Why we’re not going to intervene in Syria

Jim Geraghty of the National Review writes an email column, the Morning Jolt, that I’ve been getting for years. Today, he wrote the best takedown ever of why the U.S. isn’t going into Syria. I do believe we’re going to have to grant Mr. Geraghty a Master of Juvenile Scorn™.

The invasion of Iraq was treated as the greatest crime against humanity in the history of the world, denounced far more frequently and loudly than any act by Saddam Hussein, Bashar Assad, the Iranian regime, or North Korea.

Giant protests in lots of American cities. Giant protests in every foreign capital. The 2004 Guinness Book of Records described the anti-war movement around the globe as the largest mass protest movement in history — eclipsing any popular opposition to any act of the Soviet Union or any other totalitarian regime around the globe, ever. Among the elites in Paris, Berlin, and most corners of London, the Iraq War was the single-most important issue, and denouncing the evil of George W. Bush was the most important goal, not building a stable and peaceful Iraq. You recall Kofi Annan denouncing it, and the United Nations delegates scoffing when Hugo Chavez called our president the devil.

You recall the cries of “Bushitler,” the ubiquitous Code Pink interrupting every event in Washington, as if some ninny shouting during a press conference ever spurred sudden reversals in U.S. national security policy. You recall Hollywood’s relentless cavalcade of movies demonizing the war and those fighting it: In the Valley of Elah, Stop Loss, Green Zone, Redacted, Grace is Gone, Fahrenheit 9/11.

Hey, my Turkish friends so upset by a bloody civil war across the border and a flood of refugees, remember Valley of the Wolves: Iraq? Remember when that film suggested that Jewish U.S. army doctors in Iraq were harvesting organs from Iraqi civilians to be sold in Israel, and that U.S. soldiers use Iraqi children as human shields? Yeah, remember that? Well, go solve your #*%&^ border problems yourself.

The Davos set is horrified to learn that after spending the better part of a decade screaming at the top of their lungs that an American intervention to topple a bloodthirsty Arab dictator is the absolute worst thing imaginable, suddenly Americans are no longer interested in toppling bloodthirsty Arab dictators.

(Slap, slap) Wake up, anti-war movement! You’ve got what you wanted! The United States is out of the armed intervention business, besides the occasional “leading from behind” in Libya, or the occasional covert mission in Pakistan.

Posted in Juvenile Scorn, Syria, World | Comments Off on Why we’re not going to intervene in Syria

Thursday briefs

You know where you can stick your missiles: Turkey’s Defense Minister says that the Patriot missiles installed there–at Turkey’s request, to guard against Syrian missiles–are really there to help Israel against Iranian missiles. Fine. I say withdraw all U.S. support from Turkey, the Islamist state that is doing everything it can to work with our Islamist enemies, including funding terrorists. Screw Turkey.

Those objective journalists: This is why I read EVERYTHING about Israel by non-Israeli sources with a jaundiced eye. The Financial Times mideast reporter accused Israel of bribing Bulgaria in order to blame Hezbollah for the terrorist bombing that killed five Israelis and the Bulgarian driver. He apologized for it, and yet–he tweeted the thought in the first place.

I would like to take this moment to say that I personally can’t stand using Twitter, but I love it for the honesty it shows from so many, many people who are too effing stupid to understand that once you send something across the intertubes, you can’t get it back.

Loving Julie Burchill: I remember her as one of the few voices of support for Israel during the early days of my blogging career. Here’s a profile of her. A bit depressing, because she also mentions how anti-Semitic the U.K. has become.

Iran’s Stealth Fighter is Probably an Elaborate Fraud: See title. (No! Really?)

Stop making sense: Barry Rubin on why Obama is going to Israel. If you’re still not reading Barry regularly, you are missing one of the best analysis of Israel anywhere. Also, Barry’s books are available as free ebooks. I’ll be posting links later.

