Whitewashing terrorists’ speech

I really do wonder, sometimes, why the AP constantly quotes Chipmunk Cheeks. They don’t pretend he wants peace, but they do have a much softer spin on what he actually said. Note the headline, which makes you think the article is about the end of the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. No, it’s not. It’s about calling the Arab world to war against Israel. But that’s not how the AP wrote it up.

Lebanese Hezbollah: Peace talks with Israel ‘dead’
Lebanon’s militant Hezbollah leader has praised an Arab decision to halt peace talks with Israel, saying the only option remaining is armed resistance against the Jewish state.

A little bit of looking around in other news sources finds that once again, the AP is whitewashing the anti-Israel line of Israel’s enemies. Here’s what Nasrallah actually said:

Lebanon’s Hezbollah called on Arab states on Thursday to abandon peace talks and join the militant group in its fight against Israel, after negotiations foundered over Israeli settlement building.

“Come to the path of resistance and the choice of resistance,” the leader of the powerful Shiite movement, Hassan Nasrallah, said in a televised address…

“Be honest with your people and confess to them the truth — the possibility of a settlement is over,” said Nasrallah, whose movement fought a devastating 2006 war with Israel.

“We have no choice to restore our land and dignity… but through resistance,” he added, drawing chants of “death to Israel” from the tens of thousands of faithful who had gathered in the Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs of the capital Beirut.

What is especially lacking from the AP news article is the definition of “resistance”—that is armed attacks against the Jewish state. Once in a while, you’ll find that definition in a news article. But the media narrative carries the Arab point of view, so the words “resistance” or “armed resistance” are used, instead of, say, “war”—which is actually what “resistance” means.

You also don’t see Hezbollah described as a terrorist group, because hey, terrorists against Israel are just “militants”—because the word has been redefined by the media.

Hezbollah calls for war. The AP calls it “resistance.” What else is new?

Posted in AP Media Bias, Israel, Lebanon, Media Bias | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

On Henry Kissinger and the Jews

A long, long time ago, I saw a protest against Henry Kissinger. There was a sign that left an indelible impression on me. “In Egypt he is Kissinger, in Israel he is Killinger.”

Now I know why.

Gal Beckerman, a historian of the Soviet Jewry movement, told Tablet on Tuesday that this even led Kissinger to suppress a letter that might have helped salvage a deal with the Soviets to release Jews under the Jackson-Vanik stipulations.

Similar considerations led Kissinger to press Nixon during the 1973 Yom Kippur War to delay delivering arms to Israel by a few weeks. Their conversations at the time show Kissinger arguing that Anwar Sadat, Egypt’s president, needed an unadulterated victory to make peace concessions. Nixon argued — correctly, as it turned out — that Sadat was already able to claim a victory, and that it was more important to stanch an ally’s casualties in a war that would claim 3,000 Israeli lives.

Un-freaking-believable. Kissinger was willing to sacrifice Jewish lives to feed Anwar Sadat’s ego.

I would very much like to be able to throw him out of the tribe, but it looks like he’s already removed himself. And His Holiness feels he is utterly above apologies, and has nothing to apologize for. Eff you, Hank. Eff you.

Posted in Israel, Jews, Politics | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Wednesday, briefly

The subtle delegitimization of Israel, one article at a time: What’s missing from this AP article on the Western Wall? Any indication that the Wall is, as they now boilerplate it, “the holiest place where Jews can pray.” Now, compare that with any article that mentions the al-Aqsa mosque. If you can find one that doesn’t immediately follow that with “Islam’s third-holiest site,” I’ll print this post out and eat it.

Wait for the world to shriek over this: Sudanese refugees are heading back home, insisting that Israel is worse than Sudan. Because in Israel, the Janjaweed are raping and pillaging? Nope. Because in Israel, Sharia law is forced on everyone? Nope. Because in Israel, Islamist militias do pretty much whatever they want and the rule is of fear, not law? Nope. Because he can’t get work. Look, I feel for these people. But Israel is not obligated to take care of every refugee in the world. Let their fellow Muslims in Egypt help them out. What’s that? Egypt puts them in wretched refugee camps, beats them, murders them at will, and tries to send them back to Darfur? Huh. Go figure.

