When a terrorist is less controversial than a religious shrine

via memeorandum

Barak Ravid of Ha’aretz reports on a report apparently circulating among Israel’s diplomats:

“The recent American statements point to the adoption of wording in line, even if partially and cautiously, with Palestinian demands in regard to the framework and structure of negotiations,” the report stated. “Still, the [U.S.] administration is making sure to avoid commenting on its position on core issues.”

U.S. Mideast envoy George Mitchell arrived in Israel last night for what is expected to be a final series of talks before the official announcement of the resumption of talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, in an indirect format.

Israel Matzav observes:

While Obama will be subject to a lot of restraints from Congress on domestic policy in the second scenario, there is very little Congress can do to prevent Obama from doing things like convening an Annapolis-type conference and trying to shove a ‘settlement’ down Israel’s throat. A ‘Palestinian state’ would be a wonderful legacy for Obama, especially if (as is likely) creating one results in a second Nobel Peace Prize that could be used to fund his Presidential library and post-Presidential activities.

And indeed, Vice President Biden will snub Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman:

US Vice President Joe Biden, expected to arrive this afternoon, is scheduled to meet with Israel’s most senior leadership during his three-day visit, with the glaring exception of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman.

But the Palestinians who just took the provocative action of naming a public square in memory of a terrorist, will suffer no such indignity. This leads Dr. Aaron Lerner to ask:

Where are the comments from American officials – and others – that it is “inappropriate” for the PA to do this the same week that V.P. Biden is visiting. That its the “wrong time” and “counterproductive” to celebrate the murder of civilians the same week that the launching of proximity talks with Israel are being finalized?

You’d think that honoring a terrorist bodes less well for peace than expressing a commitment one’s religious shrines wouldn’t you?

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | 1 Comment

Just in case you were still in doubt

From the Mitchell Report:

The GOI asserts that the immediate catalyst for the violence was the breakdown of the Camp David negotiations on July 25, 2000 and the “widespread appreciation in the international community of Palestinian responsibility for the impasse. In this view, Palestinian violence was planned by the PA leadership, and was aimed at “provoking and incurring Palestinian casualties as a means of regaining the diplomatic initiative.”[8]

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) denies the allegation that the intifada was planned. it claims, however, that “Camp David represented nothing less than an attempt by Israel to extend the force it exercises on the ground to negotiations,”[9] and that “the failure of the summit, and the attempts to allocate blame on the Palestinian side only added to the tension on the ground …[10]

From the “Green Prince” (via Instapundit)

As a spy, Mr. Yousef wasn’t fully activated until the outbreak of the second Intifada in September 2000. A few months before at Camp David, the late PLO chief Yasser Arafat had turned down the Israeli offer of statehood on 90% of the West Bank with East Jerusalem as the capital. According to Mr. Yousef, Arafat decided he needed another uprising to win back international attention. So he sought out Hamas’s support through Sheikh Yousef, writes his son, who accompanied him to Arafat’s compound. Those meetings took place before the Palestinian authorities found a pretext for the second Intifada. It came when future Prime Minister Ariel Sharon visited the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, site of the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock. Mr. Yousef’s account helps to set straight the historical record that the uprising was premeditated by Arafat.

Mr. Yousef tells me that he was horrified by the pointless violence unleashed by politicians willing to climb “on the shoulders of poor, religious people.” He says Palestinians who heeded the call “were going like a cow to the slaughterhouse, and they thought they were going to heaven.” So, as he writes in the book, “At the age of twenty-two, I became the Shin Bet’s only Hamas insider who could infiltrate Hamas’s military and political wings, as well as other Palestinian factions.”

UPDATE: Related see memeorandum and Backspin.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Just in case you were still in doubt

Time out for a station break

I am several hundred miles north, in the wilds of NJ, visiting family and friends (and buying kosher corned beef and Italian bread!). Ergo, the paucity of posting.

Posted in Life | 1 Comment

Dowd of Saud?

It’s often hard to know what to make of a Maureen Dowd column. She’s so interested in sounding snarky, it’s often hard to know when she’s being serious. She’s in Riyadh now, acting as a stenographer for Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal.

Here’s her setup:

Actually, the president didn’t say all the right words in his speech. He created an obstacle for himself by demanding that Israel stop expanding settlements when it was not going to do so — even though it should — and when that wasn’t the most important condition to Arabs.

