Israel Harel: The ideological war against Israel

Ha’aretz publishes an op-ed that says the Arab war against Israel is ideological, not territorial. I think what he means is, “It’s the Islamism, stupid.”

Peres, who wrote enthusiastic articles in favor of the greater Land of Israel in a journal I edited, and Olmert, who collected signatures on a petition that stated “liberated territory will not be returned,” and later guarded the settlers at the Kaddum camp with me, should know very well that the main reason for the Arabs’ war against the Jews is ideological and not territorial, and that even a concession of 100 percent will not satisfy the Arabs.

This is why the 2000 withdrawal from Lebanon strengthened Hezbollah and not the moderates, and why Hamas, not Fatah, won control in free elections after 25 Israeli settlements were uprooted from the Gaza Strip.

If the conflict were territorial, a Palestinian state would have arisen in 1947 when the Jews greeted the partition plan with singing and dancing; certainly the Palestinians would have been prepared to accept the 1948 armistice lines as permanent borders. Ultimately they would have accepted – following an internal crisis, which they probably would not have overcome – the far-reaching concessions that prime minister Ehud Barak made to Palestinian Authority chairman Yasser Arafat in 2000.

But at the crucial moment, Arafat proved that even 96 percent of the territory, including the Temple Mount, was not his real goal. And now, with Hamas having won in free elections, will it accept less than Fatah would have?

The extent of the extremism can be seen through what is happening among the Arabs of Israel. A week ago, a delegation headed by Shawki Khatib, the chairman of the Higher Arab Monitoring Committee, met Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and demanded he refrain from any agreement with Israel that is not acceptable to Hamas.

That would explain why every Muslim nation on earth would like to see Israel disappear.

Posted in Israel, Religion | 4 Comments

U.K. academic boycott backlash

The AJC got 300 heads of American colleges and universities to sign a statement against the U.K. academic boycott of Israel, and placed a full-page ad (PDF at the link) in the New York Times yesterday.

I’m proud to say that my alma mater, Montclair State University, is among those that signed the statement.

Posted in Israel Derangement Syndrome | 9 Comments

Palestinian terrorists not honoring amnesty agreement; dog bites man

In one of the most unsurprising developments ever, the IDF arrested a Palestinian terrorist who signed the amnesty agreement—in the act of smuggling bullets. The surprising thing to me, though, is that they let him go. I suppose I should be more jaded than that, but I’m not.

The incident in question occurred on Wednesday at 8:30 pm when the IDF stopped what security sources said were four suspicious Palestinians entering the al-Badin checkpoint outside the northern West Bank city of Nablus.

Two Palestinians were immediately let go when it was determined they were civilians, but the two others – known Brigades members – were detained after they were found to be carrying large quantities of bullets security sources said were being smuggled from Jenin to Nablus.

According to security sources, one of the detained Brigades members – who normally resides in Jenin and had pledged to remain there another two months in line with the amnesty agreement – told the IDF repeatedly he was on Israel’s amnesty list and that arresting him would “blow up” relations with the PA.

After consulting with superiors, the IDF released the Brigades member on the amnesty list but arrested the other gunman.

Asked to comment, the IDF did not deny the incident:”We make our arrests in accordance with the directives of the political echelon and the different agreements with the PA,” said an IDF spokesperson.

An Israeli security official told WND this was not the first time Brigades members granted amnesty violated their agreement to refrain from terrorism. He said the military was aware of one incident last month in which a Brigades gunman on the list shot at Israeli forces.

“We now have a situation in which a terrorist organization has been given a get-out-of-jail-free card – literally,” the official fumed.

And the beat goes on. What’s old is new again. Same-old, same-old. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Tired of this crap yet?

Yeah, me too.

Olmert is proving to be the biggest moron since Shimon Peres. Oh, wait. Peres is now the President of Israel. I wonder if this shamnesty agreement was his idea?

Posted in Israel, Terrorism | 1 Comment

The joke of the week

Snoopy wrote this

Thus does a person with a moniker “Tim from Australia” title his opus in AlJazeera.com. He supports this revolutionary discovery by a following example of a brilliant historical review:

For sixty years, Arab countries have been offering peace deals to Israel and it always refuses to even negotiate.