He should have operated: A German Jewish surgeon walked out on a man because the patient had a Nazi tattoo. Sure, he got another surgeon to do the job, but he should have done it. He lost an opportunity to change a bigot’s mind. And he gave the neo-Nazis and other Jew-haters more propaganda points. Israeli doctors operate on suicide bombers. This guy should not have walked out.

Mad Mahmoud speaks, anti-Semitism occurs: Now Israel is an “insult to humanity.” Of course it is. It’s full of Jews who can defend themselves. That’s the main reason so many nations around the world loathe Israel. Damn Jews don’t know when to lie down and die already. Oh, and that speech was made to the latest Gaza convoy. This one’s chock-full of “activists,” including those who fought the IDF on the Marvelous Marbly Marmalade. They’re planning on going to Egypt and then getting into a ship. My money’s on their not getting in.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, AP Media Bias, Iran, Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

Hamas’ anniversary party: Burying the lede

The AP buried the lede of the Hamas 23rd anniversary celebration in Gaza. Paragraphs 16 and 17 in an 18-graph story:

In a message distributed to media Tuesday morning, Hamas said it remains committed to destroying Israel, bringing back Palestinian refugees and seizing control of Jerusalem’s holy sites.

“Anyone who gives up these rights is a traitor,” it said – an apparent dig at Hamas’ rival, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who favors a peace agreement with Israel.

These words will be utterly ignored in the next AP “analysis” that insists Hamas is ready to recognize Israel and live in peace. And every time the AP and other news services put out a story that some Hamasnik has said so, Hamas immediately follows up with “No we didn’t,” but that doesn’t get nearly the same play as the myth that Hamas is moderating and ready to make peace. And the fact that the AP can publish photo captions like this and still pretend that Hamas wants peace is a perfect example of the refusal to report the reality of the situation. (Click on the link above to see the photo.)

Palestinian Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar walks on an Israeli flag while taking part in a rally to mark the upcoming 23rd anniversary since the group’s foundation, in Gaza city, Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010. The arabic text reads: “For sure will be destroyed. Israel”.

That was it. However, other news outlets managed to find a lot more.

Hamas will never recognise Israel, the Islamist movement’s Gaza leader Ismail Haniya said Tuesday at a rally to mark the 23rd anniversary of the organisation’s founding.

‘We say it with confidence as we said it five years ago when we formed our government, and we say it today: We will never recognize Israel,’ Haniya told a crowd in Gaza City numbering tens of thousands.

Nothing from Reuters yet. Interesting, how there’s no coverage of this rally, but there is always coverage of anti-Israel rallies. Oh, and a bit more from those other media sources:

A Hamas communique distributed at the rally stressed that “armed resistance is a legal right for the Palestinian people and we will never abandon this legal right until all our land and all our holy sites are liberated. We will never recognize what is called Israel.”

This is my favorite skewing of the headline, in the L.A. Times:

Gaza’s Hamas seeks to boost popularity with mass rally for group’s 23rd anniversary

Got it? They’re trying to boost their popularity. That’s the angle, not the fact that Hamas will never cease being the murdering, terrorist, Islamist group that it’s been since its inception. As for never recognizing Israel and vowing its destruction? Ignore that. The non-Israeli media do.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Hamas, Israel, Media Bias | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Time Magazine: Rhymes with crap

Okay, maybe it doesn’t rhyme. But it is what it is. The magazine that brought you Begin “rhymes with Fagin” is at it again. Remember the guy who wrote the article “Do Israelis Want Peace?” Well, now he’s writing about the evil, evil Israelis forcing the Palestinians to hate them. Terror war? Barely a mention. Suicide bombings and attacks on Israelis? Turned into this:

In the spirit of resistance, the boy was named for an uncle who was killed in 1991 while fighting Israelis near Gaza alongside his friend Anis, for whom Ramzi’s brother is named. “I don’t know – I guess they had a Hamas feeling, like they wanted to battle,” says their father with an admiring smile. “I named my sons after my brother and my neighbor – ” “So that people don’t forget them,” Ramzi says from the couch. “And always remember them.”