Now Obama seems ineffectual, as Israel pushes ahead on 600 more new homes in East Jerusalem, where the Palestinians want their capital, despite the White House protest in November about 900 other houses that Israel plans to put up there.

Then she gets the Prince’s comments:

I asked Prince Saud if he thinks America has less influence over Israel than it used to.

“You’re asking me about something that has tickled our imagination,” he replied. “If the settlements are illegitimate, the least you would expect is that the aid the United States gives to Israel would cut that part that is going to build settlements. Israel is getting away without implementing the Geneva Convention as an occupying authority. Now if it were somewhere else, in Burma or somewhere like that, hell would be raised.”

It’s probably a sign of progress that Prince Saud calls it “a border dispute.” Unless it’s just his understated way. He also refers to “the 9/11 incident” and alludes to the Holocaust obliquely as “World War II.”

Now there’s nothing in that comment about a “border dispute,” so it must be from a comment the Prince made that she didn’t transcribe. Dowd doesn’t dispute the Prince’s dubious use of “occupying authority.” In an earlier paragraph it’s clear that she doesn’t approve of Israelis living in any territory that wasn’t part of the country before 1967.

But then Dowd writes:

Despite repeated attacks by Arab states and Arab and Iranian-backed militant groups, and a call for Israel’s destruction by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, Prince Saud suggested that Israel might be overreacting about security because of “World War II” and that this prevented a peace deal.

“There are no troops arrayed on the border of Israel waiting for the moment to say, ‘Attack Israel,’ ” the prince said. “Nobody is going to fight them and threaten their peace. But they didn’t accept that. So it makes one wonder, what does Israel want?”

If anyone deserves to be paranoid, of course, it’s Israel. But Israel can’t be paranoid because paranoia is the mistaken perception that people are out to get you.

Now, it’s clear that she has a different opinion of Israel than I do, but did she just diss the Saudis in their own home by acknowledging that Israel’s fear of its Arab and Islamic neighbors is well-founded?

Crossposted on Yourish.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | 1 Comment

… and israel’s unpopularity among some americans

Given Israel’s popularity in America, that popularity is not universal. So those who don’t share pro-Israel views need an explanation. Walter Russell Mead explains:

While I say nothing because I know nothing about the motives of particular people, it’s impossible to understand the popularity of ILS or Israel Lobby Syndrome (the belief that the organized, insistent power of American Jews as deployed through organizations like AIPAC is primarily responsible for American support of the Jewish state) without assigning a role to a lingering whiff of anti-Semitism in the American air.

At a time when most of America’s Jewish leadership was strongly anti-Zionist, American gentiles overwhelmingly supported the Zionist cause. And today American gentiles are generally more hawkish on Israel than American Jews who on this issue, like so many others, tend to skew toward the center-left band of the American political spectrum.

Some ILS victims have a ‘clever’ explanation for this disturbing fact: Jewish media power. The insidious, overwhelming power of those sneaky Jews in the mainstream media feeds a steady stream of pro-Israel propaganda disguised as news to the idiot gentiles out in the boondocks and the dumb hicks and yokels swallow the propaganda hook, line and sinker.

Again, I say nothing about the motives of individuals, but only entrenched, unconscious anti-Semitism could make an opinion this dumb seem so credible to so many otherwise intelligent people.

Let us take, for example, Sarah Palin, who formerly kept an Israeli flag in her office while serving as governor of Alaska. How much influence does the mainstream media have on her thinking about abortion? About global warming? About US relations with Cuba?

The answer, of course, is that whatever the sources of Ms Palin’s opinions on a very wide range of subjects, the mainstream media has not played a major role in her intellectual formation. And what is true for her is true for a great many other Americans who disagree with the mainstream media virtually across the board. They are more likely to disagree with the mainstream media than to mindlessly parrot its views — so why does it seem even remotely credible to assert that Palin and so much of the rest of the country is pro-Israel because of Jewish media power?

Again, a deep and unreasoned belief that powerful Jews control things and that the powerful Jewish media shapes public opinion could lend broad social credibility to ideas with so little support or coherence.

The whole idea of a powerful Israel lobby, then, is a construct designed by people who can’t understand why Israel is so popular in America. Mead demonstrates why this is belief is nonsense.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Tagged | 5 Comments

Israel’s popularity in America

The latest Gallup poll on American attitudes shows that by a ratio of 63 – 15, those who have an opinion, favor Israel as opposed to the Palesitnians. The New York Jewish Week opines:

Analysts no doubt will find any number of reasons for the numbers coming out the way they do, but it seems clear that the Palestinian Authority does not instill confidence among Americans, who gave it the lowest approval rate among 20 countries listed.

