Perspective, Daoud, perspective

During Israel’s justified response to repeated Hamas attacks against it southern citizens, Daoud Kuttab, a prominent Palestinian “moderate” described the rocket attacks:

In its efforts to stop amateur rockets from nagging the residents of some of its southern cities, Israel appears to have given new life to the fledging Islamic movement in Palestine.

I dunno, Daoud, but does this look like “nagging” to you?

Yesterday Kuttab wrote:

The Unites States cannot continue to be all but silent on an attack in international waters on civilians representing most Western countries, including the United States. It cannot hide behind the facade of waiting for an inquiry when basic facts such as the location of the attack, the perpetrators of the killings and the absence of violent intent or goods on board the ships are so obvious.

Does this picture look like the “absence of violent intent?”

Remember, this violence took place before the Israeli commandos shot anyone. Clearly, then, the Israeli soldiers were acting in self-defense.

Someone else lacking in perspective is Turkey’s ambassador to the United States, Namik Tan, who writes:

Whatever the aid carriers may have chanted in opposition to Israel, this was a humanitarian initiative. In any democratic country, people have freedom of expression so long as they avoid violence.

But incitement to violence is not tolerated.

And it appears that the flotilla participants were doing more than chanting “in opposition to Israel.” MEMRI reports:

The father of Kuwaiti activist Abd Al-Rahman Al-Filkawi told the Kuwaiti Al-Watan daily that his son had told him that the flotilla participants’ morale was high, and that they “would sacrifice themselves for the sake of Allah. He added that his son had “told them before embarking that he would be a martyr for the sake of Allah.”[31] The next day, the father told a press conference: “My son Abd Al-Rahman came to me and said: ‘Reckon my sacrifice [of my life] in anticipation of the reward of Allah’ and I did so. Then he went to his mother and she reckoned his sacrifice in anticipation of the reward of Allah. If he dies there [with the flotilla], he dies as a martyr [with the predetermined aim of becoming one].”

And the chants were in “opposition to Israel” in a way that Nazis are in opposition to Jews.

On board one of the ships, according to Al-Jazeera, the “humanitarian” Palestinians sang “Khaybar, Khaybar, oh Jews, the army of Muhammad will return” — a reference to the 628 massacre of Jews in Arabia at the hands of Muhammad.

So yes, a little perspective would be nice. Unfortunately we’ve gotten precious little of it regarding Israel’s self-defense.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Perspective, Daoud, perspective

I like being a Jew

I got home late tonight from a former student’s bat mitzvah party. She led services this morning, chanted Torah (wonderfully), haftarah (wonderfully), smiled happily throughout the wonderful kiddush lunch (delicious), and danced with her friends and family pretty much the whole night long after Havdalah service.

I kept thinking I’d leave, and then I’d get sidetracked one more time by one of my former students, or their parents, or my friends from the congregation, or even the new people that I met today. And I stayed and stayed and stayed, until suddenly the last dance ended and the DJ told everyone good night and it was time to leave.

At one point, though, the DJ was playing Hava Nagilah, and the bat mitzvah girl and her family were in chairs being held up over the heads of four strong men, and then everyone was on the dance floor and I realized, you know, I like being Jewish. I like my religion, I like my culture, I like my music, I like my people.

I truly don’t understand what it is about us that sends the haters into paroxysms of rage. Tonight, though, I simply didn’t care. Rachel was a happy, happy girl today, and there were dozens of Jewish children from age four to the late teens who were having a phenomenal time enjoying being with each other, whether it was dancing the horah or the limbo.

I had a blast, too, because about a dozen of the kids were my former students, some of whom I hadn’t seen in five years. It isn’t often a sixteen-year-old boy gives his former fourth-grade teacher a hug when she says “Oh my God!” as she suddenly recognizes that the young man whose face she was sure she had seen before but couldn’t place was Matthew B., who was in fifth grade (and a lot smaller) when they last met. (He’s finishing his junior year.) And he initiated the hug, no less.

It was wonderful mixing with the people from my former congregation. I saw my fellow teachers, my students’ parents, congregants that I liked and hadn’t seen in ages. It was my community, something I never really had in New Jersey.

