AP now letting Hezbollah set the boilerplate

Seriously? The AP is so desperate for “balance” that they’re now quoting the paranoid accusations of a terrorist group as boilerplate “balance”?

Because here’s what the AP wrote about the indictment filed against Hezbollah by the UN commission:

The court is widely expected to accuse members of Hezbollah of being involved in the killing, something the Shiite militant group has insisted it will not accept.

The Iran- and Syria-sponsored group fiercely denies any role in the killing and says the tribunal, jointly funded by U.N. member states and Lebanon, is a conspiracy by Israel and the United States.

Seriously? What next, the ravings of Jared Loughner as a defense of why he murdered six and shot 13?

Really, just when I think the AP can’t stoop any lower, I get to read drek like this.

Update: Yes, it’s the official boilerplate. From their latest article on the Hariri indictments:

The Iran- and Syria-sponsored Hezbollah calls the tribunal a conspiracy by Israel and the United States.

This is what now passes for journalism: Quoting a conspiracy theory as if it’s a legitimate rebuttal to the facts at hand.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Lebanon | Tagged , | 1 Comment

It’s true: Dictators hate being mocked

Hugo Chavez forced a Colombian soap opera off the air in Venezuela because it mocked him and his country. I think he’s right about the mocking part, anyway.

A Venezuelan television station has stopped airing a Colombian soap opera after government regulators demanded its removal saying the program was offensive and denigrating to Venezuela as a country.

The soap opera “Chepe Fortuna” features an unscrupulous secretary named “Venezuela” who has a dog called “Little Hugo,” an apparent reference to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

“What disrespect for Venezuela!” Chavez said in a speech to lawmakers Saturday. “That soap is so horrible!”

Let’s see why he’s offended.

The character Venezuela, in contrast to her sister named Colombia, “is repeatedly characterized as associated with illegal activities, meddling and vulgarity,” Venezuela’s telecommunications regulatory agency Conatel said in a statement.

Chavez noted the program featured the dog named “Little Hugo” and said it’s disrespectful to the country that the character Venezuela is portrayed as ill-mannered, overweight and “arrogant.”

Yep. I’d have to say that’s about right. If the shoe fits, and all that. Little Hugo deserves no respect.

Posted in Juvenile Scorn, World | 3 Comments

Briefs

But it’s anti-Zionism, and don’t you forget it: Synagogues and a Jewish school vandalized in Canada, yawn, yawn, yawn. Swastikas? Why, they’re just welcoming the Jews to Canada, 1930s-style. Talk about your climate of hate, perhaps America’s left should take a look at what the demonization of Israel is doing to Jews in Canada.

Another day, another kassam in Israel: More rockets in Israel, more non-reactions from the anti-Israel press. Oh, and I didn’t point out the Times headline from last week. “Hamas tries to curb rocket attacks on Gaza.” Tries? Nice to see that the media recognize how hard it is for Hamas to control Gaza. Except that’s a lie. You can’t sneeze in Gaza without official Hamas permission, and pretending that they can’t control the rocket and mortar launches is a flat-out lie.

The Muslim freak-out over Jewish holy sites: I don’t know a lot about this topic, but read the Ha’aretz article on the removal of a scaffolding over a site where Jews have been praying year-round, then read the interpretation of that article by the Arab News. Yet another example of the hysterical anti-Jewish rhetoric of the Muslim press.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Religion | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Lieberman: the new Caroline’s idol?

It is not a secret that Caroline Glick’s infatuation (politically-wise only, of course) with Bibi has been replaced lately by a markedly cooler attitude. Her latest JP column Exposing the puppetmasters shows that her heart is captured by another hero. I avoid the word “knight”, because in my worstest nightmares I cannot use it in this case, and I hope you are with me on this point.