On the plus side, the poll is a reminder that, despite large doses of paranoia in the Jewish community from time to time, most Americans identify with Israel as a bastion of democracy in a chaotic Middle East.

It should also be noted that for all the criticism of the mainstream press among pro-Israel advocates in this country, most Americans get their news and views about the Mideast from the very same news media so often perceived of as biased against Israel. Somehow a positive message must be getting through.

That last bit is nonsense. There is a cost to the poor media coverage. Nearly one in four Americans have no opinion or favor neither side. If the media were balanced, there’d be many fewer doubters. It’s also important to note that these numbers are somewhat volatile.

For example in 2002, when Israel launched Defensive Shield, the prefer neither/no opinion component of the population was close to the pro-Israel sentiment. Right now with things pretty quiet, Israel’s support is growing. In the past though, during times of crisis poor reporting has diluted American popular support of Israel.

I can’t disagree with the Jewish Week’s conclusion though.

Since these polls have been recorded the ratio of pro-Israel to pro-Palestinian has generally ranged from 3 or 4 to 1. Right now with support for Israel so high, the ratio is now over 4 to 1.

The encouraging survey results do not mean that we should, as a community, ease up on our advocacy for Israel. But we should keep our work in perspective, mindful of and grateful for an American society that appreciates the importance of Israel as a strong and loyal ally in an increasingly dangerous neighborhood.

We are fortunate in that respect.

Barry Rubin explains the implications of Israel’s popularity.

Two fascinating questions arise from this analysis: What does all this matter, since public opinion doesn’t make foreign policy, and why is there such a gap between the most vocal elites and masses on Israel?

The answer to the first question is that it matters to members of Congress who are running for election in November and know that voters don’t want to see them bash Israel or support a president in doing so. Indeed, as President Barack Obama’s popularity has fallen and even the media has become more critical, Congress is reclaiming an independent role on foreign policymaking.

And of course the White House, too, is watching the polls. This is one of the most elections’ conscious, always campaigning presidencies in history—and the standard there is very high—and clearly attacking Israel either isn’t seen as beneficial for its ambitions. This isn’t the only factor affecting its behavior but it is one of them.

As to the second issue, there are many factors but let me try to list them briefly. Those who are unhappy with the status quo—that is, the U.S.-Israel special relationship, are going to be noisier. Another is the concept of “Realism” which is, unfortunately, extraordinarily unrealistic, the idea that all governments think alike, defining interest the same way regardless of all other factors. To assume that type of government, political culture, distinctive history, and ideology plays no rule in Arab politics ensures you don’t understand them. And so much of the Western elite assumes Israel is the only problem preventing Arab rulers and Islamist revolutionaries from loving the West.

Another issue is narrative, with much of the elite believing that the conflict is one of Palestinians and Syria desperately wanting peace but Israel saying no. In the American elite, there is also more of a yearning to be like Europe.

But American public opinion has more common sense to see through these myths. It understands that there are huge differences between democracies and dictatorship. It knows demagoguery and extremist ideology on sight and doesn’t like them. Thus, matters are precisely the opposite of what much of the elite thinks: public opinion, not elite institutions, accurately predicts where policy on these issues will go in future.

To see how Israel polls in the Arab world (and more) see JoshuaPundit.

Crossposted on Yourish.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | 1 Comment

Muslim ERA watch: Hamastan bans hairdressers

In 2007, the New York Times happily published a lying op-ed by Ahmed Yousef that said, among other things:

“Palestinians want, on their terms, the same thing Western societies want: self-determination, modernity, access to markets and their own economic power, and freedom for civil society to evolve.”

[…] Our stated aim when we won the election was to effect reform, end corruption and bring economic prosperity to our people. Our sole focus is Palestinian rights and good governance. We now hope to create a climate of peace and tranquillity within our community

This was a blatant lie, but that didn’t stop the Times from continuing to publish Hamas’ lying op-eds. As for the freedom Hamas talk about? Well, if my hairdresser worked in Gaza, he’d be out of a job today.

Gaza’s Islamic Hamas government on Thursday banned men from working in women’s hair salons, the latest step in its campaign to impose strict Islamic customs on Gaza’s 1.5 million people.