I had a lovely time. So much so that I’m planning a Dalet class reunion after the high holy days this year. I spoke to the caterer tonight. Yossi’s the man who catered my adult bat mitzvah two and a half years ago. I doubt we’ll have dancing, but we’ll have food and conversation and fun. Really, moving to Richmond was the best decision I ever made in my life.

Posted in Jews, Religion | 3 Comments

Helen Thomas, your anti-Semitism is showing

So we’ve all seen the despicable quotes from Helen Thomas by now telling the Jews of Israel to go back to Germany, Poland, and the U.S., right?

Lair Simon has an excellent idea. He’s inquiring into buying her a guest membership to the Houston Holocaust Museum. I think we should purchase her a guest membership closer to home, to the Washington Holocaust Museum. Or perhaps we should just buy memberships for her all over the world. It would raise money for Holocaust remembrance and shame this openly Jew-hating scumbag disguisiner herself as a reporter.

Ari Fleischer says she should lose her job over this. I wholeheartedly agree.

“She should lose her job over this,” Fleischer said in an email. “As someone who is Jewish, and as someone who worked with her and used to like her, I find this appalling.”

“She is advocating religious cleansing. How can Hearst stand by her? If a journalist, or a columnist, said the same thing about blacks or Hispanics, they would already have lost their jobs.”

Ed and Allahpundit don’t think she’s going to get fired. I disagree. Keep the heat on her. Turn up the volume. Write to Hearst. Write to the White House. Do not let this Jew-hater keep her seat when there are actual journalists like Jake Tapper who deserve to be in the front row, asking the first question.

Here’s her non-apology apology:

“I deeply regret my comments I made last week regarding the Israelis and the Palestinians. They do not reflect my heart-felt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance. May that day come soon.”

Note that she doesn’t say anything except that she regrets her comments. Not an apology. Not a “Sorry I said I wanted all Jews out of Israel; I didn’t really mean it.” Because she did mean it. All she did was issue a statement with the word “regret” so she can claim she apologized.

Fire her, Hearst.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Media Bias | Tagged | 16 Comments

Caturday sillies

Via Sarah.

Pictures of Tig and Gracie to come later. I have another former student leading services today.

Posted in Cats, Humor | Tagged | 2 Comments

The poisoned fruit of GA resolution 2708

After becoming the 1137th pundit to declare (against all evidence) that Turkey is an ally of the United States, David Ignatius reverts to blaming Israel first in The U.S. needs to keep nudging Israel on a Gaza fix:

The Obama team recognizes that Israel will act in its interests, but it wants Jerusalem to consider U.S. interests, as well. The administration has communicated at a senior level its fear that the Israelis sometimes “care about their equities, but not about ours.”

This cautionary message — that Israel must act as a more reliable and responsible partner — may be the most important one conveyed this week.

The absurdity of this line of “reasoning” is that when Israel withdrew from Gaza, it was supposed to become a mini-Dubai (as Thomas Friedman put it the other day), instead Israel got a mini-terror state that threatened its southern population. Then Israel watched as the world stood by and refused to allowed Hezbollah, Syria and Iran violate Security Council Resolution 1701 with impunity allowing Hezbollah to stockpile three times the number of missiles at had before the 2006 war with Israel. Given that Israel sees that it can’t rely on others for its security, it’s not unreasonable for Israel to rely on itself.

And Ignatius shouldn’t worry his little head about this. Figthing Hamas – a proxy of Iran – serves America’s interests too.

Leon Wieseltier also gets things wrong (via memeorandum)

It is also the inevitable consequence of Benjamin Netanyahu’s cunning pronouncement last year that Israel is now endangered by “the Iran threat, the missile threat, and the threat I call the Goldstone threat.” The equivalence was morally misleading, and therefore dangerous. Ideological warfare is not military warfare. I have studied the entirety of the Goldstone Report, and whereas I do not doubt (and wrote in this magazine in the days before Goldstone) that Operation Cast Lead caused the unjustifiable death of non-combatants, I also do not doubt that the Goldstone Report, which was nastily indifferent to Israel’s security predicament and to the ethical challenges of Israeli self-defense, was an instrument in a broad campaign of delegitimation against Israel—and yet the threat of delegitimation is not like the threat of destruction. It is different in kind. A commando operation is not an appropriate response to an idea. “This was no Love Boat,” Netanyahu said yesterday. “It was a hate boat.” He is right, but so what? The threat of delegitimation is not a military problem and it does not have a military solution. And the attempt to give it a military solution has now had the awful consequence of making the threat still greater. The assault on the Mavi Marmara was a stupid gift to the delegitimators.

