Four more “civilians” killed by IDF

Three more terrorist-slash-“civilians” were killed by the IDF today, as well as a boy who got caught in the crossfire when the IDF tried to arrest a relative of his and were fired on.

Four Palestinians were killed Friday by Israeli forces after gunmen opened fire at troops operating in the West Bank and outside Gaza. Among those killed is an 11-year-old boy, a relative of a wanted Islamic Jihad member who was apparently caught in the crossfire.

In the village of Seida northeast of Tulkarm a special joint IDF, Border Police and Shin-Bet force conducting an arrest operation came under fire from Palestinian gunmen as they approached the home of a wanted man and a gunbattle ensued.

[…] Also Friday evening an IDF force patrolling the security fence between Israel and the Gaza Strip came under fire from two armed Palestinians, just north of the Karni crossing.

The troops then crossed some 330 feet into Gaza and killed the gunmen after a short exchange of fire. No IDF casualties were reported. The soldiers recovered AK-47 assault rifles from the gunmen’s bodies.

Officials within the Gaza battalion said the gunmen had apparently been waiting for an IDF patrol to pass by in order to attack it.

So far, AP has not picked up the story. They appear to be too busy talking about the Fatah/Hamas “protest” clashes.

Hamas security agents clashed with supporters of the rival Fatah movement Friday, firing into the air and beating journalists covering a demonstration against the Islamic militant group’s rule in the Gaza Strip.

It was the second time in recent weeks that Hamas has scuffled with Fatah protesters, a signal of possible cracks in the Islamic group’s two-month-old takeover of Gaza. Harassment of journalists and political opponents has grown increasingly common in the coastal strip.

By the way, the anarchy that’s been subdued, and the freedoms that Ismail Haniyeh and his stooges keep writing about in American op-ed pages? Not so much.

When several Hamas security men roughed up a Reuters TV cameraman and tried to confiscate his camera, protesters surrounded the Hamas men, beat them to the ground and prevented the journalist’s arrest.

The Hamas men also detained a photographer for Agence France-Presse and a cameraman for the Russian TV channel Russia Today, along with two other reporters working for local news outlets. They also broke a TV camera belonging to the Arabic-language TV network al-Arabiya.

All four detained journalists were quickly released and got their equipment back, Hamas officials and witnesses said. Later, journalists staged a protest against the crackdown.

Khaled Bolbol, one of the local reporters detained, said he was abused and ordered to speak to Hamas’ al-Aqsa television station.

But I don’t understand—the Christian Science Monitor keeps running articles that prove Hamas is moderating.

Though many observers argue that Hamas’s political agenda dictates different behavior from its days as underground opposition to the Palestinian Authority (PA), Israel’s army continues to see Hamas as a group driven by an extremist agenda. Still, a military spokesperson acknowledged that Hamas has recently resisted the kind of sustained barrages on Israeli cities that provoked escalations in the past.

“It’s a matter of interests. The interest of Hamas now is to show the world stability inside Gaza. But the stability is only visible on the outside,” says Maj. Avital Leibovich. “Take Gaza as a metaphor for something that is [being] wrapped up. When you take off the wrapping, you see something different.”

Oh, it’s the wrapping. It’s coming off. All will be revealed, certainly the moment Hamas’ Iranian masters tell them to let loose.

Posted in Gaza, palestinian politics | 1 Comment

The UN and EU: All set for Durban II

The UN World Conference on Racism, held in Durban, South Africa, just prior to 9/11, went down in the annals of UN as one of the most infamous, hideously anti-Israel events, even by UN standards. Israel and the United States walked out of the conference which, of course, did not stop the haters from continuing with their Israel-bashing agenda. In the past few years, notables at the UN have insisted that the reforms enacted would change things. Things got so bad that even Kofi Annan even noted—without sarcasm—that the UN was anti-Israel more than, well, just about anything. And Ban Ki-Moon? Well, he said that he wouldn’t allow that on his watch. Nosirree.

Yeah, Durban II is good to go. Libya has been elected to head the committee that’s planning next year’s anti-racism conference (which shall from now on be referred to by me as Durban II). And Iran has just been selected for a leadership role on the committee as well. This is all on top of the anti-Israel fest that will be hosted by the EU in just a few days:

Israel has protested to the European Parliament about plans to host a conference under the auspices of a U.N. committee for Palestinian rights, saying it was biased and anti-Israeli, a spokesman said Monday.

Israel’s ambassador to the European Union wrote to the president of the European Parliament last week urging reconsideration of plans to host the U.N. International Conference of Civilian Society in Support of Israeli-Palestinian Peace from Aug. 30-31.

The conference has been called under the auspices of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, which was established in 1975 and Israel considers anti-Israeli.

‘To put it mildly, this is not the most balanced committee in the United Nations,’ said Sagi Karni, spokesman for the Israeli mission to the European Union. ‘This committee is very biased and often their discussions are aimed at Israel-bashing.’

