Yourish.com

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck—it’s an effing duck. (H/T: Charles.)

On June 29th, MSNBC personality and three-time presidential candidate Pat Buchanan appeared on a neo-Nazi radio program to promote his new revisionist history of the Second World War, Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World. James Edwards is the host of the program “Political Cesspool,” the stated mission of which is to “represent a philosophy that is pro-White.” Edwards and his colleauges seek “to revive the White birthrate above replacement level fertility and beyond to grow the percentage of Whites in the world relative to other races” and believe that “Secession is a right of all people and individuals. It was successful in 1776 and this show honors those who tried to make it successful in 1865.”

According to the researchers at the Anti-Defamation League, who listened to the show, Buchanan defended Charles Lindbergh, saying, “…his reputation has been blackened because of a single speech he gave and a couple of paragraphs in it where he said that … the Jewish community is beating the drums for war … but frankly, no one has said what he said was palpably untrue.”

Buchanan is in good company. Perusing the guest list of Political Cesspool, one sees Willis Carto, (perhaps the most prominent anti-Semite in America), Mark Weber (Director of the Institute for Historical Review, a Holocaust denial outfit) and Jared Taylor, the editor of American Renaissance, a eugenicist publication. A political cesspool indeed. Calling Buchanan a “brownshirt” a few weeks ago may have seemed a little impertinent at the time, but it’s entirely accurate.

A quick reference to the Wikipedia entry on Lindbergh gives you some idea about his thoughts on Jews. They’re not unlike Buchanan’s, I think.

Lindbergh’s reaction to Kristallnacht was entrusted to his diary: “I do not understand these riots on the part of the Germans,” he wrote. “It seems so contrary to their sense of order and intelligence. They have undoubtedly had a difficult ‘Jewish problem,’ but why is it necessary to handle it so unreasonably?”

In his diaries, he wrote: “We must limit to a reasonable amount the Jewish influence… Whenever the Jewish percentage of total population becomes too high, a reaction seems to invariably occur. It is too bad because a few Jews of the right type are, I believe, an asset to any country.”

So let’s take a look at what our newly uncloseted neo-Nazi has to say about the Jews, from his piece titled, “Who’s Planning Our Next War?”

Yet Israel is even today pushing Bush into a pre-emptive war with a naked threat to attack Iran itself should Bush refuse the cup.

[…] Ehud Olmert came home from a June meeting with Bush to tell Israelis: “We reached agreement on the need to take care of the Iranian threat. … I left with a lot less question marks regarding the means, the timetable restrictions and American resoluteness. …

“George Bush understands the severity of the Iranian threat and the need to vanquish it, and intends to act on the matter before the end of his term. … The Iranian problem requires urgent attention, and I see no reason to delay this just because there will be a new president in the White House seven and a half months from now.”

If Bush is discussing war on Iran with Ehud Olmert, why is he not discussing it with Congress or the nation?

[…] Moving through Congress, powered by the Israeli lobby, is House Resolution 362, which demands that President Bush impose a U.S. blockade of Iran, an act of war.

Is it not time the American people were consulted on the next war that is being planned for us?

Blaming the Jews: Check. Blaming Israel: Check. Blaming “the Israel lobby”: Check. Implying that Israel and/or Jews are running American foreign policy: Check.

You could easily interchange Lindbergh’s and Buchanan’s words and not know which was speaking. No wonder Buchanan defended Lindbergh on a neo-Nazi radio station. They’re brothers-in-ideology, separated by a few decades.

And in case you’re thinking that people are exaggerating about neo-Nazi quotient of the radio program, here are some quotes from the host’s blog:

At any rate, it’s nice to see that, while Jews in the government, media, and among the neocons work feverishly to get America to attack one Muslim country after another because of “Islamofascism” and “the Muslim threat to Israel”, other Jews are condemning white Europeans for not warmly welcoming tens of millions of these same Muslims into their midst.

Oh, but there’s more:

Jews have always been the biggest pushers of interracial marriage in America. Not for themselves, of course, and God forbid interracial marriage should be legal in Israel! But, as Greenberg makes plain, Jews think white people people marrying blacks should happen a lot.

This one’s just too-too:

Boy, here’s a surprise. A homosexual Jew editor over at The New Republic doesn’t like Pat Buchanan’s new book on World War II.

That’s about as much hate as I can take in one sitting.

Remember when I said just a few weeks ago that Buchanan had gone about as low as he could go? I was wrong. He’s now fully down in the gutter with the Jew-hating scum, and no longer bothering to hide it. (I wonder if Michael Kinsley would like to change his assertion that Buchanan doesn’t have a problem with Jews.) Buchanan is now openly on David Duke’s level, and in fact, has now spoken on the radio station that proudly interviewed David Duke as well. The question is, will NBC finally fire him?

Debbie Schlussel has quite a lot of stories about her personal experiences with Buchanan’s Jew-baiting. Why is it that the news shows seem to think Buchanan is immune, but sportscasters like Jimmy the Greek get fired for racist remarks?

Oh, wait. I forgot. It’s The Exception Clause. Bigoted statements are cause for immediate firing, except when made about Jews.

Time for the Yourish.com mantra: Anti-Semites of the world, just die already.