Drunk on his own eloquence

In Driving Drunk in Jerusalem Thomas Friedman warns PM Netanayahu:

In sum, there may be a real opportunity here — if Netanyahu chooses to seize it. The Israeli leader needs to make up his mind whether he wants to make history or once again be a footnote to it.

What opportunity?

This whole fracas also distracts us from the potential of this moment: Only a right-wing prime minister, like Netanyahu, can make a deal over the West Bank; Netanyahu’s actual policies on the ground there have helped Palestinians grow their economy and put in place their own rebuilt security force, which is working with the Israeli Army to prevent terrorism; Palestinian leaders Mahmoud Abbas and Salam Fayyad are as genuine and serious about working toward a solution as any Israel can hope to find; Hamas has halted its attacks on Israel from Gaza; with the Sunni Arabs obsessed over the Iran threat, their willingness to work with Israel has never been higher, and the best way to isolate Iran is to take the Palestinian conflict card out of Tehran’s hand.

His description of Abbas and Fayyad as “genuine and serious about working toward a solution as any Israel can hope to find” underscores a problem. I don’t think that guys who are burning Israeli products are that serious about a solution. But more importantly, they’re about as moderate as the PA comes and thus have no real power. Hamas has halted its attacks, but that’s been due to Cast Lead. But finally we get to Friedman’s analysis of the Sunni Arabs. Well if Iran is so important to them, why don’t they become more concilliatory towards Israel? (In fact, what’s going on in Israel may be of less importance to them than Friedman thinks.)

When you read Friedman’s recommendations for the Middle East, recall that he predicted that once Israel withdrew from Lebanon, Hezbollah would lay down its arms as it would no longer have any grievance against Israel. That worked out really well didn’t it?

As for Friedman’s contention:

Biden — a real friend of Israel’s — was quoted as telling his Israeli interlocutors: “What you are doing here undermines the security of our troops who are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. That endangers us and endangers regional peace.”

Mere Rhetoric has the particulars about Biden’s pro-Israel credentials.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time | Tagged | 4 Comments

Happy EATAPETA Day!

Mmmmm.... Meat.It’s the eighth annual International Eat A Tasty Animal for PETA (EATAPETA) Day.

Today, as uber-commenter Alex Bensky likes to say, if it didn’t have a mother, don’t eat it. However, as I like to say: Eat meat. It pisses off PETA like nothing else.

Click the category for the reasons why we still do this.

Posted in EATAPETA | 7 Comments

A history of the Obama Administration’s Israel policy (whiplash warning)

In their own words, the Obama Administration’s changing position on Israel, particularly “settlement” building in Jerusalem:

Obama to AIPAC, March 2007:

“We should never seek to dictate what is best for the Israelis and their security interests. No Israeli prime minister should ever feel dragged to or blocked from the negotiating table by the United States.”

Obama to AIPAC, June 2008:

“I want you to know that today I’ll be speaking from my heart, and as a true friend of Israel.”

Obama to AIPAC, June 2008:

And then there are those who would lay all of the problems of the Middle East at the doorstep of Israel and its supporters, as if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the root of all trouble in the region. These voices blame the Middle East’s only democracy for the region’s extremism. They offer the false promise that abandoning a stalwart ally is somehow the path to strength. It is not, it never has been, and it never will be.

Obama to AIPAC, June 2008:

Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided.

Obama to CNN, one day after the AIPAC speech:

“Well, obviously, it’s going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues. And Jerusalem will be part of those negotiations.”

Obama’s Cairo speech, June 2009:

The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.

Hillary Clinton on Israel halting settlement building except in east Jerusalem, Oct. 31, 2009:

What the Prime Minister has offered in specifics of a restraint on the policy of settlements which he has just described – no new starts for example, is unprecedented in the context of prior-to negotiations.

Hillary Clinton on the same subject, Nov. 25, 2009:

Today’s announcement by the Government of Israel helps move forward toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We believe that through good-faith negotiations the parties can mutually agree on an outcome which ends the conflict and reconciles the Palestinian goal of an independent and viable state based on the 1967 lines, with agreed swaps, and the Israeli goal of a Jewish state with secure and recognized borders that reflect subsequent developments and meet Israeli security requirements.