In the article Caroline rushes to the defense of indefensible: the highly unfortunate Knesset decision to create a parliamentary commission of inquiry into the foreign funding of Israeli NGO. Let me start with a few words of explanation: NGOs are non-profit organizations, bound to keep publicly accessible reports of their incoming moneys and the sources of their financing, as well as of the use of the money. We have enough financial institutions, such as the omnipresent Tax Authority, the ministry of finance, the comptroller office, eventually the police for especially hardy cases of financial mayhem. There is nothing this new commission could (or is qualified to) do better than the above mentioned institutions.

Clearly the initiators of the whole idea had something other in mind than just some financial monkey business. And this something doesn’t have much to do with transparency, but much more to do with politics and with Lieberman’s totalitarian mindset (not only Lieberman’s but many of his party’s notables and his supporters from other parties). Of course, Lieberman means much more than the finances: according to Caroline herself:

He said that these groups “help terrorists, and their main aim is to weaken the IDF and its ability to protect the citizens of the State of Israel.”

Even if we disregard the incendiary and Soviet-like language for now – if these allegations are even half-true, why didn’t Lieberman call the General Security Services (Shin Bet) and the police to act on his behalf and on behalf of his endangered motherland? Doesn’t he know the relevant phone numbers? Guess…

But Caroline, although (unlike Lieberman) born and raised in a democratic country, doesn’t seem to notice his clearly totalitarian and thuggish behavior – if anything, it makes her hot under the collar. She applauds his thuggery as if it was a shining example of bravery and nobility. And when he attacks Tzippi Livni who opposes the commission or when he loses it totally, calling Likud (!) ministers “traitors to the national camp” (why not call them “enemies of the people” directly?) , this Chicago – bred girl adores him even more!

I can’t abide a few of the NGOs Caroline mentions in the article, am indifferent to others and see some sense in two or three of the rest. But in any case, rushing into a witch hunt of this intensity is an indication of a sickness, of some bug we caught and definitely don’t know how to treat.

Funnily, the article is very long for one simple reason: Caroline, with a great deal of expertise and knowledge, tells about funding of many NGOs, making it even more unclear why do we need to have this abominable commission. What is clear that never in the short history of the state of Israel there was a danger to its democratic institutions such as Yvette/Avigdor Lieberman and his thuggish cohorts. And if there is a person who should be investigated for causing extensive damage to the image and international standing of Israel during the reign of the current government, it is no other than Mr Lieberman himself.

Interestingly, in the same edition of JP appears an article The battle of rights and wrongs by Liat Collins, where Liat, another foreign-bred JP journalist, opposes the committee, albeit in her usual chirpy and unfocused manner. But her conclusion hits the spot:

No wonder Israeli commentators have been struggling to pronounce the word “McCarthyism.” This is not just a slippery slope; it’s a slippery slope with land mines.

This is a slippery slope indeed. And we seem to be willingly skating towards it, while a leading editor of a leading Israeli English newspaper lauds the person who pushes us all to that slope…

Cross-posted on SimplyJews

Posted in Israel, Politics | 12 Comments

Stuxnet: Made in USA & Israel

The Times has an in-depth article on the origins of Stuxnet. It appears to be one more thing the world will be able to thank George W. Bush for:

By the accounts of a number of computer scientists, nuclear enrichment experts and former officials, the covert race to create Stuxnet was a joint project between the Americans and the Israelis, with some help, knowing or unknowing, from the Germans and the British.

The project’s political origins can be found in the last months of the Bush administration. In January 2009, The New York Times reported that Mr. Bush authorized a covert program to undermine the electrical and computer systems around Natanz, Iran’s major enrichment center. President Obama, first briefed on the program even before taking office, sped it up, according to officials familiar with the administration’s Iran strategy. So did the Israelis, other officials said. Israel has long been seeking a way to cripple Iran’s capability without triggering the opprobrium, or the war, that might follow an overt military strike of the kind they conducted against nuclear facilities in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007.

And yes, I will say thanks to Obama as well, for his part in it.

