Truce violations = non-truce violations

Ehud Olmert does the predictable, and ignores all Palestinian truce violations. Mortar fire? No problem. Kassam rockets? Not an issue. Sniper attacks on Israeli farmers? Hey, it’s just another day in Gaza Town.

Palestinians opened fire Sunday afternoon at farmers working in fields near Kibbutz Nahal Oz in the Gaza vicinity. There were no reports of injuries.

This is the first time gunmen shoot at farmers since the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas went into effect about two and a half weeks ago. Since the truce began, Palestinians have fired several Qassam rockets and mortar shells into the western Negev on a number of different occasions.

Addressing the fragile truce, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said last week that “an absolute lull cannot be imposed within a short while, and therefore we have shown and will show some patience. However, no one should interpret this patience as weakness.

“Should the lull not be maintained, we will respond with full force,” he said.

Liar. The lull is not maintained. There has been violation after violation. In fact, a day without an attack on Israel is still the rarity, not the exception. So what is the lull truly accomplishing? No Hamas terrorists have been killed in three weeks, and Hamas has been able to smuggle more weapons and train more terrorists without fear of being attacked by Israel.

Well done, Hamas. And say, Israel? You might want to look into dumping this PM and getting another. This one really sucks.

Update: The tractor may have been hit by a rock. However, Olmert still sucks.

Posted in Gaza, Israel | Tagged | 3 Comments

Celine Dion on the Middle East

I’ve learned many important things from Barry Rubin. Last week’s column taught me something new: Celine Dion covered Eric Carnen’s “All by myself.” Dr. Rubin used the lyrics to illustrate the shifting sands of politics of the Middle East.

For more than a half-century, the region’s politics revolved around Arab nationalism. Individual states sought to have influence, leadership, or just to survive. The Arab-Israeli conflict was an important issue in this framework, though not the sole or even the most significant one.

Now, as Celine Dion sings, “Those days are gone.” Today, the centerpiece is a struggle between two blocs, one well-organized, the other weak and facing internal conflict. The former is the Tehran-led alliance of the HISH (Hamas-Iran-Syria-Hizballah); the latter is just about everyone else, call it the coalition of the unwilling.

So how do the moderate Arab states deal with this?

Still, their behavior is understandable. They want to use the radical appeal of Arab nationalism, Islamism, anti-Americanism, and xenophobia to divert attention from their own failings while mobilizing support for themselves as the true defenders against all those big and little satans out there. At the same time, they are happy to appease their foes if possible.

A particularly blatant example is Kuwait’s foreign minister who denounced those who want to wage a false jihad at home. He explained that instead of murdering innocent Muslims, young people should kill Israelis instead. Much of the regimes’ “anti-terrorist” rhetoric is merely really aimed at shifting the targets away from themselves.

On one hand, the Saudis host a global interfaith dialogue conference; float a peace initiative toward Israel, fight domestic terrorism, and battle Syria and Hizballah in Lebanon. On the other hand, they aid terrorists and spread extremist forms of Islam. Egypt is horrified by radical Islamism but refuses to go all-out against Hamas. The official media demonize the West and Israel, while the official Islamic religious apparatus endorses terrorism against Israel and in Iraq.

I’d say that this is a somewhat generalized form of what Dr. Rubin writes in “The truth about Syria,” in that the Assads use all means at their disposal to deflect criticisms of themselves and preserve their family’s tenuous hold on power.

So how does the West respond. I once wrote in a letter to the editor that every time Hafez Assad or Yasser Arafat sneezed it was interpreted as a signal of moderation. It appears that I was more or less correct.

By apologizing, conceding, refusing to defend themselves, or by negotiating, exaggerating the potential for moderation, and dropping sanctions, they can strengthen the extremists and undercut the regimes. When that happens, the regimes know they might better cut their own deal. So while there are arguable reasons to bargain with Hamas, Hizballah, Iran, or Syria, such a strategy splits the anti-HISH alliance and starts a race toward appeasement.

In the Dion song, “Love so distant and obscure, Remains the cure.” But this is politics. The best one can hope for is the wisdom to build on coinciding interests and courage to stand up to unrelenting enemies

And strengthening the extremists, no matter how well they keep the trains running on time, does not help.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Miscellaneous, Politics | Tagged , | Comments Off on Celine Dion on the Middle East

Booting Hersh

Last week, Cheat Seeking Missiles went after Seymour Hersh for an recently written “expose” in the New Yorker. What troubled me is that CSM took everything Hersh wrote at face value. Hersh cherry picks some stuff, confuses some stuff, makes some stuff up and exaggerates the rest. It’s hard to know exactly what’s true in a Seymore Hersh story.