Oh, there’s so much more.

The separation barrier – the seldom-used formal name for the Wall – turns out to be a label lush with meaning. Israelis credit the serpentine, 400-mile (640 km)system of fences, barricades and checkpoints with reducing terrorist attacks to almost nil since construction began in earnest seven years ago. But the Wall has done more than keep out suicide bombers. No less important, it has created a separation of the mind. Israelis say they simply think much less about Palestinians. And a generation of Palestinians is coming of age without even knowing what Israelis look like, much less the land both sides claim as their own. The absence of familiarity, names, basic knowing – the absence of the foundations of empathy – does not bode well for the chances of the two peoples one day living as neighbors in peace.

Say, you think maybe another reason there’s such a low chance of living in peace is because the Palestinians have yet to acknowledge that Israel isn’t going anywhere? That they constantly teach their children about the mythical nation of Palestine, where there were only a couple of Jews and they had no real history or attachment to the land? The kind of teaching that puts up “studies” that prove the Western Wall has no Jewish history? The kind of leadership that includes a man who wrote a thesis that can best be described as Holocaust denial? The kind of leadership that utterly refuses to recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people? Nope. It’s all about Israelis no longer employing Palestinians as gardeners at their hospitals. Why is that, exactly? Oh, yeah. The Palestinian employees kept murdering their employers.

The separation was not caused by the Israelis. This is something that the media narrative never gets around to noting, just like when they quote this:

At that point in Israel’s 43 years of occupation of Palestinian territory, its army maintained a permanent checkpoint in Ein Arik, a village strung along a deep cleft in the steeply terraced hills just west of Ramallah.

They never, ever, ever provide a reference to exactly why there are army checkpoints in Ein Arik. The Arab nations surrounding Israel were about to attempt yet again to destroy the Jewish state? The Six-Day War? The Three No’s of Khartoum? All irrelevant. Because the poor, poor, pitiful Palestinians can no longer work in Jerusalem.

They brought it on themselves. As to this, which is the thrust of the article:

The absence of familiarity, names, basic knowing – the absence of the foundations of empathy – does not bode well for the chances of the two peoples one day living as neighbors in peace.

Really? Because Israelis and Egyptians don’t know each other. Israelis and Lebanese don’t know each other. Israelis and Syrians don’t know each other. They live as neighbors. Without Hezbollah, Israel would be at peace with Lebanon. Israel and Egypt signed a peace treaty and live in a cold peace. The Syrians may not be at peace, but neither are they in active war, as in, a shooting war, now, shelling Israel from the Golan Heights whenever they pleased in the past. So the main point of the article is bullshit, the narrative is bullshit, and the facts are bullshit.

Way to go, Karl Vick. That’s oh-for-two.

Oh, if I were as shoddy a writer as Vick, I would point out that since his last name is Vick, and Michael Vick’s last name is Vick, Karl Vick must also beat dogs to death. (Well, he kinda beats dead horses that he creates himself, but that’s beside the point). Then again, for all I know, he does beat his dogs. I’ve now done about as much research on Vick as he did for his cover story on how Israelis don’t want peace.

Posted in Israel, Media Bias, palestinian politics | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Friedman and The Dealer

Before I begin to discuss Tom Friedman’s latest, I invite you to take a look at two articles that I wrote about Kissinger’s despicable statements as revealed recently. The first of the articles is about Kissinger’s comment that gassing the Jews in the USSR would not be an American concern. The second of the articles is perhaps more important and concerns Kissinger’s wrongheaded strategy for peace in the Middle East. Both are posted on the We Are For Israel Blog. I think you will find them enlightening, especially when addressing Thomas Friedman’s recent piece.