There’s also this fascinating piece of information: The Times says that Israel built an exact duplicate of the Iranian centrifuges in the Dimona nuclear plant, and tested Stuxnet on it there. If true, it makes me admire Israeli ingenuity even more.

How and when Israel obtained this kind of first-generation centrifuge remains unclear, whether from Europe, or the Khan network, or by other means. But nuclear experts agree that Dimona came to hold row upon row of spinning centrifuges.

“They’ve long been an important part of the complex,” said Avner Cohen, author of “The Worst-Kept Secret” (2010), a book about the Israeli bomb program, and a senior fellow at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. He added that Israeli intelligence had asked retired senior Dimona personnel to help on the Iranian issue, and that some apparently came from the enrichment program.

“I have no specific knowledge,” Dr. Cohen said of Israel and the Stuxnet worm. “But I see a strong Israeli signature and think that the centrifuge knowledge was critical.”

And the same thing happened in the U.S., but with bad results:

But the United States and its allies ran into the same problem the Iranians have grappled with: the P-1 is a balky, badly designed machine. When the Tennessee laboratory shipped some of its P-1’s to England, in hopes of working with the British on a program of general P-1 testing, they stumbled, according to nuclear experts.

“They failed hopelessly,” one recalled, saying that the machines proved too crude and temperamental to spin properly.

Dr. Cohen said his sources told him that Israel succeeded — with great difficulty — in mastering the centrifuge technology. And the American expert in nuclear intelligence, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the Israelis used machines of the P-1 style to test the effectiveness of Stuxnet.

When your inspiration is stopping the mad mullahs from destroying your nation, failure is not an option. A nuclear-armed Iran can’t destroy America. But one nuclear missile devastates the Jewish state. And we have seen how little the Arab and Muslim world care for Palestinian casualties caused by their fellows.

Stuxnet isn’t a cure-all. The only thing that will stop Iran is a change in government, and even then, I’m not so sure the new government won’t want to be a nuclear-armed state. But Stuxnet is giving us breathing room.

Posted in Iran, Israel | 2 Comments

Caturday again

Fluffy kitty posts are called for.

Tig in a box

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gracie in her bed

Posted in Cats | Tagged | 3 Comments

And now a word

This post was originally published on March 9, 2002. Shortly before that, I was discussing how awesome it was to get several hundred visits a day. Adil Farooq and Glenn Reynolds (Adil first, then Glenn) were responsible for getting me the notice that would turn this blog from a 200-a-day habit to what it is today. Once again, Adil, a sincere thank you!

A wonderful thing happened this week. Adil at Muslimpundit.com, whom I have been reading for months (and you should be reading him, too), mentioned me kindly in a recent blog, and told people to take a look at Iseema’s Diary while they were here. It got picked up by BBSpot and Metafilter and a few other places. (Not, may I point out, by Daypop.)

And thousands of people came.

They came, they read the diary, some of them looked around at other pages, and I hope to have interested some of them enough so that they come back on Monday.

But the most important thing, I think, is that they came not for a funny cat picture, not for a “Which X are you?” quiz, not for some freakish story, but for the writing. It’s up to me to keep them here now. I will do my best.

So, welcome, new readers. Kick your shoes off. Put your feet up, get comfortable, make yourself at home, and as soon as I’m settled back in from my Virginia trip (which will be tomorrow), I’ll be serving up some more helpings of what got you here in the first place.

But Adil is the one who gets to sit in The Chair That Swallows You Whole (so comfortable that you can’t get out of it), so nobody else sit there.

Posted in Blasts from the past, Bloggers, Humor | Comments Off on And now a word

My first Blogathon

In the summer of 2002, I had just moved to Richmond, VA, and was talked into taking part in the Blogathon, a 24-hour blog-posting marathon designed to raise money for the charity of your choice. This was my 10:30 a.m. post:

Yesterday I mentioned the things to expect during the Blogathon. But I forgot one. Violence.