Hillary Clinton, on the same subject, March 12, 2010:

It was insulting. And– it was insulting not just to the vice president, who– certainly didn’t deserve that. He was there with a very clear message of– commitment to the peace process solidarity with– the Israeli people. But it was an insult to the United States.

David Axelrod, speaking for the Obama administration on NBC, March 14, 2010:

This was an affront, it was an insult, but most importantly it undermined this very fragile effort to bring peace to that region.

Barry Rubin on the hypocrisy of the Obama administration’s ever-changing position on Israel settlements as the “obstacle to peace”:

Meanwhile, even though the Palestinian Authority has refused to negotiate for 14 months; made President Brack Obama look very foolish after destroying his publicly announced September plan to have negotiations in two months; broke its promise not to sponsor the Goldstone report in the UN; and rejected direct negotiations after months of pleading by the Obama White House, not a single word of criticism has ever been offered by any administration official regarding the PA’s continuous and very public sabotage of peace process efforts.

Israeli Double Standard Time is in effect. As always, it only occurs on days that end with a “y.”

Posted in Israeli Double Standard Time, The One | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Of grievances and perceptions

Last week in an article about the eviction of two Arab families from the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood, Isabel Kershner of the New York Times summed it up:

For those who want to see a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the eviction of the Ghawis has touched on two sensitive nerves: the fate of East Jerusalem, where Israel and the Palestinians vie for control, and the abiding grievances of Palestinian refugees from the 1948 war.

She mentioned two things: both sides are competing and the Palestinians have a grievance. In fact most of the article centers around the Palestinian claims and how even some Israelis support the Palestinian case. The history leaves out inconvenient details such as:

On April 13, 1948, a convoy of ambulances, armored buses, trucks loaded with food and medical equipment, and 105 doctors, nurses, medical students, Hebrew University personnel, and guards headed for Mt. Scopus. The convoy was ambushed in the middle of Sheikh Jarrah, the lead vehicle hit a mine, and gangs of armed Arabs attacked. Seventy-eight Jews were murdered, among them 20 women and Dr. Haim Yaski, the hospital director. In the following months the hospital and university ceased to function. After the Six-Day War, when the area was returned to Israel, a memorial was built in their honor in Sheikh Jarrah on the road leading to Mt. Scopus.

Compare Kershner’s care in preserving the Palestinian narrative in the Sheikh Jarrah story to the way she handled the Israeli narrative in the case of honoring Dalal Mughrabi:

The woman being honored, Dalal Mughrabi, was the 19-year-old leader of a Palestinian squad that sailed from Lebanon and landed on a beach between Haifa and Tel Aviv. They killed an American photojournalist, hijacked a bus and commandeered another, embarking on a bloody rampage that left 38 Israeli civilians dead, 13 of them children, according to official Israeli figures. Ms. Mughrabi and several other attackers were killed.

To Israelis, hailing Ms. Mughrabi as a heroine and a martyr is an act that glorifies terrorism.

But, underscoring the chasm between Israeli and Palestinian perceptions, the Fatah representatives described Ms. Mughrabi as a courageous fighter who held a proud place in Palestinian history. Defiant, they insisted that they would not let Israel dictate the names of Palestinian streets and squares.

Note that here the dispute is reduced to a matter of perceptions, as if a “bloody rampage” that claims the lives of “38 Israeli civilians” isn’t the very definition of terrorism.

As Judith Apter Klinghoffer writes:

At no point does the reporter point out the sophistry of the position. There is nothing mysterious in the notion. It is an action designed to frighten a population. Hijacking a random public bus and murdering the passengers can have no other motivation but spreading fear, i.e., terror.

Kershner actually compounds her felony.

“We are all Dalal Mughrabi,” declared Tawfiq Tirawi, a member of the Fatah Central Committee, the party’s main decision-making body, who came to join the students. “For us she is not a terrorist,” he said, but rather “a fighter who fought for the liberation of her own land.”

Who is Col. Tawfiq Tirawi? He has an interesting record.

