Sticks and stones, Palestinian edition

In January 1998 when Binyamin Netanyahu was serving his first term as President and Bill Clinton was President of the United States, Clinton was pressuring Netanyahu to cede territory to the Palestinian Authority. Netanyahu refused until the Arafat and the Palestinian Authority started observing the agreements they signed. These points had been reaffirmed after the Hebron Accords in a Note for the Record. Among other provisions, the note demanded:

Preventing incitement and hostile propaganda, as specified in Article XXII of the Interim Agreement

Here’s the relevant text of THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN INTERIM AGREEMENT

28 Sep 1995

CHAPTER 4 – COOPERATION

ARTICLE XXII
Relations between Israel and the Council

1. Israel and the Council shall seek to foster mutual understanding and tolerance and shall accordingly abstain from incitement, including hostile propaganda, against each other and, without derogating from the principle of freedom of expression, shall take legal measures to prevent such incitement by any organizations, groups or individuals within their jurisdiction.

2. Israel and the Council will ensure that their respective educational systems contribute to the peace between the Israeli and Palestinian peoples and to peace in the entire region, and will refrain from the introduction of any motifs that could adversely affect the process of reconciliation.

Note the date. Yitzchak Rabin was still alive and yet Clinton who recently mourned the death of Yitzchak Rabin treated Netanyahu as if he were making some new uncalled for demands on the Palestinian Authority.

The incitement still has not stopped. Clinton is no longer President but Netanyahu is again Prime Minister. Once again, Netanyahu is demanding that the Palestinians observe past agreements, by publishing an incitement index. (via Israel Matzav)

The [incitement] meter comprises four central components: clear incitement to violence; an atmosphere that encourages violence and terror; incitement to hatred, demonization and failure to create an environment for positive progress.

The ratings are based on analysis of institutionalized Palestinian media and Palestinians schoolbooks and remarks of senior Palestinian Authority officials.

According to the Prime Minister’s Office:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that, “Achieving an historic peace with the Palestinian people requires a change of approach by the [Palestinian] Authority and the recognition of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish People. Just as in Israel there is no denial of the other side, so we expect the Palestinians to act likewise and to educate for peace.”

Check this out and see why 15 years later, this is still an issue.

For all those who insist that Israel do more for peace, it’s worth asking why they don’t condemn the Palestinians for failing to make good on so many of their commitments over the past 17 years. Incitement is just one of those failures.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time, palestinian politics | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Lasik office things

Thing 1: The most annoying test for Lasik surgery? Putting these papery things in my eyes (yes, really) to test if my eye were dry (yes, really). “Well, they’re drying NOW,” I told the tech, what with her sticking paper in my eyes.

Thing 2: My friends in NJ have four tickets to the Pee-Wee Herman Broadway show, and I’d like them to sell the tickets so they can come to my birthday party that weekend. They’re amenable to that. The tickets are for the Saturday, Nov. 20 matinee. If you’re interested, leave a comment here and I’ll get you in touch with each other.

Thing 3: While I was sitting in the office with those paper things in my eyes, all I could think of was the old Cheech & Chong routine where they’re changing channels on late-night TV and come across an old, horrible movie where one guy is torturing a captive. “Oh, wow, man—they stuck it in his eye!”

Thing 4: The techs at my doctor’s office call stink bugs “Fred bugs.” I didn’t ask why, I was just astonished at the size of the giant stink bug that scared my personal tech out of her office and caused her to warn me not to go in there. WAY bigger than the stink bugs I’ve seen in Richmond.

Posted in Life | 2 Comments

Clinton: nostalgic for a past that never was

In the weeks following the assassination of Yitzchak Rabin, Israel handed over control of six cities to the Palestinian Authority. The New York Times reported at the time.

For Mr. Abu-Ghdeib, a local wallpaper dealer who had enlisted in the police, the building carried added significance, for it was there that he had been imprisoned by the Israelis.

“I shook the door of the cell where I was held,” he said today. “It made my hair stand on end. I saw the place where they had beaten me. I had dreamt of freedom, and today I feel free.”

Mr. Abu-Ghdeib, who had been jailed in Nablus and elsewhere in the 1970’s for taking part in weapons training and a grenade attack on Israeli soldiers, joined the several hundred Palestinian police officers, whose arrival today from the self-rule enclave of Jericho was met by ecstatic throngs.