After only an hour and a half, and due to the fact that I have no prepared posts, I’ve realized that I might get a mite testy by the end of the day. So please forgive me when I do, because I’m pretty sure it’s an inevitability.

If this keeps up, I might get desperate enough to post pictures of my cats.

Well. The least you can do is contribute to Shaare Zedek. There’s still about a 90% non-contributor rate out there, which saddens me. Six hundred-plus (non-Instalink) visitors a day, on average, and only 69 sponsors as of 10:30 a.m.

Wait! I know! I’m giving away free words with every contribution today. That’s right, you get to read 48 posts in 24 hours! Hey, how can you go wrong with that? And not only that, you can use my words anytime, in any situation, thereafter. Free words, no fair use constraints—why, it’s an invitation to plagiarize. That’s right, impress your friends. Guys, impress that girl you’ve been wanting and see if those free words don’t just get her into the bedroom. Use them in any combination, and you’ve got words for every occasion! I’ll even throw in a few swear words so you can tell off that asshole that sits next to you at work.

Yourish.com. The place on the Internet where you can get all the words that are fit to speak. And then some.

Posted in Blasts from the past, Bloggers | Comments Off on My first Blogathon

A question for the relativists

This post was first published on April 2, 2002.

It occurs to me that I need one simple question answered, and only one. Let’s for the moment drop all of my arguments about the Palestinian suicide bombings, the refugee problems; in fact, let’s assume for the moment that I agree with everything you say regarding the Palestinian side of things. Except for this.

I have one question, and one question only: In what way does blowing up families sitting down to the Passover dinner aid the Palestinian cause? Please explain this to me in short, simple sentences so that I may follow your logic. Let me repeat it in simpler phrases: How do suicide bombings advance Palestinian self-rule and solve the refugee problem?

No, don’t go on about how they’re driven to it by the wretched excesses of the Israeli oppressors, or the conditions of the camps, or the Right of Return, or for whatever other reason you can think of. Answer the question, simply and directly: In what way does blowing the arms and legs off old men and women and children solve the problems of the Palestinian refugees? You can start like this: “Blowing up innocent men, women, and children helps solve the Palestinian refugee problem because…”

When you can answer that question to my satisfaction, then I will begin to take your arguments seriously.

Posted in Blasts from the past, Terrorism | 5 Comments

What I’m reading

Thing 1: Yaacov Lozowick illustrates and explains the Shepherd’s Hotel (a.k.a. the dead Nazi’s former home). (Daily Alert linked him, good job, Yaacov!)

Thing 2: This is a very interesting look at the Arab mindset, buried inside a New York Times article on the Arab gay culture in New York.

“It got big, which is not always a good thing, because you have all nationalities of the Middle East,” said Abraham, who is of Syrian and Palestinian descent, grew up in Kuwait and now lives in Astoria, Queens. Like others interviewed for this article, he spoke on the condition that his last name not be used.

“The Egyptians want to hang out with the Egyptians, the Moroccans want to hang out with the Moroccans, et cetera,” he said. “This is always a problem you have with Arabs.”

You don’t say. Oh, wait, those of us who write about Arab discrimination against Palestinians have been saying this for years.

Thing 3: Oh, this one will piss off all the ZOG morons out there. Hillary Clinton told Al Jazeera that Israel makes its own decisions. But here’s the shocker: The AP actually published this quote!

Clinton pointed out that Israel has reasons to be cautious. “You often make decisions based on your own experience and history,” she said. “And when the Israelis pulled out of Lebanon they got Hezbollah and 40,000 rockets and when they pulled out of Gaza they got Hamas and 20,000 rockets.”

Holy crap! Someone check the sky for flying pigs!

Posted in Israel, Media Bias, palestinian politics | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Finally Friday briefs

The awesome awesomeness of the ability of Israel to cause everything: You know, we Jews are so wily, so powerful, so all-encompassing, that we can cause neighboring state governments to fall. An Iranian minister said so. (With help from the Big Satan, of course.) [Using best cartoon bad guy voice] Behold our power!

