Seif at first

The New York Times featured a paean to Libyan pretender to the throne, Seif al-Islam el-Qaddafi. While the end of the article explains why a government controlled economy is bad, that part of the article is there to show what the younger Qaddafi hopes to change.

Yet that is the goal of Seif al-Islam el-Qaddafi, the son and possible successor to Libya’s leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, as he sets out to dismantle a legacy of Socialism and authoritarianism introduced by his father 40 years ago.

“It is hard work reinventing a country,” he said in an interview last month, as he slouched on a sofa in his villa in the hills above Tripoli, picking at a tray of fruit including fresh dates brought to him by a black-suited waiter. “But that is what we are doing. We will have a new constitution, new laws, a commercial and business code and now a flat tax of 15 percent.”

In the last few years, Mr. Qaddafi, 37, who has a doctorate from the London School of Economics, flawless English and a bold independent streak, has emerged as the Western-friendly face of Libya and symbol of its hopes for reform and openness. When he was nominated last year to lead a powerful government body overseeing tribal leaders, analysts saw it as a sign of his father’s endorsement.

Barry Rubin trashed this uncritical treatment of the friendly face of tyranny.

… the once-great newspaper of broken record now gives us a long article about how great the Libyan regime and son-of-Qadhafi are. Here you can see the pattern that prevails elsewhere: taking for granted as truth the lies that dictatorial regimes and radical movements tell while endlessly explaining that just about everyone in the world except Usama bin Ladin is a moderate.

For all of the kind words used to describe Seif Qaddafi, the profile neglects to mention his role in the release of Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi. After all if you’re showing Sief to be a moderate, why ruin it with the cynical business venture that freed a mass murderer, who wasn’t nearly as sick as we were told.

As The Lede noted last week, in 2008 the younger Mr. Qaddafi said in this extraordinary interview with the BBC that Libya had “accepted responsibility” for the actions of Mr. Megrahi and paid compensation for the Lockerbie bombing simply to bring about an end to international sanctions, but “that doesn’t mean we did it.” In the same interview, Mr. Qaddafi called the families of the Lockerbie victims “very greedy” and said, “Instead of wasting their time blackmailing us,” they should now work with the Libyan government “in order to find the real criminal who was behind that attack.”

That would have ruined the mood, wouldn’t it?
UPDATE: If the New York Times wanted to give Saif Qaddafi an unchallenged forum for his views isn’t the op-ed page the place for that not the news section?

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | 4 Comments

Goldstone’s last gasp?

While the UN General Assembly voted to renew its demand that Israel and Hamas investigate themselves as demanded by the Goldstone report, a New York Times report observed:

… other ambassadors suggested that repeated resolutions with little effect was more likely to be a sign of the report’s slow, bureaucratic death.

(Israel has been investigating the IDF’s conduct during Cast Lead, the General Assembly just hasn’t acknowledged that.)

Normally I wouldn’t give a whole lot of credence to a throwaway line in a news report, but I read this interview with Nick Kaufman, who argues that the path forward to condemning Israel, is not as straightforward as Israel’s enemies believe.

“I don’t understand how the United Nations Security Council has made a decision to transfer the case to the international criminal court at The Hague, because I think in any event, the United States will veto the decision.”

“The UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon said he was satisfied with the investigation Israel has conducted, but the Arab League and other unidentified countries have insisted that a new investigation be conducted in the next 5 months. I don’t see it going beyond this.”

“On the other hand, I don’t believe the senior prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, will yield to the Palestinians request and order an investigation against Israel: For him to accept the Palestinian request to recognize their court authority to try and judge the violations committed on their land, he would first have to recognize the Palestinian Authority as an independent country, and I cant see him making such an extreme decision. I just don’t see it happening.”

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, United Nations | Tagged | Comments Off on Goldstone’s last gasp?

A repentant troll?

Wow, you guys need to check out this comment. I think my anti-Semitic comment troll has seen the light!

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Evil Meryl | 8 Comments

For all your terrorist news

Fred Pruitt’s Rantburg has been around for a long, long time. I’m on the daily newsletter list, and this is why:

Rantburg's daily newsletter

Besides the wealth of information, there are the comments. Fred’s aren’t the only funny ones. (But they are the funniest.) All this, and classic movie stars (mostly women, but he added Cary Grant when I requested it).

