at least managed if resolution is impossible, as most Israelis are convinced, even though this means it’s they (and the Palestinians) who aren’t going to have peace:

Shimon Peres, 1995-96. Considerably more dovish than Rabin, and elected out of office because he was refusing to recognize that the Palestinians weren’t using the same rulebook.

Binyamin Netanyahu, 1996-1999, elected only after changing the Likud’s platform to acquiesce in partition as the way to resolve the conflict (i.e repudiating Greater Israel).

Ehud Barak, 1999-2000, elected on the clear platform of negotiating a partition with the Palestinians, he offered to dismantle some 80% of the settlements in the summer of 2000, and was praised for this by Bill Clinton.

Ariel Sharon, 2001-(Dec) 2005, initially elected to defeat the 2nd Intifada, not negotiate with Arafat, in 2005 Sharon unilaterally pulled out of Gaza while dismantling 23 settlements, then split the Likud and set up Kadima so as to continue the partition on the West Bank.

Ehud Olmert, 2006-2009, Olmert was elected in 2006 on an explicit promise to disband settlements and evacuate Israel from most of the West Bank, even if the Palestinians wouldn’t give peace in return. This intention was derailed by the 2nd Lebanon war, yet by September 2008 Olmert was offering the Palestinians more than they had ever been offered, including an effective 100% of the West Bank or adjacent areas and partition of Jerusalem.

2009– Binyamin Netanyahu indeed doesn’t look like your run-of-the-mill NIF activist, yet he has openly accepted partition as the way to reach a two-state solution.

Even with those rejections, Palestinians are, for the most part, ruled by their own corrupt and dysfunctional governments. They may not constitute a nation, but that’s the result of choices made by Palestinian leadership. Cohen, in effect, approves giving the Palestinians a veto over peace thus removing any incentive for them to reach an agreement with Israel.

Cohen is not alone in promoting this. But given how utterly discredited he was by the Iranian regime, I didn’t think it unreasonable to pile on.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | 4 Comments

Goldstone facts: when the messenger is the message

When I have first looked at the site that carries on its masthead a proud statement “Goldstone facts”, after browsing its main page and several links I became uncomfortable. I was unable to dispose of a feeling that someone went to great length to perpetrate a hoax that will further undermine the flimsy foundations of the Goldstone report. It took me some considerable time to make sure that it’s not so and that this site is quite serious and indeed supports the report, albeit in a way that leaves the report in shambles.

They say that it’s impolite and generally politically incorrect to attack the messenger – one should concentrate on the message itself, proving or disproving its contents. The case at hand, however, is too glaringly absurd to follow that maxim. I am confident that this is a case where the messengers themselves are a message, loud and clear at that.

I offer you a snapshot of the front page of the report, with a video clip as its centerpiece, played and stopped at a point where I have ended up laughing my head off. Click on the picture below to see the details.

So who are the messengers? Lets’ start with the “sideboard”. Amira Hass and Gideon Levy – two Haaretz scribes that lost their last shreds of respect and credibility so long ago that no one (aside of the worst Israel bashers) would use their articles for anything having to do with facts. Norman Finkelstein – a pathetic individual that carries out some deep psychological trauma, expunged by academic community and living of the Holocaust memories in his own perverted way. Uri Avnery – a truly comical figure that passed into obscurity years ago, after his career in a yellow tabloid, friendship with late Yasser A. and other shenanigans. And these are the token Jews chosen to laud the Goldstone report? Pathetic.

Now to the principals:

Factual Findings narrated by Ross Vachon

Cannot say that I have been familiar with the name, but these two links: one to Vachon’s opus SEMITISM GONE WILD The Psychopathology Of Neo-Conservatism: A Clinical History and one to a person being harassed by Vachon: My Nasty Mailers, should suffice for everyone. And now: the crown jewel:

Factual and Legal findings narrated by Noam Chomsky

Mastermind of the Century, no less and no more… Well, Noam C. with his well known strict adherence to facts… no, it sounds sarcastic, and sarcasm doesn’t play well with this case of an unsmiling, pompous, self-important luminary. If you need someone to play loose with facts and to manipulate history to customize the results to your own ends, you can’t do better than recruiting Noam. Let’s say it shorter: the man is a liar. But now, I see, he is also credited with being a legal expert – will the wonders ever cease?