The UN is running out of money: Not in the way you think. American banks have declined to carry many UN diplomats’ accounts any more due to the high cost of making sure that foreign diplomats aren’t laundering money for terrorist operations (gee, who would ever suspect them of doing that?). Pardon me while I try to wipe the smile off my face at the sheer schadenfreude of UN staffers running out of money. Nope. I just can’t seem to do it. Grinning like a Cheshire Cat. Yep.

Whoops, they did it again: The AP managed to bury the lede in the 14th paragraph of a 17-paragraph story. Here’s the angle: Hamas is “deploying forces” to stop PIJ from launching rockets and mortars at Israel. The AP goes through hoops to show us how serious Hamas is about trying to stop the rocket fire. And then, in graf 14, we get this information:

Before nightfall, however, an Associated Press photographer said no Hamas forces were to be seen in the area.

In other words, the effort was a show. The AP dutifully reported it as a serious effort to stop the rocket fire (also managing to slam Israel liberally, of course). And then, near the end of the article, the AP reports that all of the Hamas forces that were “deployed” to stop the rocket fire had returned home before nightfall. In other words, they went out for a photo op. Then they went home. And the AP feels it is only necessary to point this out at the very end of the article. (To its credit, the NY Times’ condensation of the story includes that information.)

Yet another example of the willing duplicity of the anti-Israel media.

Posted in Iran, Israel, Media Bias, United Nations | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Arafat phone transcripts revealed!

This was first posted on March 30, 2002, during the seige of Arafat’s headquarters in Ramallah.

Eat your heart out, Drudge. Glenn, ya snooze, ya lose. Yourish.com has obtained the actual transcripts of Yasser Arafat’s phone calls to world leaders from inside his besieged compound! It’s another exclusive from the folks that brought you Iseema bin Laden’s Diary! Without further ado:

Arafat: Kofi, my friend, I need a little help here. Can you convene the Security Council and get them to get these Israeli tanks off my front yard?
Annan: Mr. President, you know that I will do everything in my power to help you. I have sent a memo using the strongest possible language to each of the Security Council members that we must do something about the situation in Ramallah right away. I am recommending that our assistants schedule a meeting to discuss what time the Council can meet, where we will certainly get down to the business of putting together a resolution that will ask both sides to cease the violence. But first, a question: Mr. President, have you sent out the word to your people to stop the bombing? Terrorism will not bring the Palestinian people closer to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.
Arafat: [click]

Arafat: Moammar, my brother, now is the time for you to step up to the rock and help your Palestinian brethren. We need you now as never before to help us defeat the Israeli aggressors!
Gaddafi: Yasser, let me ask you–did you or did you not say that you think “Isratine” was the stupidest idea since that assassination attempt on you-know-who in the eighties?
Arafat: Moammar, my brother, my friend–you do know I was only kidding, right? Just a joke! Isratine is a great idea; I’m going to bring it up at the very next Arab League Summit, I swear by the Prophet, peace be upon him.
Gaddafi: [click]
Arafat: Hello? Hello?

Arafat: Rafik, my Lebanese brother, I need your help now more than ever. What about mobilizing the forces and maybe throwing in a few columns from Syria, sending them here to Ramallah and kicking these Israelis right out of here?
Hariri: Mr. Arafat, you know we’re not allowed to mention the S-word here in Lebanon. There are no S-columns here, no soldiers from any nation other than Lebanon, and I’m afraid I don’t know what you’re talking about.
Arafat: Rafik, what’s the matter with you? The Israelis can’t listen in on this, it’s a secure cell phone line! Just pick up the phone to Assad and ask him for permission to send in a couple of companies!
Hariri: [using disguised voice] We’re sorry, but that number is no longer in service. Please hang up and try again later. [click]
Arafat: Hello? Hello? Damn! Again?

