More Mughniyeh fallout

Unlike the fanciful account in the Times of London, AP has an interesting view of what it would have taken to kill Imad Mughniyeh, provided by an ex-Mossad agent who saw the results of Mughniyeh’s work first hand.Although Israel and the U.S. perhaps top the list of suspects in Mughniyeh’s assassination, Tsafrir said, France, Germany, and Saudi Arabia are also among countries that had “unsettled accounts” with him. And he likely had internal opponents.

“A person like this makes a lot of enemies,” Tsafrir said.An operation like the one that killed Mughniyeh last week would have been extremely complex, requiring years of intelligence work and dozens of people, he said. “It’s not a matter of just pressing the button,” he said.

“An operation like this would take tremendous amounts of intelligence _ human intelligence, not electronic intelligence,” he said. “You need the ability to find people, to check the location, to install the device, and to escape” _ no simple task in the middle of a hostile capital.

“The agents could be recruited, or infiltrated into the organization, or both. But there would be dozens involved, and everything would be compartmentalized: People wouldn’t know what the others were doing, and would only know what they needed to know,” Tsafrir said.

Clearly, if Israel carried out the hit, it would suggest that it is acting with a surprising amount of freedom in Syria.

But Tsafrir points out that Mughniyeh wasn’t disliked only by the Israelis. Nor were his enemies only non-Muslims.

It’s been reported Kuwaiti parliamentarians are initiating legal proceedings against other Kuwaiti lawmakers for their eulogy of Mughniyeh.

The opposition Popular Action Bloc yesterday expelled its members Adnan Abdulsamad and Ahmad Lari over their participation in a mourning rally for top Hezbollah commander Imad Mughniyah who was killed last week. The surprising decision came as pressure mounted on the two lawmakers, with some MPs either urging the government to take legal action against them and others already preparing for lifting their immunity to allow their prosecution.The Popular Action Bloc, headed by veteran MP Ahmad Al-Saadoun, strongly condemned in a statement that the participation of the two MPs in “the rally to mourn terrorist Imad Mughniyah who brutally killed two Kuwaitis during the hijacking of the Jabriya plane” in 1988. It added that the rally was held on Kuwaiti territory after 20 years of the hijacking “which has hurt the feelings of Kuwaitis”. The expulsion came following a lengthy meeting of the group and after consultations with all members, the statement said. Besides Abdulsamad and Lari, the group comprises of five MPs.

Though Israelly Cool points out that the Kuwaitis who deplored the eulogy weren’t much interest in Israelis killed, it does point to a Shi’ite/Sunni rift that may have some significance.

Barry Rubin noticed

Yet, wait a minute; it reveals a major shift from what has been true for the last 60 years or more.Jafari, and other Iranians, don’t want to say that Iran itself is going to do the wiping out. After all, such hints in the past strengthened international resolve against Iran getting the nuclear weapons that it might use to destroy Israel. Such a posture also justifies an Israeli attack on Iran, since that country is openly threatening genocide against it.

In effect, though, Jafari is erasing all the historical actors in the conflict: Arab states, Arab nationalist groups, Sunni Muslims, and–most remarkably of all–the Palestinians.

The battle is being waged by the heroes of today and the victors of tomorrow–Shia Muslims, and Lebanese ones at that. It is not even a Muslim-Jewish battle (which is in general the Islamist line), because the great majority of Muslims are also not included.

So perhaps that’s why the Kuwaiti lawmakers are reacting so strongly. What’s going on is a Shi’ite/Iranian war for hegemony in the Middle East. The Kuwaitis scared to challenge Iran directly (Kuwait has been swallowed up once already) so they focus their rage on its proxy instead.

(This Iranian war might also explain why PM Olmert and DM Barak have refused to budge. A motivation other than, or in addition to, arrogance, may be a sense that with the Iranian threat, continuity is important. h/t judeopundit)

As I’ve mentioned before there seems to be a lot hidden from view right now. I suspect that we’ll see a lot more action in the coming months on the Israeli/Iranian front that seems disconnected but would really be part of this ongoing conflict.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Iran, Israel, Syria | 1 Comment

Green flags

captjrl12102201738mideast_israel_palestinians__jrl121.jpg

This is the funeral of Shadi Zghayer and Mohammed Herbawi the two terrorists who launched an attack in Dimona two weeks ago. Israel returned their bodies to their families in Hebron for burial. (Despite my suspicions at the time, they did not come from Gaza.)