Thomas Friedman has previously written about “friends not letting friends drive drunk” and yesterday about not continuing to be the “crack dealer.” He’s now calling for the US to abandon aid to Israel because peace has not come about. Israel is not doing what the US wants, no “settlement” halt. Punish Israel. Take it off “crack”, off American aid. Friedman doesn’t even mention that it wasn’t Israel who rejected the deal with the US, but the Palestinians who rejected it, just as they have rejected numerous previous attempts to get them to negotiate.

It is not Israel who has refused to make peace. The Palestinians have repeatedly refused to make peace. Israel has offered peace multiple times now. President Clinton concluded a peace agreement in 2000 that the Palestinians rejected. Israel did not reject it. This alone is indicative of the fact that it is not Israel which is impeding peace. The Palestinians are holding out for more. This is another reason you need to read my article on Kissinger’s failed peace strategy. I explain why they are continually holding out for more.

Were the US to state unequivocally that it will never press the Israel to give up a united Jerusalem (granted one accessible to Palestinians at least as much as it is today) and that it would be willing to let the Palestinians rot in a state of subjugation eternally if they don’t agree to reasonable peace terms, I bet they would be more than willing to make peace. Sure, it would piss off the UN’s Israel haters, aka America Haters, but that is exactly what is necessary. It is precisely the fact that the United States will not stand up for Israel that is delaying peace indefinitely.

Israel has said that it is willing to remove some settlements and trade land for others. But it cannot trade secure access to the Old City. It is easy to envision what Jerusalem would look like under US security control which would already be vastly better than under any international regime. The situation would look like a much more chaotic and explosive version of Baghdad 2010. Would large groups of tourists journey to Baghdad today much less into a situation with danger amplified immeasurably?

No more of this “Friends don’t let friends…” nonsense. Take a look at what Kissinger said, as quoted in the article that I suggested that you read above) about empowering Egypt by delaying a US airlift to Israel so that Egypt would feel more confident in making peace with Israel. With friends who would readily sacrifice Israel’s security in order to appear more “even-handed” in the peace process or to empower Israel’s enemies so that they feel more able to make peace because they can threaten Israel more effectively, Israel is better off staying at the wheel, even drunk. Her blind, deaf, and delusional friends certainly won’t help her get to her destination more safely.

Posted in Israel | 5 Comments

A pop quiz on anti-Semitic tropes

Name the author:

I suspect that what really ticks [redacted for the quiz] off is this: My co-author and I (and a few others) have had the temerity to write critically about the political role of “pro-Israel” forces (both Jewish and non-Jewish) in America today. This is a topic that the goyim aren’t supposed to talk about openly. It’s fine for Goldberg to write at length about this topic, or for former Forward editor J. J. Goldberg, to devote an entire book (which is well worth reading) to it. But when a non-Jew writes about this issue, and suggests that these groups are advocating foolish and self-defeating policies, then that person must of course be an anti-Semite. If Jews express similar doubts, they must be labeled as “self-hating” and marginalized as well.

David Duke? Someone from Stormfront? An anti-Semitic commenter?

Nope. That’s Stephen “I am not an anti-Semite and my writings are not anti-Semitic” Walt.

Please. I really do understand this sort of tribalism and up to a point, I’m sympathetic to it. Given Jewish history — and especially the dark legacy of genuine anti-Semitism — it is unsurprising that some people are quick to assume that any gentile who criticizes the present “special relationship” must have sinister motives, even when there’s no actual basis for the suspicion. But that sensitivity doesn’t make the elephant in the room disappear, and given that America’s Middle East policy affects all of us, the various factors that shape that policy ought to open to fair-minded discussion devoid of name-calling and character assassination.