Max Boot read the same article and concluded that there’s probably a nugget of truth in the article but the rest is speculation.

For my part I am skeptical that there are a lot of Special Operations raids occurring in Iran. It’s probable that there are small penetrations of Iranian territory by CIA and Special Operations teams as part of the covert destabilization program to meet with Iranian “assets.” There may even have been a few operations carried out against the Quds Force, but, given the risk-averse culture of the U.S. government, I doubt that it amounts to very much.

I find David Ignatius’s analysis plausible. He writes:

In the new cold war between America and Iran, the U.S. appears to be running some limited covert operations across the Iranian border. But according to knowledgeable sources, this effort shares the defect of broader U.S. policy toward Iran–it is tentative and ill coordinated, and undermines diplomacy without bringing serious pressure on the regime.

He quotes “one Arab official familiar with the covert program” as saying, “There are attempts to cause mischief inside Iran and go after the Quds Force. Some things are being done, but not with the seriousness that’s needed.”

Boot adds:

He also perpetuates a myth that there is a major policy divide between the White House which supposedly favors a “military strike” on Iran and the armed forces which supposedly oppose such a move. It would be more accurate to say that there are some political appointees in the administration who favor a strike on Iran because they don’t think that any other action will stop or even significantly slow its nuclear program. But there are also political appointees who oppose such a move. A similar division exists in the military, but you would never know it from Hersh who paints a crude caricature of hawkish civilians and dovish soldiers. No doubt he is partly a victim of his anti-Bush worldview and partly a victim of his sources: Since it’s pretty obvious that no one who is reasonably hawkish or conservative will speak to a journalist with Hersh’s reputation, he must be reliant on those who favor a softer line.

Boot also attacks a major premise of Hersh:

The biggest misunderstanding, or outright deception, in the entire article is its very premise: that the covert action program that Hersh describes is a prelude to a larger military action against Iran—that it is, as the headline has it, “Preparing the Battlefield.” Actually it’s far more likely that such a program, if it exists, is designed to be a substitute for military action.

Hersh unfortunately isn’t the only writers engaging in such speculation. Tim Shipman of the Telegraph writes (via memeorandum):

American commanders worry that Israel will feel compelled to act within the next 12 months with no guarantee that they can do more than slow Iran’s development of a weapon capable of destroying the Jewish state.

Gaps in the intelligence on the precise location and vulnerabilities of Iran’s facilities emerged during recent talks between Admiral Mike Mullen, the Chairman of the American Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Israeli generals, according to an official familiar with the discussions who has briefed Iran experts in Washington and London.

The assessment emerged as Iran in effect thumbed its nose at proposals by the West to freeze its uranium enrichment programme in exchange for easing economic sanctions. In its reply, sent to the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, Iran said it was prepared to negotiate but only from a position of equality – and made no reference to the specific proposals.

Israel Matzav thinks that there is a gap between what Israeli and American intelligence know and that Israel may have better knowledge of where it needs to hit. Arthur Herman wrote that destroying the nuclear facilities may not be as important as crippling Iran economically and conventionally.

Still one gets the impression that Shipman cherry picks his sources to reach his conclusions and fills the rest in with speculation.

I wonder how much of the military threat against Iran is real and how much is Israeli or American disinformation. I can’t believe that planning of a potential attack on Iran is such an open book in either country.

Two years ago I speculated that Israel would have a difficult time carrying out a raid on Iran as it did on Iraq, if for no other reason because it couldn’t have the same secrecy that surrounded the attack on the Tamuz reactor.

All this speculation about what Israel might do, does nothing to alleviate my skepticism that Israel could pull off the same sort of attack again.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Iran, Israel, Media Bias | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Still on holiday time

Hey, I checked my email again and took care of something important for work.

Me, I’m relaxing and reading up on mattresses and looking around at sales.

And playing with Tig.

Yep. A busy day.

Posted in Life | 1 Comment

Fine Arabian chargers

Horse racing appears to be really popular among the Palestinians.