Posted in Bloggers, Terrorism | 1 Comment

Israel’s Axis of Evil

The heads of Hamas and Hezbullah met in Damascus with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Bashar Assad to plot Israel’s destruction. How is the Obama administration handling the fact that Syria hosted the heads of two terrorist organizations and one terrorist-supporting state? Why, by keeping to its promise to re-appoint an ambassador to Syria, even though Obama’s policy on driving Syria and Iran apart was mocked by Assad and Mad Mahmoud.

During the summit, Mad Mahmoud called for a Middle East without Zionists (and let us not pretend that when he says Zionists, he doesn’t mean Jews).

In the meantime, Israelis are being mailed new gas masks in case the Axis chooses to use the chemical weapons they’ve been stockpiling. The IDF completed exercises for a two-front war (you may even count on three if the West Bank Palestinians jump in).

As for the rest of the world? Well, the UN General Assembly passed another resolution insisting that Israel respond to the Goldstone report with an “independent” investigation. Australia is so mad that forged passports were used in the Dubai hit that it deliberately didn’t vote against the resolution this time and warned that Israel’s ties with Australia are at risk. (It’s good to know that Australia has its priorities straight.) Spanish schoolteachers are indoctrinating their students with so much hatred for Israel that the Madrid embassy is receiving letters that say “How many Palestinian children have you murdered today?” And the EU released a letter condemning the Dubai hit without mentioning Israel by name, apparently after the heads of European intelligence got through to the political leadership that they are going to badly damage intelligence operations throughout the world if they don’t STFU about Dubai (can’t remember my source on this; link welcome if you read it, too).

Now we read that Hillary Clinton is telling Lebanon that there’s no way the U.S. could stop an Israeli strike on Lebanon if they continue to allow Hezbullah to arm itself. I do believe that the UN Security Council passed a binding resolution (1701) forbidding exactly that. Perhaps she might have mentioned that as the reason for Hezbullah to stop arming itself, instead of using the “I can’t control my crazy friend here” argument. But that would be asking for logic and fairness concerning Israel, which is utterly ridiculous.

Israel’s Axis of Evil continues its mission, unfettered by world opinion, and not impressed by the Obama administration. What could possibly go wrong?

Posted in Iran, Syria, Terrorism, The One | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Cracks in Hamas’s armor?

One of the mantras of Israel’s critics during Operation Cast Lead last year was that it would only build support for Hamas. I noted at the time anecdotal evidence suggested otherwise. Now the Washington Post is reporting Once seemingly impregnable, Hamas shows signs of vulnerability. The article unfortunately only focuses on the story of the “Green Prince.”

Hamas has been reeling from the assassination of one its leaders, Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, in Dubai on Jan. 19. His killing by what authorities say was a hit team suspected of being part of Israel’s Mossad spy agency has become an international espionage drama that now has a sequel in Yousef’s story.

In his soon-to-be be published memoir, “Son of Hamas,” Yousef, 32, says his code name was “Green Prince” and that he helped Shin Bet operatives kill Hamas leaders and arrest his own father, according to an interview in the Haaretz newspaper.

Shin Bet’s high-level penetration of Hamas, if true, is a “catastrophe for Hamas,” said Mkhaimar Abusada, a political science professor at Al Azhar University in Gaza. It is not clear whether the report will cause Hamas to target other suspected informants or if the movement’s leaders will simply regard it an isolated incident, Abusada said.

Retired Brig. Gen. Shalom Harari, a former army intelligence officer and adviser on Palestinian affairs in Israel’s Defense Ministry, said Yousef’s spying and Mabhouh’s killing make Hamas appear vulnerable.

Elder of Ziyon suggests that there’s much more going on.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Hamas | Tagged | Comments Off on Cracks in Hamas’s armor?

Would you have Seamus Milne for lunch?

In the spirit of the slightly cannibalistic Purim this year, I would like to offer you a three course meal cooked chiefly using Seamus Milne, the Guardian’s own Stalinist. So, without further ado:

Appetizer

Cooked by Norm:

If there’s an anti-democratic organization or movement anywhere, an individual dictator or a tyrannical regime, then it’s a safer than safe bet, because it’s a certainty, that somewhere or other a commentator on the Western left (verkrappt section) will be telling you that the said organization or movement, dictator or regime, isn’t as bad as all that. And it’s a near certainty that one of the somewheres he or she will be telling you this is in the Guardian. You don’t need three guesses, you need only one; it’s Seumas Milne.