Tens of thousands of people spilled into streets covered with brightly colored banners and pennants in the largest outpouring of jubilation since Israel began withdrawing its troops last month from West Bank cities and villages under an agreement signed in September. Most of the pullout will be complete by January, ending Israeli rule over much of the West Bank.

And two weeks later:

Under a final cascade of stones, Israeli troops withdrew today from Ramallah, completing a pullout from six West Bank cities and their neighboring villages in preparation for Palestinian elections next month.

“Out!,” shouted youths as a column of Israeli jeeps moved away from a police station downtown, trailed by scores of cheering Palestinians. As stones pitched by the crowd arched toward the receding vehicles, Palestinian officers entered the station, raised a flag and greeted the throng from the roof, waving their rifles.

The scene was similar to others played out this month across the West Bank, and it set the stage for Palestinian elections planned for January 20.

Under an Israeli-Palestinian accord signed in September, Israeli forces have left six cities and more than 400 villages and towns in recent weeks, ending 28 years of control over much of the West Bank.

Then a few weeks later the terror started:

A six-month lull in terror attacks in Israel was shattered in the early morning today when militant Muslim suicide bombers detonated pipe bombs in Jerusalem and Ashkelon, killing 25 people and wounding 77, some critically. Among the dead were two Americans.

Messages received by news organizations said the attacks were an act of vengeance for the death of Yahya Ayyash, a Palestinian known as “the Engineer” for the bombing attacks he organized in recent years against Israel. Mr. Ayyash, who belonged to an armed wing of the militant Islamic movement Hamas called the Qassam Brigades, was killed by a booby-trapped mobile telephone on Jan. 5.

The terror lasted for about two weeks killing over 60 people.

No. 18 buses have been traveling across this tense city largely empty since two recent suicide bombers killed 45 people on the line. Today, as Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani expressed his solidarity with Israel by climbing aboard the 6:30 A.M. run trailed by staff members and a gaggle of television crews, the problem was finding space.

“Who in their right mind is going to get on this bus?” said Cristyne Lategano, the Mayor’s spokeswoman, surveying the mob of photographers, bodyguards and aides wrestling around the Mayor and his host, Mayor Ehud Olmert of Jerusalem. About 10 regular riders found seats in the commotion, only to flee when it became clear that the driver would not be making the regular stops.

Instead, the bus delivered Mr. Giuliani to the scenes of the bombings, where he laid wreaths bearing the banner of New York City. “We’re doing this in memory of the people who lost their lives,” he said.

Suicide bombers have killed 62 people in four attacks in Israel since Feb. 25, including the two bus attacks. The militant Islamic group Hamas, which is opposed to the peace accord between Israel and the Palestinians, has claimed responsibility for the explosions.

When Israel withdrew from those six cities, responsibility for security was given to the Palestinian Authority. Rather than fulfill its obligations to secure the areas it was now in charge of, Arafat (and the PA) ignored (if not encouraged) Hamas. I know that most people don’t connect the withdrawals with the subsequent terror, but I don’t think that there’s any other way to explain. Sure the killing of Ayyash provided a pretext, but the laxer (if not negligent and not complicit) security provided Hamas with an opportunity to operate.

I recall this bit of history because in an op-ed today, former President Bill Clinton asserts:

A decade and a half since his death, I continue to believe that, had he lived, within three years we would have had a comprehensive agreement between the Israelis and Palestinians. To be sure, the enemies of peace would have tried to undermine it, but with Rabin’s leadership, I am confident a new era of enduring partnership and economic prosperity would have emerged.

Nonsense. That assumes that Arafat was negotiating in good faith and was committed to peace. Subsequent terror demonstrated otherwise. Arafat’s claim that there was no Jewish temple in Jerusalem to Clinton in 2000 should have cemented that fact in Clinton’s mind. Instead Clinton waxes nostalgic for a past that never could have been. He does it here too:

There is a real chance to finish the work he started. The parties are talking. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has the necessary support from his people to reach an agreement. Many Israelis say they trust him to make a peace that will protect and enhance their security. Because of the terms accepted in late 2000 by Prime Minister Ehud Barak, supported in greater detail by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and approved by President Mahmoud Abbas and other Palestinians, everyone knows what a final agreement would look like.