Yes, devoid of name-calling and character assassination. But it’s perfectly fine to be using anti-Semitic terminology ripped from the pages of Stormfront. A Jew is criticizing Walt, and therefore it follows that Goldberg is upset because a non-Jew is criticizing Israel? Walt is going all Israel Lobby on his ass. Boom! Pow! Standard Jewish Trope No. 1, mention that Jews get all upset when someone who isn’t a Member of the Tribe criticizes Israel. (Which is, of course, an outright lie.)

No name-calling or character assassination unless you’re Stevie Walt. The second paragraph I quoted follows immediately the first. So he calls Goldberg names, slams him in the same manner as the neo-Nazis using the same terminology (go read Stormfront and see how they use the words goyim and gentile), then says Goldberg should stop calling him names.

This is the Goldberg post in question. There was no name-calling, simply statements that Walt was wrong about the Israelis being the only ones wanting Iran’s nuclear ambitions stopped. Oh, and pointing out, again, that The Israel Lobby is blood in the water to the anti-Semites of the world. Walt doesn’t like to hear that he’s been feeding the sharks, even though you can see the results if you troll sites like David Duke’s and other neo-Nazi slimeballs. They trumpet Walt & Mearsheimer’s book like it was the word of God. “See? We told you so, here’s an ACADEMIC from a COLLEGE PRESS proving everything we ever said about Israel!”

You know, I’m pretty sure that Mr. Ego has read my posts about him, but will never respond. I am beneath his notice, since I do not get paid to write these things, and I am not an academic. Nah. I’m just a scrapper who knows how to string words together. This is what I do best:

Hey, Steve: Eff you, and your anti-Semitic buddy Jack, too. Let me quote you the Yourish.com mantra: Anti-Semites of the world, just die already.

If the shoe fits….

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The view from my window

I thought I was dreaming when I got up this morning.

The view from my window

That’s the view from my office window. Here’s what it looks like from the front door:

The view from my front door

That was a surprising thing to wake up to. On my way home from NJ, I hit a few pockets of sleet, but I didn’t expect snow in Richmond in early December. (Nobody expected snow in Richmond in early December.) So much for the forecast I heard of a warm, dry winter in Richmond. I’m thinking a reprise of last year might be in the cards.

Well, I have my cheap Chinese boots, made from the skin of the Nauga, so I’m prepared.

Posted in Life | 5 Comments

Thomas L. Friedman reader – chapter one

This new endeavor comes to remedy the lack of respect many Thomas L. Friedman readers start to experience after reading two (or, as it was measured, maximum of three) of his articles in NYT. The best remedy is to follow a single article or even a part of it, accompanied by comments written by someone really enlightened. Or someone less busy, like yours truly. So we are starting today with TLF’s latest: Reality Check.

Reality checkmeans in this case “a loud complaint with whiny overtones about some no good people who repeatedly ignore my edicts printed in the world leading progressive newspaper and who will be sorry about that later”.

The failed attempt by the U.S. to bribe Israel with a $3 billion security assistance package, diplomatic cover and advanced F-35 fighter aircraft — if Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu would simply agree to a 90-day settlements freeze to resume talks with the Palestinians — has been enormously clarifying.

enormously clarifying“: “It was absolutely clear and self-evident to me all along, and if someone can’t catch up – this is the only reason I am bothering to write another article in the world leading p…”

Oil is to Saudi Arabia what unconditional American aid and affection are to Israel — and what unconditional Arab and European aid and affection are to the Palestinians: a hallucinogenic drug that enables them each to think they can defy the laws of history, geography and demography.

Oil is to Saudi Arabia…“: “I don’t know why the heck I mentioned the Saudis here, but it’s a long statement and it ends in long words too. Commands respect, I say”.