No peace with you, Great Satan! Iran’s Supreme Leader (and gee, a country with democratic elections, as Chuck Hagel said, is run by a guy called “Supreme Leader”, which is the most democratic title EVAH!) says Iran will not negotiate with the U.S. over its nukes. Well, I’m surprised. No, really. Because they usually do the cheat-and-retreat bit a lot less openly. They must be getting close to an atomic bomb if they feel they can slap Obama in the face this openly. And note that the media will not tally this up as a loss for Obama, because he never loses, you see. I’m sure they’ll find a way to blame Israel for it.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Iran, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Media Bias, Middle East, Terrorism, Turkey | 1 Comment

The “armed wing” excuse strikes again

Bulgaria released a report proving without doubt that Hezbollah was behind the bus bombing in Bulgaria that killed five Israelis and a Bulgarian. The EU will not be naming Hezbollah as a terrorist organzation, and here’s why:

On Tuesday, Bulgaria’s interior minister, Tsvetan Tsvetanov, announced that two of the people behind the July 18 bombing, which killed five Israeli tourists, a Bulgarian bus driver and the bomber, were believed to be members of the military wing of Hezbollah.

Decades ago, the West found a way to ignore Palestinian terrorism against Israel by organizations like Fatah, in order to keep alive the fiction that the Israelis could negotiate with Palestinians without having to negotiate with terrorists. They created the words “armed wing” and applied it to Fatah. The al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade is one such organization. Yasser Arafat got to laugh at all the morons in the U.S. and Europe who gave cover to the idea that his terrorists weren’t working under his orders. They were the “military wing” of Fatah–which was part of the PLO (and now the PA). The West continuously ignored evidence linking Arafat directly to terror attacks, including an entire ship of arms and weapons captured by Israel.

The EU, led by France and Germany, refuse to designate Hezbollah a terrorist organization in spite of all the evidence proving they murdered Israelis in a member nation of the EU. It doesn’t matter how many times Benjamin Netanyahu calls a terrorist a terrorist. They’re not buying it.

Referring to the findings, which blamed Hezbollah’s military wing for involvement, Netanyahu said “there is only one Hezbollah, it is one organization with one leadership.”

The EU also doesn’t care that it is helping Hezbollah to endanger non-Israelis (and for non-Israelis read: Americans).

John Brennan, US President Barack Obama’s assistant for counter-terrorism, urged the EU and its member countries to designate Hezbollah as a terrorist entity. He noted that Ireland, where he was delivering his remarks, was among those countries that had not yet done so.

“Failure to designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization makes it harder to defend our countries and protect our citizens,” Brennan declared, saying it complicates law enforcement efforts because of the problems invoking terror charges against Hezbollah suspects.

Hezbollah is building a large presence in South America with states that are very unfriendly to the U.S., such as Argentina–where Iran also is building a presence. They are partners in terror.

Asked about the interplay between Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Levitt told the Post that “Hezbollah and al-Quds are in bed together” and are mounting “a shadow war against Israel and the West.” The al-Quds force of the IRGC is an elite unit designed to spread Tehran’s Islamic philosophy and launch terror operations abroad.

The EU is ignoring Hezbollah’s terrorism. Not doing so allows the group to raise money in Europe and undermines security for the West.

It is a “very bad thing that Hezbollah can operate in Europe regarding fund-raising and logistics,” US Ambassador Daniel Benjamin, a former coordinator for counterterrorism at the State Department in the first Obama administration, said. Hezbollah’s legal status in the EU “undermines security goals,” he said.

But it doesn’t matter, because the EU countries that refuse to name Hezbollah a terror organization are doing so out of their own self-interest, which apparently trumps the prevention of terrorism.

What are those interests, outside of influence inside Lebanon? For some the interests are economic, a concern that such a move could anger parts of the Arab world that invest in their economies. For others it is a fear of “provoking” Hezbollah, and a concern that blacklisting the organization would trigger a terrorist retaliation on their own territory, or against their own nationals.

Ten global terrorist plots against Israelis? Doesn’t matter. U.S. State Department urges the EU to designate Hezbollah terrorists? Nope.

Let’s be honest here. It’s not just self-interest that is stopping the EU from designating Hezbollah a terrorist organization. The precedent was set when the world chose to ignore all evidence that Yasser Arafat spoke peace to the West and orchestrated war when the cameras were off. And the West bought it, hook, line, and sinker.

But there’s one more reason: The world believes that terrorism isn’t terrorism when it is carried out against Jews.

Posted in Iran, Israeli Double Standard Time, Middle East, Terrorism, World | 1 Comment

The gatekeepers of what is news

The hypocrisy and double standards of the major news organizations are so obvious, one almost doesn’t need to point them out. Almost.