The Palestinian Security Organs – such as Preventive Security, as well as the General Intelligence Service and its arm in the West Bank, under Colonel Tawfiq Tirawi – have been involved in other violent actions in breach of the agreements, such as the abduction or unlawful arrest of Israeli citizens (in some cases, Israeli Arabs suspected as “collaborators”), and the murder of Palestinian real estate dealers (suspected of selling land to Jews).

Tirawi’s actions took place after the Oslo Accords were signed. The idea that he would deny that Mughrabi (or anyone attacking Israelis) is a terrorist is rooted in self interest. By any reasonable definition Tirawi, too, is a terrorist. Though I don’t think that’s what he means by “We are all Dalal Mughrabi.”

If there’s anything positive about these two articles it’s that in the first one, Kershner writes about “Israel’s long dormant peace camp.” While I don’t agree with the peace camp’s position here, it’s pretty clear that there is no parallel one among the Palestinians.

Crossposted on Yourish.

Posted in Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time, Media Bias | Tagged | 2 Comments

Saturday night open thread

I have family over. We’re looking at pictures.

Damn, I was a cute little kid.

Maybe I’ll scan some in.

Posted in Life | Comments Off on Saturday night open thread

Eat an Animal for PETA

I totally forgot about EATAPETA Day until Sabba Hillel reminded me. There have been a lot of things on my mind lately that rather drove it out, but don’t forget to eat lots of tasty animals on March 15th!

Here’s the background.

PETA’s still as offensive as ever. I will be dining with friends on Monday night. I think veal may be on the menu.

Posted in EATAPETA | Tagged | 7 Comments

Friday briefs

Hell hath frozen over: The EU released a statement demanding the immediate release of Gilad Shalit. No, really. Wait, there has to be a catch. Oh, here it is. They’re also calling on Israel to make “substantial release of Palestinian prisoners.” Phew, snowballs are still melting in hell.

Rockets in, missiles out: More kassams in Israel, so the IDF bombed a tunnel and a weapons lab. Watch for the screams from the Israel-haters. Oh, and the AP managed to put this in the last paragraph of its latest article about the 1600 new units in east Jerusalem:

In Gaza, ruled by the Islamic militants of Hamas, Israeli aircraft struck twice early Friday, retaliating for rocket fire into Israel on Thursday. No one was hurt in any of the incidents.

I will reiterate that the last graf of an article is the first to go when a newspaper needs the space.

A store opens in Israel, a protest opens in Europe: Filthy capitalists! Opening a store that was so much desired that Israelis nearly trampled two babies (!) to get in. Of course there will be protests throughout Europe and Canada. Listen to this brilliant protestor’s explanation:

“The Goldstone Report was published recently, and we think that one cannot open a store in Israel until it starts obeying international law.”

That’s what I like about Israel’s foes. They’re so smart, you have to wonder how they manage to dress themselves in the morning. Really, Israel-haters lead pretty pathetic lives. Imagine obsessing about something that really has nothing to do with living your life, to the point of gettting enraged by a store opening thousands of miles away in another country. Or a pro-Israel blog. To paraphrase, the vast majority of Israel haters have lives of pathetic desperation.

Posted in Gaza, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome, News Briefs, Terrorism | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Iranians and Turks with fake Israeli passports

I have read first two reports: by Kateland and by colleague Elder of Ziyon, both based on a Maariv article (in Hebrew). The essence of the reports is that:

…three Iranians were caught at an airport in Seychelles trying to use stolen Israeli passports. The Iranians were sent back on a flight to Nairobi, Kenya, from where they came.

Seychelles authorities passed the information to Israeli authorities, who found that the passports were stolen from Israelis who traveled to Thailand last year.

The general concern, which I fully share:

Israeli authorities fear that this was the precursor to a terror attack in the archipelago, which has been advertising heavily to attract Israelis on Passover vacation this year. Charter airlines now go directly to Seychelles from Israel.

Maariv also carries an attractive picture of the island:

I am not sure, though, about its relevance, but why not? In addition, Maariv claims that 15,000 (fifteen thousand) Israeli passports disappear every year. Wow…

Anyhow, I have decided to wait for a while with that story, and indeed, a new article in Ynet (in English this time) looks somewhat better researched.