Garnish offered by Jams.

Main course

Main ingredient: St. Seumas and his article This is no ripping yarn, but a murder to fan more conflict.

This is not a ripping yarn indeed, so be warned, it’s another long anti-Israeli rant by Seamus Milne. Thankfully, fisking of the article was made conveniently easy by the author, who started it with the following sentence:

Imagine for a moment what the reaction would be if ­Iranian ­intelligence was almost ­unversally believed to have ­assassinated a leader of one of the organisations fighting the Tehran government in a western-friendly state.

Imagine indeed. Actually, why should you bother stressing your overworked imagination: here comes a report by IHRDC – Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, on Iran’s state sponsored campaign of political assassinations abroad that says, among other things:

The regime’s campaign can be traced to nearly twenty countries around the world, from neighboring Pakistan and Iraq, to far-flung locations such as France, the Philippines and the United States. Victims specifically addressed in the two previous reports are but a sampling of the more than one hundred and sixty dissidents who dared challenge the clerical establishment’s grip on the country.

Do you read what I do: “a sampling of the more than one hundred and sixty dissidents”? Do you think Seumas M. would notice the difference between a political opponent, let alone 160 political opponents (to start with), and a confessed and proud killer? Nah…

I could provide a lot of (free) garnish, such as Iran’s direct and indirect responsibility for terrorist acts all over the world, direct and indirect support – financial and military – of countless terrorist and fundamentalist gangs, but I think this dish doesn’t need any of that. Tasty enough as it is. So, to

Dessert

It will be a bit muddy, but I hope you will enjoy the taste:

But muddying the waters was a statement from Dubai police on Wednesday that two of the people accused of belonging to the hit team departed by boat for Iran shortly after the murder – as unlikely a destination for a Mossad assassin as one could imagine.

Bon Appetit!

Cheeses, digestive and cigar not included in the price of the meal.

Now, lunch being served, may the sweaty chef straighten his back, look around and say (re St. Seumas): “What a f…..g* moron!”?

*Cause of Meryl, and all them rules…

Cross-posted on SimplyJews

Posted in Israel | 2 Comments

A riddle wrapped in an enigma and mocked on Facebook

I’ve been skeptical of the ever growing hit team that knocked off Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, but Robert Baer (h/t Powerline) provides an explanation:

The truth is that Mr. Mabhouh’s assassination was conducted according to the book—a military operation in which the environment is completely controlled by the assassins. At least 25 people are needed to carry off something like this. You need “eyes on” the target 24 hours a day to ensure that when the time comes he is alone. You need coverage of the police—assassinations go very wrong when the police stumble into the middle of one. You need coverage of the hotel security staff, the maids, the outside of the hotel. You even need people in back-up accommodations in the event the team needs a place to hide.

I can only speculate about where exactly the hit went wrong. But I would guess the assassins failed to account for the marked advance in technology. Not only were there closed-circuit TV cameras in the hotel where Mr. Mabhouh was assassinated and at the airport, but Dubai has at its fingertips the best security consultants in the world. The consultants merely had to run advanced software through all of Dubai’s digital data before, during and after the assassination to connect the assassins in time and place. For instance, a search of all cellular phone calls made in and around the hotel where Mr. Mabhouh was assassinated would show who had called the same number—reportedly a command post in Vienna. It would only be a matter then of tracking when and where calls were made from these phones, tying them to hotels where the team was operating or staying.

Not completely understanding advances in technology may be one explanation for the assassins nonchalantly exposing their faces to the closed-circuit TV cameras, one female assassin even smiling at one. They mistook Dubai 2010 for Paris 1992, and never thought it would all be tied together in a neat bow. But there is no good explanation why Israel, if indeed it was behind the assassination, underestimated the technology. The other explanation—the assassins didn’t care whether their faces were identified—doesn’t seem plausible at all.

Baer, for his part, thinks that the hit was a bad idea. But did Dubai really prove Israeli involvement. A number of claims from Dubai haven’t panned out or make no sense (like fleeing to Iran). Sense of events points to another implausibilty.