Here are things that are given wall-to-wall coverage, op-eds in the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, the wire services, and other major media outlets: Israeli settlements, an Israeli rabbi that makes a bigoted remark about Arabs or Palestinians, Palestinians “protesting” (read: Rioting) for some stupid reason or other at the Temple Mount (read: Al-aqsa mosque), Israel causing harm or death to Palestinians regardless of the reason (read: Retaliating for multiple terror attacks on Israeli civilians), the separation fence, and, well, pretty much everything Israel does.

Here are things that are ignored or minimized by the same media outlets above.

A Saudi cleric says even girls who have not yet reached puberty should be covered from head to toe, citing instances of child molestation in the ultraconservative kingdom and elsewhere.

He is not affiliated with the government nor considered a senior sheik.

Judge Mohammed al-Jazlani, a senior sheik, said Monday that such talk denigrates Islam and may push non-Muslims to view Islam negatively. He urged Saudis to ignore unofficial fatwas, or edicts.

An American priest who nobody heard of before he threatened to burn the Koran? Wall-to-wall news coverage and a call from the president. Did anyone explain him away as a leader of a tiny sect that nobody ever listened to?

No.

The continuing Islamization of Gaza:

The Gaza Strip’s Al-Aqsa University recently advertised a sweeping order that beginning in the second semester, female students will be required to arrive in traditional Muslim garb, from head to toe, burka included.

Will it get world-wide saturation coverage? Of course not. However, the next time a Haredi spits at a secular Israeli woman, watch the story taken up by all the usual suspects. And of course, the New York Times utterly outdoes itself over the Chuck Hagel nomination. The man embarrassed himself in all aspects of his hearing, on every subject–Iran, the Defense budget, Israel, foreign affairs–and all the Times can do is blame the Jews for Hagel’s terrible performance, and they manage to get in a defense for Brooklyn College’s shameful BDS events as well. This is how the Times appreciates dialogue on college campuses, as well as free speech:

In the Brooklyn College case, critics have used heated language to denigrate the speakers, Omar Barghouti and Judith Butler, a philosopher at the University of California, Berkeley, leaders of a movement called B.D.S., for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, that espouses “nonviolent punitive measures” to pressure Israel. Alan Dershowitz, a Brooklyn College graduate and Harvard law professor, has complained that the event is unbalanced and should not be co-sponsored by the college’s political science department. On Monday, Ms. Gould said other events offering alternative views are planned.

This, by the way, is only after weeks of protest that the BDS event does not have anyone defending the Israeli side.

And so we come back full circle. The gatekeepers at the Times are perfectly satisfied with one-side anti-Israel events, but they are shocked, shocked that someone should question Chuck Hagel’s recent 180 turn on his support of Israel and sanctions on Iran. The AP carries every lie the Palestinians tell about Israel attacks on them, almost never issuing retractions when it it shown their sources were lying, and ignores stories that put the Palestinians–even terrorist organizations like Hamas–in a bad light. Oh, sure, they may publish a paragraph or two about the new burka requirement at Gaza universities, but it won’t be the screaming headlines that a like event in Israel would cause.

Just another day in the world of the anti-Israel media bias, complete with Israeli Double Standard Time. But not to worry. It only occurs on days that end with a “y”.

Posted in Gaza, Israeli Double Standard Time, Media Bias, palestinian politics | Comments Off on The gatekeepers of what is news

Please tell me

Got a spam email caught in my message filters. The title is “A secret the won’t know.”

WHO won’t know? WHAT won’t know?

I have to know!

Please tell me!

Posted in Humor | 1 Comment

Monday briefs

Let’s you and him fight: Turkey’s Islamist prime minister is yelling at Syria for not attacking Israel in response to Israel flattening a biological weapons lab and taking out advanced anti-aircraft missiles headed to Lebanon. Some reports are also saying that Israel took out a number of Iranian Revolutionary Guards when they attacked the weapons lab. If that’s true, then good. About damned time Iranians started dying in their undeclared (and yet, open) war against Israel. And note that it’s not Iranian civilians who were killed, but Iranian soldiers–as opposed to the hundreds of Israelis murdered by Iranian-sponsored terrorist and missile attacks.

Because the media is so unbiased: Say, you know what’s interesting about all the reporting on the attack? Not a single article has mentioned that shipping weapons to Lebanon is in direct violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701. Isn’t it funny how the mainstream media always mentions Israel supposedly being in violation of international law regarding settlements, Gaza, the Mavi Marmara, etc.–and yet, when a country is caught in actual violation of international law via the UN Security Council, the media has a mass case of amnesia.