The committee is refusing to announce ahead of time the panel events that are occurring. Funny, that. It’s almost like they have something to hide.

What the conference will pronounce is pre-determined. Carefully pre-determined: the UN’s Palestinian Division runs a tightly-controlled operation that accredits only anti-Israel NGOs and speakers. And recently they’ve become quite clever. Without altering the virulently anti-Israel nature of their meetings, the organizers instead seek to mask their activities — under such innocent-sounding titles as “support for Israeli-Palestinian peace.” Moreover, to add credence to their cover, they invite specially approved “Israelis” — a select group of radicals who openly espouse hatred of Israel, claiming the license to do so because of their citizenship. Both tactics give conference organizers the cover they need for their allies and enablers to then use the material.

Among the speakers at the conference are Michel Warschawski, who proudly describes himself as a “well-known anti-Zionist activist.” Others speakers include Nurit Peled Elhannan, Amira Hass, Raji Sourani, Jamal Jumaa (Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign), Mohammed Khatib (Popular Committee of Bilin Coordinator), and David Shearer (OCHA). See the recent meeting in South Africa, featuring Gideon Levy and others, to get a sense of what to expect in Brussels.

None of the radical Israeli Jews at the Brussels conference represents even a tiny segment of the Israeli Jewish population. So it’s like holding a conference on U.S.-Islamic rapprochement and inviting John Walker Lindh—the American who joined the Taliban—to represent America’s position. Technically, Walker is as American as Warschawski and Hass are Israeli. But only a scoundrel or a fool would treat either exercise as anything but a sham.

But the two committees, though united in their hatred for Israel, are actually two different organizations. Here’s information on the one with Libya and Iran:

Despite its numerous calls for Israel’s destruction, and repeated denials of the Holocaust, Iran has been selected by the United Nations for a leading position in a committee that will plan the 2009 UN World Conference against Racism.

The planning committee, which will meet for the first time in Geneva on August 27, will be made up of an inner circle of 20 UN member-states, to be headed by Libya.

Of course, the UN is in hear-no-evil mode:

A spokesperson for the UN’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights confirmed to Ynetnews that “Iran is one of 20 States who are members of the bureau of the Preparatory Committee,” but added that “Iran does not occupy a leading role.”

When asked how a state which openly denies the Holocaust could find itself in such a role, the spokesperson said: “The Preparatory Committee is an inter-governmental body, meaning States were chosen freely to sit on the Prep-Com. It is the Member-States who decide.”

And here’s how they did it: The Arab bloc, which effectively controls the UN. Funny, the Arab bloc never gets mentioned by people like Mearsheimer and Walt. And yet, it is powerful enough to keep Israel the world’s pariah, year after year, and to name Palestinian refugees separate and above all of the rest of the world’s refugees, giving them a decades-old renewable mandate, and declaring even their American-born grandchildren refugees. Anne Bayefsky has been keeping an eye on the UN for years:

Bayefsky explained that the structure of the UN’s Human Rights Council has effectively been taken over by the countries of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), allowing Iran and Libya access to key roles.

“The states were selected by the UN Human Rights Council and the Council is controlled by the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The majority of seats on the Council are held by the African and Asian regional groups and the OIC has a majority of seats on each of these groups. Western states do not have the votes to block this outrage and it is another example of the hijacking that has occurred of the UN’s lead human rights agency,” she said.

The conference is going to be every bit as much an outrage as its predecessor. Guaranteed. The foxes are guarding the henhouse. Egypt is on the committee, too. That would be the selfsame nation that’s been murdering Sudanese refugees.

No way this turns out well.

Posted in Israel Derangement Syndrome, World | 5 Comments

Fifty things about me, part 5

Part one. Part two. Part three. Part four. Part six.

33. I like Jackie Chan movies. And some Jet Li movies, too. In fact, when I come across them late at night while channel-surfing, I have been known to actually rent them so I can see the whole film.

34. Pursuant to the above, I think Asian men are hot. I have a thing for guys with that epicanthic fold. What can I say? If I ever find a single Jewish Asian man, I will be in absolute heaven.

35. I hate being tickled. I hate people coming up behind me and putting their hands over my eyes and saying, “Guess who”? I hate kids hiding behind things and jumping out and yelling “Boo!” I blame all of these things on my brothers, except for the tickling thing. That, I blame on being a control freak. But my brothers used to hide behind things and under things and around things so much while I was growing up that I sometimes had to be pulled off them after striking back for being frightened. (That was when my older brother hid underneath my quilt, which was rumpled because I’d already been in bed and got out for some reason. He jumped out and yelled “Boo!”, I started crying and punching him. Brothers.) I actually have to disappoint every child I know who becomes a regular part of my life, because kids loving jumping out and yelling “Boo!” The nice thing is, they do understand when you tell them you really don’t like it.

36. My family moved about every three years from the time I was five until I was nearly fourteen. I went to six different schools from K-12. We weren’t military brats. My mother was divorced. In the days when nobody had divorced parents.