Note the green flags being displayed. Those are the flags of Hamas and this is Hebron where, supposedly, Fatah holds sway. This suggests that Fatah either can’t or won’t prevent Hamas from operating openly.

Either way, not a good sign.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Hamas, Israel, Terrorism | Comments Off on Green flags

Significant microbe

A number of bloggers have noted that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad’s latest rhetorical attacks on Israel.Steven Peter Rosen wonders if the change in terminology is a harbinger of something more sinister. (via memeorandum)

Some streams of discourse are chronically laden with dehumanizing rhetoric. Detecting meaningful shifts requires close study of the discourse of interest over time, and I have not done this with regard to Iran and Israel. Casual observation suggests that references to Israel as a “cancer” are old, but that the reference to Israel as a “black and dirty microbe” is new.On the basis of my historical research, my recommendation was that a significant shift in discourse of this character be used as a indicator that we should focus intelligence collection assets on a target that is now suspected of being willing to engage in mass killing by unconventional means, and to issue specific deterrent threats of retaliation.

The Belmont Club counters that the likelihood of Iran using biological weapons against Israel is more related to its ability to protect its own population.

The critical nature of these variables implies that any enemy country or terrorist organization contemplating a strike must game things out beforehand. This would probably take the form of a deniable test attack to see how Israel or the US respond. Or perhaps an unrelated Western country could be chosen as the guinea pig to see how an equivalent society would fare in the face of a similar threat. Without a test run to gauge the effects of their weapons an enemy force would run too great a risk that the strike would fail, exposing them to a devastating response. Second, even primitive enemies would probably take steps to protect their core assets from a riposte by investing in low-tech precautions like creating redoubts in distant areas to which key personnel could retreat. Again, the key to early warning is to detect enemy defensive or planning operations first.

But what if Rosen and the Belmont club are being too specific in their approach? Maybe the change in terminology isn’t indicative of a non-conventional attack but of a conventional one.

The other day David Hazony wondered if Israel and Hezbollah were headed to war again. He concluded that, despite the escalating tensions, neither side was anxious to fight right now.

Of course another possibility is that Hezbollah (and its sponsors Syria and Iran) is less likely to fight now that Imad Mughniyeh is dead. Assuming that Israel killed Mughniyeh, maybe they did it to avert an attack or even war in the near future that he was involved in planning.

There is a lot going on now, much of it underneath the radar. Maybe Israeli is fighting Lebanon III but doing it a lot more quietly and effectively than Lebanon II.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Iran, Israel, Syria, Terrorism | Comments Off on Significant microbe

Confirming the kill

I wrote yesterday about the importance in many situations of killing a terrorist who might still present a threat. It reminded me of an incident in the Old City of Jerusalem a few months ago. The New York Times reported then.

According to the police and witnesses, two armed security guards who work at a nearby yeshiva were walking near the Jaffa Gate on Christian Quarter Street when the young man attacked one guard and took his gun. He shot the guard in the upper chest and ran toward the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate, chased by the second guard, the witnesses said.There was an exchange of fire and bystanders were wounded, mostly by ricochets. The gunman was badly wounded, witnesses said, slumping against a wall, and was told to drop his gun. He died in a narrow street lined by shops. Ahmed Tibi, an Israeli Arab member of Parliament, said that the man was killed when he was already down, but the police said that they could not verify the charge.

One witness told Israel Radio: “I saw the wounded man on the ground wasn’t moving at all. I didn’t see anything in his hands. I saw two security guards continuing to shoot at the man.”

By quoting the witness and referring to the account of the killing as a “charge,” the reporter Steven Erlanger implicitly accuses the guards of over-reacting.

Only later in the article do we learn:

Two other security guards who have lived in the Old City for 20 years were nearby, both armed. They refused to give their names, but one said: “We work according to rules, and one of the very clear orders we have is that when we see a terrorist who is armed, we are instructed to shoot back at him until we kill him. This way we will prevent a bigger incident.”

I know that the witness says that he/she didn’t see anything in the attackers hands, but that doesn’t mean that there was no weapon nearby either.

Given that the attacker had shot a number of people before he was killed, he hardly deserves the benefit of the doubt. At the time the guards were bound to “….prevent the bigger incident.”

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Terrorism | 2 Comments

Christian missionaries arrested in Jordan

Say, you know that enlightened, “moderate” state next to Israel? The one that everyone says is so cool with the West? The one that keeps refusing to change the laws about honor killings and declares Islam to be its state religion? Yeah, that one. Well, they just arrested a group of Christians, for the awful crime of—wait for it—evangelizing.