It’s like asking the murderer to be lead detective on the case: Argentina has made a deal with Iran to jointly investigate the 1994 bombing of the Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 and wounded hundreds. Yet another South American country has fallen into the Iranian axis. Disgusting. Oh, and Venezuela is now spying on its Jews. Looks like 1938 is going to start in South America this time. Maybe our new Secretary of State could do something about that? Oh, wait. He’s too busy trying to solve Middle East peace on his first day. Because that’s the most pressing problem in the world today. Not Iran. Not North Korea. Not Afghanistan or Syria. Israeli settlements. Wait for it.

Posted in Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Media Bias, Middle East, Syria, Turkey, United Nations | Comments Off on Monday briefs

The Missionary position

Found this while looking for something on my site. It’s from September 17, 2003.

The missionary position

I’m pretty sure I terrified a young, just-out-of-missionary school Mormon this afternoon. I heard a soft knock on my door and voices, leading me to believe that Heidi and Sorena had dropped by before Sorena’s cello lesson. But when I opened the door, there were two young men, wearing name badges clearly identifying them as Mormons. The newbie asked if he could talk to me for a few minutes, and I looked at him and said, “Jewish. I’m Jewish, and quite happy that way,” pointing to the Star of David around my neck. Of course, this did not deter him one whit. But he made a fatal error. He hit a few of my hot-button topics.

“Are you a messianic Jew?” he asked.

“No. I’m a real Jew,” I replied.

He paused a moment. “Well, we love the Jews,” he said.

“No you don’t,” I responded a little heatedly. “The Mormon Church is baptizing Jews after they’re dead.”

“We don’t do it anymore.”

“Yes you do. You were supposed to stop, but you haven’t yet.”

“Yes, but try to see it from our point of view.” He was definitely sweating by this point.

“No, try to see it from my point of view,” I told him. “It’s offensive.”

“But ma’am, they’re being given a chance to decide whether or not they want to accept Jesus.”

“They’re dead!” I said, my voice rising. “How can they decide when they’re dead?”

“Well, that depends on what you believe happens after we die,” he said.

At that point, I decided to stop wasting my time, told him I wasn’t interested in any more discussion, and closed the door. I think the next time, I’ll just tell them that there’s no soliciting allowed in my complex and if he doesn’t leave, I’m going to call the police. Probably a lot faster than arguing.

Posted in Blasts from the past, Religion | 3 Comments

“Any support of Israel is hate speech”

The title quote of this post is from this video, at about 19:30. The rest of it is long, boring, and typical sophomoric “analysis” by college students of what is wrong with Zionists and Zionism, filled with words like “oppression” and “people of color”. It was taken during the “occupation” of a building on the UC Davis campus. The Forward questions and downplays whether Jewish students were harassed, but at least reports that the anti-Israel students carried “Death to Zionism” signs. (A quick aside: Imagine what would happen to protesters that carried “Death to Islamism” signs.)

Anti-Semitism keeps rising, country by country. And yet, prominent Jews (and others) keep denying that it is a problem. And that most of the perpetrators just happen to be Muslim.

Barry Rubin has written one of his most important articles about the massive assault on Israel in a concerted, world-wide attack from the Israel-haters and the Western “intelligentsia,” which includes anti-Israel academics poisoning young minds against the Jewish state. He points out that nearly all of the major attacks on Israel are either lies or stories that get blown so far out of proportion to their actual facts as to be ridiculously anti-Israel. And that the assault is working.

Yet again this situation can no longer be dealt with as an ordinary, though rather spirited and emotional, debate. It is a massive, often conscious and deliberate, campaign of defamation. No longer on the margins, this campaign has penetrated into using the commanding heights of the Western mass media, intellectual, and academic institutions.

The defamation of Israel on college campuses is ubiquitous, so much so that Jewish groups charged some universities with violating their civil rights. And lost. But the constant drumbeat of anti-Jewish propaganda continues.

Some details of interest:

–This campaign’s intensity and one-sidedness has relatively little effect on the actual Middle East situation or on Western government policies.

–The main single issue is to try to portray Israel as responsible for the lack of peace, just as Jews were historically blamed by those hostile to them for antisemitism. Since the experience of the 1993-2000 “peace process” era, the fact that the conflict continues because of the intransigence of Israel’s enemies should have been obvious. Yet this history has been forgotten and its impact on Israeli thinking buried or censored.