37. Due to the fact that I was the new kid in school every three years, I got into a lot of fights as a child. Actually, that wasn’t the reason. The reason is because, well, I fought a lot as a child, and my coping skill for being the new kid was to wait for someone to pick on me—and somebody always did, boy or girl—and meet them after school. We’d fight, I’d win, nobody would pick on me any more. I learned much later in life that there were other ways of coping with being the new kid in school. Too late. Oh, there was the little matter of beating up anyone who picked on my brothers, too. I was a scrapper as a child.

38. Sometimes, even as a grownup, I think that a good fight is still the way to settle some issues. I know, I know. I haven’t raised a fist in anger since I was thirteen. But that doesn’t mean I don’t want to, sometimes.

39. My younger brother and I were picked up by the MP’s at Fort Wadsworth one year when we sneaked onto the base to watch the NYC Marathon start. Our dad was running in it, and that was the first year you couldn’t stay on the Verrazano Bridge to see them off, because it got too big. I was over eighteen, and scared to death this was going to go on my record. Dave was a wiseass who, when asked where he lived, gave our address, and then said, “But I have a summer home in Newark.” One of the MP’s, obviously from the area, laughed. His partner, a girl from Kansas or some such state, looked puzzled. I was not pleased, and told David to be serious and shut up, because if anyone was going to jail, it was going to be me. The MP’s just took our names and information and then dumped us off outside the base and told us not to come back.

40. Judy Garland is probably my all-time favorite actress and singer. I’ve seen nearly every movie she’s ever done (minus a bunch of the teenage “Let’s put on a show!” films), and got into arguments with one of my early boyfriends, who insisted Streisand was better. I saved our relationship by deciding to declare Streisand the best living singer, and Garland the best deceased. But I didn’t mean it. I was lying. Garland was superior to Streisand vocally (politics don’t come into play here; Barbra is a phenomenal singer, but not as good as Judy was). Oh, and I liked Judy before it was cool. Comes from growing up with a mother who always watched movie musicals on TV.

And one more post ought to do it.

Posted in Life | 9 Comments

It’s terrorist season

The JPost has an anaylsis of why we’ve seen so many successful attacks on terrorists in Gaza lately. Here’s a hint: Having an actual military man directing military operations seems to be a bit help.

The recent escalation stems from a number of factors, the most significant of which is Israel’s new defense minister, Ehud Barak, who, with only two months on the job, has given the army a longer leash in combating terrorism in the Gaza Strip.

Barak has said in closed-door meetings that he does not believe Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas will succeed in gaining control over the Strip. Barak has also expressed scepticism regarding the possibility of reaching an agreement through the ongoing talks between Abbas and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

Unlike his predecessor, Amir Peretz, who was a strong proponent of the policy of restraint vis-à-vis the Kassam rocket fire from Gaza, Barak has ordered the IDF to take a tougher stance in responding to the attacks and has allowed the IDF to take greater risks when operating inside the Strip.

Where Peretz would have held back the green light for an air strike that could end in civilian casualties, Barak is more inclined to say yes. He has also ordered the army to use additional and riskier intelligence-collecting methods when preparing for targeted killings and strikes against Kassam rocket squads.

It seems that Barak has unleashed the IDF more than anyone in recent years.

The IDF’s Southern Command is under orders to use all available defensive and offensive measures to prevent the rocket attacks, and has carved out something of a “security zone” two kilometers into Gaza, the depth it has been authorized by Barak and Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi to operate within.

According to military sources, the relatively high number of deaths from IDF strikes this past week is also due to chance and the defense establishment’s newfound ability to quickly “close circles” – military jargon for translating and utilizing real-time intelligence in immediate operations.

I think the word isn’t “chance.” I think it is “opportunity.” The IDF is constantly looking for terrorists, and when you are looking for something, and find it, it isn’t luck. It’s method, surveillance, information-gathering, and more. Perhaps the “chance” part came in on there being no one around the jihadis car, but still—that’s what the IDF waits for before ordering a strike.

Of course, there’s also this bad news:

At the moment, the army is holding back from initiating a large-scale operation into Gaza, despite intelligence indicating that Hamas and Islamic Jihad are smuggling unprecedented amounts of weaponry into Gaza. In the end, however, OC Southern Command Maj.-Gen. Yoav Galant’s assumption is that there will be a need for an operation in the Strip to curb the Hamas military buildup.

There’s going to be a war. The question is, with whom, and how many fronts will there be?

Posted in Gaza, Israel | 7 Comments

The Michael Vick t-shirt contest

Okay, I’ve figured out what I think I would like to get printed up if I decide to go to the courthouse and tell Michael Vick how much I think he sucks:

“Give Michael Vick the same justice he gave his dogs.”

What do you think?

So where do I find out what time he shows up downtown? It’s a 20 minute drive for me, and I am really, really, really thinking about going. This guy is a total slimeball, and he thinks that he deserves to go back to football after he serves his year or 18 months. I think he needs to be banned for life. I hope to God that the Commonwealth of Virginia throws state charges at him on top of the federal charges. Just read this WaPo article and tell me he doesn’t deserve at least five years. Maybe ten.