Arafat: Hosni, nobody understands the depths to which Sharon will sink better than you! Can you help me get those tanks out of my compound? They’ve already destroyed four of my buildings, and I just put in a hot tub last month!
Mubarak: Yasser, I’d really love to help you out. I’ve already issued a very strong statement saying in no uncertain terms that the Israelis have no right to occupy Ramallah and should leave immediately. Oh, and I called the Israelis “terrorists”, just like you suggested.
Arafat: But Hosni, I need more than words, I need action. My men are being killed, I’m trapped with no electricity, no water, and if you think not being able to flush toilets isn’t one of the more annoying things in life, you haven’t been to the slums of Cairo lately.
Mubarak: There are no slums in Cairo. There are no slums in all of Egypt. What are you implying?
Arafat: Can we talk about the poverty situation in Cairo some other time? I really need—
Mubarak: [click]

Arafat: Amr, can’t the Arab League do something about the situation?
Moussa: Yasser, we did. We issued the unanimous approval of the Saudi Peace Plan. We’ve got the PR upper hand; now the Israelis are going to look like fools, and intractable ones at that, when they refuse to go along with it. Of course we rigged it so they’ll never agree to our terms, but–
Arafat: No, Amr, I mean now. I mean can you get the League back together, issue a statement to Israel demanding that she remove the tanks from my doorstep—oh, dammit, now they ran over the rosebushes! Do you know how hard my mother-in-law worked to make those roses grow?
Moussa: Yasser, you know how hard it is to schedule these things. We can’t do this at the drop of a kaffiyeh, you know. There are people to contact, schedules to work out, parties, feasts—oh, we can’t possibly do this before August. Can you hold out ’til then?
Arafat: [click]

Arafat: Mr. Secretary, we all know that if the United States says jump, Israel says how high, can’t you call Sharon and get these tanks—
Powell: Don’t interrupt me again, Mr. Arafat, I have a few things to say to you about—terrorism.
[15 minutes later]
Arafat: So you’re telling me that I’m on my own?
Powell: No, that’s not what I said. Listen. And stop interrupting.
[15 minutes later]
Arafat: Can I get a word in edgewise now?
Powell: Yes?
Arafat: So you’re telling me I’m on my own?
Powell: [click]

Arafat: Hey! How’s it going, uh—um—
Various African leaders: [click] [click] [click] [click]

And that’s the end of the transcripts. Remember, this is exclusive to Yourish.com—so if you post this anywhere else, don’t forget our slogan: What, you think we make this stuff up?

Posted in Blasts from the past, Israel, Terrorism | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

What the AP doesn’t tell you, part 2

The AP quotes every anti-Israel quote it can find from Turkey’s Prime Minister’s interview with Al Jazeera. But it left out this one:

Hamas “is not a terrorist movement.”

It gets better.

During an interview, the Turkish leader said Hamas was not a terrorist group, and its members were not terrorists, but “people defending their land.”

Oh, they’re freedom fighters. Yeah. The launching of thousands of rockets after Israel left Gaza to its own devices? Defending their land. Suicide attacks? Defending their land. Murdering Israelis at the Karni Crossing? Defending their land. So, what did the AP choose to use as a description of why Israel and Turkish relations are at an all-time low? (Note the weasel words in bold, put there to place doubt in the reader’s mind that Israel is telling the truth.)

Relations between the two soured, however, with Turkey’s government’s increasingly vociferous criticism of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. They hit an all-time low in May, when Israeli naval commandos killed nine activists from Turkey on board a Gaza-bound ship that tried to breach Israel’s naval blockade.

Israeli commandos said they opened fire in self-defense after meeting what they called unexpected resistance when they boarded the ferry carrying aid supplies to Gaza.

Interesting that they couldn’t seem to find it important enough to quote, because that is the root of all the current problems Israel is having with the Erdogan government. It’s the Islamism, stupid. It isn’t Avigdor Lieberman.