In the past few weeks, more then 10 Iranian nationals were caught carrying forged Israeli passports, Israel’s leading newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reported Wednesday. The information came from reports relayed to Israeli embassies in Japan, Thailand, and India. In the last several months, Pakistani and Turkish citizens were also caught with fake Israeli passports.

And the reason seems to be not necessarily related to the terrorism business, rather to business business:

The Israeli passport is considered to be one of the easiest passports to forge and can be purchased in Asia, and especially in Thailand’s markets, for anywhere from USD 500 to 2000. The Israeli passport is in great demand because people carrying it can enter Asian countries without a visa.

Of course, the threat of terrorists using same passports for their nefarious purposes shouldn’t be discounted. On the other hand, there is no need to exaggerate the situation, like Maariv had done, since:

In 2004, six hundred Israelis reported their passports stolen in Asia. In 2005, the number increased dramatically.

Still, it’s a far cry from 15,000. Another article, from Sky News Blogs, seems to settle (at least) the issue of the three Iranians caught in Seychelles:

A Israeli government source has told Sky News it understands the incident happened but does not believe there was any terror threat. The Iranians are believed to have been refugees who were using the passports in order to enter the Seychelles with a view to travelling on to a first world destination in search of a better life.

I would say that in a case like this we shouldn’t be too prissy and mind a few forged passports… like some other people I don’t want to mention here. The more the merrier, I would even add.

Now to the comic element of the story. From Ynet:

Another Iranian who was caught in Japan with a fake Israeli passport was caught when the name in his passport belonged to a female. The Iranian replaced the picture, but didn’t bother changing the name.

Beef up on your Hebrew next time, doofus…

And from that Sky News blog – its headline says: Forged Passports: Is It Catching On?

Such naivety from a seasoned journalist… surely forged documents are as old as the first clay tablet… nay, as a first stone tablet… oh well…

Cross-posted on SimplyJews

Posted in Iran, World | 3 Comments

When honoring terror is “conciliatory”

The AP has the most fascinating pro-Palestinian spin. The PA cancelled an anniversary ceremony that was supposed to honor a terrorist who helped her people murder 35 Israelis who were traveling on a coastal highway. Here’s the AP spin:

The Palestinian Authority has called off a ceremony honoring a woman involved in the deadly hijacking of an Israeli bus.

The Palestinians had planned on Thursday to name a square in the West Bank city of Ramallah after Dalal Mughrabi for her part in the 1978 hijacking on Israel’s coastal highway. Thirty-eight people were killed in the assault.

But they decided Wednesday to put it off. They offered no official explanation and it was not immediately clear if the ceremony would be rescheduled.

And here’s Ynet’s view:

On March 11, 1978, 11 Fatah terrorists infiltrated Israel’s coast using a rubber raft. They murdered photographer Gail Rubin and proceeded to hijack a bus while shooting at passing vehicles. They shot at the passengers and al-Mughrabi blew up the bus.

Altogether, 35 people were killed and 71 injured in the massacre, which to this day remains the deadliest terror attack in the State of Israel’s history.

Thirteen of the dead were children. I wonder why Joe Biden didn’t condemn the anniversary ceremony that was to take place today? He sure condemned Israel quickly for the crime of—building in east Jerusalem.

It is, as always, Israeli Double Standard Time. But not to worry: That only happens on days that end with a “y.”

Posted in AP Media Bias, Terrorism | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

An unbelievable protest

The Lede blog of the New York Times writes in a post, “Palestinians against terror,” that plans to honor terrorist Dalal Mugrabi in Ramallah have been met with opposition from Palestinians who favor the living alongside Israel in peace.

Plans to build a square in honor of Dalal Mugrabi the female terrorist who was involved in the coastal highway terror attack that killed 37 people has been met by protests by Palestinians who find it inappropriate to honor a terrorist while trying to make peace with Israel.

One of the Palestinians at the demonstration against the honor in Ramallah on Saturday, a woman named Fatima, told The Jerusalem Post that “…terror belongs in the past.” She added: “I imagine if the government of Israel was honoring those who deliberately killed Palestinians outside the context of war, that we would be offended.