And it isn’t just dogs they kill. They use cats and kittens and small dogs and guinea pigs while training their dogs. I read recently that someone dropped off something like 60 kittens at a North Carolina animal shelter, most probably for use in dogfighting. The good news is the bastards are running scared. The better news would be that the major breeders and ringleaders were all shut down.

Vick’s friends testified that Vick himself killed—brutally—several dogs that were no longer “of use” to him. And on cue, the NAACP comes along to call Vick’s case “persecution.” This guy is a freaking moron.

“In some instances, I believe Michael Vick has received more negative press than if he would’ve killed a human being,” White said. “The way he is being persecuted, he wouldn’t have been persecuted that much had he killed somebody.”

[…] White also said he didn’t understand the uproar over dogfighting, when hunting deer and other animals is perfectly acceptable.

Yeah, they’re practically interchangeable. There’s no difference between training dogs to kill one another and hunting a deer. None at all. There’s no difference between Michael Vick pouring water all over a dog and then electrocuting it, and some hunter shooting a deer dead with a gun. None of that matters, though. For this freak, it’s all about the football.

“As a society, we should aid in his rehabilitation and welcome a new Michael Vick back into the community without a permanent loss of his career in football,” said R.L. White, president of the group’s Atlanta chapter. “We further ask the NFL, Falcons, and the sponsors not to permanently ban Mr. Vick from his ability to bring hours of enjoyment to fans all over this country.”

White said the Falcons quarterback made a mistake and should be allowed to prove he has learned from that mistake.

Bullshit. When you forget to pay your bills on time, that’s a mistake. When you lock your keys inside your car, that’s a mistake. When you purchase a house and set up a kennel for the sole purpose of watching dogs tear each other apart, that’s not “a mistake.” Vick didn’t accidentally fund and build the kennel, and then accidentally set up the dogfights, and then accidentally kill the dogs that weren’t of any use to him. None of those were mistakes, except in the context that lawbreaking and cruelty to animals are not the right things to do.

The cult of victimology strikes again. Watch for this guy to play the race card if Vick gets state charges added to his federal sentence.

Posted in Cats, Miscellaneous | 14 Comments

Mahmoud Abbas, moderate, peacemaker, and LIAR

The so-called moderate, Mahmoud Abbas, with whom the Israelis are supposed to be moving forward towards final-status issues, issued a statement about the number of terrorists killed by the IDF yesterday:

A spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Wednesday condemned “the Israeli escalation, the killing crimes and the assassinations against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

“The assassination of 13 civilians in one day, including innocent children, is a massacre which cannot be justified. This escalation casts doubt on Israel’s real intentions regarding the peace process, which is first of all expressed in halting all violent activities, attacks and assassinations,” the spokesman said in a statement.

Let’s break down the “massacre,” shall we? This is a list of who the 13 “civilians” were:

  • Six Hamas members killed by a missile strike after launching kassams into Israel
  • Three members of Islamic Jihad approaching the border fence
  • One member of the PFLP who fired on IDF soldiers in Nablus
  • Two children killed by IDF missiles right after kassams were launched
  • One senior Hamas commander killed in Gaza while heading with a group of armed men towards the border fence.

By my count, that makes 11 terrorists and two children used by terrorists to help perform terrorist acts against Israel. Even stretching the word “civilian” to its limit will not fit. Dupes, maybe. Child soldiers, perhaps. The responsibility for their deaths is the terrorists’.

The deals being made with Abbas will turn out no differently from the deals made with Arafat. There has been no reform whatsoever in the PA. There is no real wish for peace, only for a regrouping and a re-arming. And statements like this, which doubtless will be denied by Abbas tomorrow, simply prove that there is still no real peace partner for Israel.

Posted in Israel, palestinian politics | 3 Comments

Levels within levels to this story

One one level, it’s black humor: A crematorium was set on fire. (You mean a crematorium can be burned? Who knew?) On other levels, this is a story that just feels—wrong.

A fire broke out Wednesday evening at a crematorium located in the community of Hibat Tzion in the Sharon region. Firefighters dispatched to the scene extinguished the flames; no injuries were reported.

Signs of forced entry were apparent, increasing suspicions that the fire was not accidental.

See, the black humor is everywhere in this story, because I’m thinking the line above me is a Duh! moment.

The location of the crematorium, the first ever to be built in Israel, was revealed Wednesday morning by an Orthodox newspaper Kav Itonut Datit, which is distributed in the city of Bnei Brak.

Until now the funeral home that owns the crematorium, Alei Shalechet, kept the location secret fearing it would be attacked by elements opposed to cremation.

After hearing of the fire, Meshi Zahav, who visited the crematorium on Tuesday, told Ynet that he “blesses the person who (set the crematorium on fire)”, adding that ZAKA has been fighting against the cremation of Jewish people’s bodies all over the world and that it was “inconceivable that this custom exists in Israel”.