Unfortunately there was an accident at the races today near Nablus.

A Palestinian man , left and a horse rider, lay on the ground after they collided during a horse race …

More interesting is that they also have horse races in Gaza. Camel races too.

I wouldn’t say that the animals in either case look particularly undernourished. How severe was the Israeli blockade really in terms of letting in food and necessities?

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Media, Media Bias | Tagged | 3 Comments

Interesting euphemisms

Honor Guard

An honor guard stand to attention …

These are members of Hamas brandishing (I think) AK-47’s. Wouldn’t the more appropriate term be “armed terrorists?”

Iranian diplomats

picture depicting the four Iranian diplomats who were kidnapped in Lebanon in 1982 …

More likely they were intelligence officers tasked with coordinating Shi’ite militias at the time.

But this does make me wonder: If the Iranians are claiming that they were kidnapped by Christian and transferred to Israel, is this an implicit admission that the Iranians are/were holding Ron Arad. According to some rumors after he bailed out of his plane he was captured and eventually transferred to Iran.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Media Bias, Miscellaneous | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Not the worst politician

Eric Trager had a post a few days ago The Worst Politician Ever?:

Still, one might expect Israel’s political leadership-which overwhelmingly approved the deal yesterday-to declare that Israel is achieving some sort of strategic benefit through the prisoner swap. After all, a prisoner swap only becomes a strategic liability when the adversary believes that it could achieve the release of more prisoners-and all the political benefits that come with it-through future kidnapping raids. For this reason, leaders typically spin prisoner swap deals as somehow enhancing their states’ strategic outlook, aiming to undermine support for future raids among the enemy’s constituency.

Yet Ehud Olmert is hardly your typical leader. Indeed, rather than making any argument for Israeli strength in the aftermath of the prisoner swap, Olmert has declared total failure…

Israel Matzav seconds that motion (via memeorandum):

What’s amazing is that this time, for once in his life, Olmert is actually telling the truth. The ‘swap’ is a total failure, there will be (and is) much sadness and humiliation in Israel about Olmert’s government’s failure in the Second Lebanon War and thereafter, and there will be lots of celebrations on the other side when and if the ‘swap’ is carried out (as now seems inevitable).

He then suggests that PM Olmert draw the requisite conclusion and resign. However, I think that’s where he (and Trager) underestimates Olmert. He is a failure, but not as a politician. As a politician he has managed to defy all expectations and political gravity, staying power despite microscopic popularity and scandals hanging over his head.

Now one of the authors of the Winograd Report, Prof. Yechezkel Dror has weighed in:

Professor Yehezkel Dror, member of the Winograd Commission which investigated the failures of the Second Lebanon War, launched a frontal attack Thursday against Ehud Olmert, clarifying that the prime minister has failed and cannot stay in office.

A year after the committee submitted its final report into the war, Prof. Dror wrote in a harsh article published in the Jewish-American Forward weekly that such a situation would not be possible in any other parliamentary democracy.

“I was sure the prime minister would resign. It’s amazing this hasn’t happened yet. This is not what I expected. It’s beyond my nightmares,” Dror told Ynet on Thursday morning.

Prof. Dror goes on to explain that given Olmert’s political weakness he can’t believe that the Prime MInister is weakening Israeli bargaining positions with no serious consultation.

Dror also expressed his criticism against Olmert in terms of the prime minister’s recent conduct, which is not directly related to the war. He referred to Olmert’s peace initiatives with Syria and the Palestinians as superficial maneuvers and even “a complete spin.”

He explained that these initiatives lacked any deep, long-term and strategic thinking on the prime minister’s part, which he said should be based on professional political-security staff work.

If Olmert had a sense of shame he’d resign, but he doesn’t, so he stays in office. And his political foes have mutually exclusive aims, so that they can’t or wont’ present a united front and force him out. The media still considers him an etrog so the chances of building public outrage (despite the poor poll numbers) are virtually nil.

Olmert has made political survival his ultimate goal. Unless the state prosecutor indicts him, he will survive indefinitely because he’s a great politician. He’s just a lousy prime minister.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | Comments Off on Not the worst politician

Glorious Fourth

I never get tired of posting this:

Old Glory waving in the breeze

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

I will not be going to Fort Lee this year. I’ll be celebrating at Chesterfield County Fairgrounds with Sarah and family. (My big job of the day: Going to Chesterfield Berry Farm, an awesome produce place, and getting the corn.)