And here is the AP twisting itself into knots trying to whitewash the constant stream of Hamas trying to force Islamic law on Gaza:

Since seizing Gaza in 2007, Hamas has taken steps in that direction while avoiding a frontal assault on secularism. The majority of Gaza residents are conservative Muslims, but Hamas is under growing pressure from more radical groups to prove its fundamentalist credentials by imposing ever harsher edicts.

You have to head down nine paragraphs before the AP writes:

Fares said Hamas’s new ruling takes away one of the last remnants of a more liberal lifestyle in Gaza that flourished decades ago, when the territory had cinemas and bars. All cinemas and bars were closed years ago.

Let me just repeat the Hamas spokesliar’s words from 2007:

“Palestinians want, on their terms, the same thing Western societies want: self-determination, modernity, access to markets and their own economic power, and freedom for civil society to evolve.”

Many probably do want that. But Hamas does not.

Posted in Feminism, Gaza, Hamas | Tagged , | 1 Comment

A note to the blowhards in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran

The Axis of Stooges that met in Damascus a few weeks ago and subsequently issued threats of Israel’s death and destruction probably will not like to hear that Israeli high school students are choosing combat service over noncombat service positions at a record rate. So much so that the IDF has to balance out the noncombat needs with the combat needs.

Some 76% of new army recruits with combat qualifications want to serve in field units according to Ground Forces data collected ahead of the March round of enlistment to commence next week.

IDF elements are pleased with the record number but admit that the situation causes a problem in manning non-combat positions. “We are starting to look for solutions in order to find the right balance in manpower assignment,” a senior Ground Forces officer said.

Every so often you read a jeremiad about how Israel’s youth don’t want to serve in the IDF, that Israel’s morale is down, that Israelis are a doomed people thinking they live in a doomed land.

Shyeah. And then you read the truth, which is quite the opposite. Am Yisrael chai.

Posted in Israel | Tagged , | Comments Off on A note to the blowhards in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran

Negotiation is its own reward

A few years ago Treppenwitz observed:

Has anyone else noticed that most civilized countries don’t list any designated ‘negotiators’ among their dignitaries? Last time I checked, none of the EU members, the U.S., nor any top tier Asian nations lists among their top political echelon anyone described as a ‘negotiator’.

Yet if you look at the countries and entities who seem to have appointed themselves as designated thorns in the side of civilization, each of them has several prominently placed ‘negotiators’ listed on their letterhead.

For example, the Palestinian Authority has the perpetually shrill Saeb Erikat as their chief negotiator, the North Koreans have Kim Kye-gwan named as their chief nuclear negotiator and the Iranians have Saeed Jalili, installed as their top nuclear negotiator.

Doesn’t it seem just the tiniest bit odd that these entities profess a desire for nothing more than peaceful coexistence yet seem to have mounted what amounts to pre-emptive defense strategies, complete with designated council, designed to block all attempts at indictment?

These oleaginous negotiators are invited by the world to sit smugly at polished conference tables wearing bespoke suits and sipping mineral water while playing us for the fools that we apparently are. Their intention seems to be to use the trappings of diplomacy to the same ends that the PLO, Red Brigades and Baader-Meinhof Gang used grenades, AK-47s and hijacked passenger airliners back in the ’70s.

In short, while they seem to have climbed a few rungs up the sartorial ladder and mastered the mind-numbing language of diplomacy, these self-described ‘negotiators’ seem to be nothing more than the same old practitioners of extortion, writ large.

Instead of doing their negotiating via angry communiqués handed out of hijacked airplane cockpits or published in left-wing Italian newspapers, they now deliver their ultimatums across polished conference tables in blasé Oxford-accented tones.

What brings this observation to mind is the recent news that the Arab world has allowed the Palestinians to negotiate with Israel.

Mussa said that the Arab ministers had called for a four-month deadline for the indirect talks.

“Despite a lack of conviction over Israel’s seriousness, (Arab foreign ministers) will give indirect talks a chance, for the final time, in order to facilitate US efforts, within four months,” he said.

“There was a consensus that Israel is not interested in peace, the proof being what is taking place on occupied land… acts which are meant to provoke the Arab and American sides,” he added.

Since 1993 Israel has been negotiating with the PLO and PA. It has done so at great risk to itself and suffered increased terrorism as a result of the concessions it made in the course of those negotiations. The negotiations are aimed at creating a Palestinian state and yet the Palestinians and the Arab world generally treat these negotiations as a favor that they doing for Israel!