Eight people have been arrested in Jordan for propagating the Christian faith, according to a Saudi newspaper.

Jordanian security forces arrested eight people, mostly foreigners, after they were caught distributing missionary material to Bedouin families north and east of the Jordanian capital, Amman, the Saudi daily Al-Watan reported.

The authorities received information about the missionaries from local residents who said these foreigners were offering humanitarian assistance to poor Muslim families and distributing fliers promoting Christianity.

Sources said they were “enticing” impoverished youngsters by paying them money and calling on them to marry foreign girls.

Mind you, I can’t stand evangelists coming to my door and trying to convert me, either. But then, I just tell them to get lost and close the door. (Unless I’m in a really pissy mood, in which case I am less kind.) But it’s good to know that such a “moderate” state is so tolerant. This is the state that constantly lectures Israel on her treatment of Muslims, in particular, when discussing the Temple Mount in re: Al-Aqsa Mosque. Funny how they’re not so tolerant about their own property.

The Jordanian government prohibits conversion from Islam and the proselytizing of Muslims. The Shari’a courts have the authority to prosecute people trying to convert Muslims, according to the United States State Department’s annual report on religious freedom.

Muslims in Jordan who convert to another religion face social and governmental discrimination, the report said.

Yes, it’s another example of the famed Muslim tolerance of other religions. Tolerance. That’s why eight Christians were arrested for proselytizing.

Posted in Religion | 9 Comments

The modern-day Hitler speaks again

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is channeling Hitler. Think I’m exaggerating? Let’s compare and contrast.

Ahmadinejad:

“World powers have created a dirty microbe, called the Zionist regime, which they have unleashed on the region’s nations,” said Ahmadinejad in his speech, which was broadcast on Iranian National Television.

“This (regime) is supported by those who created it as their scarecrow, to keep the region’s nations under control.”

Hitler:

For us, it is a problem of whether our nation can ever recover its health, whether the Jewish spirit can ever really be eradicated. Don’t be misled into thinking you can fight a disease without killing the carrier, without destroying the bacillus. Don’t think you can fight racial tuberculosis without taking care to rid the nation of the carrier of that racial tuberculosis. This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end, until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished from our midst.

And it’s not just Ahmadinejad. His generals are using the same language—the recycled language of the Nazis, to describe the Jews of Israel. And make no mistake, when they’re talking about Zionists, they’re saying, “Jews.” But sometimes, the mask slips, and one of them mentions Israel by name.

Mohammad Ali Jaafari, commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards:

“I am convinced that with every day that passes Hizbullah’s power increases, and in the near future we will bear witness to the disappearance of this cancerous bacterium, Israel, by the Hizbullah’s fighters.”

Hitler again:

“Only when this Jewish bacillus infecting the life of peoples has been removed can one hope to establish a co-operation amongst the nations which shall be built up on a lasting understanding.” quoted in N H Baynes, The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, Oxford University Press, 1942, Volume I, pp.743)

There is no real difference between the language of Hitler and the Nazis during the 1930s and 40s, and the language of the Iranians today. Ahmadinejad, with each passing day, is proving himself to be the heir of Hitler. His nation has funded the longest war against Israel, with the largest number of murdered Jews. Iran—through its proxy, Hezbollah—is behind the death of hundreds of Jews in Argentina and Israel. Iran funds Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hamas, and other terror groups that have murdered Jews in Israel and elsewhere. Iran is actively working to destroy the Jewish state, provides arms, weapons, and personnel to war against Israel and Jews, and has made no secret that it wants the end of “the Zionist entity.”

This modern-day Hitler aims to bring Israel down in a nuclear holocaust. It’s time the world stopped pretending otherwise.

Posted in Iran, Israel | Comments Off on The modern-day Hitler speaks again

More mor

I’d like to remind you something Seraphic Secret wrote (in the comments) in the aftermath of Dimona bombing and the actions of the heroic policeman, Kobi Mor.

A head shot to a terrorist trying to self-detonate is an amazing accomplishment. Under those circumstances your heart is racing, your throat is dry as the Negev, and fear is eating your soul. Kobi Mor is quite a man, and a great marksman. He risked his life and saved many lives.

Mr. Mor saved many lives by keeping his cool and ensuring the second terrorist was dead before he could detonate his bomb. If an illustration was needed for how incredible his feat was, note this report from Iraq:

The 42-year-old electronics store owner peered outside and saw an Iraqi soldier draw a pistol on a young woman wearing a black robe. The woman raised her arms. “I have nothing on me,” she pleaded.But she did: Mr. Ali saw wires protruding from her clothing. The soldier, hands shaking, fired two bullets at the woman as she began to run toward the shops. Then another shop owner shot the woman again with a Kalashnikov assault rifle that he said he keeps in his store for protection.