If “everyone knows” then nobody told Arafat or Abbas, because Arafat in 2000 and Abbas in 2008 rejected deals that “everyone knows” would bring peace.

Look Clinton has to believe what he wrote. It’s easier to believe that he would have been successful had Prime Minister Rabin not been assassinated. But he was dealing with one party, which has demonstrated time and again, that it is not interested in peace. I’m sure it’s difficult to acknowledge that his work on peace was based on a false premise.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | 1 Comment

Delusions of the self kind

Soccer Dad is writing about Bill Clinton’s imaginary Israel/Palestinian negotiations, where Yasser Arafat was not an unrepentant terrorist who launched countless terror attacks in the hopes of defeating Israel, but a partner in peace.

But he missed the most deluded portion of the Times op-ed:

The remaining issues can be resolved, and the incentives to do so are there. Israel has its best partner ever in the Palestinian government on the West Bank led by President Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, with its proven ability to provide security and economic development. The peace alliance put together by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia offers Israel full political recognition and the prospect of security and economic cooperation with a host of Arab and other Muslim nations in exchange for an agreement. And many Arab states are engaged in their own economic and social modernization efforts, which prove they are ready to let go of past differences and eager to reap the possibilities of cooperation with Israel.

Let’s take it one bit at a time. Israel’s “best ever partner” says it will never, ever recognize Israel as a Jewish state. They refuse to sit down with Israel for direct negotiations, after stalling for ten months. Abbas has made it de rigeur to now get “permission” from the Arab League for any negotiation with Israel, thus adding an extra, more difficult layer to the peace process—especially because the Arab League has declared that Israel was always Arab land.

Compare the paragraph above to Clinton’s recent statements that Russian immigrants are the real reason there is no peace. (Yes, he apologized and backtracked, but he said it. He must have meant it.)

Israel’s “best partner ever” does not see fit to stop Palestinian TV from saying that Jews praying at the Western Wall are “sin and filth.” Israel’s “best partner ever” is constantly pictured with maps of “Palestine” that include all of Israel. Israel’s “best partner ever” says that “resistance” can never be counted out as a way to attain Palestinian goals. And he will never compromise.

Why is it we don’t have peace, exactly? It’s simple. The self-delusion of people like Bill Clinton and Barack Obama prevent them from seeing the truth: The Palestinians don’t want peace. They want the land of Israel for themselves.

Posted in Israel, Politics | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Not to bring you down a notch but…

Friends, I know that many out there are thrilled that the Republicans control Congress. You were shouting for joy at times last night and have a big grin on your face and a spring in your step this morning. I understand that you’re happy. Myself, I’m a big fan of gridlock and of forcing the parties to work together to accomplish goals. I don’t like it when either party controls the Executive and Congress. Gridlock brings about moderate and centrist policies. So I’m happy that one party isn’t in that position anymore. Others among you are not happy that the Democrats will not be able to bring hope and change to America anymore. Stop the snickering, you with the grin. I know. I know. However, I’m not happy with something else that occurred last night and none of you should be either, no matter whether you consider yourself to be red or blue.

Gridlock will make it very difficult, if not impossible, for the President to advance his domestic agenda. You might like that. You might be saying, “And I’m happy!” However, what this means is that for the next two years, the President can almost solely affect foreign policy and foreign trade. Guess what he thinks are two of the primary problems facing the world? Israel-Palestinian peace and Nuclear Arms Control. Guess where much of President Obama’s attention is going to be focused over the next two years? On a tiny sliver of land in the Eastern Mediterranean.

You may say, “Yes, but the country has spoken. The country rejects the Obama Administration’s policies!” That may well be true, but look at the choices presented to President Obama at this point. The first option is that he could admit defeat and alter his policies to please the bulk of the American population, assuming that he believes that the bulk of the population disagrees with him on those issues. To alter his path could displease his own party, actually it almost certainly would. It might please those on the political right, but will any of them vote for him in 2012 if he changes his policies over the next two years? Probably not enough to matter. He may be able to win over some centrist independents by changing his policies, but he cannot count on that. To put it bluntly, changing his policies will likely not help him at all in 2012.