Wieseltier likes to project an image that he’s smarter than everyone else. But here he’s just being obtuse.

Charles Krauthammer, an astute observer of the situation, writes why delegitimization of Israel is a threat to its existence, concluding Those Troublesome Jews with:

What’s left? Nothing. The whole point of this relentless international campaign is to deprive Israel of any legitimate form of self-defense. Why, just last week, the Obama administration joined the jackals, and reversed four decades of U.S. practice, by signing onto a consensus document that singles out Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons — thus de-legitimizing Israel’s very last line of defense: deterrence.

The world is tired of these troublesome Jews, 6 million — that number again — hard by the Mediterranean, refusing every invitation to national suicide. For which they are relentlessly demonized, ghettoized and constrained from defending themselves, even as the more committed anti-Zionists — Iranian in particular — openly prepare a more final solution.

The campaign to undermine Israel’s legitimacy has been going on for some time. The late Jeane Kirkpatrick noted in 1989 in How the PLO was legitimized:

NOT long after Khrushchev articulated these distinctions, the United Nations General Assembly formally adopted them. Where the Charter permitted force by member states only to defend themselves against attack, GA Resolution 2708 XX (1970) created a new category of “legitimate” force which could be used against member states. This new right was confirmed in subsequent resolutions approving the struggle of “liberation” groups against “colonialism” by “all necessary means at their disposal.” Step by step the new doctrine was codified in the General Assembly. In 1970, with U.S. and Western support, the General Assembly adopted the “Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Nations” which further expanded the rights of “peoples” and restricted those of states by providing, inter alia, that “all peoples have the right freely to determine without external influences their political status and pursue their economic, social, and cultural development, and every state has the duty to respect this right in accordance with the provisions of the Charter.”
Moreover: “Every state has the duty to refrain from any forcible action which deprives peopIe … of their right to self-determination and freedom and independence. In their actions against resistance to such forcible action in pursuit of the exercise of self-determination, such peoples are entitled to seek and receive support, in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter” (emphasis added).
With this declaration, the General Assembly, more clearly and unambiguously than ever, took the position not only that “peoples” had rights superior to those of member states, but that states resisting the rights of “peoples” could themselves become a “threat to peace.” The General Assembly thus subordinated the principle of the “sovereign inviolability” of states to the struggle of “peoples” against “colonialism” and put important new restrictions on the right of states to selfdefense.

In 1969 it was the Soviets attempting to delegitimize Israel along with their Arab allies. Now, the Soviet Union is gone but the seeds it planted is bearing poisoned fruits.

Crossposted on Yourish.

Posted in Gaza, Israel | 1 Comment

An eyewitness account of the Turkish “activists”

The Jerusalem Post has the account of one of the IDF soldiers from the attack on the Mavi Marmara, whose story contradicts the “peace activists” that are now speaking up. This was the situation he encountered:

The 15th and last naval commando from Flotilla 13 (the Shayetet) to rappel down onto the ship from the helicopter, S. said on Thursday that he was immediately attacked by what the IDF has called “the mob of mercenaries” aboard the vessel, just like the soldiers who had boarded just before him.

Looking to his side, he saw three of his commanders lying wounded – one with a gunshot wound to the stomach and another with a gunshot wound to the knee. A third was lying unconscious; his skull was fractured by a devastating blow with a metal bar.

So he acted like a soldier in a battle—which is what he was.

He pushed the wounded soldiers up against the wall of the upper deck and created a perimeter of soldiers around them to begin treating their wounds, he said. He then arranged his men to form a second perimeter, and pulled out his 9 mm. Glock pistol to stave off the charging attackers and to protect his wounded comrades.