It is like Treppenwitz observed, negotiation is merely terror by a different name.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, palestinian politics | Comments Off on Negotiation is its own reward

Thursday snark briefs, all-Dubai hit edition

Time for your daily AP article on the Dubai hit: You’d think that the assassination victim was some kind of worldwide hero or something, for this much media attention, but you would be wrong. Israel supposedly did it, so the “Jews is news” rule is in effect. Yesterday’s article? All about the bank that supplied the prepaid credit cards for the assassination team. Ooh, fascinating stuff. Maybe tomorrow they can tell us the kind of ink that was used to forge the passports! Today’s article: The Dubai hit will never be repeated. Wanna bet?

A Dubai hit the world is mostly ignoring: So this rich Egyptian hired a hit man to slit the throat of his ex-lover in Dubai. They caught the killer on security camera, then allowed the man who paid him to leave Dubai and be tried in Egypt. Egypt has just ordered a retrial (surprise, surprise, since the guy is tied to the dictator’s son). I’m wondering why the Dubai police chief isn’t sending out daily press releases about this murder, or talking about how Dubai will not allow Egyptian assassins to run free. (No, not really, because Israeli Double Standard Time is always in play.)

Everybody comes to Rick’s Dubai: Your daily Reuters Dubai hit piece, which glorifies Dubai as a nation that asks few questions and attracts real lowlives as a matter of course. It’s a “tradition of openness,” you see—allowing mass murderers to hide out safely in its borders. Ah, double standards. They’re simply everywhere.

Australian police hit and run: An apt metaphor. The Australian officers in Israel to interrogate the dual nationals whose IDs were used in the Dubai assassination hit a cyclist in Israel and didn’t stop to see if she was all right. The thing speaks for itself.

Posted in Hamas, Media Bias, News Briefs | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Hell freezes over: UN notices Egypt is shooting Sudanese refugees

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights actually came down on Egypt for shooting unarmed migrants by the dozens over the past few years. And the release didn’t mention Israel once! Hell, even the AFP article doesn’t mention Israel.

High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay underscored the need for an urgent independent inquiry into the killings of some 60 people – and the wounding and disappearance of dozens more – on the Egyptian side of its Sinai border with Israel since summer 2007, when the two countries agreed to bolster border controls.

“While migrants often lose their lives accidentally while traveling in over-crowded boats, or trying to cross remote land borders, I know of no other country where so many unarmed migrants and asylum-seekers appear to have been deliberately killed in this way by Government forces,” she said.

“It is a deplorable state of affairs, and the sheer number of victims suggests that at least some Egyptian security officials have been operating a shoot-to-kill policy. It is unlikely that so many killings would occur otherwise. Sixty killings can hardly be an accident.”

The tally is nine killed so far this year. I would point out that the year is only two months old. I would also point out that it is highly unlikely that Egypt either stops the killings, or launches an independent investigation into them. Or that the UN does anything beyond having Navi Pillay send out a press release on the issue. I would also point out that I will be very glad if I have to eat these words. But I doubt I will.

Posted in United Nations, World | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Not a mistake but a liberal democracy

I don’t agree with everything that Richard Cohen argues, but his central thesis about charging Israel with apartheid is unassailable:

What can be said about others who apply the term to Israel in general? No apology has come from them — and the way things are going, none will be forthcoming. The use of the word has become commonplace — Google “Israel and apartheid” and you will see that the two are linked in cyberspace, as love and marriage are in at least one song. The meaning is clear: Israel is a state where political and civil rights are withheld on the basis of race and race alone. This is not the case.

The Israel of today and the South Africa of yesterday have almost nothing in common. In South Africa, the minority white population harshly ruled the majority black population. Nonwhites were denied civil rights, and in 1958, they were even deprived of citizenship. In contrast, Israeli Arabs, about one-fifth of the country, have the same civil and political rights as do Israeli Jews. Arabs sit in the Knesset and serve in the military, although most are exempt from the draft. Whatever this is — and it looks suspiciously like a liberal democracy — it cannot be apartheid.

The West Bank, more or less under Israeli military rule, is a different matter. But it is not part of Israel proper, and under every conceivable peace plan — including those proposed by Israeli governments — almost all of it will revert to the Palestinian Authority and become the heartland of a Palestinian state.