It is long past time that we stop being their crack dealers.

crack dealers“: “It’s a good one. A punch in the face that is bound to get their attention. They will talk about it, these no good…”

The people running Israel and Palestine have other priorities. It is time we left them alone to pursue them — and to live with the consequences.

And to live with the consequences“: “That one is gonna learn these assholes for sure. You shall see them running to Obama (my loyal disciple – never misses an article, that kid) covered by snot and tears.”

I understand the problem: Israeli and Palestinian leaders cannot end the conflict between each other without having a civil war within their respective communities.

I understand the problem“: “Ha! Speak about the British art of understatement. Not only do I understand every tiniest bit of the problem – I AM the problem, the solution and the only ONE who will show them the WAY. And ‘them’ includes Hilary too, accidentally.”

Make no mistake, I am for the most active U.S. mediation effort possible to promote peace, but the initiative has to come from them.

I am for the most active U.S. mediation effort possible to promote peace“:  “That one is a pointer for Obama, so he would know what to do with hisself come Monday. And where the pointer comes from too…”

The Middle East only puts a smile on your face when it starts with them.

“That one is a doozy, ain’t it? I don’t have a slightest what starts where and who puts what on whom, but who cares? It all comes from ME and it is printed in in the world leading p…, so who will dare to ask?”

For those who are still feeling foggy after reading the linked article and don’t fully appreciate the depth and wealth of TLF’s wisdom and magnanimity, more lessons will follow.

Cross-posted on SimplyJews

Posted in Israel, Media, palestinian politics | 5 Comments

Who spiked Tom Friedman’s coffee?

Did someone else write Friedman’s column this week? Look at this:

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, what are you thinking? Ehud Olmert, the former Israeli prime minister, offered you a great two-state deal, including East Jerusalem — and you let it fritter away. Now, instead of chasing after Obama and telling him you’ll show up for negotiations anywhere under any conditions that the president asks, you’re also setting your own terms.

He’s almost making sense. Of course, he does slam Israel far more than he slams the Palestinians, but at least he has the sense to point out that the Palestinians were offered everything they wanted years ago—again—and said no.

The rest is typical Friedman b.s., quoting a study about how if Israel doesn’t settle things soon, the one-state solution is the only solution, apartheid, oppression, revolt, blah, blah, blah… but at least he’s starting to acknowledge that there are two players in this negotiation, and it isn’t all Israel’s fault.

By the way, who knew that Friedman can google?

Posted in Israel, palestinian politics | 6 Comments

Your daily does of AP whitewash

This is the caption of an AP photo:

Palestinian women sing while waving red flags at a rally marking the 43rd anniversary of the leftist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), in Gaza City , Saturday, Dec. 11, 2010.

Really? The PFLP is a leftist group? That’s all they are?

No.

Let’s see. There was the Lod Massacre and dozens of other terror attacks before the year 2000. And there were many more attacks, including suicide bombings, after 2000.

This is another example of the minimizing of Palestinian terrorism against Israelis, while also maximizing the anti-Israel rhetoric in your average, daily AP (and other) news stories. The current narrative? Bad, bad Israel refuses to freeze settlements, thus causing direct talks to fail. Good, good Palestinians won’t talk without a freeze, in spite of the fact that there was a ten-month freeze and they did not come to the talks until two weeks before the freeze was to end.

Washington’s proposed return to indirect negotiations comes days after the U.S. announced that it has abandoned weekslong efforts to persuade Israel to extend a settlement construction slowdown in exchange for security and diplomatic incentives. The Palestinians have said they will not resume negotiations as long as expanding settlements grab more of the land they want for a future state.

Both the European Union and the U.N. rebuked Israel this week over its refusal to stop building settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, lands Israel occupied in the 1967 Mideast War.

Every Israeli point must be presented negatively:

Netanyahu has endorsed a Palestinian state in principle, but has attached a string of conditions, and has not revealed his proposal for a border between Israel and Palestine. Doing so might cost him the crucial support of pro-settlers parties in his right-wing coalition.