The attackers had already seized two pistols from the commandos, and fired repeatedly at them. Facing more than a dozen of the mercenaries, and convinced their lives were in danger, he and his colleagues opened fire, he said. S. singlehandedly killed six men. His colleagues killed another three.

Now compare the statements of the “peace” activists:

In his telling, activists initially wounded and captured four Israelis from a first wave that boarded the ship. A second wave of troops tried to storm the ship after the four were taken below decks.

“Twenty Turkish men formed a human shield to prevent the Israeli soldiers from scaling the ship. They had slingshots, water pipes and sticks,” he said. “They were banging the pipes on the side of the ship to warn the Israelis not to get closer.”

After a 10-minute standoff the Israelis opened fire.

“One man got a direct hit to the head and another one was shot in the neck,” he said. In all he saw some 40 people wounded, some to the legs, eye, stomach and chest.

That would be a combat situation as well. The world opinion seems to be, well, yes, the “activists” mobbed the soldiers, but why did the soldiers have to fire back with their guns? They were only being beaten with metal rods, attacked with knives, sticks, and slingshots!

One of the organizers on board who returned on Thursday from an Israeli jail, Bulent Yildirim, chairman of the Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), said activists had indeed seized weapons, but never fired them.

There are Israelis in hospitals recovering from bullet wounds that say otherwise. And then there is this:

The group was well trained and was split into a number of squads of about 20 mercenaries each distributed throughout the upper deck, the IDF said. All of the mercenaries wore gas masks and ceramic bulletproof vests and were armed with either bats, slingshots, metal bars, knives or stun grenades.

And this:

Nevertheless, the IDF suspects that the group did have some guns of its own. Israeli forensic experts who examined the ship found casings belonging to a weapon that was not used by the commandos, and the Turkish captain of the ship later told the IDF that the “mercenaries” threw their weapons overboard after the commandos took control of the vessel.

One thing that the IDF account does do is verify some accounts that the “activists” heard firing before the soldiers landed. A warning shot, however, does not a wounded “activist” make. This story fits perfectly the narrative that Hamas—and its Iranian masters—wanted. They won’t get the same thing on the Rachel Corrie, which is sailing into Israeli territorial waters.

The latest AP article on the Free Gaza ship includes the latest abomination by the Neturei Karta nutjobs—they’re in Ankara protesting Israel’s actions. Where there is an enemy of Israel, there is the Neturei Karta. That tells you enough about them. The fact that there are three of them and the AP felt it was newsworthy tells you enough about the AP.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Media Bias, Terrorism, Turkey | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Newest Flotilla video: We Con The World

Jack passed this one along to me. Thanks, Jack! Update 6/12: Cowardly YouTube removed it. EyeblastTV put it up. Hence, the change.

For background:

And this:

And where’s the MEMRI video? I seem to have misplaced the link. Well, someone will find it.

And if anyone out there is good with video ripping skills, boy, there are a lot of places in this video you could insert the pictures of weapons, the shots of the Turks getting ready to bash the IDF, shots of them attacking the boat as the IDF tried to board… I’m not all that great with video, but I know some of my readers must be. Here’s the IDF YouTube channel. It’s the motherlode.

Posted in Gaza, Humor, Israel | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Fish heads to lighten the mood

Barnes and Barnes wrote a song and created a video that, during the 1980s, gave my friends and me hours of amusement. (All Dr. Demento fans will remember this one.) As a matter of fact, I developed an entire theory about music based on “Fish Heads” that proves that Andrew Lloyd Weber drools, and Stephen Sondheim rules, based on the ability—or lack thereof—to sing their lyrics to the tune of Fish Heads. (You can’t sing any Sondheim songs to it, not even “Send in the Clowns,” but most ALW songs fit the tune perfectly.)

Presented, to lighten the mood, the Fish Heads video in its entirety. Stick with it during the long intro. It will make you laugh.

Posted in Humor, Music | Tagged | 4 Comments

National Jewish Democratic cluelessness

Commentary magazine asked thirty one prominent American Jews their opinions on the relationship between Jews and President Obama. While the results of the symposium are generally not available, behind Commentary’s subscription wall, some of the participants have posted their thoughts on line at their own websites.