The President’s other options are to try to prove himself correct on foreign policy, potentially, if he is in fact correct, swaying voters to come back to his side, or he can attempt to accomplish the things that he wishes to see accomplished as long as he has the ability to do so regardless of what may or may not happen to please the bulk of the voters or even his party. In other words, he can admit, if he believes it, that his policies are unpopular and alter them while likely accomplishing little to help him in 2012 or he can forge more strongly ahead. This last option may or may not make things better for him in 2012, but might make him feel better.

I think he’s going to choose the latter option, especially if he feels that his policies are correct. He may even believe that he has nothing to lose that has not already been lost, including the 2012 Presidential election. If so, should his actions upset a few voters more than they please, it will not matter.

So not to bring you celebrants down a notch, but for those of you who are not big fans of the President’s foreign policy positions and who are cheering Republican victories in Senatorial, Congressional, and Gubernatorial elections, things might not be great for the next two years.

Posted in American Scene, Israel, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

US election results, Palestinians vs Elders and more

The latest outcry by secretary-general of PLO’s Executive Committee, Yasser Abed Rabbo, shows how difficult it is for Palestinian propaganda to get a handle on a simple and unified Elders’ theory. Abed Rabbo said:

Israel intervened in the American mid-term elections in a bid to disrupt the Middle East peace process.

It’s hard for an outside observer to figure out why the cousins’ propaganda is so inconsistent. Holocaust is the more obvious example: first they deny that it happened, then they thank Hitler for a job well (but not completely, to their chagrin) done. First they deny the mere existence of Israel, then demand that it return to 1967 borders… Etc.

As for Israel “intervening” in some measly American mid-term elections: Abed Rabbo has to make up his mind. Either we, the Elders, control the Big Satan and then “intervention” is a totally wrong term or we don’t and then what “intervention” could have occurred?

I don’t know. The guy sounds confused. I am confused. Are you confused? Let’s decide that we are all confused, OK?

Cross-posted on SimplyJews

Posted in Israel Derangement Syndrome, palestinian politics | Comments Off on US election results, Palestinians vs Elders and more

My personal NY Post headline for tomorrow

REPUBLICANS TO OBAMA:

WE WON

Going to bed now. And fairly content.

Posted in Politics | 2 Comments

The UNESCO outrage

UNESCO has declared that Ma’arat Hamachpelah and Kever Rachel (the cave of the Patriarchs and the tomb of Rachel) are Palestinian mosques.

The UNESCO board voted 44 to 1, with 12 abstentions, to declare Rachel’s Tomb, which it referred to as the “Bilal bin Rabah Mosque,” as “an integral part of the occupied Palestinian territories.” Israel says Muslims had also traditionally referred to Rachel’s Tomb in Arabic as “Qubat Rachel,” and the claim that it was a mosque was coined by Palestinians for political reasons only following Arab riots in 1996.

(via Daily Alert blog)

This outrage is compounded by the fact that during the Arafat orchestrated tunnel riots of September 1996, the Palestinians attacked the tomb of Rachel.

The Tomb, located on the outskirts of Bethlehem, is the burial site of the Biblical matriarch Rachel and is under Israeli control. During the September 1996 riots, Palestinian mobs assaulted the site and hurled rocks and firebombs at it, causing damage to the outer part of the structure. Palestinian policemen on the scene shot and wounded Israeli soldiers guarding the Tomb. Today, Rachel’s Tomb is again a major target for Palestinian attacks.

And during “Aqsa intifada” Israeli soldiers guarding the tomb were targeted.

Nov 10, 2000 – Sgt. Shahar Vekret, 20, of Lod was fatally shot by a Palestinian sniper near Rachel’s Tomb at the entrance to Bethlehem.

Apr 2, 2001 – Sgt. Danny Darai, 20, of Arad, was killed by a Palestinian sniper after completing guard duty at Rachel’s Tomb at the entrance to Bethlehem.

In Context provides background:

The “unilateral action” to which UNESCO is referring is Israel’s inclusion of these pivotal places in a list of Jewish heritage sites published last winter. And while the lack of broad coverage doesn’t make the UNESCO declaration any less repulsive, it may reflect on the seriousness attributed to it by rational people not immediately affected. Really, who cares what UNESCO says?