The young woman fell hard, Mr. Ali said, but “managed to press the detonation button with her last breath.”

The explosion, near the National Theater, killed three people and wounded eight, according to the Iraqi police. The death toll would have been greater if the Iraqi soldier had not screamed a warning, said Hamid Khalil, who has a tea shop on the same street.

“He was very brave, but hesitant a bit,” Mr. Khalil said.

My point is not to fault the Iraqi soldier, but the story illustrates the difficulty of what Mr. Mor did and gives context to the challenge he faced.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Terrorism | Comments Off on More mor

Where credit is due

Henry Kissinger was interviewed by Der Spiegel (and helpfully excerpted by Ocean Guy)

SPIEGEL: Isn’t German and European opposition to a greater military involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq also a result of deep distrust of American power?

Kissinger: By this time next year, we will see the beginning of a new administration. We will then discover to what extent the Bush administration was the cause or the alibi for European-American disagreements. Right now, many Europeans hide behind the unpopularity of President Bush. And this administration made several mistakes in the beginning.
[…]
Kissinger: … But I do believe that George W. Bush has correctly understood the global challenge we are facing, the threat of radical Islam, and that he has fought that battle with great fortitude. He will be appreciated for that later.

SPIEGEL: In 50 years, historians will treat his legacy more kindly?

Kissinger: That will happen much earlier.

Henry Kissinger thinks that President Bush will be vindicated for dislodging Saddam and, in general, taking the fight to the Islamists.

But there’s another area where he’s starting to get credit, even if not at home.

Reuters reports Unpopular at home, Bush basks in African praise (via memeorandum)

Unpopular at home and in much of the world during the last year of his presidency, George W. Bush is basking in rare adulation on his African tour.Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete poured praise on Bush in Dar es Salaam on Sunday, the second day of his five-nation African tour, each compliment applauded warmly by members of the east African country’s cabinet.

Although around 2,000 Muslim demonstrators protested against Bush on the eve of his visit, many thousands more cheering, waving people lined his road from the airport on Saturday.

According the article the adulation isn’t rare in Africa at all.

Don Surber observes

No president has made fighting AIDS and HIV in Africa a bigger priority than George Walker Bush. He has quietly, in his way, forged ties with African leaders and their people that both American and Africa will enjoy for decades to come.Reuters reported: “Because of the U.S. anti-malaria program, 5 percent of patients tested positive for the disease on the offshore islands of zanzibar in 2007 compared to 40 percent three years earlier, the Tanzanian leader said.”

Remarkable.

However the Reuters reporter mocks the President, the significance of his policy was not lost on Bob Geldof. (h/t memeorandum)

Mr. Geldof is an Irish rock and roll singer and longtime social activist who has helped, along with U2 rocker Bono, raise awareness about need in Africa. His most well known achievement is organizing the Live Aid concert in 1985, which raised money for debt relief for poor African countries.But Mr. Geldof has remained closely engaged with African affairs since then, and he spoke off the cuff to reporters today who were waiting for a press conference with Mr. Bush and Rwandan President Paul Kagame.

Mr. Geldof praised Mr. Bush for his work in delivering billions to fight disease and poverty in Africa, and blasted the U.S. press for ignoring the achievement.

Mr. Bush, said Mr. Geldof, “has done more than any other president so far.”

“This is the triumph of American policy really,” he said. “It was probably unexpected of the man. It was expected of the nation, but not of the man, but both rose to the occasion.”

“What’s in it for [Mr. Bush]? Absolutely nothing,” Mr. Geldof said.

Similarly, a few years ago, Geldof’s partner in raising awareness of problems in Africa, Bono, gave President Bush credit for his efforts.

There are a few ironies that come to mind.
1) Eight years ago candidate George W. Bush mocked the idea of nation building. After 9/11 though he came to realize that a vacuum of governance allows malignant movements to metastasize. In effect President Bush has been fighting the war on terror on two fronts: he’s taken the battle to the Islamists and he’s sought to deprive them of the bases they need to flourish. Bush’s many critics accuse him of not learning or adapting. In these ways, it’s pretty clear that President Bush has learned lessons in office that he didn’t conceive of when he was just a candidate.
2) For the first six years of President Bush’s tenure anytime an European head of state differed with him it was major news. Now that African heads of state are praising him, it isn’t reported straight but in contrast to his unpopularity at home. Perhaps the media ought to look at the way they’ve treated the President and wonder if their coverage plays any role in the public’s perception of him.
3) Michelle Obama has never been proud of her country in her adulthood until her husband’s success in his presidential bid. Amazingly when her country reached out to protect the most vulnerable of the world, it didn’t make her proud.
4) If the words of Bob Geldof and Bono toward the President had been critical, how many papers would have run with those criticisms on A1?