Specifically Commentary asked:

The open conflict between the Obama administration and the government of Benjamin Netanyahu has created tensions between the United States and Israel of a kind not seen since the days of the administration of the first President Bush. And those tensions are placing unique pressure on American Jews, who voted for Barack Obama by a margin of nearly 4-to-1 in 2008 after being assured by Obama himself and by his supporters in the Jewish community that he was a friend and an ally of the State of Israel despite his long association with, among others, the unabashedly anti-Israel and anti-Semitic Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

We argue that American Jews are facing an unprecedented political challenge, and at a crucial moment, with the need to address the existential threat to Israel–and by extension to the future of the Jewish people as a whole–from a potentially nuclear Iran. How will American Jews handle this challenge? Can Obama’s Jewish supporters act in a way that will change the unmistakable direction of current American policy emanating from the White House? Will American Jews accept Barack Obama’s view that the state of Israel bears some responsibility for the loss of American “blood and treasure” in the Middle East? Will they continue to extend their support to the Obama administration and to Barack Obama’s political party?

Martin Kramer, Daniel Pipes and Jeff Jacoby have all published their responses. Commentary also asked Ira Forman of the National Democratic Jewish Council his opinion.

Given an opportunity to respond in a politically unsympathetic forum, Forman would try to be persuasive. Instead his response both combative, puerile and offputting. I’m sure there are places where people make real efforts to defend President Obama’s relationship with Israel. Forman’s response is not one of them:

You lost me at “Rev. Jeremiah Wright”…

The Editors at Commentary could have decided to conduct a substantive debate about the merits of the Obama Administration’s policy toward Israel. Instead they decided to frame the “discussion” by positing that in Israel’s hour of need we have a Rev. Wright-worshiping president who is blaming Israel for the loss of American “blood and treasure” and what are liberal Jews going to do to make up for the error of their ways … in other words by asking the equivalent of “when did you stop beating your wife.”

I understand why the question bothered Forman. However given President Obama’s long relationship with Rev. Wright, I find it hard to believe that the congregant didn’t (at least at some point) share the same views as his clergyman. This is hardly unfair.

Furthermore as someone who follows the news, I am well aware of how Gen. Petraeus’s remarks were spun, not just in the media, but by some in the administration. To deny this so flippantly shows more that Forman doesn’t wish to discuss.

After Chas Freeman withdrew his nomination for a high level administration post, he blasted supporters of Israel for the controversy that sunk his appointment. The NJDC properly struck back against Freeman. What was missing though, was an acknowledgement of how frightening it was that the administration thought of appointing Freeman in the first place. Freeman was a known quantity when the nomination was submitted. There’s no way to criticize Freeman without criticizing the administration for nominating him, but the NJDC did just that. They only criticized Freeman’s vicious remarks after his nomination was scuttled and wrote not a word of concern about the decision to offer him a job in the first place.

But Jeff Jacoby points to a bigger problem:

There is no reason to think so. American Jews have been stalwart Democrats for nearly a century, and their partisan affiliation shows no sign of weakening — not even as the Democratic Party’s support for Israel grows steadily weaker. When Gallup earlier this year surveyed Americans on their sympathies in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, 85 percent of Republicans expressed support for Israel — but only 48 percent of Democrats did so. Reams of data confirm that solidarity with Israel is now far stronger among Republicans and conservatives than among Democrats and liberals.

Democrats are not supporting Israel in the number they once did. No doubt that played a role in nominating a President whose commitment to Israel is minimal. Instead of using his position to advocate for Israel in his political party, Forman is content to blast those who point out that Democratic support for Israel is down. His tactics may have the effect of keeping Jews loyal to the Democratic party, but they will, in no way, increase support for Israel in his party.

Instead of directing his anger at those who point out the administration’s hostility towards Israel, perhaps Forman should be challenging people like Peter Beinart and demonstrate that being pro-Israel is consistent with being liberal and Democratic. Unfortunately, Forman doesn’t care enough about Israel to make that effort.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in American Scene, Israel | Tagged | Comments Off on National Jewish Democratic cluelessness

New IDF videos of Turkish terrorists activists

Fresh from the IDF: Theme song here should be “I Wanna Be A Martyr” (taken from Blotto’s “I Wanna Be A Lifeguard“)

My suggested lyrics:

I wanna be a martyr
I wanna end my life
I wanna be a martyr… martyr… martyr!