The trend exemplified by such perfidious proclamations, however, is cause for concern. For more on that, see my post on the earlier salvo in this particular battle, from back in February when the Heritage Sites were first announced.

Those who choose to blame Israel, solemnly declare that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible. In this case, it doesn’t seem to bother the idiots at the UN, that they are effectively doing just that. I guess it’s hardly surprising that an agency of the UN would abet Palestinian efforts to deny the historical ties between Jews and Israel. What’s next?

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Tagged | 1 Comment

Election Day briefs

Oh, the horrors! Best headline of the day: On Election Day, Democratic Party control in peril. It’s like the AP thinks that Dems are tied up on the railroad tracks by those evil Republicans

Oh, the disappointment: Eric Cantor only called me twice, and the second time, he didn’t even say hello. (Because I didn’t. Works for most robocalls. Say “hi” and see what happens.)

Oh, I feel so much safer now: American intelligence officials told the New York Times they think they’ve found the dry run for the Yemen package bombs, which apparently were not directed directly at Jews, after all—they wanted to blow the flights up in the air. Too bad these brilliant officials didn’t figure it out at the time, and lucky for us, the PETN bomber doesn’t seem to be as good as he thinks he is—yet.

Oh, that Obama outreach is going gangbusters! Hezbullah is planning to take over Lebanon if their members are charged in Hariri’s murder. Watch the world stand by and do nothing.

Posted in American Scene, Lebanon, Politics, Terrorism | Tagged , | Comments Off on Election Day briefs

Things

Thing 1: Remember that scene in Home Alone when McCauley Culkin went screaming down the hall after applying the aftershave? That’s how I felt this morning when I found my first-ever trojan report on my personal (not work) computer. It’s the first since I bought my IBM PC-XT back in 1984. I had one virus on a work computer in 2000, and it was sent to me by my then-boss, who infected anyone who clicked on the link he sent. Yay, Trend Micro! Yay me, come to think of it. I think I got it from an infected PDF. Make sure your Acrobat is updated; there are some nasty trojans out there.

Thing 2: Aaaaah, cinnamon brooms. They’re back in the stores, and Trader Joe’s has them for several dollars less than Kroger, so I picked one up and put it in my office. My two favorite scents are cinnamon and vanilla. I prefer natural scents to man-made, apparently. Vanilla candles. Cinnamon brooms. Life is good.

Thing 3: Speaking of scents, I heart sulfur matches. When Gracie drops a stinkbomb in the litterbox (and boy, does she drop odor bombs; worst of all the cats I’ve ever had), I light a few matches afterward and things are much better.

Thing 4: I am going to be out of action most of Thursday and Friday. I am getting Lasik surgery done, all things permitting. Posting will be light, and when I post again after the surgery, I will be posting with an entirely new view on life. (Yes, I did have to say it. I’ll stop now.)

Posted in Life | 8 Comments

Stones of gold; feet of clay

Recently, reports appearing the media contradicted assertions made by the Goldstone report. These go to the beliefs promoted by Judge Goldstone and his confederates that Israel’s restrictions imposed on Gaza constitute collective punishment, that Israel did not take adequate care to avoid civilians casuatties and members of the Hamas police force should not automatically be considered terrorists.

From the executive summary of the Goldstone report:

The Mission is concerned by declarations made by various Israeli officials who have indicated the intention of maintaining the blockade of the Gaza Strip until the release of Gilad Shalit. The Mission is of the opinion that this would constitute collective punishment of the civilian population of the Gaza Strip.

From Mitchel Prothero’s Under the gun in Gaza:

I ask him if that means the human rights situation was better under Israeli occupation that it is today for residents of both the West Bank and Gaza. “Why do you think I ask you not use my name? Yes, 100 percent yes,” he said. “At least the occupation had a positive effect of drawing the Palestinian people together instead of dividing them. I now fear that we’re seeing a systematic effort by Hamas and its religious backers to enter every component of society.”