The demonstration on Saturday followed the notice that the government of the PA including its moderate leaders, Mahmoud Abbas and Salam Fayyad were planning to honor the terrorist.

Palestinian writer Daoud Kuttab who was also at the demonstration added, “Some Palestinians protest the declaration of the Tomb of the Patriarchs or Rachel’s Tomb as important Israeli heritage sites. I don’t understand this myopia. If we don’t respect the Jewish heritage of Israel, how can we expect them to respect our heritage?”

Of course the Times didn’t report on such a protest. There wasn’t one. It did find a protest to highlight though.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Media Bias | Tagged | Comments Off on An unbelievable protest

A matter of trust

Last week Daled Amos wondered:

It will be interesting to see just what kind of tone Biden takes with Israel this time–and whether Netanyahu is up to dealing with Biden from strength the way Begin did–or like Olmert.

Now we don’t need to wonder anymore. At least about the first part. (via memeorandum)

“I condemn the decision by the government of Israel to advance planning for new housing units in East Jerusalem,” Biden said. The American vice president added that the “substance and timing of the announcement, particularly with the launching of proximity talks, is precisely the kind of step that undermines the trust we need right now and runs counter to the constructive discussions that I?ve had here in Israel.”

As a side point is there anything that the Palestinians do that doesn’t undermine trust?

Israel Matzav observes:

Ramat Shlomo was never supposed to be an issue with the ‘Palestinians.’ Abu Mazen had agreed with Ehud Olmert in 2008 that it would remain part of Israel in any future settlement.

JoshuaPundit puts it succinctly:

It seems the US cares more about denying Jews their religious sites and the right to build homes than it does about the Palestinians building facilities with our money honoring terrorists who’ve killed Americans.

Funny, but the NJDC doesn’t say a word about the Vice President’s condemnation of Israel. Will they continue to ignore it or spin the condemnation as to how it’s somehow pro-Israel?

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Bidenisms, Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time | Tagged | Comments Off on A matter of trust

Wednesday snarks

But Islam is a religion of peace: Jihad Jane, a blonde-haired, blue-eyed American woman who converted to Islam, was arrested for plotting to murder a Swedish cartoonist and enlisting terrorists to the cause. But “jihad” means inner struggle, so that can’t be true.

But the Obama administration is Israel’s friend: Joe Biden strongly condemned the announcement of new buildings in east Jerusalem, an area that the Palestinians had already agreed was going to be Israel’s. No word yet on whether the White House is going to condemn Iran for once again threatening to destroy Israel. Also no condemnation of the Egyptian murders of Sudanese refugees trying to escape to Israel. But boy, can the Obama administration tell it to Israel or what?

But the Palestinians want peace: So, if you’re committed to peace, you should be committed to peace because, well, war is bad, right? Everyone seems to think so. And yet, Mahmoud Abbas said in response to Joe Biden’s statement that the Pals deserve a “viable state” that he was committed to peace for a different reason:

Abbas, for his part, urged Israel to commit to the peace process. “The Palestinians remain committed to peace as a strategic choice,” he said.

What that strategy is, he did not elaborate. You need to read what he says to the Arabic press for that. Here’s a hint: It’s a two-part strategy, and the second part is “from the river to the sea.”

Posted in Israeli Double Standard Time, News Briefs, The One | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Instransigence: a single use word

The Washington Post reports:

Mitchell, who in January boasted that a peace deal could be done within two years, said he hoped the indirect talks would lead to direct negotiations as soon as possible and encouraged the parties “to refrain from any statements or actions which may inflame tensions or prejudice the outcome of these talks.”

Just such a thing happened Monday when Israel announced construction of 112 new housing units in the West Bank settlement of Beitar Ilit. The administration had pushed hard — but unsuccessfully — last year for a complete freeze on settlements, and Israel’s new announcement came as Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas was meeting with Mitchell.

Now if Beitar Illit will remain part of Israel, why would building 112 houses there “inflame tensions?” I would think that orchestrating riots and honoring a terrorist are more obvious statements of contempt for peace.