Presence revealed Wednesday, religious Jews protest, set on fire Wednesday night. Check. But here is where that black humor comes right back in:

“The purpose of the crematorium is to burn, so now – an eye for an eye – it has fulfilled its purpose,” he said.

I like this guy’s sense of humor. I’m not in any way condoning the destruction of someone’s business. But I find this story a tiny bit amusing, in a bizarre sort of way.

Posted in Evil Meryl, Religion | Comments Off on Levels within levels to this story

Attention, finance geeks

Okay, now I’m starting to worry. Two subprime mortage lenders closed shop in the last week. Word is that it’s going to be harder to get a mortgage. And this is occurring just about the time I am finally going to be able to buy a condo or a townhouse of my very own.

The on-staff track continues apace, and odds are very high I will be a member of Northern Virginia Company in a matter of weeks. I am paying down the debt that I accrued from, well, living while unemployed and underemployed. I wish I could tell you that my credit debt has at least some very cool toys to show for it, but I’m still watching TV on my ten-year-old Panasonic 36-inch TV that’s been repaired once by Panasonic (warranty) and once by a repairman. The laptop I own was effectively given me by my mother, who came into a little money three years ago. My biggest non-essential item expenditure in the last few years was my new digital camera, and you know, I deserved it.

So I’m paying down debt, and that will continue until sometime next year. Then I’ll finally be able to start saving money towards a down payment. I don’t think I’ll be able to swing more than ten percent, what with the lack of savings right now, unless the last of my tech stocks suddenly goes back up to what it was worth when I bought it. And in spite of all the debt and under- and unemployment, my credit record is quite good. I almost never paid late on the bills that count you late if you’re a second overdue (e.g., credit cards), and when I did, I made sure to get the late fee and mark stricken from the record. (It’s a simple phone call, and if you have no late payments in the last six months, they’ll waive the fee.) Last month, I visited a local company that’s building townhouses in my neighborhood (and which is probably part of the subprime problem, because they wanted me to sign on the dotted line right then and there, my credit was good, honest!), and had them check my credit score. It’s high enough that I don’t have to worry about getting a mortgage, they said.

But here’s what I am worried about: How many more lenders are going to go belly-up, and how much harder will that make it for me to get a mortgage loan? That, and how high the interest rates will go, are starting to make me worry quite a bit.

So, finance people: Is it time to worry yet? Or should I just continue with what I’m doing and see where things are six months from now, when I was planning on getting serious about shopping for a home? Because if this keeps up, I’m going to have to move out to the sticks if I want to own something, and, well, I hate the sticks. No offense to people who live there, but I’m a city girl, more or less.

Posted in Life | 16 Comments

Really evil thought about Hurricane Dean

President Bush offered Mexico help to Mexican areas devastated by Hurricane Dean.

I suggest that there are huge numbers of Mexicans with the knowledge and skills needed to rebuild stricken areas.

Just send ’em some of the illegals in the American construction industry.

Posted in Evil Meryl | 2 Comments

Shire Network News 100th episode!

This week we present our 100th episode of Shire Network News. To celebrate the occasion, Tom Paine, Brian of London, and I got together over the Internet (because we are all internet geeks) and talked about SNN, our participation, and strip clubs. Yes, really. We also got Lair Simon to come out of semi-retirement, and he is at his fiery best.

If you haven’t listened to SNN yet, you may want to start with this one. You don’t need an iPod. All you need is some kind of media player. It’s just as easy to download the audio file directly and listen to it on Windows Media Player in the background as it is to do it any other way. If your computer has speakers, you can hear our podcast.

Right-click over the link that says “100 Podcast Hits A Century And Celebrates With A Threesome #100” and select “Save Link As” and you’re on your way to becoming a dedicated SNN listener.

Posted in Podcasts | Comments Off on Shire Network News 100th episode!

The Moebius Man

Snoopy wrote this
I was hesitating for a while about the title for this post. How do you call a person who sees only one side of a multi-dimensional problem? One-trick pony? One-sided coin? Obsessed? Then I recalled what was shown to me many years ago in the classroom: the Moebius Ring (look for “Escher’s ants” on the page). Like the ants in that animation, some people are revolving endlessly on the same circular road of habitual love/hate, coming to a degree of mental laziness where they are unable to discern anything that exists beyond their single track. Their highly developed selective vision will filter out all that clashes with their simple world view.

Now, of course, Moebius people are not endemic to one specific political wing (and I shall never tire to repeat it). But for this post I have chosen a specimen of the anti-Israeli side.

It’s a dirty job, but somebody has to do it!

This is the way one of the Jonathan Cook’s supporters characterized his latest outburst of hate on CiF (yep, the Guardian again, how did you guess?). And the supporter is absolutely right – this is an exceedingly dirty job Cook is doing, no buts about it.