And here’s the latest video on the “activists” preparing to bash in IDF heads:

In spite of these videos, watch the Israel haters out there insist that the IDF still had it coming to them because they had “no right” to board the ship in international waters. Um, yes. Yes they did. And the AP exposes the terror ties of the Marble Marmalade.

The cover story is unraveling. Pretty soon, all that will be left is the naked Jew-hatred of the anti-Israel side.

Posted in Gaza, Media Bias, Terrorism | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Hamas refuses Gaza flotilla aid

Hamas is refusing to accept the aid from the Free Gaza flotilla. And they’re doing a damned good job of pretending they don’t have the responsibility

Ahmed al-Kurd, Social Welfare Minister in the Hamas government which rules Gaza, said Hamas would block the aid cargo until Israel met all of the group’s conditions.

Israel must release all of the activists detained after Israel’s interception of the Gaza-bound convoy and transfer all, not just part, of the seized cargo, Kurd said.

He added that since the convoy was organized in Turkey, it was up to Ankara to decide whether to allow the goods to enter the Strip.

I checked the Free Gaza website. No mention. Not a peep of protest about the tons of humanitarian goods—that they said were so very, very necessary to Gaza’s wellbeing—being refused by Hamas. Gee. You’d think that the very important humanitarian aid would be the main reason the Gaza flotilla took off, not “breaking the seige” of Gaza.

Oh. Wait.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Your Thursday morning briefs

Actually, these are my Thursday morning briefs. I just let you borrow them.

Activists for Iran sanctions: You know, it’s a good trade. No wonder the terrorists who attacked the IDF soldiers were let go with the rest. Of course, if there’s no follow-through, it’s just another broken Obama promise.

An international inquiry? I say yes, if Israel conducts the inquiry and gets veto power over the international observers on the committee. Sorry, Bibi, but Lieberman is right on this, and you and Tzipi Livni are wrong. Israel needs this to prove that they were set up by a terror-tied “charity” organization using idiots as cover. Having international observers would lend legitimacy to the investigation in the eyes of the world. Israel’s PR needs this. Note that I’m not saying give the internationals any kind of power. Just let them observe the investigation.

Friends don’t let friends get attacked by terrorists: Turkey’s Islamist prime minister is lying again. Israel is going to lose its “closest ally,” he says, over their reaction to being attacked by Islamists sent by a Turkish charity with ties to terrorists. With friends like these, who needs Hamas? There’s a bright side to all of this, though. Israel can finally weigh in on the Armenian genocide.

Posted in Gaza, Israel, News Briefs | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Turkey Blaming Israel

Enough is enough! I just read Ari Shalit’s article in Haaretz about why Israel needs to admit it was wrong and bend over and take it from Turkey so that Turkey won’t see ISRAEL as a terrorist state! Are you kidding me!

TURKEY, T-U-R-K-E-Y, is at fault here in so many ways that it boggles the mind. What kind of friend would offer support and sponsorship of a flotilla of ships to break a blockade designed to maintain the security of its ally in order to aid that ally’s sworn enemy??? Please tell me!

What kind of friend would go out of its way to violate the security needs of Israel and the US as well as the other nations working to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons by negotiating its own agreement solely for the purpose of aiding one of the worst enemies of the democratic world and the primary enemy of its “close friend” Israel??? Please tell me!

The United States should quietly let PM Erdogan know that continuing to pursue this path will jeopardize Turkey’s standing in NATO along with all economic agreements and potentially render it a state sponsor of terror. Remember, Hamas is a recognized terrorist organization and Iran is a terror sponsoring nation. Being friendly with them should not in any way be considered defensible, much less meritorious. Enough!