That really got me thinking over these 60 years. In 1948 Arabs came out with a smasher of a peace offer, and Israel had the chutzpa to reject it disdainfully. In 1967 Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt invented a new, modified version of a peace offer, which was quite appealing too, and again the Israelis had the nerve to reject it. In 1973 Egypt and Syria came out with an even more modern, cutting edge technology offer that could have brought peace and prosperity forever to the Middle East, were they able to persuade the Israelis, who by that time have become totally recalcitrant.

And so it goes, Tim. Keep plugging, meanwhile…

Cross-posted on SimplyJews.

Posted in Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | 5 Comments

The casual anti-Semitism of everday people, on TV

Nothing will come of this.

But two nights ago on CBS’ overnight feed on Showtime Networks, a player named Amber Siyavus Tomcavage stirred things up. The 27-year-old Las Vegas cocktail waitress must have forgotten that the cameras were on when she — under her breath — had a long discourse with housemate Jameka about “the Jews.” Her mother must be so proud.

The essence of Amber’s complaint? That Jews she has met were “bad” people and you could tell them by either their noses or their names. Jameka, who professes to be a Christian, made no reaction to Amber’s declaration. None of the footage has been shown on CBS’ broadcast so far, but it’s all over the Internet.

Nothing.

Unless your rant against Jews includes mentioning your very powerful (Jewish) boss by name, or you are a proven member of a neo-Nazi party trying to pass along your filth to college students, you will not be fired for anti-Semitic remarks. You will not be penalized for anti-Semitism. In spite of CAIR’s lies to the contrary, it is anti-Semitism—not “Islamophobia”—that is the one “ism” still allowed. To find that some braindead wannabe from Vegas who apparently wasn’t even hot enough for the strip club circuit is anti-Semitic is both unsurprising and a bit of a yawn.

Oh, sure, it pisses me off. All anti-Semitism bothers me. But this bimbo reminds me of no one so much as the stupid piece of crap at a party I attended years ago, who, right after admiring the largesse of Donald Trump bestowing a fist-sized rock of an engagement ring on Ivana, turned around and dissed Jackie Mason for giving his fiancee a big engagement ring, complete with a “Those Jews and their money” ignorant rant, and utterly missing the hypocrisy of her anti-Semitism.

Nothing came of that, either. Well, I did get a very silent, very pointed fuckyou moment a bit later. My cousin prevented me from going off on the idiot, begging me not to make a scene. I did, and walked away. (This was many years ago.) But I also took my Star of David, which had slid inside my buttoned top, out of the shirt, making sure it was now displaying openly. I saw the anti-Semite in the backyard and pointedly walked up to her, probably glaring. I am not subtle when I am angry. I said nothing, just stood there for a long moment. Her eyes moved to my Star of David. She said nothing, either. She dropped her glance and walked away. The cowards always do, when confronted with the truth of their ignorance, or a chance to say it again, this time, when they know a Jew is listening.

Our little Vegas strip-club wannabe probably never had the nerve to say anything negative about Jews to Jews, either, and will probably not suffer anything at all for her little “slip.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism | 4 Comments

And the Yuckitude Scale is officially at 10

Yes, the Yuckitude Scale™ has maxed out.

Richmond tied its record high temperature for the date at 12:54 p.m. today when the mercury hit 100 degrees. The record was set in 1977.

Now we go to our cat in the street, for the all-important cat-in-the-street interview.

Say, Tigger, it’s 100 degrees in the shade on your patio. What do you think of the heat?

Tig lying in 100 degree heat

Thank you, Mr. Tig.

Posted in Cats, Humor | 3 Comments

98 in the shade

It’s 98 degrees Fahrenheit in the shade of my patio, and Tig couldn’t be happier. That Magical Maine Coon Cat Coat, the one that insulates summer or winter, keeps him napping all afternoon when the local stations are issuing extreme heat warnings on the crawls below their afternoon shows.

I’m going to have to issue an extreme laziness warning.

Tig napping in the summer shade

It should hit triple digits sometime this afternoon, with the heat index about about 110-115. Sarah and I discussed this in our own meteorological terms. We have decided that yesterday was about an 8 on the Yuckitude Scale™, and that only triple digit temperatures could make it a 10.

Forecast for today: 10 on the Yuckitude Scale™, leading to Extreme Yuckitude and cautions to remain in waist-deep water if at all possible.

(All bloggers using the Yuckitude Scale™ must link back to this post as payment of my Yuckiright™ fee.)