From Peter Hitchens’ Lattes, beach barbecues (and dodging missiles) in the world’s biggest prison camp

Can anyone think of a siege in human history, from Syracuse to Leningrad, where the shops of the besieged city have been full of Snickers bars and Chinese motorbikes, and where European Union and other foreign aid projects pour streams of cash (often yours) into the pockets of thousands? Once again, the word conceals more than it reveals.
In Gaza’s trapped, unequal society, a wealthy and influential few live in magnificent villas with sea views and their own generators to escape the endless power cuts.
Gaza also possesses a reasonably well-off middle class, who spend their cash in a shopping mall – sited in Treasure Street in Gaza City, round the corner from another street that is almost entirely given over to shops displaying washing machines and refrigerators.
Siege? Not exactly. What about Gaza’s ‘refugee camps’. The expression is misleading. Most of those who live in them are not refugees, but the children and grandchildren of those who fled Israel in the war of 1948.
All the other refugees from that era – in India and Pakistan, the Germans driven from Poland and the Czech lands, not to mention the Jews expelled from the Arab world – were long ago resettled.

These and similar data lead Michael Horesh to conclude (h/t Barry Rubin):

Is Gaza rich? No. It still needs the tons of daily aid, which Israel facilitates. On the other hand, a utube video from an unknown source shows beyond doubt just what multiple resources are available in wide parts of the territory.

Again from the executive summary of the Goldstone report:

589. Even if the Israeli armed forces were under fire from anti-tank missiles from Palestinian armed groups at the time, all of the information referred to above indicates that the commanders in question did not take all feasible precautions in the choice of methods and means of warfare with a view to avoiding or, in any event, to minimizing incidental civilian casualties or civilian property damage.

The recent Wikileaks revelations about Iraq though give a much different perspective. Joshua Mitnick wrote in the Christian Science Monitor:

Gerald Steinberg, an Israeli-American professor of political science at Bar Ilan University, shares the view that the volume of international criticism of Israel is out of proportion, though he departs from Ben Ari when it comes to the case of the US.

“In the US, we already have a greater understanding. They know that they are vulnerable and they will be the next in line”‘ to be accused of wartime misconduct, says Mr. Steinberg, who also runs NGO Monitor, which has criticized non-profits that criticize Israel. “If this was a fair world and there were universal human rights, then Goldstone would open up an investigation, and the United Nations would meet to investigate the allegations… There would be more Wikileaks about violations in China and Saudi Arabia.”

Or to generalize and put it into numbers, as Evelyn Gordon did:

This elicits an obvious question: if civilians routinely account for 90 percent of all casualties in modern warfare, why is the world up in arms about the civilian casualty rate in last year’s Israel-Hamas war in Gaza — which, by even the most anti-Israel account, was markedly lower?

Then there’s the matter of the members of the Hamas police force. The Goldstone report found Israel’s striking of the graduation ceremony to be excessive:

To examine whether the attacks against the police were compatible with the principle of distinction between civilian and military objects and persons, the Mission analysed the institutional development of the Gaza police since Hamas took complete control of Gaza in July 2007 and merged the Gaza police with the “Executive Force” it had created after its election victory. The Mission finds that, while a great number of the Gaza policemen were recruited among Hamas supporters or members of Palestinian armed groups, the Gaza police were a civilian law-enforcement agency. The Mission also concludes that the policemen killed on 27 December 2008 cannot be said to have been taking a direct part in hostilities and thus did not lose their civilian immunity from direct attack as civilians on this basis. The Mission accepts that there may be individual members of the Gaza police that were at the same time members of Palestinian armed groups and thus combatants. It concludes, however, that the attacks against the police facilities on the first day of the armed operations failed to strike an acceptable balance between the direct military advantage anticipated (i.e. the killing of those policemen who may have been members of Palestinian armed groups) and the loss of civilian life (i.e. the other policemen killed and members of the public who would inevitably have been present or in the vicinity), and therefore violated international humanitarian law.

However it was recently reported that:

An admission by a militant named Abu Khaled, whose interview appeared in the Christian Science Monitor in its Nov. 1, 2010 edition, that “two thirds of Hamas policemen are police by day and Al Qassam by night” lends support to those who all along contended that the overwhelming majority of the police were Hamas militants. Al Qassam is the Hamas military formation which is also responsible for carrying out terrorist acts. Israel claims that at least 709 of 1166 Palestinian fatalities were combatants, approximately 61 percent. This figure includes the policemen as combatants. PCHR claims that only 236 of 1,417 fatalities were combatants, calculating 83 percent as civilians. Palestinian Policemen are described by PCHR as “non-combatants.”