Well, they’re all European, Ashenazie, in face and name. There are no Mizrachi faces or names. Several of these “usual (Jewish) suspects” are using names of people from the UK who are living in Israel. Gasp! Identity theft! Something only the Israeli (and Chinese computer sales hackers who regularly seize my machine peppering my friends with the latest laptop prices in Shanghai) are capable of doing. Clearly the view of someone who believes that all Israelis are European Crusaders–clueless about what the “average” Jew looks like. [They really don’t all have Brooklyn accents.]

Now in a country like Israel, a significant percentage of the population who are refugees from places like Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Libyia, Syria, UAE, and Dubai, AND who speak a range of Middle Eastern languages and dialects in their home with their grandparents. WHY would the Mossad send lily white European faces to blend in with the crowd? The mission was, after all, supposed to be clandestine.

This isn’t to say that the Mossad didn’t kill Mabhouh or that Dubia doesn’t have better proofs than what’s been offered so far. But the media and a number of governments have been absolutely credulous in accepting the Dubai account at face value, regardless of the implausibilities.

Fortunately, there appears to be some cooler head prevailing.

Caroline Glick observed (h/t Roger L. Simon)

It reportedly took the intervention of the highest echelons of Europe’s intelligence agencies to get their hysterical politicians and diplomats to stop blaming and threatening Israel. After being dressed down, on Monday, the chastened EU foreign ministers abstained from mentioning Israel by name in their joint condemnation of the alleged use of European passports by the alleged operatives who allegedly killed the terrorist Mabhouh.

One thing’s for sure:

You’ve got to give Dubai credit. They harbored an international terrorist and have managed to exploit his murder for media attention.

(h/t Omri via Twitter.)

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Tagged | 3 Comments

Sunday morning snarks, media bias edition

What a difference an angle makes: Biased AP headline of the morning: Israel police storm holy site to quell protest. Ynet news headline: Riots erupt on Jerusalem’s Temple Mount.

Awesome AFP anti-Israel slant of the month: The Dubai assassination of a terrorist was a “Cold War-style hit.” What, exactly, is a “Cold War-style hit”? Apparently, the AFP conflates political assassination for ideological purposes with the assassination of a murderer, an arms dealer, and a planner of future murders of Israeli citizens. Because they’re just like each other. Obviously.

If the Israelis were holding him, there’d be daily headlines: Hamas has extended the unlawful remand of a U.K. reporter, and it’s barely a blip on the media radar. What’s he been charged with? Nothing, really. He was about to contradict the Hamas leadership during a trial of a “collaborator.” So he was arrested. Say, Condi Rice, how do you feel now about your decision to allow Gaza to run for election all those years ago? And hey, the date for new elections has come and gone, so I guess that was a really good call, huh?

Shyeah.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Media Bias, News Briefs | Tagged , | Comments Off on Sunday morning snarks, media bias edition

Dubai police chief: All Jews are suspects

No wonder there’s now a Facebook group called “I was also a part of the Dubai Assassination Squad.” Because the Arabs are now declaring all of us Jews guilty of being part of assassination squads.

According to Emarat Al Youm, a newspaper published in the United Arab Emirates, Tamim urged Arab countries to thoroughly check any Jewish person who carries a non-Israeli passport in order to “prevent Mossad’s infiltrations”.

Substitute “Islamic” and “Arab” for “Jewish” and “non-Israeli,” and you’d have the United Nations issuing resolutions against Dubai, human rights groups calling for the resignation of the police chief who said such a thing, and the entire world up in arms.

But since he’s talking about a Jewish conspiracy, and he’s an Arab, you will get: Nothing. The naked anti-Semitism of the Arab and Muslim world has been ignored for decades.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Jews | Tagged | 5 Comments

More on the Dubai hit

The AP has a story that isn’t getting nearly as wide release as the stories about the Mossad being responsible for the Dubai hit, but it’s interesting for what countries are doing—and not doing—to find the killers.

A killer – or killers – may be on the loose in Europe after a Hamas operative was slain last month in Dubai. European nations, however, seem to be in no rush to find him, her or them. The spotlight is falling on those countries where police say the alleged assassins’ trails begin and end: Switzerland, Italy, France, Germany and the Netherlands.