President Bush hasn’t been a perfect president, but he has adopted many policies that have been good and possibly even transforming. He doesn’t get nearly enough credit for them. Part of the problem, of course, is his failure to communicate his policies effectively. But part of the problem has also been the refusal of his opponents – especially those in the media – to give him his due.

Maybe Kissinger’s right, and we’ll start seeing some reconsideration of his record sooner rather than later.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Media Bias, Politics | 6 Comments

Tell me who your friends are…

I am not into American elections scene at all, catching only some ricochets from the friendly bloggers. So, following this tradition, a recent post by Ami Isseroff:

I can feel in my heart much better than I can explain, the need to make Barack Obama president, and the will to believe that this man who talks about change and has captured the imagination of the American people can really make it happen. I also want to believe that Barack Obama is the American leader who will finally have the stature to somehow make peace between Israel and its Arab neighbors. That would truly be a wondrous miracle.

However, I am not willing to sacrifice Israel in order to realize the dream of Martin Luther King Jr. Whatever my heart tells me, my head tells me that Wright, Malley and Brzezinsky can’t be good for Israel, and if they are Obama’s associates, whether day-to-day or only on Sundays, he can’t be good for Israel. And my head also tells me that the villains of Washington DC or those in Tehran for that matter, cannot be defeated just by chanting “Yes we can.”

Yep. The unholy trio of Wright, Malley and Brzezinsky makes me uncomfortable too. Especially the last “expert”. Are we looking at another peanut president stretch?

Cross-posted on SimplyJews.

Posted in Politics | 2 Comments

Where in the world is Meryl?

If you’re wondering why Soccer Dad seems to be the heart and soul of this blog these days, it’s because I still have The Plague That Struck Richmond. Apparently, there’s a Round Two. That means, you get better, and then you get knocked off your feet all over again and set back to the beginning. Round Two struck over the weekend. So today, I’m right about where I was on, oh, Thursday.

I had just about enough energy to get to the supermarket yesterday and buy things like fresh vegetables. And more Gatorade.

My leftover energy goes into my paying job. So thanks to Soccer Dad for keeping this blog going, because without him, you’d have had all of two posts in the last four or five days.

Posted in Life | Comments Off on Where in the world is Meryl?

Beyond mainstream

In this past week’s Baltimore Jewish Times, Dr. Robert O. Freedman analyzed the chances of peace “Beyond Winograd.”

The primary alternative to Olmert, former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, is likely to freeze the peace process by not permitting further Israeli withdrawals from the West Bank, thus preventing the contiguous Palestinian state that Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas has been demanding.

Those of us who remember when Netanyahu was Prime Minister, remember that he withdrew Israeli troops from Hebron. So to argue that he would certainly not withdraw from any territory is simple propaganda. Prof Freedman, a vocal member of Americans for Peace Now is simply promoting the view that PM Olmert is good for Israel because he’s most likely to cede territory to the Palestinians.

What’s remarkable about the article is the absence of assigning any responsibility to the Palestinians for peace. To Dr. Freedman peace can only come from acceding to the demands of the Palestinians.

Since Barak wants to return as prime minister, he cannot afford to appear weak on the Palestinian issue. This is the case because Netanyahu has argued that the withdrawals from southern Lebanon (under Barak) and Gaza have led to disasters.

Note the qualification “Netanyahu has argued.” Except it’s pretty clear that Netanyahu is correct. After Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon, Hezbollah was afforded the opportunity to build its forces in southern Lebanon eventually becoming intolerable in the summer of 2006, forcing Israel to strike back. And the continued barrage of rockets emanating from Gaza certainly suggests that the withdrawal from Gaza was not an unqualified success.

The strongest opposition to Olmert’s plan for a two-state solution will come from the so-called “Hilltop Youth,” children of the Religious Zionists who settled the West Bank in the 1970s and 1980s. The largest group of Israelis opposing further withdrawals may be called “security pragmatists,” individuals who oppose further withdrawals from the West Bank. This group forms the bedrock of Netanyahu’s support.