I have checked my email for the day, and will be filling out my electronic timesheet as soon as this post is done. For the rest of the day, well, it’s a holiday. I’ll be back after the fireworks. I hope my cobloggers are taking a break as well.

Posted in Holidays | Tagged | 4 Comments

Never the twain shall meet

Griff Witte’s report, Motives in Earthmover Rampage Debated in Jerusalem is striking for two things one that it says and one that it omits.

Israeli officials and media described Edwyat as a terrorist who had targeted Jews. But friends and relatives in East Jerusalem on Thursday described a man with no political affiliations or particular grievances against his Jewish neighbors. Instead, they said Edwyat had suddenly snapped for reasons they did not understand.

There is New York and there’s West New York, however there’s east Jerusalem and west Jerusalem. They are not separate municipalities.

The second is the way he frames the story between the perceptions of the Jews and the perception of the Arabs. He leaves out an important detail though:

“He shouted ‘Allah Akbar.’ At that moment I pulled the pistol that Oron carried and shot the terrorist three times in the head. After I verified that he was dead, I raised the pistol to make sure that passersby were not hurt,” he recounted.

Shouting “Allah Akbar” is a signature of a terror attack. It might be that Edwyat wasn’t handled by any terror organization and previously was on good terms with Jewish Israelis, but on Wednesday he, for some reason, chose the path of terror.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad

Posted in Israel, Media Bias | Tagged | 1 Comment

De-stress holiday cat post

Time to forget about our problems and think about the simpler things in life. Like, cats. And umbrellas. And cats and umbrellas.

Tig with my umbrella

Oh. No wonder my umbrella started leaking the last time I used it.

Tig with my umbrella

“Oh, were you looking for this?”

I’ve been saying for months: “Je suis un cat toy.” (Yeah, I know, my French is a little off, but then, the French are a little off, so we’re even.) Well, everything in my house is a cat toy. Tig was actually chewing on the wooden rods holding my bookshelves together. They’re an inch in diameter. I assume he was teething.

He is growing very quickly. I tried to measure him the other day, but he wouldn’t hold still for it. He wanted to play with the tape measure. But I think his tail is about eleven inches long right now. And it’s very fluffy. His ruff (the Maine Coon cat mane) is starting to come in, and he’s beginning to look very dignified.

Tig has also discovered Kitty Nirvana: Sleeping in my bed. I finally opened up the bedroom to him this week. He got thrown out two nights in a row until he finally figured out that if he stops attacking me every time I breathe, he can stay. Unfortunately, I’m still getting woken up at odd hours, but at least now he’s not yowling at the door. (He’s climbing on me and licking my nose instead.) During the daytime, he takes turns sleeping downstairs and upstairs. Since Gracie no longer sleeps upstairs (she gave it up completely to Tig), I’m getting to hear the big thunk of a cat jumping off my bed after a nap again. I’m looking forward to hearing the Tig-sized thunk I used to hear from Tig the Second. I could always tell which of my two cats was waking up. The difference was very noticeable. Tig3 makes a little thunk. He’s only five pounds, yet. But he’s showing promise to grow up bigger than his predecessor. And that tail… wow, that is one long, fuzzy tail. And he holds it upright most of the time.

I just counted eight weeks backwards from April 18th, when I got Tig. That would put his birthday at February 29th. I’ll call it March 1st. I hadn’t realized that until now. (Tig and Gracie were born on March 15th, 1997.) That makes Tig about a week past four months old. And he’s already hit the five-pound mark.

Yep. He’s gonna be big.

Posted in Israel | 6 Comments

Reflexively telling

Yesterday, Boker Tov Boulder aptly observed that following a terror attack:

… there’s the attack by the media that inevitably follows. Then there’s the aftermath, in which we can see the results of the first two, usually along the lines of Israel being weakened and our enemies further emboldened.

The attack she referred to was by the BBC.

It didn’t take long elsewhere.

via memeorandum

The New York Time reported on yesterday’s terror attack. There’s nothing remarkable about the headline:

Palestinian Kills 3 With Construction Vehicle.

However that wasn’t the original headline, that read:

Construction Vehicle Kills 3 in Israel Attack

However as we all know construction vehicles don’t kill people, people kill people.