So this is the pair chosen to present the “factual and legal findings” of Goldstone report. Were these findings presented by Baron Munchausen and Hodja Nasreddin, we would have been at least entertained by the presentation, but no such luck.

And now to the centerpiece: the clip. As you can see, the hapless creators of the clip have used the famous crudely photoshopped Joozilla the Super Dozer, without any, no matter how feeble, attempt to check the veracity of the story. Here comes a better picture:

Of course, the picture of the whole sordid affair wouldn’t be complete without mentioning the three members of Mr Goldstone mission: Ms Hina Jilani – a Pakistani (sic!) judge who signed an open letter, published 16 March 2009, condemning Israel before the Goldstone committee was convened; a law professor Ms Christine Chinkin, who is “categorically rejecting” Israel’s right to self-defence against Hamas rocket attacks; and the last but not the least, quite an odious character, Desmond Travers, a retired Irish army colonel, who rejected out of hand any evidence presented by IDF, is concerned with the devious Jewish lobby and claims that Israeli soldiers had “taken out and deliberately shot” Irish peacekeeping forces in southern Lebanon. Mr. Travers should become famous (but probably wouldn’t) for the following quote alone:

“Gaza is the only gulag in the Western hemisphere; maintained by democracies; closed-off from food, water, air” says Colonel Desmond Travers, co-author of the Goldstone report, in an exclusive MEMO interview.

I guess that Mr Goldstone didn’t check with Mr. Travers in advance in what hemisphere (or, indeed, on what planet) the good colonel thinks he (and Gaza) is located. Obviously, checking the mental state of his fellows committee members wasn’t in Goldstone’s brief. Too bad.

And this is how the history is made these days, ladies and gentlemen.

Afterword: about my own opinion on the Goldstone report and its aftermath. I still belong to the minority (I haven’t any statistical data, though) that considers it necessary to set up our own commission of inquiry. I think that it was a mistake to disregard the Goldstone mission to start with and that now we are paying the price. I am sure that the civilian casualties were inevitable in an urban combat situation when the enemy has done their considerable best to increase the number of such casualties. But if the commission of inquiry would have found cases where the casualties were a result of willful action by IDF, the guilty should have been punished. And no, I’ve no hope that the results of an Israeli commission of inquiry, had such commission been set up, would have been accepted by UN – I am not that naive about the automatically anti-Israeli setup of this august outfit. Still, there is some hope yet.

Hat tip: Laurence.

Cross-posted on SimplyJews

Posted in Gaza, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Politics | Tagged | 6 Comments

As persistent as they wanna be

If the UN has been persistent in pursuing the Goldstone Report, it hasn’t been as scrupulous in a different matter. Michael Young complains about the U.N.’s betrayal in Beirut. Five years ago former Lebanese President Rafiq Hariri was killed.

Half a decade later, however, the Hariri case has made little progress toward justice. Lately, Syria has reasserted its power in Beirut after years of trying to destabilize a government dominated by its political foes. In December, Saad Hariri, Lebanon’s prime minister and Rafik’s son, met with Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad, acceding to the reconciliation between his own political sponsor, Saudi Arabia, and Damascus — making Lebanon less likely to point the finger at Syria for the killing.

But the more significant problem actually lies within the United Nations investigation itself. While it has been upgraded to a special tribunal, sitting near The Hague, it has suffered from questionable leadership, lost key members and last year had to release suspects for lack of formal indictments.

Young concludes:

Any murder case takes time, but there’s reason to believe that investigative incompetence or international political pressure, or a combination of both, has played a role in slowing down, and even rolling back, the search for Mr. Hariri’s killers. Whichever it is, the United Nations has done little to ensure success. In our interview, Mr. Mehlis recalled that the United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, had warned him that “he did not want another trouble spot.”

The impetus to identify Mr. Hariri’s assassins is gone; not only has Lebanon sought rapprochement with Syria, but the Lebanese public’s expectations, after years of an inconclusive inquiry, have hit rock bottom. Foreign governments fear the instability that might ensue if Mr. Bellemare issues indictments, so few will regret it if he doesn’t. But the United Nations pushed for the Hariri investigation; its integrity is tied up with a plausible outcome. If that’s impossible, there is no point insulting the victims by letting the charade continue. Better to send Mr. Bellemare home.

Now from where might that “international political pressure” originate? Two months ago, Barry Rubin offered a likely culprit.

