If the UN has been persistent in pursuing the Goldstone Report, it hasn’t been as scrupulous in a different matter. Michael Young complains about the U.N.’s betrayal in Beirut. Five years ago former Lebanese President Rafiq Hariri was killed.
Half a decade later, however, the Hariri case has made little progress toward justice. Lately, Syria has reasserted its power in Beirut after years of trying to destabilize a government dominated by its political foes. In December, Saad Hariri, Lebanon’s prime minister and Rafik’s son, met with Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad, acceding to the reconciliation between his own political sponsor, Saudi Arabia, and Damascus — making Lebanon less likely to point the finger at Syria for the killing.
But the more significant problem actually lies within the United Nations investigation itself. While it has been upgraded to a special tribunal, sitting near The Hague, it has suffered from questionable leadership, lost key members and last year had to release suspects for lack of formal indictments.
Young concludes:
Any murder case takes time, but there’s reason to believe that investigative incompetence or international political pressure, or a combination of both, has played a role in slowing down, and even rolling back, the search for Mr. Hariri’s killers. Whichever it is, the United Nations has done little to ensure success. In our interview, Mr. Mehlis recalled that the United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, had warned him that “he did not want another trouble spot.”
The impetus to identify Mr. Hariri’s assassins is gone; not only has Lebanon sought rapprochement with Syria, but the Lebanese public’s expectations, after years of an inconclusive inquiry, have hit rock bottom. Foreign governments fear the instability that might ensue if Mr. Bellemare issues indictments, so few will regret it if he doesn’t. But the United Nations pushed for the Hariri investigation; its integrity is tied up with a plausible outcome. If that’s impossible, there is no point insulting the victims by letting the charade continue. Better to send Mr. Bellemare home.
Now from where might that “international political pressure” originate? Two months ago, Barry Rubin offered a likely culprit.
On January 1, Lebanon will become a member of the UN Security Council, having been elected last October by the General Assembly for a two-year term. The Lebanese government now includes a majority of ministers who are nominees of either Hizballah or of President Michael Suleiman, a Syrian and thus Iranian client. Hizballah also has a veto over government decisions.
This means that Hizballah will have a say in resolutions condemning Israel, managing peace-keeping operations in Lebanon, dealing with sanctions against Iran, and so on.
It was bad enough that a Libyan official chairs the General Assembly while Sudan, Algeria, and Iran virtually run the Human Rights Commission.
Michael Young seemingly reverses cause and effect. He points to the rapproachment between Lebanon and Syria as a sign that the need to identify Hariri’s killers is no longer strongly felt in Lebanon. Rather it is the rapproachment that is the very sign of why the investigatin has gone off track. Syria (and Iran) through its proxy Hezbollah has infiltrated the Lebanese government. It’s not that Lebanon doesn’t want justice served; it’s that it doesn’t dare. Syrian/Iranian pressure likely is also behind the sabotage of the Hariri investigation. In the meantime Haririr’s son, Saad, prefers to pretend that Israel, not Syria is his true enemy. Maybe he really feels that way. But if he doesn’t, he wouldn’t dare say so.
Crossposted on Soccer Dad.
This was entirely predictable. When hariri was murdered everybody with two brain cells to click together knew the Syrians did it, directly or indirectly. The Lebanese had no doubts; that’s what brought on the Cedar Revolution, now failed. By setting up an needless investigation, and by the spineless UN at that, people just arranged for the case to be swept under the rug. If anybody had actually wanted to do something they should have gone after Syria immediately. A total blockade, air, sea, and land, of all traffic and trade, might have toppled the Ba’athist thugs at that time. Or some military force might have been needed. But too many countries were making money from dealing with them or did not want the boat rocked. Now Syria and its leash holder in Tehran have made incremental progress towards their goals of renewed genocide of the Jews and destruction of the USA.