More directly, those newly graduated police cadets are now acknowledged to have been terrorists.

And thought Goldstone actually makes a mention of the arbitrary killings of others by Hamas, Hamas’s procedures for executing rivals should make it clear that Goldstone’s expectation that Hamas could properly investigate itself, is bogus.

Richard Goldstone was set up as some sort of demigod. These latest details suggest that he was a hack whose main purpose was to convict and condemn Israel. It would be fair to say that Judge Goldstone’s feet are of clay.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Tagged | 1 Comment

Monday briefs

UN to Israel: What Jewish history? UNESCO has declared the tombs of the Patriarchs and of Rachel to be “Palestinian.” Because the Palestinians named them mosques. City of Hebron the oldest Jewish city in existence? Doesn’t matter. It’s Palestinian, because it fell outside the lines of the Jewish state at the end of the War of Independence, just like the eastern half of Jerusalem, which houses the Jewish Quarter and the remains of the First and Second Temples. The Arabizing of Jewish heritage sites continues apace. The fact that thousands of Arabs and Jews had a day of successful interaction in Hebron last week? Hey, stop messing up the narrative! Evil settlers are stealing Palestinian heritage sites!

Hamas to world: Uh, a couple hundred of our guys died in Operation Cast Lead. Hamas is finally admitting that their death toll of “less than 50” was a lie. They’re also finally admitting that Gaza “police officers” are card-carrying members of Hamas, thus lowering by hundreds the “civilian” toll of Cast Lead, and making the Goldstone Report even more filled with lies.

UNRWA helping Hamas with that human shield thing: UNRWA is going to build a UN school right next to a Hamas military base. Israel is asking them not to. I wouldn’t even waste a penny betting on the outcome of this one. The question isn’t if there will be civilian casualties; it’s when.

Jeffrey Goldberg gets the emails from my ex-commenters: You know, having moderate comments and a small following means I don’t have to get the asinine comments from Jew-haters like the ones Goldberg is getting for daring to suggest that al Qaeda’s targeting of synagogues means they want to kill Jews. I know a lot of Jew-haters read my blog, but not nearly as many as read Goldberg’s. Sometimes, it pays to be less popular.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Gaza, Hamas, Israel, News Briefs, United Nations | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Sunday night cats

Twofer! (Unmade bed!) ((They love the unmade bed!!))

Tig and Gracie

Gracie in close-up.

Gracie

Posted in Cats | 4 Comments

Oh, it’s Halloween

Went to the gym this morning and couldn’t understand what kind of idiot would work out in a floor-length dress. Then she came near me, and I realized she was a staffer in costume. (She was a princess.)

Oh. Right. NOW I get it.

Posted in Holidays, Life | 3 Comments

The dull, throbbing anxiety of Jonathan Franzen’s potential reader

I have a confession to make. It is with growing feelings of inferiority and frustration that I look at the growing list of authors who, according to widely accepted verdict of literary critics belong to the Pantheon of greatness or already put their first foot into it, and yet I still cannot make myself like them. Not to put too fine a polish on the sad fact, in many cases I wasn’t even able to finish some of their books.

Of course it’s a matter of taste, you will say, and it’s perfectly excusable for a person to fall in love with one author and to hate another’s books. But still, seeing as how most of the civilized world sings hosannas to a book and not being able to progress beyond page 32 is kind of alarming. On the other hand, I am not into reading literary criticism, resorting to this kind of stuff only when I am overly puzzled by an author, like in case of Jonathan Franzen. I have dutifully read two of his earlier books: The Twenty-Seventh City and The Corrections. While I can’t say that I fell in love with them or even that I liked them, I can at least carve two additional notches on my reading glasses and declare that I am done with Mr Franzen forever.

But fate, apparently, has its own goals and, no matter what Internet page I open lately or what paper I happen to spread on my breakfast table, Franzen’s name in conjunction with his new book Freedom jumps in my face. What should I do after announcing, albeit only to myself, that I’ve already paid my dues to that author – with all due respect and all that?