The gist of the article The propaganda machine is that poor Mr Cook and his colleagues in the good fight against Zionism are being relentlessly and viciously attacked by the Hasbara cohorts. And the one-sided vision is displayed in the article in all its glory. Take this:

Volcanic outbursts of hatred on Cif greet anyone who objects to Israel’s policies…

It would have been funny if it were not so pitiful: anyone who have invested half an hour of his/her time in browsing Middle East (or anything else, for that matter) – related articles will immediately know that volcanic outbursts of hatred greet anyone who supports Israel as well – and to a much higher intensity. But remember – we are talking about the Moebius Man here.

I am not sure if any other country or cause encourages this kind of mainly voluntary propaganda work, but I am sure that no other country or cause has the human resources that Israel can rely on to carry it out. There are thousands of people sitting at their computers ready to pounce.

You see how scary the picture is? Thousands – literally thousands of Hasbara grunts, coordinated by octopus-like tentacles of the Elders (right, let’s not forget the Elders) and ready to pounce. Indeed, one gets heebie-jeebies imagining this. Of course one should not mind the myriads of happy fellow travelers infesting The Guardian, the Daily Kos, the Huffington Post, the Counterpunch, MPAC, Electronic Intifada… the list is endless, and I am not even mentioning the Muslim countries press (get your inkling here) dubbing in pure antisemitism and the neo-Nazi sites and… ad infinitum. But remember – we are talking about the Moebius Man here. And one who is not above profiting from many of the media outfits mentioned explicitly or implicitly above – just take a look at his visiting card. Truly a man whose freedom of speech is being curtailed…

And of course, the poor injured freedom fighter does not forget to push that straw man of “I am being called an anti-Semite”. Really, my heart goes out to him. How about “dork”, Jonathan? And a pitiful one to boot, not above some hypocrisy? Take this complaint, for instance:

Other posters simply lied, in the great tradition of hasbara. Several suggested I had written that Rafik Hariri was killed by Israel. I hadn’t, and you can check my website to be sure.

Indeed, legally speaking, our man is correct. But in an article titled Syria: Convenient but Unlikely Fall Guy for Gemayel’s Death that mixes Gemayel’s and Hariri’s murders, Middle East politics and whatnot (thanks to the peculiar Cook’s habit to make a hash of every topic), he says:

Unlike my colleagues, I do not claim to know who killed Gemayel. Maybe Syria was behind the shooting. Maybe, in Lebanon’s notoriously intrigue-ridden and fractious political system, someone with a grudge against Gemayel – even from within his own party – pulled the trigger. Or maybe, Israel once again flexed the muscles of its long arm in Lebanon.

No surprise, then, that some people may have mixed one semi-libelous statement with another, quite similar.

Speaking about libels – take a look at this quote from here:

Several Israeli armaments factories and storage depots have been built close by Arab communities in the north of Israel, possibly in the hope that by locating them there Arab regimes will be deterred from attacking Israel’s enormous armory. In other words, the inhabitants of several of Israel’s Arab towns and villages have been turned into collective human shields – protection for Israel’s war machine.

That Israel is one of the most populated corners in the world and that existence of military installations of all kinds everywhere is a sad background of our existence – these facts do not enter the one-dimensional brain of the author. The shteitl where I happen to be living, is quite far from the centers of Arab population in Israel, but is surrounded on all sides by this or that military installation. Should I check my DNA for presence of Arab blood? But remember – we are talking about the Moebius Man here, one who will not be deterred by mere facts.

And since facts are mentioned (really out of tune with the fact-less article in question), one must not overlook the hilarious introduction to that article:

Time For a Champion of Truth to Speak Up

More than a little uncomfortably, I find myself with a bone to pick with one of our finest champions of humanitarian values and opponents of war.

You may not believe this, but it is true – the words above are dedicated to Fisk! One of the most ridiculous bloody liars of partisan journalism serves as a shining beacon to our hero, who in his Moebius state does not even realize where this act of worship puts him…

So intense is Cook’s love/hate affair with Palestine/Israel that he is ready to clash with HRW, an outfit that has definitely no love lost for Israel. He is going out all the way to prove that, while the Zionists intentionally and blood-thirstily killed civilians in Lebanon, Hezbollah targeted only military installations. And get told off by HRW for his trouble.

Well, that is enough, although there are more wonderful, albeit laughable, passages in the article.

Just as a funny detail – the last paragraph, where Cook is frothing about the Camera:

Camera has a section dedicated to “naming and shaming” some of the most influential journalists writing about the Middle East.

Of course, being a humble person, Cook forgot to mention his own puny self. But the fact is that he is also named and shamed here, quite deservedly too, having his ignorance displayed for all to see.

Accidentally, that supporter I mentioned in the beginning, titled his post “Jonathon Cook staves off the zionist hordes“. What can I say: the Zionist hordes can definitely do with more jkcooks – so pathetic and ridiculous that they do the Zionist’s work for them.

So, I have finished my Hasbara pounce for now. Time for a rest…

Cross-posted on SimplyJews.