In case you’ve forgotten, you can go here to watch Erdogan attack Shimon Peres and Israel unexpectedly at the Davos forum in 2009. The deterioration of Turkish-Israeli relations was long-planned and executed by Erdogan, for Islamism, and at Israel’s expense. The culmination of the deterioration was Turkish government support of the Gaza flotilla “activists,” whose “unexpected resistance” was in total contradiction to the supposedly peaceful message the international fools who started the flotilla said they wanted to convey. Turkey—via the IHH—sent the message they really wanted.

[…] When leaders of the charity returned home after nine Turks died in the Israeli raid, they were warmly embraced by top Turkish officials, said Huseyin Oruc, deputy director of the charity, who was aboard the flotilla.

“When we flew back to Turkey, I was afraid we would be in trouble for what happened, but the first thing we saw when the plane’s door opened in Istanbul was Bulent Arinc, the deputy prime minister, in tears,” he said in an interview. “We have good coordination with Mr. Erdogan,” he added. “But I am not sure he is happy with us now.”

Oh, he is, Bulent. He is.

Posted in Israel, Turkey | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

The incivility of the right left

Remember this? It’s from an entire website that was developed solely to apologize to the world for re-electing George W. Bush. Say, that right-wing incivility that the pundits are all decrying? Backatcha, pals.

Liberal incivility on the re-election of GW Bush

In this one, “get the bastards” is obviously a prelude for inviting the other side to sit down and have a meaningful dialogue about politics, without any eliminationist rhetoric.

Liberal incivility on the re-election of GW Bush

In this example of left-wing civility, a sign proclaiming “The good in this country will prevail” libels half the voters in the nation—but don’t worry, it’s only the half that voted for Bush. (The evil half. Obviously.)

Liberal incivility on the re-election of GW Bush

And here, a young woman cleverly assigns to all people who voted for Kerry a hatred for George W. Bush. Because obviously, if you voted for the guy running against someone, you simply must hate his opponent.

Liberal incivility on the re-election of GW Bush

This is the civility of the left that pundits like Paul Krugman wish us to achieve. This is the left, the side that never uses hateful language or violent rhetoric. No, only right-wingers use hateful language and brutal imagery when describing the politics of the other side.

Oh. Wait.

These images took me all of five minutes to find. And according to the FAQ, none of the images above violate the rules governing which pictures will be included on the site:

We will reject your picture if it is too hateful or hostile. We are about courtesy and communication, not insults and recrimination. You may hate Bush or think his supporters are idiots; we prefer not to give voice to such sentiments.

Really?

Liberal incivility on the re-election of GW Bush

So I guess “hate” isn’t really “hate-hate.”

Big Brother would be proud.

Posted in Juvenile Scorn, Politics | Tagged | 1 Comment

Yes, I am a Jew, Part 2

This post was originally posted on March 10, 2002. (It’s the post that started my schism with my left-leaning blog circle of that time.)

About a week and a half ago, I found a brief mention of my first essay on Metafilter, along with a question in the comments that needs answering. The question:

“I’m confused. I thought that the implication of his ‘I am a Jew’ statement was that it was something he was forced to say by way of giving the murders justification for killing him, claiming he was a Mossad spy or something.”

And there was something else, something from Mike Golby’s website, posted in response to my earlier essay. Here are the pertinent paragraphs, since Blogger seems to have damaged Mike’s archives (the essay is from March 3; you need to scroll down to read it):

“However, neither article will do much to assuage Meryl’s concern at the hatred others show towards her because of her faith. I firmly believe that, while others can support her, only she can do something to assuage the real anger she experiences at the thought of others hating her simply because she is Jewish. If it’s of any value to the feisty Ms. Yourish, I’ve seen infinitely more people twisted, broken, or driven crazy by the hatred they carry within than I have people who’ve been crippled by any viciousness voiced.

Those who hate are victims of self-abuse. I’d ask Meryl to follow the path she and her Polish friend took in their childhood, that most sensible time of our lives. Wait until they stop behaving like idiots, because, most of the time, and if South Africa is anything to go by, they eventually do.