In a similar vein we see in a Washington Post editorial:

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has resisted direct negotiations partly out of a conviction that Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is intransigent. And Mr. Netanyahu regularly offers evidence that this is so. He recently appeared to rule out Israeli withdrawal from the Jordan Valley, which previous Israeli governments have conceded to a future Palestinian state, and he allowed new Jewish settlement construction to proceed in the West Bank despite the “freeze” he announced several months ago. Mr. Abbas, for his part, already rejected a far-reaching peace offer from Mr. Netanyahu’s predecessor.

The New York Times though, clarifies something:

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, supports two states but wants the Palestinian side to be demilitarized and to accept an Israeli military presence on its future eastern border to prevent the import of weapons and rockets that could be aimed at Israel’s population centers.

The Israeli presence in the Jordan Valley, then, is a precaution. After being burned time and again by the Palestinians after withdrawing from territory, Netanyahu talks about protecting his country from that happening again. That’s a sign of intransigence?

But more generally that paragraph is disturbing. To defend Abbas claims that Netanyahu is being “intransigent” is dishonest. The editorial itself acknowledges that Abbas “…already rejected a far-reaching peace offer from Mr. Netanyahu’s predecessor.” That, to me, is the definition of intransigence. Yet somehow the adjective, “intransigent” in its various forms somehow only describes Israeli leaders.

The Post’s editors can lament that Netanyahu isn’t as generous as his predecessors. But the reason there is no peace that Abbas and Arafat before him rejected generous offers. If they are demanding that Netanyahu accept deals that were previously rejected by the other side they are in fact rewarding intransigence, not advocating for peace.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Tuesday snarks

The Obama administration is fine with risking Israeli lives: Hey, great! Our vice-president wants Israel to “take risks for peace.” Because it’s not like they, say, gave the PA control over most of the West Bank and Gaza and were answered with terror; withdrew from Lebanon and were answered with war; withdrew from Gaza and were answered with rockets; and eased checkpoints and were answered with terror attacks. So yes, absolutely, Joe, Israel should takes risks for peace. Because it’s worked so well so far!

You have our permission to build on your land: The State Dept. told Israel that an exception will be made to the “settlement” freeze. How kind of them.

Are real Iranian sanctions starting? Three major oil companies cut their ties with Iran. Hm. Double hm. (Here’s hoping!)

Ew! Jew Cooties! Turkey has rejected Israel’s offer of earthquake aid. But Turkey wants to mediate Israeli-Syrian talks, and are bragging that they’ve been chosen. Netanyahu has denied this. Hey, Turkish dudes, here’s a tip: Cozying up to Iran and Syria aren’t going to make you best buds with Israel.

Posted in Iran, Israel, News Briefs, The One | 6 Comments

Back home, tired, and there’s work to do

I am back in my home sweet home, with my cats yowling for attention in the background. I’m currently cleaning up a mess on the blog. I have a ton of real work to do, and though I had a great weekend, I will be busy the next few days. Posting may be light.

I do have some random thoughts though.

Alice in Wonderland was brilliant. If you liked Edward Scissorhands, you will love Tim Burton’s version of Alice. I want to see it again. And again. And again.

The Neil Patrick Harris song opening the Oscars was mean, nasty, stupid, and unfunny. Here’s a suggestion for the Oscar writers: Cut the opening number. And get rid of the dance numbers. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

So glad Kathryn Bigelow won the Oscar for Best Director. Ditto Sandra Bullock, because she’s one of my favorites. (Funny speech!)

Now I have four more movies to see: Crazy Heart, Avatar, Hurt Locker, and District 9 (not in that order). Plus, I have to see Alice in Wonderland again. Oh, and reread the books. I didn’t catch enough of the references because it’s been too long since I read them. I got bored. Burton made me interested again. Probably because he wove a narrative that doesn’t exist in the novels, and made it far more interesting and a little less a compilation of bizarre and disparate scenes. I really liked the narrative. It made the story so much better. That, and Helena Bonham Carter, Johnny Depp, and a fantastic cast, the special effects—I kept wondering “How did he do that?” every time I saw the red queen’s bulbous head—I highly recommend the film.

Back to the usual stuff later.

Posted in Life, Movies, Pop Culture | 5 Comments