(h/t LGF’s link viewer)

Similarly Meryl observed that the AP headline used words as if:

… it was an accident, instead of a deliberate, murderous attack.

McClatchy’s Jerusalem correspondent showed his true colors with:

The video also shows a policeman shooting the lifeless man at point-blank range, a move that could spark questions from Israeli human rights groups about whether the officer’s shot was necessary and if he might have unnecessarily killed the man.

(Though, from the footage, it looks as if the first shots probably killed him.)

My first thoughts on observing this action would have been amazement at the heroism of the shooters; his first thought was of the possible human rights violation. The truth is that Israeli security forces follow a protocol of “confirming the kill.” This is especially important when terrorists may have explosives strapped to their bodies.

The Israelis intervening yesterday had no idea, of course, if the terrorist was indeed wearing explosives but it wasn’t a chance they could take. And given that he was at the controls of a construction vehicle, if he were still capable of controlling it he presented a danger.

Just for a reminder here’s what happened in Dimona a few months ago:

Shalom Bar Avi, a journalist speaking to Channel 10, said “I am here no longer as a journalist but as a simple citizen … I pray and hope my wife is okay.”

Bar Avi praised the police’s quick response to the attack, and said Mor, the officer who identified the second attacker shot “four or five times … he took no chances.”

Later Mor’s heroism was revealed in detail: He shot the terrorist in the head, and when the latter in his last breath still tried to press the detonator button, shot him four more times and killed him. Mor managed to kill the terrorist before he could explode and without hitting his explosive belt, thus preventing a much more devastating attack.

You don’t take chances. And while this isn’t the reason the terrorist was killed, Seraphic Secret notes:

Here’s the good news: this is one Muslim terrorist who will not be used in a disgraceful and damaging prisoner swap.

The reaction to terror against Israel is telling of the mindset of those reporting the news. Though it was reported that the terrorist yelled “Allahu Akbar” most press accounts still try to raise doubts that this was a terrorist attack rather than an accident or criminal act.

(There are those who complained that Al Jazeera’s coverage of the attack was too pro-Israel!)

Ha’aretz reports on the Israelis who stopped the attack.

“I approached the bus on my bicycle, and then began to run to the site, looking for a weapon to use against the terrorist,” he told reporters yesterday. The military censor imposed a gag order on his identity.

Near the bulldozer the young soldier found a civilian, Oron Ben-Shimon, 28, a regional manager of a security firm in Jerusalem, who was armed. “Together we tried to neutralize the terrorist, at least to lift his feet off the pedals.

“He shouted ‘Allah Akbar.’ At that moment I pulled the pistol that Oron carried and shot the terrorist three times in the head. After I verified that he was dead, I raised the pistol to make sure that passersby were not hurt,” he recounted.

“I went out on Jaffa Road,” says Oron, “and as I was driving I saw a crowd of people shouting ‘terrorist’ and ‘mad man.’ I put on a police hat, and took my pistol and ran toward the bulldozer.”

“I saw a policeman on the bulldozer with a drawn gun. I holstered my weapon and the policeman told me there was no need to shoot him because he passed out and we need to pull him out of the bulldozer.

“And then the terrorist woke up and grabbed the wheel and tried to run over more people. I was already on the bulldozer and I hit him with my fists in the face in an effort to take over the wheel. I shouted to the young man near me to shoot him. He drew my pistol from the holster and shot him three times in the head.”

Oron confirms that the terrorist was dead when shot by the policeman. Still even here, the terrorist apparently out of commission started his attack again.

Then there’s the heroism of a mother who saved her baby:

Seconds before being crushed to death by a bulldozer, 33-year-old Batsheva Unterman succeeded in unbuckling her 5-month-old baby from the car-seat and passing her out through the window to safety.

“Just as I took the baby out, he reversed on top of the car. The baby is okay, but not the mother,” Jeremy Aronson, the man who helped save the baby, told The Jerusalem Post quietly as he sat alone in the waiting room of Hadassah-University Hospital in Mount Scopus.

I am amazed by those who can act quickly at times of crisis. Unfortunately Mrs. Unterman didn’t survive.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Terrorism | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The utter denial of the Arab mind

Unbelievable. First, the lawyer says that the Israeli Arab who murdered three and wounded at least 66 should not have been shot. Then the family says it wasn’t a deliberate attack. It was a “road accident.”