–Much of the new antagonism stems from Western intelligentsias’ sharp turn to the left. The question, of course, is why Israel is such a prominent issue among the many causes available to them.

–What is important is not so much to define specific things as “antisemitic”—which generates distracting debates—but to explicate the creation of a situation equivalent in effect to pre-1945 antisemitism. Since about 40 percent of the world’s Jews live in Israel and most of the rest support Israel, the resulting slander and demonization is also a slur and hatred against the vast majority of Jews. The irrationality, obsession, intimidation, and slander is quite equivalent to what Jews suffered under historic antisemitism.

–Israel, Israelis, and their supporters are portrayed—as in classical antisemitism–as irrational creatures involved in incomprehensible behavior. Removing from public consciousness their experiences, attitudes, and sufferings leaves the conclusion that their behavior is evil, racist, bloodthirsty and seeking total power.

Read the whole thing. And spread the link far and wide.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Israeli Double Standard Time, Media Bias | Tagged , | Comments Off on “Any support of Israel is hate speech”

The definition of irony

Saw something in the middle of a two-lane highway today. As I drove past, I saw it was an orange and yellow safety vest.

Posted in American Scene | Comments Off on The definition of irony

Friday briefs

How’m I doing? Ed Koch, a New York Jewish icon, died this morning. The liberal world cast him out because he endorsed George W. Bush in 2004, but it’s one of the things that made me respect him even more–the ability to ignore party lines in favor of country. People from the rest of the nation probably know about him, but he was larger than life to those of us from the New York area. This is why:

Commuters walking across the Brooklyn Bridge during the first day of an 11-day transit strike in 1980 were startled to find the bald, 6-foot-1-inch mayor cheering for them. He called critics “wackos,” welfare advocates “poverty pimps,” told visiting Soviet schoolchildren that their government was “the pits” and said a crack-smoking lawyer accused of killing his daughter should be “boiled in oil.”

May his memory be a blessing.

Don’t think we’re going to have to worry about SecDef Hagel: How bad was he? This bad. And this bad. And this bad. He was so bad, people are feeling sorry for Chuck Schumer, who put his reputation on the line for the president over this jackass. Oh, and MJ Rosenberg, a proudly-declared self-hating Jew, felt confident enough in Hagel’s nomination to admit that Hagel was lying through his teeth yesterday. Rosenberg is a despicable douche. Here’s hoping he has to break out the Kleenex when his Jew-hating hero withdraws his nomination for SecDef.

Score one for Hague: Well, that’s a surprise. The U.K.’s foreign minister is refusing to condemn Israel over the bombing of anti-aircraft missiles at a Syrian military base. Now, if only he would stop pretending that the Palestinians want to negotiate with Israel. They don’t. They’re trying to create a state by fiat.

Oh, that’ll work: This is interesting. Washington is warning Syria not to transfer weapons to Hezbullah. Not that we think Assad is going to listen. But it was interesting.

Posted in American Scene, Iran, Israel, Lebanon, palestinian politics, Syria | 3 Comments

Ignoring the Islamism in Gaza

Say, remember when the New York Times published an op-ed from Ismail Haniyeh’s political advisor, stating that the world didn’t need to be worried that Hamas would turn Gaza into a Taliban-style dictatorship?

Our stated aim when we won the election was to effect reform, end corruption and bring economic prosperity to our people. Our sole focus is Palestinian rights and good governance. We now hope to create a climate of peace and tranquillity within our community that will pave the way for an end to internal strife…

And

Palestinians want, on their terms, the same thing Western societies want: self-determination, modernity, access to markets and their own economic power, and freedom for civil society to evolve. Those who warn of “failed states” and “Hamastan” as a breeding ground for terrorism forget where blame for failure belongs — at the feet of the American administration, which has chosen to isolate, rather than deal with, the elected government.

Good times, good times. Of course, now, Hamas doesn’t have to pretend anymore that they don’t want an Islamic state “from the river to the sea“.

Those who thought that Hamas would ever establish a modern and liberal regime in the Gaza Strip received another reminder this week of how the radical Islamist movement is pursuing its effort to create a Taliban-style entity in the territory that has been under its control since 2007.

The reminder came in the form of a decision taken by the Al-Aqsa University administration in the Gaza Strip to force female students to dress in accordance with Islamic teachings.