Posted in Israel Derangement Syndrome | 1 Comment

The narrative changes

Funny how over the last few days, the IDF scored more than a few hits on terrorists, and the media mostly ignored it—because the terrorists were effectively caught red-handed launching rockets at Israeli towns. There was no “poor, poor, pitiful Pals” narrative to go with the story—just naked attemped murder on Israeli civilians.

Until yesterday. Yesterday, the IDF killed two boys when it launched its own rockets at a rocket-launching crew—and it turns out, the narrative is a little different. You see, Palestinians have been using children to retrieve their rocket launchers after firing kassams at Israel, because they know that if the IDF sees that there are children nearby, they will hold their fire. It’s a common practice, long known by the IDF, and long hidden from the public by the AP, Reuters, or any other major news media. And while the current news stories actually acknowledge this practice, the media are using weasel-wording and their tried-and-true practice of burying that fact far enough into the story as to not make your average newspaper’s “World” section, which carries only the first three to five paragraphs of a story, and sometimes only the first two.

The AP:

Israeli forces killed six Palestinians, two of them children, in the West Bank and Gaza Tuesday and early Wednesday, Israeli and Palestinian officials said.

The Israeli army said ground forces fired at gunmen who approached the Israel-Gaza border fence Tuesday. The Islamic Jihad group said three militants on a mission against Israel were killed.

[…] Later in the day, the army said troops targeted two figures spotted near a rocket launcher in an area of northern Gaza where a rocket had been fired into Israel earlier.

The fire killed a 10-year-old and a 12-year-old who were members of the same extended family, said doctor Muawiya Hassanin of the Palestinian Health Ministry. Another 10-year-old was seriously wounded and six other people were lightly hurt, all of them civilians, Hassanin said.

The army said Palestinian rocket teams have been known to send young children to retrieve rocket launchers after firing.

“In light of the reports, it seems likely that this was the case here,” the army said in a statement.

Notice the lack of a name for the army spokesperson, as is nearly always the case with any report from an Israeli regarding a “militant” strike. Notice also you have the doctor’s name. There is nearly always a named Palestinian spokesperson, and often, the victims names, ages, and quotes from families are part of the AP and Reuters stories.

Meantime, this is the very last paragraph in the AP narrative, and please remember that the last paragraph of a news article is always considered to be the most cuttable:

Israel frequently carries out ground and air attacks in an effort to stop near-daily rocket fire. Palestinians fired three rockets into Israel on Tuesday including one that hit an empty kindergarten in the town of Sderot near Gaza, the army said.

This is the CNN narrative:

On Tuesday, Israeli attacks launched at what Israel said were Palestinians involved in firing missiles into Israel from Gaza killed as many as four people, including two children, Palestinian sources said.

There were conflicting reports about how many people were killed in the initial attack, an air strike. In the second attack, Hamas security sources said Israeli forces had killed two children.

[…] In the second attack, the Israeli army said it launched an attack on two Palestinian militants standing near a rocket launcher in northern Gaza, in an area from which a Qassam rocket was fired onto Israel just a short while before.

Hamas security sources said the Israelis hit and killed two children, both age 11, with what seemed to be a ground-to-ground missile.

An Israel Defense Forces representative did not specify what weapons were used. The IDF did not immediately respond to the Hamas accusation that it had killed two children.

Note the boldface words, and please note that there are no such weasel words on Hamas spokesmen. See the CNN bias in action: Israelis lie, Hamas terrorists speak the truth. Subtle, but there. And if you were reading this story from another planet, you’d think that Hamas was the trustworthy source, and the IDF was the organization that didn’t want to speak to reporters or give out any information.

Now Reuters:

Israeli missiles killed three Palestinian militants and two young boys in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday, Palestinian officials said, ratcheting up tensions two months after Hamas seized control of the territory.

Yes, they’re starting off with the whole overarching “ratcheting up tensions” meme: Israel is causing the tensions because they aimed for terrorists firing rockets into Israel, and caught two kids who were being used as human shields for the terrorists.

The fifth and sixth paragraphs give the Israeli side of the story, again from an unnamed Israeli spokesman, because personalizing the Israelis makes them more human.

An army spokesman said that militant groups “often use children as part of their operations” to retrieve launchers and equipment following rocket attacks.

“In this recent event it seems likely that this was the case,” he said.

The BBC version doesn’t so much as bother to contain context, only the fact that children were killed. And oh yeah, in case you miss the point, here’s the headline:

Children killed in Israeli strike
Two Palestinian children have been killed and three others wounded by Israeli forces in northern Gaza, Palestinian health officials have said.

The dead boys, aged 13 and 14, were close to an area from which militants had been firing rockets at Israel, the officials said.

Israel said its ground forces had fired upon two people who were seen near a rocket launcher near Beit Hanoun.

I’m guessing the BBC got the exact same statements as the other news services, and yet, they neglect to point out the crucial fact that young boys are used to retrieve the launchers after they are fired so that the IDF can’t get a bead on the terrorists launching them. That’s an unpleasant fact the BBC will probably never publish.