Perhaps not in our lifetimes, but eventually.”

I can’t really speak for the hatred in South Africa. I ‘m no expert on South African history. And it is usually an exercise in futility to get into a comparison of whose misery goes deeper, but it must be pointed out that Jews have been subject to anti-Semitism for thousands of years, in, as far as I can tell, every nation in the world in which they have lived. Our history and South Africa’s are vastly different; it’s not a workable comparison.

Anti-Semitism doesn’t seem to be showing any sign of going away, except in places like the United States–which is over and above more tolerant of every ethnicity and religion than any other country in the world. Many of my anti-Semitic experiences have been with students or immigrants–Iranian Muslim students or immigrants, in point of fact. The negative experiences of my friend’s father and my mother–both native-born Americans–are the only ones that changed. The Iranian students weren’t willing to so much as give me a chance to become friends with them. In fact, the only Iranian I ever became friends with was a student at my college who had come to America as a small child, and whose parents deeply opposed the Ayatollah’s revolution. Nader was, in any case, completely Americanized by the time he met me–a critical factor in our friendship, I believe.

So here’s the problem, Mike. You recommend to me that I don’t fall victim to hatred. That I simply wait until the people who hate me because I am Jewish simply stop behaving like idiots.

I agree with you about not falling into hatred. It is extremely difficult not to, though, when I see Jews being gunned down at a Bar Mitzvah celebration, or while they are eating lunch at a cafe, or simply trying to study in their religious school. My anger overflows, but it is ultimately reined in and turns to sadness for the dead. I won’t fall into hatred, because it’s not in me to hate for no reason. And because when I do fall into anger and despair, I have friends–good friends–who can remind me that hate is the wrong path to follow.

But to “wait for them to stop behaving like idiots”? They’re not behaving like idiots. They’re behaving like murderers.

My mother and my friend’s father were acting like idiots, but they weren’t trying to kill us. Arab terrorists will kill me because I am Jewish. Danny Pearl is dead because he was Jewish. More people will die because they are Jewish, and this will keep happening for a very, very long time. I don’t have the luxury of waiting for them to stop behaving like idiots. My life could be at stake.

Which brings me around to answering the question from Metafilter: The reason we use that phrase is because even knowing full well that Danny Pearl was forced to recite the words that became his last, they resonate in every Jewish person’s soul: Yes, I am a Jew. Whether it is said voluntarily, or whether it is forced out in some pretense of justification by the executioners, it has the same resonance. I am a Jew, and I may die because of that. How many Christians ever think they may be killed for being a Christian?

The mob that surrounded and murdered Yankel Rosenbaum in Crown Heights was chanting “Kill the Jew!” In Nazi Germany, Jews who had completely assimilated were put to death alongside those who were deeply religious. If only one of your grandparents was Jewish, you went to the camps alongside someone whose Jewish lineage went back hundreds of years. It isn’t a question of faith. There is a distinction that gentiles make that cannot in actuality be made about Jews. If you take away my religion, I am still a Jew. Judaism is both religious and cultural. You cannot separate the two like you can, say, an Italian Catholic. Take away my sister-in-law’s Catholicism, and she is still an Italian-American. Take away my religious Judaism, and I am still a Jew. All of us know this, consciously or subconsciously. Because even if we want to no longer be Jewish, the world rarely lets us let go of our Jewishness. Hitler certainly didn’t. A lapsed Jew is still subject to the same hatred and bigotry that a religious Jew endures.

Therein lies the distinction that no other culture can claim. Therein lies our difference, our Otherness. Therein lies the reason for the continued attempts at our extinction. Therein lies my reason for taking the words forced upon Danny Pearl, and putting them out on a banner for all to see. Yes, I am a Jew. I was born a Jew, and I will die a Jew. I certainly hope I won’t die because I’m a Jew.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Blasts from the past, Bloggers | Tagged , | 4 Comments