On January 1, Lebanon will become a member of the UN Security Council, having been elected last October by the General Assembly for a two-year term. The Lebanese government now includes a majority of ministers who are nominees of either Hizballah or of President Michael Suleiman, a Syrian and thus Iranian client. Hizballah also has a veto over government decisions.

This means that Hizballah will have a say in resolutions condemning Israel, managing peace-keeping operations in Lebanon, dealing with sanctions against Iran, and so on.

It was bad enough that a Libyan official chairs the General Assembly while Sudan, Algeria, and Iran virtually run the Human Rights Commission.

Michael Young seemingly reverses cause and effect. He points to the rapproachment between Lebanon and Syria as a sign that the need to identify Hariri’s killers is no longer strongly felt in Lebanon. Rather it is the rapproachment that is the very sign of why the investigatin has gone off track. Syria (and Iran) through its proxy Hezbollah has infiltrated the Lebanese government. It’s not that Lebanon doesn’t want justice served; it’s that it doesn’t dare. Syrian/Iranian pressure likely is also behind the sabotage of the Hariri investigation. In the meantime Haririr’s son, Saad, prefers to pretend that Israel, not Syria is his true enemy. Maybe he really feels that way. But if he doesn’t, he wouldn’t dare say so.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The extended day of rest post

Sorry, folks, but I am out of outrage today. That sinus infection that I’ve had all week is still hanging on, and I’m using my holiday to rest up some more.

Posted in Life | 2 Comments

The administration’s Goldstone omission

Benny Avni writing about the Goldstone Hustle in the New York Post concludes:

If Goldstone’s tactics succeed, future imitators will surely build cases for “war crimes” in Iraq, Afghanistan or Yemen. Indeed, the ICC’s top prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, has already expressed interest in trying allegations against NATO troops, including Americans, operating against al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

The United States should protect Israel in this case as if it were protecting itself — because it is.

Barry Rubin wonders how the Obama administration defines “U.S. interests.”

There are two possibilities in explaining this phrase about “U.S. interests.” The first is that it was careless phrasing, a sign of low competence.

The second is that it does reflect a thinking which conflates defining any force that poses a threat to U.S. interests with identifying a force that seeks a direct attack on the U.S. homeland. After all, the Obama Administration only views itself as being at war with al-Qaida because al-Qaida wants to attack New York or Detroit and–though they don’t necessarily seem clear on this point–Fort Hood.

But what signal does this send to U.S. allies? That, Hizballah, Pakistani-based terrorists striking against India, Syria which is subverting Iraq, Iran’s growing power, or countries like North Korea or Venezuela are no big problem?

This may seem a minor problem in Washington but it is a huge concern in dozens of other countries. And if the administration is hazy on this point, it is some day going to find itself in a much weaker position in terms of both America’s friends and enemies.

Given the news from the new fronts of the war on terror, how the adminstration answers these questions will clearly affect America’s efforts to defend itself.

When a window of opportunity opened to strike the leader of al-Qaeda in East Africa last September, U.S. Special Operations forces prepared several options. They could obliterate his vehicle with an airstrike as he drove through southern Somalia. Or they could fire from helicopters that could land at the scene to confirm the kill. Or they could try to take him alive.

The White House authorized the second option. On the morning of Sept. 14, helicopters flying from a U.S. ship off the Somali coast blew up a car carrying Saleh Ali Nabhan. While several hovered overhead, one set down long enough for troops to scoop up enough of the remains for DNA verification. Moments later, the helicopters were headed back to the ship.

The strike was considered a major success, according to senior administration and military officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the classified operation and other sensitive matters. But the opportunity to interrogate one of the most wanted U.S. terrorism targets was gone forever

While the Washington Post reporter seemingly decries the hit on Saleh Ali Nabhan for the loss of actionable intelligence, there’s something else going on here. If Israel had undertaken a comparable action, it would have been decried by many as an extrajudicial killing. If killing Al Qaeda operatives is the preferred anti-terrorist approach of the administration, it ought to regard the Goldstone commission as a direct threat to its ability to defend America and take a much more active role – not just a rhetorical one – in fighting Goldstone’s slander. How long will it be before some radical leftist or Islamist starts agitating for putting America’s current leadership on trial for the very same actions they deplore when Israel carries them out.

(Isn’t it ironic that the administration considers incarceration at Guantanamo as inhumane and a blot on America’s reputation while killing terrorists – without trial – is acceptable?)