So, feeling that my resistance is waning and that my right hand is going to click on the Amazon button and one-click-order the book, I’ve resorted to that act of despair: I have started reading criticism of that book in particular and of the author in general. Poor I…

By now I know why the right hates Freedom (don’t expect to learn something about the book, but the piece is verily an abattoir of right-wing literary critics). I also know why I should love the book and its author. I have been on Amazon and have seen that as many people hate the book as love it (as usual, actually). Etc. But the main question: should I or shouldn’t I click that Amazon button – remained unanswered. Then I have stumbled upon Franzen’s interview with Guardian’s Sarfraz Manzoor. What can I say? Franzen is very likable: thoughtful, free of self-importance, rather shy, suspicious of authorities – in short, every attribute that will always win a place in my heart. And he is chock-full of guilt, that without being Jewish! Take, for instance, the following verbiage that appears in the area of  6:20 (not a precise transcript):

Our treatment of the Indians… our long relationship with slavery… and then the Cold War – we were certainly culpable…

Oops… let’s run the last one again. And again. Hmm… yes, so, according to Mr Franzen, US is culpable in the Cold War. That’s not a novel statement. It was frequently and generously used by the other side of the Cold War, but of course, where the other side used a buzzword, there always happened quite a few folks on this side of the Curtain to echo the sentiment. And still it’s eerie  to hear this in XXI century. One would have expected the fellow travelers of the late Soviet Union to be extinct or too old and quiet by now. Unless, of course, we are talking some stupid dinosaurs of the extreme left media like Seumas Milne and such.

Mr Franzen is born in 1959: not too young to be absolutely excluded from a list of potential Soviet fellow travelers, but still too young for this possibility to be explored seriously. And that “almost rogue state”,  happily picked up by the buzzards of the Guardian, doesn’t point at a fellow traveler, just at a typical confused lefty who successfully passed the mandatory liberal arts education in US and a complimentary ideological brainwashing in Europe. One practically expects some raving and grumbling re “military – industrial” complex, the right-wing cabal etc. And the subject doesn’t disappoint, freely providing his view on “the degree to which… we are almost a rogue state and causing enormous trouble around the world… to preserve our freedom to drive SUVs…”.

Still, much is excusable (or practically expected) when dealing with a genius. Much, but not that peculiar vision of “culpability in the Cold War”. Sorry, Mr Franzen, whatever left-wing garbage your “liberal” mind collected during the brainwashing period, too many people owe too much to the victors of the Cold War for your opinion of it to be excusable.

But the interview didn’t stop there. Mr Franzen has decided to share more of his wisdom in the bloody fields of sociology and history (transcript imprecise):

It does make one wonder what is it in our national character that is making us such a problem state and I think that a kind of mixed up childish notion of freedom and perhaps… really, truly – who left Europe to go over there? It was all the malcontents, people who were not getting along with others…

The depth of this analysis is staggering. I mean, where else but in an interview a leading progressive American writer gives to a most progressive British media outfit could one gain such a pearl of cutting edge wisdom? It’s a pity that Mr Franzen stopped there, without explaining how come the peaceful and easy-to-get-along-with denizens of enlightened Europe, after getting rid of their malcontents, their bullies, their hooligans, suddenly decided to kill off one another and did it for about two hundred years with zeal and skill unmatched in the recorded history.

It is also strange that the interviewer, so obviously delighted with the text quoted above, decided to make do with it, refraining from questioning Mr Franzen on that other missing part. Yeah, I am being facetious here a bit… Guardian always gets the worst out of me…

To conclude: this interview decided the question for me. I will not click that Amazon widget. The budget, almost spent on Freedom, shall go to some other happy graduate of liberal arts. Someone else will have to wade through the book, which effort, judging by the two others I read, will be considerable. So good luck to someone else.

And I shall leave Jonathan Franzen to his dull, throbbing anxiety. Better him than me…

Afterword:

Meanwhile I have learned that, according to the currently accepted classification,  Franzen adheres to the genre of hysterical realism. To my surprise and delight, I have found out that the list of authors belonging to hysterical realism covers a high percentage of the books and authors I have mentioned re my feelings of inferiority and frustration… Lucky me, indeed. I’ve also discovered that it sometimes pays off to read literary critics. Go figure…

If you want to know more about this literary genre, I warmly recommend this article.

Cross-posted on SimplyJews

Posted in American Scene, Juvenile Scorn | 9 Comments