Posted in Israel | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Blockades and Humanitarian Crises

It seems to me that if in fact the United States supports Israel’s blockade of Gaza, which it does according to recent statements by Robert Gibbs, Sec. State Clinton, and Vice President Biden, that it should be HIGHLY CRITICAL of TURKEY for promoting the violation of that blockade, much less offering an active, not passive, defense of Israel’s actions against it. Certainly everyone feels bad that there were deaths and injuries, but when you commit an act of war, and running a blockade is an act of war, you cannot expect to be received with flowers and not violence. When you use violence yourself in attempting to run the blockade, even more so.

There are those who believe the blockade to be illegal. Certain consequences follow if that is the case including the illegality of any efforts to maintain it. If you are among those people, no defense of Israel is going to be acceptable. I personally think that the blockade of Gaza is a security necessity for Israel, as does the United States, and as such it is indeed LEGAL and justifiable as a necessity in on ongoing military conflict. If you disagree, you disagree. I’ll accept that not everyone will agree with me.

Now if you rattle on about “the humanitarian crisis” in Gaza, know this. While Israel probably should increase what it allows into Gaza, if for no other reason than to lessen the necessity for the average Gazan to use the smuggling tunnels which fund Hamas and provide it significant control and influence, Gazans are no where near in the humanitarian crisis that daily faces the population of other nations and many are in no humanitarian crisis at all. Take a look at this video of the Hamas elite in Gaza suffering away posted AFTER Operation Cast Lead:

Posted in Israel | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Blockades and Humanitarian Crises

See no (Hamas) evil

Predictably the editors of the New York Times find fault with Israel:

There is a bigger question that Israel — and the United States — must be asking: Is the blockade working? Is it weakening Hamas? Or just punishing Gaza’s 1.4 million residents — and diverting attention away from abuses by Hamas, including its shelling of Israeli cities and its refusal to accept Israel’s right to exist?

At this point, it should be clear that the blockade is unjust and against Israel’s long-term security.

After Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, Israel — with Egypt’s help — imposed a blockade on many goods and most people going into and out of the territory. The goal was to quickly turn residents against their new government. Three years later, Hamas is still in charge — and the blockade has become an excuse for any and all of the government’s failures.

The situation in Gaza is grim. Eight out of 10 people depend on international aid agencies to survive. Basic foodstuffs are available, but medical supplies and construction materials are severely lacking. The desperation could be seen on Tuesday when Egypt lifted the blockade and several thousand Gazans rushed the border but were later sent home after police officers said they did not know when the crossing would be opened.

It is ironic that like their star columnist the editors of the Times seem to have forgotten that Israel withdrew from Gaza only to have it turned into a mini terrror state. For some reason the liberal editors of the New York Times think that it’s good for Israel to keep Hamas in power.

But Barry Rubin recently wrote:

Hamas has oppressed the people of the Gaza Strip, murdered Palestinian Authority supporters in hospitals and thrown them off roofs; driven the Christians out; taken relief supplies for its own soldiers; launched a war on Israel in December 2008 that caused avoidable death and destruction; used civilians as human shields and mosques for ammunition dumps; indoctrinated children to be suicide bombers; are putting women into a Taliban-like situation; and repeatedly announces its antisemitic views and intention to wipe out Israel and massacre its people.

For some, none of this makes any difference though–to be fair–the media they get information from may not have presented these facts. For those on the left, Hamas should be considered as a fascist organization which they passionately oppose. For those sympathetic to human rights or women’s rights, or many other good causes, Hamas should be anathema.

What should be paramount, then, is an international determination to overthrow the Hamas regime. After all, while it had earlier come in first in elections, it staged a coup and overthrew what was perceived as the rightful government of the Gaza Strip, the Palestinian Authority. To do such a thing would—to paraphrase the Carnegie report—reduce regional tensions and aid the peace process lead to an independent Palestinian state. Yet this rather obvious idea simply does not seem to have occurred to any Western government or elite.

So instead there is a policy, albeit an eroding one, of isolating Hamas and denying it at least some supplies and money, demanding that it accept the idea of real peace with Israel and cease the use of terrorism. Even this seems too much for many people and, increasingly, for some governments.

The editors of the Times pretend that it’s only Israeli actions and shortsightedness that prevent peace and cause the people of Gaza to suffer. They (and many other likeminded people) don’t acknowledge the evil of Hamas.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Hamas, Israel, Media Bias | Tagged | 4 Comments