The lawyer representing the family of bulldozer driver Hossam Dawyyat of east Jerusalem, who murdered three people and injured dozens during a killing spree in Jerusalem on Wednesday, said Thursday that had the police cuffed the terrorist’s hands and legs and removed him from the vehicle, the incident would have ended at once and “life would have been spared.”

[…] According to the brother, the incident may have been a road accident which had gone wrong. “Any person responsible for a road accident is alarmed and afraid. This can happen to anyone, and this could have been a road accident. It’s possible that my brother was scared when people started chasing him and shooting,” he told Ynet.

However, Issam did not rule out the possibility that his brother had lost control and gone on a rampage under the influence of drugs. “It was easy to irritate him. He had a criminal record for violence offenses and he was punished for this.”

Yeah. A “road accident.” Like this:

“I was trying to enter a parking lot when the bulldozer’s driver signaled me to move back. I moved my car, and then he began ramming into it over and over,” one of the women injured in Wednesday’s terror attack in Jerusalem recounted.

Or this:

“Then I saw the bulldozer heading in my direction; it gave me a little nudge. I opened the window to yell at the driver, but then he turned the bulldozer in its place, lifted the bus up and flipped it over.

“He slammed into the bus a few more times then continued on his way. I was knocked back to other side of the bus and then climbed out the window. A female officer then shattered another window and began pulling the passengers out of the bus,” he said.

Accidents. Things like that just happen when you’re scared, or irritated. You do this, too:

“At one point he yelled out, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ and stepped on the gas pedal,” M recalled. “I drew the weapon of the civilian who was with me and shot the driver three times in the head. I think I did what is expected from every soldier and citizen.”

The amount of denial in terrorist acts is pretty astonishing. I think this one falls into Robert Spencer’s Daniel Pipes’ “Sudden Jihadi Syndrome” category—one in which everyone seems surprised that the terror attack occurred, and yet, as always, it is Jews who wind up being the target.

But a “road accident”? That’s just beyond stupid. The rampage lasted for 500 meters, killed 3, and wounded 66. Try again. “Road accident” just doesn’t cut it.

Posted in Israel | 3 Comments

The AP finally names the victims

Stop the presses. The AP has identified two of the three victims of the Palestinian terrorist attack. Of course, their identities are buried deep within the story, instead of in the lead, as they would be if they were Arab victims of an errant IDF shell, but hey—at least they’re finally named.

Three people were killed and 45 were injured, including two babies.

The mother of one of the babies hurled the child out of the car window to save her as the attacker bore down on their vehicle, and the mother was also injured. The mother of the other baby, Batsheva Unterman, 33, was killed in the assault. Social workers appeared on TV frantically trying to locate the child’s father.

A second dead woman was identified as Elizabeth Goren-Friedman, 54, a dual Austrian-Israeli citizen who had lived in Israel for several years, the Austrian Foreign Ministry said. The third victim was a man.

What next? Putting the names of the killed in the lead?

Naaah. Too much to ask, humanizing Israelis like that.

Posted in Israel, Terrorism, World | Tagged , | Comments Off on The AP finally names the victims

Maureen Dowd gets it wrong

I rarely read Maureen Dowd anymore. I idolized her columns when I was in college.

Times change.

But she ends a column—ironically titled “The Wrong Stuff—about the current sniping about the candidates’ military experience, with this:

Maybe instead of refighting the Vietnam War while we’re still fighting the Iraq war, the candidates can figure out how to feed the world, find enough fuel for everyone, and, oh, yeah, catch that bin Laden fiend who’s running around free.

Funny, but I thought the primary duty of the president of the United States of America was running the United States, not feeding and fueling the world.

And let me tell you, even in my most liberal leftist college days, I didn’t think it was America’s responsibility to feed the world. I thought it was our responsibility to help the poorer nations figure out how to feed themselves. Or send famine-stricken nations food. But no, it’s not my president’s responsibility to figure out how to feed the world.

The world needs to learn how to pull on its big-boy pants and feed itself.

Posted in Politics, World | 9 Comments

Can’t change the narrative

The original AP headline for the Palestinian terror attack in Jerusalem?

Driver rams vehicle into Jerusalem bus, killing 3

Like it was an accident, instead of a deliberate, murderous attack.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Israel, Terrorism | Tagged , , | 2 Comments