The problem is that though anti-Zionism (and with it, its attendant antisemitism) is that it has been made respectable by Palestinian nationalism. After all, who can object to “national aspirations” or “self-determination?” So the Nazi inspired hatred and rejection of Israel has a fig leaf. And as the reality of Zionism has appeared more reasonable and sympathetic harsher and harsher terms are needed to condemn it.

If anyone had told you twenty years ago that Israel would cede Gaza and withdraw from southern Lebanon and that would strengthen Hamas and Hezbollah, no one – except for “right-wingers” – would believe you. And that’s exactly what happened. Israel not only talked to but negotiated with the PLO and got an “Aqsa intifada” in return. The point is that Israel has indeed liberalized with regards to the Palestinians over the past sixteen years – at great cost – and is still treated as a pariah by much of the world. The Arabs haven’t changed but hide behind the pretext of “Palestinian rights” to justify their continued rejection of the Jewish state.

The now annual Israel Apartheid Week on college campuses is no noble enterprise. It is a continuation of the demonization of Israel by its implacable enemies; it is not advocating for anyone’s freedom.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Tagged | Comments Off on Not a mistake but a liberal democracy

Yes, it is anti-Semitism

The chief of police of Dubia, whom the world media have been quoting on a daily or near-daily basis (the AP alone finds it necessary to update us that the Australian police have gone to Israel to interview the former Australian citizens whose IDs were stolen for the hit, because they can tell them—uh, that their IDs were stolen for the hit).

And when the AP chose to report that the Dubai police commissioner said he would use “profiling” to “detect Israelis,” here’s what they wrote:

Dubai police will use voice and face profiling to detect Israelis arriving on foreign passports, the police chief said Monday.

[…] Lt. Gen. Dahi Khalfan Tamim said that now travelers suspected of being Israeli will not be allowed into the Gulf country even if they arrive on another passport.

[…] He did not explain what procedures would be used to identify the Israeli visitors, except that the police will “develop skills” to recognize Israelis by “physical features and the way they speak.”

Except that isn’t really what the police chief said. This is:

He said we will train our personnel in the passport of the forms and features of the Jewish people and their names, noting that no one can hide their features of Jewishness. He asked the appropriate departments to prepare nationality and residency sessions to familiarize the staff with [Jewish] forms and names, especially since most Jews hold dual passports [with Israel.]

As always, the world media whitewashes the naked anti-Semitism of the Arab world. The above could be taken directly from an official of Hitler’s Germany. But you wouldn’t know that from the mainstream media.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, AP Media Bias | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Oh and by the way he was smuggling arms

Ynet reports:

Mohammed Nassar, who was an aide to Mabhouh, spoke to Hamas’ al-Aqsa radio in Gaza from Damascus. A transcript was released Tuesday.
. . .
Nassar says Mabhouh “never stopped thinking about how to fight the occupation by supplying quality weapons to the Palestinian fighters

(h/t Dolly World)

Ynet continues:

Meanwhile, Dubai’s Chief of Police Lt. Gen. Dhahi Khalfan Tamim said he has submitted an official request to the UAE Ministry of Justice to arrest Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Mossad Chief Meir Dagan in relation to the assassination.

Khalfan Tamim said the involvement of Mossad was certain, adding that the decision to submit an international request for the arrest of Netanyahu and Dagan depends on political authorities.

Not really surprising for someone who seemingly believes in Jewish conspiracies. I like Tamim’s statement:

He also said he did not believe Israel’s prime minister would be arrested as a result, but emphasized that “whoever gave the order for the assassination is a murderer.”

And whoever protects a terrorist smuggling arms is a terrorist too. That would make the assassination, if committed by Israel, a legitimate killing not murder.

One further observation. The New York Times focused on the Dubai police and provides some interesting details, but as Elder of Ziyon observed, remained silent about the blatant antisemitism expresses by police chief Tamim.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Hamas, Israel | Tagged | 2 Comments

The I’m too tired open thread post

Long day in NorVA, beginning with some asshat trying to see if it were true that two things cannot occupy the same space at the same time (my Jeep vs. his sedan; the horn of my Jeep won), an 18-wheeler cutting me off (from the right lane, lovely), and ending in driving through a nasty snowstorm causing extremely low visibility and slippery roads. I think it’s time for a round of Plants vs. Zombies.

Although, dinner with the department was nice, especially since the boss paid for it.

Posted in Life | 1 Comment