If you read the full story, the BBC details four separate strikes, all against terrorists launching attacks on Israel. But the headline and lede are all about the children. Because that is the narrative about Israel: Terrorists killed by the IDF don’t count as newsworthy unless there are also civilians hurt. Because the narrative is that all Israel does is murder civilians. Never mind the incredible care Israel takes to prevent civilian casualties. Never mind that the terrorists who were killed by the IDF were gunning for civilians, or sending rockets at kindergartens, or trying to murder noncombatants—even when the terrorists groups admit openly that their men were trying to kill Israelis, the narrative is always, always on the damage that Israel does to civilians.

It simply amazes me that, given the anti-Israel media bias, Israel isn’t even more hated by the world than she is.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Israeli Double Standard Time, Media Bias | 2 Comments

It isn’t raining rain you know, it’s raining rockets

Rockets continue to fall in Sderot. And the world media continues to ignore this fact.

Ynet:

Palestinians in north Gaza fired two Qassams toward Israel on Tuesday. One rocket struck a vacant Na’amat daycare center in the western Negev city of Sderot, causing slight damage to the building. A woman living nearby suffered from shock as a result of the attack.

The second Qassam landed near a gas station outside the city; no injuries or damage were reported.

UPI:

Hamas harrasses Israel with rockets
Six Hamas guerrillas were reported killed by Israeli troops who opened fire on their vehicle near the Gaza village of al-Bereij, IsraelNN.com said.

The six were believed to have been involved in an earlier launch of Kassam rockets at nearby Israeli towns.

Scattered incidents of Kassams and mortar rounds being lobbed into Israel from Gaza continued Monday.

The LA Times, in the last two paragraphs of a lengthy article on the EU cutoff of aid to Gaza:

In other developments, Israeli forces killed six Hamas militants in the central Gaza Strip late Monday.

An Israeli military spokeswoman said the men, who were traveling together in a car when attacked by ground forces, had fired mortar rounds into southern Israel.

Israel said Palestinian militants had fired 40 mortar rounds and crude Kassam rockets from Gaza in the last four days.

Are there any articles that cover the constant fall of rockets into Israel outside of the Israeli media?

Nope.

When the world media does mention the rockets, it’s always in an offhand manner, like the UPI saying Hamas is “harassing” Israel with rocket fire. Rocket fire. These rockets have murdered people. But Hamas is using them to “harass.”

Or they are called “crude, homemade rockets,” as if they’re built by the local soapbox derby club that decided to branch out into rocketry—not by trained and meticulous terrorists in workshops that methodically load machined metal tubes with explosives and ball bearings.

What biased media?

Posted in AP Media Bias, Israel, Media Bias | 3 Comments

One dead, three dead, ten dead terrorists

You have to like these numbers.

Six in one blow:

A missile fired from an Israeli aircraft killed six Hamas operatives travelling in a car in central Gaza on Monday, Palestinian officials said. The military said they had been targeted as participants in terror activities.

Three more:

An Israeli aircraft fired at gunmen east of Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on Tuesday, the army said. According to witnesses, at least three people were killed, all of them members of the al-Quds Brigades, the Islamic Jihad’s military wing.

Military sources said that the gunmen were members of a cell which used to fire at combat engineering forces operating near the fence in the past few weeks.

And one from the PFLP:

Israeli troops shot and killed a Palestinian gunman in an operation in the West Bank city of Nablus before dawn Tuesday, the army and Palestinian doctors said.

The soldiers operating in the al-Ein refugee camp saw a Palestinian gunman who fired at them before they returned fire and hit him, the army said.

Palestinian doctors said a member of an offshoot of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine was killed with a bullet to the head.

And the lesson, boys and girls? Ten fewer Palestinian prisoners to trade. Ten fewer would-be murderers of Israelis. Ten fewer men to fire rockets, launch attacks, and otherwise terrorize Jews.

Posted in Israel, Terrorism | 4 Comments

Got a Michael Vick jersey to get rid of?

People are finding good uses for them.

The Atlanta Humane Society said they are receiving donations from across the country — and you’ll never guess what people are sending.

More than a dozen Michael Vick jerseys have been sent to AHS, and they are putting them to good use.

[…] “At first we were like, ‘I wonder what we’re going to use this for,” said P.J. Smith with AHS.

And the jerseys kept coming. About a dozen or so jerseys were sent from people wanting to make good from a bad situation. In fact, the Humane Society is getting flooded with e-mails about Vick.

So what are volunteers doing with the jerseys?

“We discovered like any donation we get, any shirt or towel, we put it to good use here at Atlanta Humane Society. We’re always using things to clean kennels, use for bedding and stuff like that,” said Smith.

Did she say cleaning kennels?

“We’re not showing any favoritism to these jerseys, they go into our general rotation of towels,” Smith said.

One dog is using his Vick jersey as a pillow.

Posted in Juvenile Scorn | 5 Comments