This means that all female students would be required to wear the hijab or niqab which cover their heads and faces.

This latest measure is part of a Hamas campaign aimed at “inculcating [Islamic] values and virtues” in the Gaza Strip, Hamas officials explained.

As part of this campaign, Hamas last week imposed a ban on low-waist trousers, Western-style haircuts and tight gowns.

The decision to ban low-waist trousers and Western-style haircuts is directed against young Palestinian men in the Gaza Strip, who have apparently been exposed to Western fashions thanks to television and the Internet.

What? But they wrote in the Times and the Washington Post that all they wanted was peace and freedom! I don’t understand.

The Hamas official said that the campaign to enforce Islamic values and virtues was especially designed to “highlight the negative impact of the growing phenomenon of women who dress immodestly in order to highlight their charms.”

Totally moderate ideas. Also this:

Just last week, arsonists torched three restaurants in the West Bank town of Bir Zeit, a traditional stronghold of secular Palestinians, after accusing the owners of selling alcohol and allowing young men and women to sit together.

I don’t want to say “I told you so.” Oh, wait. Of course I do. Only a moron would have taken those PR agency-written op-eds as sincere. And you know, it doesn’t even need to be labeled “taqiyaa”. Note that Mohammed Morsi outright lied to the media that his calling Jews “sons of apes and pigs” was taken out of context, and they totally covered for him. So yes, we told you so. We’re telling you now. But you, the media, insist on whitewashing Islamists and terrorists and demonizing Israel. It’s not like you’re going to listen to us.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Media Bias | 1 Comment

Briefs that make you go hmmm

Probably rhymes with WMD: Israel bombed something inside Syria–a weapons convoy heading to Lebanon. Good for Israel! Now do it again, and again, until Syria stops arming Lebanon. And since Israel is still technically at war with both nations, what right does the UN have to criticize?

Israel tells the UN to eff off: Israel decided not to stand still and take the annual anti-Semitic anti-Zionist anti-Israel Human Rights Council “Universal Periodic Review” (a.k.a. the “let’s stick it to Israel!” ceremony). Anne Bayefsky explains why:

The discrimination against Israel by the UN human rights system is not hard to find. The UN Human Rights Council has a permanent agenda of 10 items, one reserved for condemning Israel and one for considering all other 192 UN members. Almost 40 percent of all Council resolutions condemning specific countries have been directed at Israel alone. There have been more special sessions on Israel than any other country. Israel is the only UN state excluded from full membership in any of the UN’s regional groups, where key negotiations and information-sharing occurs.

The official UN document entitled “summary of stakeholder submissions,” which is intended to drive Israel’s UPR, includes allegations from NGOs that object to “the Jewish character of the state,” and demand that “five million Palestinians” should “return” to Israel to seal the deal.

Gee, I can’t imagine why Israel refused to submit to this kangaroo court.

How, exactly is “the sons of apes and pigs” taken out of context? Here goes the MSM and the world’s politicians covering for the oldest hatred, again. Looks like anti-Semite Muslim Brotherhood New Pharoah of Egypt has learned a little PR in the last month or so. And everyone is willing to wipe his ass for him, including the AP and Reuters.

When asked about the anti-Jew comments at the Berlin press conference, Morsi stated: “I’m obliged [by Islamic doctrine] to respect Judaism, but I was speaking about the wrong practices committed by some. My words were edited and taken out of context.”

Just to remind you, here’s the quote:

“these bloodsuckers who attack the Palestinians, these warmongers, the descendants of apes and pigs,”

Right. Out of context. Totally.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Israel, Lebanon, Media Bias, Middle East, Syria | Comments Off on Briefs that make you go hmmm

Meanwhile, back at the writing biz

The ebook of Darkness Rising: Book One of The Catmage Chronicles is on sale at $2.99 until Thursday. You can get it via Amazon, B&N, and Kobo.

Remember, you can read four chapters for free (and send the link to your friends). I’ve got a signing at my local B&N in March. Bit by bit, the book is getting out there.

Posted in Writing | Comments Off on Meanwhile, back at the writing biz

Antisemitism and the U.K.: But I repeat myself.

Yeah, anti-Semitism is still the only prejudice you can express publicly now, pretty much without punishment.