Authorities there have either declined to say whether they are investigating, or told The Associated Press they have no reason to hunt down the 26 suspects implicated in the Jan. 19 killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh.

Perhaps this is why they’re not bothering to investigate:

France, meanwhile, has said it is only probing the alleged use of three French passports in the crime. Two suspects landed in Paris on Jan. 20. Their trail ends there.

But here is the money graf, the buried lede, the most important piece of information that the AP chose to put in the third-to-last paragraph:

Only Austria has gone further and investigated whether Austrian SIM cards were used. Interior Ministry spokesman Rudolf Gollia declined to provide details about the findings except to say there are no indications that there was a “command center” in Austria, as Dubai police have claimed.

In other words, the Dubai police are lying, the Austrians (no friends to Israel and Jews) have effectively said this, and the AP buries this evidence in a little-read story on the Saturday news cycle.

I’m shocked, shocked, to discover that the AP buries this information.

Posted in Hamas, Israeli Double Standard Time, Terrorism | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Friday news dump: Crooked congressmen

The misnamed Congressional ethics comittee cleared seven representatives of ethics violations, released the report on Friday, (papers like the Washington Post are making sure to cover it in their Saturday editions, which nobody reads) and issued a unanimous statement that read:

“Simply because a member sponsors an earmark for an entity that also happens to be a campaign contributor does not, on these two facts alone, support a claim that a member’s actions are being influenced by campaign contributions,” the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct said in a unanimous statement.

This, in spite of email evidence that campaign contributions directly affected the inclusion of earmarks—which are additions to bills that are not voted on by Congress, and which the public has no say in, although we have to foot the bill for—and, well, the no-bid contracts awarded to the contributors.

The late John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), who until his death earlier this month chaired the defense appropriations subcommittee, was also cleared. The other six lawmakers served on Murtha’s panel. In fiscal 2008 alone, the seven lawmakers sponsored $112 million worth of earmarks for clients of the PMA Group while accepting more than $350,000 in contributions from the firm’s lobbyists and its clients, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a watchdog group.

And the “Most Ethical Congress Ever” (Nancy Pelosi’s words) voted to clear the Congressmen even though they had clear evidence of wrongdoing.

The ethics committee decided to clear Visclosky even though the Office of Congressional Ethics, which conducts preliminary reviews, found probable cause that Visclosky sought contributions in exchange for steering federal contracts. It recommended that the more powerful House ethics committee subpoena Visclosky and his staff to answer questions under oath about his earmarking practice. The full ethics panel opted not to subpoena Visclosky or any other records.

You know, I get that deals are made by Congressmen. I don’t much like it, but it’s the way things work. But this goes beyond making deals. These are crooked representatives who deserve to be thrown out of office, if not in jail. And the Feds are investigating.

Then again, this administration is sitting on the Black Panther voter intimidation information and threw out the charges when there was video evidence of men with clubs intimidating the voters. Perhaps I shouldn’t be so sanguine about a Justice Department investigation of representatives. But I won’t be surprised if all seven vote for Obamacare.

Posted in Politics | 1 Comment

Mabhouh’s razor

There’s a concept of Occam’s razor, which explains that the simplest explanation for a phenomenon is likely correct. So why does the hit on Mahmoud Mabhouh keep getting more complicated. Yossi Melman explains (h/t Aussie Dave):

The story just gets more and more complicated, which on its face at least leads us into territory that is more than amazing – wild even – which is hard to judge by rational and professional means.

Twenty-six agents, perhaps even 30, sent to assassinate one person? Granted if they could flee the scene by sea, how could one think that Mossad agents would take cover in Iran? I ask myself. Even if they have unprecedented self confidence the likes of which are unknown?

For a couple of weeks now, the media and European governments have been eating up every morsel tossed to them by Dubai’s chief of police. (There’s no skepticism in this post at the LA Times yesterday.)

Of course if the Mossad has an army of a million Davids sparing a couple of dozen to whack Mabhouh and having a few more to sabotage the shark tank doesn’t seem so unreasonable. Does it?