As Barry Rubin makes clear, though, it appears that the administration isn’t giving that much forethought to its efforts to defend the country. It does not see threats against America’s allies as threats against America itself. So one can hardly expect the administration to take the necessary steps to fight the Goldstone report instead of just criticizing it.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time, The One | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Nesting

When I’m downstairs at the computer, Tig needs to be nearby. Sometimes he sleeps on one of the other kitchen chairs. Sometimes he sleeps in the living room in my chair, getting the throw covered with cat hair. And sometimes, he sleeps in the laundry room in the cat bed I bought for that very purpose.

Tig in his cat bed

That’s my happy boy.

Posted in Cats | 6 Comments

I have weird friends

This is my friend Neil, whom I met, oh, twenty-some years ago. This picture got linked by BoingBoing and Instapundit. This is the backstory on his wife’s blog. And this is another example of my crazy friend, an obvious homage to Calvin’s snow goons (scroll to the bottom of the page).

This is my friend Sarah, whom I met a little over seven years ago. She looked at the picture of Jenny Tonge I wrote about yesterday (she’s tough; figured she could take it) and while we were discussing that we thought she looked like Keith Richards, she said, “You know, she looks more like one of those apple dolls.” Then she wrote a post about it, complete with comparison pictures.

Yep, I have weird friends. I wouldn’t have it any other way.

Posted in Bloggers, Life | 4 Comments

Afternoon funny

Jon Stewart on the Iranian space program.

Fallout Boy
www.thedailyshow.com
Posted in Humor, Iran, Television | 2 Comments

The denier’s denials

Last week, Der Spiegel interviewed Mahmoud Abba, president of the Palestinian Authority. (h/t Bookworm Room) The way the interview was presented was with a question: how many lies did Abbas tell?

I didn’t go over the interview with a fine toothed comb, but one of his answers stuck out right away.

SPIEGEL: Netanyahu’s predecessor Ehud Olmert made you the best offer: The establishment of a Palestinian state on far more than 90 percent of the West Bank, a division of Jerusalem and the return of a few thousand refugees to Israel. Why did you reject it?

Abbas: I didn’t reject it. Olmert resigned from office because of his personal problems.

Except Abbas most certainly rejected Olmert’s offer. A contemporaneous account tells us:

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday rejected an Israeli peace proposal, which included withdrawal from 93 percent of the West Bank, because it does not provide for a contiguous Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.

Nabil Abu Rdainah, Abbas’s spokesman, told the official Palestinian news agency WAFA that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s plan showed a “lack of seriousness.”

MEMRI translated this account from the PA’s chief negotiator Saeb Erekat:

“Let me recount two historical events, even if I am revealing a secret. On July 23, 2000, at his meeting with President Arafat in Camp David, President Clinton said: ‘You will be the first president of a Palestinian state, within the 1967 borders – give or take, considering the land swap – and East Jerusalem will be the capital of the Palestinian state, but we want you, as a religious man, to acknowledge that the Temple of Solomon is located underneath the Haram Al-Sharif.’

“Yasser Arafat said to Clinton defiantly: ‘I will not be a traitor. Someone will come to liberate it after 10, 50, or 100 years. Jerusalem will be nothing but the capital of the Palestinian state, and there is nothing underneath or above the Haram Al-Sharif except for Allah.’ That is why Yasser Arafat was besieged, and that is why he was killed unjustly.

“In November 2008… Let me finish… [Israeli prime minister Ehud] Olmert, who talked today about his proposal to Abu Mazen, offered the 1967 borders, but said: ‘We will take 6.5% of the West Bank, and give in return 5.8% from the 1948 lands, and the 0.7% will constitute the safe passage, and East Jerusalem will be the capital, but there is a problem with the Haram and with what they called the Holy Basin.’ Abu Mazen too answered with defiance, saying: ‘I am not in a marketplace or a bazaar. I came to demarcate the borders of Palestine – the June 4, 1967 borders – without detracting a single inch, and without detracting a single stone from Jerusalem, or from the holy Christian and Muslim places.’ This is why the Palestinian negotiators did not sign…”

Aside from his paranoid delusion that Arafat was killed, this is fascinating, in that it makes clear that Abbas didn’t run out of time, but, as the interviewer stated: he rejected the offer. The interview could have been better, as the interviewer failed to follow up. But his questions were informed and the only answers Abbas had were lies.

Only regarding Israel would a powerless, violence promoting Holocaust denier be portrayed as a moderate peacemaker.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | 1 Comment