To recap: On Holocaust Memorial Day, no less, The Times of London published a disgusting blood libel cartoon of a large-nosed Benjamin Netanyahu cementing (with blood) a wall of screaming Palestinians, worthy of an appearance in Der Sturmer, the official rag of the Nazi party from the 1930s. The caption? “Israeli Elections… Will Cementing Peace Continue?”

The ADL and lots of other people and organizations call the Times out on it. The editor tells everyone to go eff off.

“This is a typically robust cartoon by Gerald Scarfe,” said a spokesperson for The Sunday Times, adding, “The Sunday Times firmly believes that it is not anti-Semitic. It is aimed squarely at Mr Netanyahu and his policies, not at Israel, let alone at Jewish people.”

The spokesperson said that appearance of the offending cartoon on Holocaust Memorial Day which is commemorated Sunday was coincidental, “It appears today because Mr Netanyahu won the Israeli election last week,” said the statement.

Then the editor, realizing perhaps there might be something to the fact that the entire Jewish world (and a few non-Jews) are condemning the editorial and threatening to take them to the U.K./EU version of whoever is in charge of hate crimes, figures maybe he should acknowledge that the cartoon is hateful.

“The last thing I or anyone connected with the Sunday Times would countenance would be insulting the memory of the Shoah or invoking the blood libel.”

While not explicitly expressing regret or offering an apology, Martin Ivens defended his paper’s coverage of Israel, saying, “The paper has long written strongly in defence of Israel and its security concerns, as have I as a columnist. We are however reminded of the sensitivities in this area by the reaction to the cartoon and I will of course bear them very carefully in mind in future.”

Finally, the paper’s owner comes out and tweets an apology.

Murdoch wrote on Twitter that the cartoonist, Gerald Scarfe — a veteran artist who frequently depicts blood in his work — did not reflect the paper’s editorial line. “Nevertheless, we owe (a) major apology for (the) grotesque, offensive cartoon,” Murdoch tweeted.

What’s going to happen? Nothing. Murdoch will wait for the furor to die down, maybe the cartoonist won’t be used by the Times for a while (but don’t worry, he’ll be given an award for having publicly criticized Israel, something which is oh-so-daring because nobody ever does that), and that will be it.

Until the next anti-Semitic cartoon, magazine cover, or article turns up in the U.K.

I really can’t stand to cover things like this anymore. After a while, it just drags you down so much you want to close your blog for good. What’s the difference between this and the cartoon of Ariel Sharon eating Palestinians babies? About ten years.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Holocaust, Media Bias | 3 Comments

Did WWII end the Great Depression?

An interesting take on how government spending did not end the Great Depression.

When we apply this standard to life during World War II in America, it’s clear that the war did not end the depression in any meaningful sense. Economic historian Robert Higgs has debunked the statistics that purport to show that the depression ended during the war. Take unemployment. Unemployment of course was historically high throughout the 1930s, and the rate plummeted once the U.S. government entered the war. But this was no sign of returning prosperity. The government drafted 10 million men into the armed forces and others enlisted to avoid conscription. Those men were not producing prosperity by making consumer goods. They were fighting a war. Moreover, statistics showing that industrial production picked up steam in the 1940s are no indication of prosperity because those plants weren’t making consumer goods; they were making war materiel. In fact, those plants diverted scarce resources from the production of consumer goods. The few consumer goods that were produced were rationed. People could buy only a fixed and small quantity of foods, gasoline, and other previously taken-for-granted products. Many things weren’t available at all.

Thus the aggregate statistics fail to capture essential details of life. A million dollars spent making automobiles and a million dollars spent making tanks look the same in the GDP tables. But the difference is vast in terms of consumer welfare.

The author goes on to explain that the average consumer’s quality of life actually dropped during the war, as goods were more scarce and people had to do for themselves what they otherwise would have bought in the marketplace.

As manufacturing was refitted for war production, there was a reversal in the trend toward specialization. Those remaining on the home front were forced to produce for themselves what they had previously been able to purchase. The household again became a center of production rather than consumption alone. The pressures of wartime meant a clear loss in productivity for those forced to engage in the more difficult processes of growing and canning their own food as well as sewing and resewing clothing to make it last longer. Women had less time to spend caring for their children as other household tasks, such as saving cooking grease or tin foil, consumed their time…

So hoping for that next big war to spend us out of our recession is probably a bad idea. Although Paul Krugman thinks an alien invasion might do it.

Posted in American Scene | 1 Comment