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | 1 Comment

The blogger’s guide to anti-Semitic comment trolls

Eight years ago this spring, at the height of the suicide bombings of Yasser Arafat’s terror war known as the second intifada, I started blogging about Jewish and Israeli issues. This, of course, brought out the anti-Israel crazies. I came up with a corollary to Godwin’s Law to describe these trolls: “In any internet discussion area concerning Israel, politics, or religion, the probability of anti-Semitic comments approaches one.” (In fact, I’ve seen comments threads that have absolutely nothing to do with Israel, politics, or religion still devolve into anti-Semitism and Israel-bashing, but that’s a post for another time.)

And so, based on the thousands of comments and emails I’ve read over the years, both here and on other blogs and media sites, I present The Blogger’s Guide to Anti-Semitic Comments Trolls. Below are the some of the types of anti-Israel commenters I’ve identified over the years, but the list is by no means complete.

The garden-variety neo-Nazi Jew-hater: Yadda yadda Jews die, yadda yadda Jews suck, yadda yadda Jews control the world, yadda yadda bankers, kikes, money, world media, ZOG, yadda yadda, yadda yadda. These are the Stormfront community Jew-haters who have never been able to figure out why their life sucks so bad, so they blame the Jews. (Here’s a tip: Look in the mirror. It’s all your fault, bubelahs. There is no vast Jewish conspiracy that made you stupid and talentless; you did that all by yourself. Oh, and God doesn’t love you, either. He told me so himself at the last ZOG meeting.)

The Faux Jew: This one is usually fairly easy to spot. The Faux Jew is often a neo-Nazi fresh from a stint at Stormfront, where he and his buddies have just discussed what they think Jews really think. He comes to my blog to pretend to be a Jew so he can trap me with his wily Faux Jew comment. He adds “stein” to a last name that generally doesn’t sound Jewish at all. He will use “Moshe” or “Hesh” or “Abe” or another name that he thinks is typically Jewish. (For some reason, these creeps never use Murray or Harry or Josh. Oh, wait. The reason is they’re effing morons and don’t really know anything about Jews.)

The Faux Jew likes to pretend to be a bloodthirsty, bigoted asshat who puts up gleeful comments about the death of Palestinians. He uses the word “goyim” a lot (because he thinks that all Jews, when talking among ourselves, use the word “goyim” a lot, always in a derogatory fashion). Over the years, I’ve come to realize that what they want me to do is publish their comment and then say, “Right on, Fellow Jew!” Because, you know, that’s what we do. A quick test to see if your Faux Jew is Stormfront material: If you substitute the word “Jew” for “goyim” in his comment, the true (and ugly) face of the Faux Jew will appear.

Sometimes, the Faux Jew uses faux quotes by real Jews. A quick check on Google will show you that the quote is fabricated, taken completely out of context, or originates on a neo-Nazi website, and is referenced only by neo-Nazi websites. That’s your clue that the commenter is probably a regular at the Stormfront Annual Picnic in East Podunk, Idaho. (I hear the fifty spots for next year’s picnic are filling up fast; reserve now.) The Faux Jew will also use Yiddish words, misspelled and misused. If your commenter sounds like he picked up Yiddish by watching Mike Myers on Saturday Night Live, he’s a Faux Jew. Ban him.

The last strain of Faux Jew is a little harder to detect. I had one that took me a while figure out, but something about the troll kept sitting wrong with me from the get-go. The Faux Jews that work really hard at it will use Hebrew words and throw in Torah quotes. The dead giveaway there is that Christians will almost always apply the principles of the religion that they learned growing up—Christianity. Believe me when I tell you that to a Jew who is even semi-observant, it’s really noticeable. This type of Faux Jew uses Christian dogma without realizing it. Also, it’s really hard to fake being an observant Jew. The dead giveaway: Posting on Shabbat. That happens more often than you’d think, because most anti-Semitic comments trolls are not all that bright.

The Mikey Rivero Wannabes: Mikey Rivero runs the execrable and anti-Semitic “What Really Happened” website. The man is positively obsessed with bashing Jews and Israel, and he writes (and runs) long-winded, boring articles that purport to prove just how evil, vicious, and inhuman Jews and Israelis really are. The Mikey Rivero Wannabe will post long-winded, boring articles that s/he finds on various anti-Semitic websites. S/he is especially fond of reposting articles by Norman Finkelstein and Noam Chomsky. The Wannabes have never yet gotten past my moderation policy; their comments are deleted as soon as I see the comment page scrolling off the screen.