Posted in Cats, Humor | 3 Comments

Ehud Barak reforms the IDF

This Ha’aretz article purports to be about a missile defense, but it’s chock-full of what Ehud Barak thinks is wrong with the current processes of the IDF, and how they can be fixed. This is why I point out that the IDF is a thinking army, and why I maintain my optimism about Israel’s defense capability.

Though Barak has declined to say so explicitly or to point an accusing finger at anyone, he has been unpleasantly surprised by what he has discovered about the Israel Defense Forces’ preparedness in the weeks since his return to the Defense Ministry. At a meeting Tuesday with reservists from an armored brigade, one tank gunner told him that his current reserve duty is the first time he has seen an actual shell in five years. “No one will wait five years before the next exercise,” promised Barak, who believes that live-fire exercises are critical, as they are the closest thing to real combat.

Last week, Barak met with a group of brigade commanders and was surprised to hear some of them say that during last summer’s Lebanon war, they had faced difficult dilemmas when they weighed the “value of their missions” against the danger to soldiers’ lives. Barak, like other former generals, has been critical of some units’ failure to stick to their missions during that war, and he told the brigade commanders that this is not an issue they should even consider during wartime. A single brigade commander, he explained, lacks a clear picture of the entire front, and must therefore act on the assumption that his superiors have good reason for their orders.

Each commander, he added, must behave as if the outcome of the war depends on his actions alone.

Barak has also met recently with several of the retired officers who led the army’s in-house probes into the Second Lebanon War. Based on these meetings and his studies of the material, he has concluded that the biggest problem was the enormous difference between a real war and counterterrorism activity in the territories, coupled with the lack of an “institutional memory”: Israel’s last real war occurred 24 years ago, and the IDF no longer has any officers who remember what that was like.

Operations to arrest wanted terrorists, for instance, are often halted in the middle if a soldier is wounded, as evacuating him is considered to take priority. In war, however, such conduct would be beyond the pale: An assault must continue even if the unit suffers casualties.

It sounds like Ehud Barak can fix things, if he doesn’t start running for office right away and sticks to managing the defense portfolio.

Posted in Israel | 2 Comments

Fatah’s “peace”

There are two less Hamas terrorists in the world today.

Two Palestinian gunmen, members of Hamas’ military wing, were killed by Golani troops Wednesday morning near the border fence in the northern Gaza Strip. There were no injuries among the soldiers.

The IDF reported that the force entered the Strip after spotting the gunmen. An exchange of fire erupted shortly afterwards and the two gunmen were killed.

At least Hamas is no longer pretending that they want anything other than the destruction of Israel. Fatah’s peace is a lie.

Meanwhile, an IDF soldier was lightly wounded in a separate incident in Nablus early Wednesday, as two explosive devices and gunshots were aimed at IDF forces operating in the city.

Another explosive device and two Molotov cocktails were hurled at troops near the village of Beit Omar, south of Bethlehem.

On Tuesday night, the IDF arrested 13 wanted Palestinians in the West Bank. Six were arrested in the Nablus area, and one was arrested in Jenin. Two gunmen were arrested in the Ramallah area and four were apprehended in Bethlehem.

I note once again that those arrests and attacks are all taking part in the West Bank, where a supposed “truce” is taking place.

Uh-huh.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Terrorism | Comments Off on Fatah’s “peace”

Grim Milestone moment

Elder of Zion has been tracking the death of Palestinians—killed by other Palestinians. The number is now 500 501. This post is a must-read, and a must-link. (That means you, blogosphere.)

We have reached the “grim milestone” of 500 PalArabs that we have been able to document violently killed by each other this year.

Since we started
the self-death count 13 months ago, we have documented 705 violent deaths of Palestinian Arabs due to infighting, honor killings, “work accidents,” shootings during funerals and weddings, children picking up bombs being built by their parents, and similar self-inflicted incidents.

Calling all reporters: Here’s a different death count you can use as a reference.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Media Bias, palestinian politics | 5 Comments

Iran tech catches up to 1960s America

This is why Iran wants the bomb:

Iran yesterday showed off for the first time a new fighter jet said to be modelled on the American F-5 but built using domestic technology, state media reported.

The Azarakhsh (Lightning) jet-one of the first to be home-produced by Iran-made a successful flight in the central city of Isfahan in a ceremony attended by Defence Minister Mostafa Mohammad Najjar and other officials.