This is a nice way of marginalizing Netanyahu. Netanyahu is a tool of an extremist group. Well why don’t we look at recent polling from Israel. Here’s a poll from February 7.

If elections were held today how would you vote (expressed in % and mandates based on those with opinion) Actual Knesset today in [brackets] 06% 11 [29] Kadima 10% 19 [19] Labor 18% 34 [12] Likud

So then Likud, according to this poll, has more support than Labor and Kadima combined. Likud (and its leader Netanyahu) is not the fringe party that Freedman seeks to marginalize. Rather he is trying to promote his own extreme agenda by defining anyone who disagrees with it as outside the mainstream.

Surrendering territory to Fatah or Hamas has not yet brought peace. Nothing Freedman writes can change that.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Beyond mainstream

Bracing

My co-blogger Judeopundit takes Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman to task for his argument that Israel hitting Imad Mughniyah was likely counterproductive in “Bracing for revenge.” In two sentences he neatly disposes of Mr. Bergman’s argument:

Obviously terrorist groups are capable of horrendous operations for reasons other than revenge. The consequences of not crossing “red lines” could be to allow a terror organization to build its capabilities and then take the initiative when it feels ready.

The Terror Wonk dealt with the question in Will Hezbollah retaliate? He lays out the information supporting the possibility and against he possibility of retaliation. While he feels that Israeli and Jewish organizations ought to exercise increased vigilance, he doesn’t (seem to) feel that revenge is automatic.

And there are indeed counterexamples to show that killing the right terror bosses will effectively reduce terror.

Last year, Elder of Ziyon noted that the Israeli killing of Sheikh Yassin and Dr. Rantisi had likely been a factor in the reduction of terror deaths Israel suffered in recent years. Also during the “Aqsa intifada” Israel hit a leader of Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Afterwards, terror attempts by the group were marked by failure. (In one case the terrorist entered a store and showed of his explosive belt warning everyone in advance of the explosion.)
There seems to be plenty of evidence that when Israel kills a terror leader who is skilled in launching operations (recruiting, training and planning), it will see less terror rather than more.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Terrorism | Comments Off on Bracing

Haveil Havalim #154 is UP!

Esser Agaroth puts a lot more than 2 cents worth of effort into this week’s Haveil Havalim #154, the Jewish/Israel blogging carnival. Check it out! (I was surprised to learn that Esser Agaroth is a waffler!)

Posted in Israel, Jews, Linkfests | 1 Comment

Sieg Heil

LGF noticed something about the Hezbollah salute. (via memeorandum)
It’s Almost Supernatural noticed the same thing about “Palestinian Security Forces” and the “Fatah militia.”
Elder of Ziyon noticed it about “supporters of the Fatah movement” Hezbollah’s 10 year old recruits and a Gaza rally for Hamas.
Israelly Cool notices it among Palestinian security forces near Tulkarem.

Repeat after me, “We have nothing against Jews, it’s the Zionists we hate.”

I guess that this bit of history from Bernard Lewis can’t be ignored.

In 1940, the government of France surrendered to Nazi Germany. A new collaborationist government was formed and established in a watering place called Vichy, and General Charles de Gaulle moved to London and set up a Free French committee. The French empire was beyond the reach of the Germans at that point, and the governors of the French colonies and dependencies were free to decide: they could stay with Vichy or rally to de Gaulle. Vichy was the choice of most of them, and in particular the rulers of the French-mandated territory of Syria-Lebanon, in the heart of the Arab East. This meant that Syria-Lebanon was wide open to the Nazis, who moved in and made it the main base of their propaganda and activity in the Arab world.It was at that time that the ideological foundations of what later became the Baath Party were laid, with the adaptation of Nazi ideas and methods to the Middle Eastern situation. The nascent party’s ideology emphasized pan-Arabism, nationalism, and a form of socialism. The party was not officially founded until April 1947, but memoirs of the time and other sources show that the Nazi interlude is where it began. From Syria, the Germans and the proto-Baathists also set up a pro-Nazi regime in Iraq, led by the famous, and notorious, Rashid Ali al-Gailani.

UPDATE: Solomonia observes:

They’re not the only guys who use that kind of salute in the region. It attests to the direct influence of European Fascism on some of the trappings that these area groups have taken on. Fertile ground.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Holocaust, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Terrorism | 2 Comments

The latest SNN

The newest Shire Network News is up, with an interview by Ezra Levant, the man being persecuted by Canada’s thought police.

Posted in Podcasts | Comments Off on The latest SNN