The Intolerant Atheist: This comments troll likes to pretend that s/he hates all religions equally, but after the opening salvo, s/he goes on and on about the evil Jews who think that Israel should be a Jews-only country. That’s the tic that gives them away: They never seem to notice that there are large populations of Israeli Arabs and Christians right there in that Jews-only state. Nor do they seem overly upset about the Islamic-only nations in the world. No, the only religion that bothers them seems to be Judaism. I wonder why that is? (Not really. See title.)

The “I’m an Anti-Zionist, Not An Anti-Semite” Troll: This one insists, over and over again, that s/he has nothing against Jews, it’s just Israel that s/he can’t stand. While defending this stand, however, the anti-Jewish remarks always seem to just slip out. These are also the trolls who make it a point to preface all of their remarks with “Of course you’re going to call me an anti-Semite for criticizing Israel.” This sort of troll spreads out into the mainstream (cf: Walt, Mearsheimer, Carter).

The David Duke/Pat Buchanan/Ron Paul Defenders: It is absolutely astonishing how fast the defenders of these three stooges come out of the woodwork. It’s zero to Jew-hate in no time at all. The mere fact that I posted their names here will bring out their supporters in droves, and as soon as they get a quick look at this post, they will leave their vile remarks for me to moderate (and add to my troll file for future use; I never approve these idiots’ comments).

The “Just The Facts, Ma’am” Irritant: This troll thinks that civilian vs. soldier casualty counts are more important than, say, the number of Israelis killed and wounded by kassam rockets. The word “genocide” gets thrown around a lot in relation to the Palestinians, even though if Israel is conducting genocide against them, it’s the worst genocide ever, what with there being only a few thousand deaths since 1948 (even including the War of Independence) and the growth of the Palestinian population since then. Comparisons with actual genocides, such as the destruction of two-thirds of Europe’s Jewry, fall upon deaf ears with this troll.

The Really Annoying Moron Who Think This Blog Is A Democracy Troll: They’re not really anti-Semitic, they’re just effing annoying. They blather on and on about how the author refuses to allow dissenting opinions, when what they really mean is that I don’t write what they want me to write. And when directed to my No Israel-Bashing Zone post, they melt down into fits of incoherent rage. I suspect they all have control issues. I suspect that I really don’t care.

That’s about all I can think of for now. I know I’ve missed a few troll types, but I can revisit this theme at a later date. In closing, I would like to direct all the anti-Semitic trolls reading this post to the Yourish.com mantra: Anti-Semites of the world, just die already. Preferably soon.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Juvenile Scorn | Tagged , , | 19 Comments

The marketing genius of Yasser Arafat

In the West an attitude towards Palestinian terrorism developed along the lines of “we don’t condone the violence but you have to understand the Palestinian grievance.” Of course that attitude implicitly excuses the violence it claims not to condone.

But this fig leaf (understanding the Palestinian grievance) didn’t just excuse Palestinian violence against Israel, it also shielded that Arab world from its openly antisemitic policies (they have to stick up for the Palestinians).

In his meeting with President Assad of Syria, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said:

“With Allah’s help, the new Middle East will be a Middle East without Zionists and imperialists. We hope they will recognize the rights of the region’s nations, but they must realize that if they continue along their wrongful path they have no place in our region. Today the ties between the region’s nations – between Iran, Syria and the resistance movement – are very strong. We believe that developments in the world will benefit Iran, Syria and the region’s free governments,” he said.

Note, Ahmadinejad didn’t specify and particular Israeli affront to the Middle East. No, he is offended by the presence of Zionists (read Israel.)

And what’s going one elsewhere? Well Israel declared the Cave of the Patriarchs and the Tomb of Rachel to be heritage sites. The UN, France and the United States have all deplored this move, giving support to the Palestinian denial of the historical connection between Jews and Israel.

So the same folks who criticize Israel for harming the “peace process” ignore or excuse a pretty direct threat against Israel.

The dynamic created by Yasser Arafat still works today more than years after his death. The Palestinian grievance trumps all.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time | Tagged | Comments Off on The marketing genius of Yasser Arafat