[…] The development of the plane was first announced in September last year, when military officials said that it was “comparable” to the US F-5 fighter jet.

From the Daily Alert editors:

The F-5 is a 1960s-vintage jet. Prior to the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Iran’s air force possessed some 160 F-5 fighters.

Welcome to the 1960s, Iran.

All sarcasm aside, this is why Iran wants nukes. Because they’re not able to build their own cutting-edge jets, and we won’t sell them any (though Russia has no such compunction; however, Russian jets always seem to lose when confronted with American jets piloted by Americans or Israelis).

Posted in Israel | 10 Comments

Hamas bans music in Gazastan

Actually, not all music. But you can no longer play the violin, the piano, or the flute.

I lead a group of 26 musicians – we play traditional Palestinian music. But for the last two months we haven’t been able to work.

This group, Hamas, believe they are the leaders of Islam. The violin, piano, flute, all these instruments are banned. Only the drum is allowed. They say any other instrument is not mentioned in the Koran.

[…] Hamas have already beaten one of my singers for singing for Fatah. He was attacked at the wedding where he went to perform.

We had to send him to Israel for hospital treatment.

We have to keep our traditional music because it is Palestinian. People without traditions are not civilised, they are nothing.

But hey, the other two Palestinians on the BBC website say that life in Hamas is okay. It’s the evil Israelis who are behind all the misery.

The Western media try to paint Hamas as the source of all evil. But Hamas are Palestinians as well. They are not strangers from another planet.

A friend of mine had his wedding party a few days ago. It was mixed male and female, not a traditional wedding. It went ahead as normal, so our way of life has not changed.

However, since the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit was kidnapped [last year] we have had less electricity. We only get between 12 and 14 hours a day.

We get it from an Israeli company and Israel decrees how much electricity we need – they want to make us suffer.

Uh-huh. They want to make you suffer. That’s why they supply electricity at all. The cognitive dissonance of the eternal Palestinian victimhood survives.

Posted in Israel | 3 Comments

What’s missing from this story?

Update: Ha’aretz says it was a rocket fired at Israel that fell on a house in Beit Lahiya. Looks like the AP was played.

A Qassam rocket fired by Palestinian militants struck the northern Gaza Strip on Tuesday, killing an eight-year-old boy and his six-year-old sister, and injuring five other children.

The rocket, fired at Israel, fell short and hit the children’s house in the village of Beit Lahiya. No group claimed responsibility.


See if you can spot the missing elements of this AP story:

Explosion in Gaza Kills Child

Headline is vague regarding what caused the explosion. A gas line break? A propane tank? Or perhaps a “crude, homemade rocket”? You know it wasn’t an IDF missile, because then the headline would be “Israel Kills Child in Gaza.”

A large explosion in northern Gaza on Tuesday killed an 8-year-old boy and his 6-year-old sister and injured five other children, Palestinian health officials said.

Witnesses said a group of children stumbled upon a homemade rocket or a mortar shell and began playing with it. The device exploded, injuring all seven children, two of whom died later of their wounds.

Moaiya Hassanain, a Palestinian health official, said the explosion occurred in the village of Beit Lahiya, in the northern Gaza Strip, and the wounded were evacuated to hospital.

We are now three paragraphs in, and have no idea where that “homemade rocket” or mortar could possibly have come from. You know it can’t be from the IDF, because if it was from the IDF, the sentence would read “stumbled upon an unexploded missile or mortar shell left by the IDF during an incursion into Gaza” followed by “The IDF makes regular incursions into Gaza in pursuit of militants.”

The explosion is in Beit Lahiya. Hm. Why is that village name so familiar? Let’s think. Think, think, think.

The Kamal Adwan hospital identified the dead children as Wesam Abed Allah and his sister Hala.

The area is a frequent launching pad for militants who fire rockets toward Israel.

Oh, look. Five paragraphs in—which is too late for many “World News” sections of newspapers, which stop at paragraph three, the AP article identifies Beit Lahiya as one of the favorite places “militants” like to fire “crude, homemade rockets” into Israel. (Note the AP use of the word “toward” Israel, as if the “militants” are only just joshin’. They don’t really want to try to kill Israeli children. The correct word would be “into,” but then, the AP can weasel-word its way out of this because some rockets actually fall on Gazans (and have killed them before).

And last, the final paragraph of the piece:

No Palestinian group accused the army of the explosion. The army often targets militants in air strikes in the region.

Which army? The Hamas army? The PA army? Oh, wait. The Israeli army. Of course. Interesting how the article doesn’t even mention which army isn’t accused. Now, that may be an editing slip. I’ve seen it more than a few times, making me wonder if the AP even has copy editors. Or if perhaps they’ve just decided that everyone knows they mean the Israeli army, and they aren’t even bothering to hide the bias anymore.

Other notes on the article: The children have names and ages, where Israeli victims of Arab terrorist attacks are rarely named, only identified by gender and whether they’re an adult or a child (and not even that, sometimes). And surprisingly, no terrorist representative is blaming this one on Israel. Perhaps even they know when the media won’t bite on a clear lie. Or perhaps they’re catching on to the fact that the blogosphere is now on the lookout for fauxtography and false stories.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Gaza | 2 Comments

Foot in mouth misreading

Talk about the power of associative (or simply lazy) processing of random information: I was slightly incensed lately about the article in the British Medical Journal by the incomparable Tom Hickey, one of the chief promoters of the “boycott Israel” initiatives. And this headline in CNN fits very well into that slightly incensed stream of semi-consciousness:

Of course, it doesn’t have a lot to do with Tom Hickey, aside of possibility that the price of steaks he will have to pay will be slightly higher for some time. And I do wish British farmers well, so let’s leave them out of this post.

Let’s take a look at the foot-in-mouth outbreak in the British academic circles. And I am not going to dissect the whole article, it is too full of malarkey and was already dissected by many a superior mind. So I shall concern myself with something simple that even I can enjoy:

We are accused of unfairly singling out Israel—the Jewish state—and hence of being anti-semites. We are asked why we do not propose a boycott of other states whose policies are barbaric and inhuman, such as China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Zimbabwe.

But whether a boycott is appropriate in such places depends on the merits of each individual case. In the case of Israel, we are speaking about a society whose dominant self image is one of a bastion of civilisation in a sea of medieval reaction. And we are speaking of a culture, both in Israel and in the long history of the Jewish diaspora, in which education and scholarship are held in high regard. That is why an academic boycott might have a desirable political effect in Israel, an effect that might not be expected elsewhere.

So – you see how it goes – simple and practical. The real big and bad ones, like China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. – they are so big, so bad and so evil that there is no sense in even mentioning them. Let’s leave them alone – after all, they do not threaten our delicate academic backsides right now.

Argh… What can one say about this perverted “logic”? Nothing, really. So here comes a picture of Mr Hickey from the shoulders up. The only reason I have posted it is that in the next picture, the one that reflects his intellectual achievements, you will not be able to see his face.

But hey, the tie is in place!

P.S. To the nitpickers – dontcha love a mixed metaphor here and there?

Cross-posted on SimplyJews.

Posted in Israel Derangement Syndrome | 2 Comments

Fact checking

Ace points to a conversation between Ross Douthat and Jonathan Chait about the Scott Beauchamp affair. Ross talks about the excellence of the Atlantic’s fact-checking process, and Ace mentions that Jonathan Chait seems rather surprised that the fact-checkers actuallly call up article sources and ask if they are being quoted accurately.

I find it shocking that a senior editor at TNR would seem so unversed in the process of fact-checking. I spent a fair amount of time in magazine publishing during my typesetting/desktop publishing career. One of my stints was as a typesetter at New Woman, a monthly women’s magazine owned by K-III Magazines, which was one of the biggest cheapskate corporations in the publishing world back then. Most people aspired to get enough experience on a K-III magazine to go work for Conde Nast or some other publisher that paid much better. But even this cheapskate monthly women’s magazine had a fact-checker, and his fact-checking was superb. I often heard him on the phone during the workday. He called every author’s interview subject to make sure that the subject said what the author quoted them as saying. He checked the accuracy of the facts of each story, either with reference books or by calling agencies referred to in articles. Nothing got into the magazine without being thoroughly fact-checked. And this was all for a women’s magazine that ran articles on fashion, diet, exercise, and women’s issues.

To find that neither Slate nor TNR has fact-checking as thorough as the underpaid twentysomething assistant editors I worked with at New Woman is a very sad reflection on the state of Slate and TNR—not on the state of fact-checking.

Posted in Media | 7 Comments