It’s all a zero-sum game to the AP, when in reality, Netanyahu said that he supports a Palestinian state as long as it recognizes Israel as the home of the Jewish people, is disarmed, and signs an agreement that this is it, they’re at peace, and they won’t ask for more in the future. The AP doesn’t name the conditions. That would enlighten people to the notion that they’re fairly reasonable conditions. But that doesn’t fit the anti-Israel narrative.

And the reason this is so important? That photo went around to hundreds, if not thousands, of AP outlets. Describing a despicable, terrorist organization that is dedicated to the destruction of Israel as “leftist.” Blaming Israel solely for the failure of peace talks. Never mentioning that Abbas followed in his master’s footsteps and said no to everything he wanted, including Jerusalem, when Ehud Olmert offered it to him. And the narrative is bought, hook, line, and sinker, by fools like Andrew Sullivan and by others who know better, but who have an anti-Israel agenda (Walt, Mearsheimer, etc.).

Which is why I’ll never run out of material for this blog.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Israel, Media Bias, palestinian politics | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

I can see clearly now

A month after my Lasik surgery, the doctor is still saying my eyes are healing “perfectly.” I’ve got 20/20 vision in my left eye, which used to be useless beyond a couple of feet, and 20/25 in my right eye, which had an astigmatism that I forgot about because it wasn’t enough to bother me much. And I’m only slightly worried that I’m going to break my corneas when I rub my eye (the literature I read said over and over again DO NOT RUB YOUR EYES AFTER THE SURGERY and scared the crap out of me that I’d totally wreck my corneas if I forgot). The doctor told me that I can’t hurt my eyes that way, but he doesn’t want me doing it anyway. He would say that. He’s an eye doctor.

I’m definitely getting used to having to wear reading glasses for things like (sigh) cutting my nails. But the upside is that I cooked latkes as my synagogue holiday party for two hours and didn’t have to clean spattered oil from my glasses afterward. (And may I say: Yum. The latkes team was Sarah and me, and our latkes were awesome.)

So now I’m about to hop in the shower and head with Mom and friend to the mall that contains my favorite hairdresser. I’ll get my hair done, they’ll spend Mom’s birthday gift cards at J.C. Penney, and I’ll pop into Brookstone and Godiva and see if there’s anything there that I like. I’m pretty sure I’ll find something at Godiva. As for Brookstone, well, that’s my favorite grownup toy store. It’s hard to resist.

Posted in Life | 2 Comments

The biggest-ever bomb cache in U.S. history isn’t news?

How is it that this isn’t all over the blogs, the media, and broadcast?

A Serbian native living in the U.S. in a rented house amassed the largest and most dangerous cache of home-made explosives, ever—so much so that authorities decided the only safe way to get rid of them was to burn down the entire house—and I only heard about the house burning down on WTOP on the way up to NJ yesterday, and had to dig around Google News to find the full story.

The various pops and bangs that rang out during the blaze were apparently the sounds of detonating ammunition and hand grenades that were among the illegal stockpile of weapons and bomb-making materials discovered in and around the home three weeks ago, sheriff’s spokeswoman Jan Caldwell said.

George Djura Jakubec, 54, who lived in the house with his wife for about four years, pleaded not guilty Monday to eight federal criminal counts and was ordered held without bail.

The Serbian native is accused of manufacturing and possessing destructive devices, as well as robbing three banks and trying to rob a fourth over the past two years. Authorities have disclosed no motive for the defendant’s alleged bomb-making activities.

If you read the full story, the house was simply wall-to-wall explosives. The only reason the police found out is because a landscaper stepped on some explosives and hurt himself badly. How is it that his neighbors never felt the need to report loud bangs and booms coming from next door over the many months this must have occurred? (They found windows blown out and ceilings blown upward. This guy was not a quiet neighbor.

You would think that in these times, with the underwear bomber and al Qaeda rampant, a native of Serbia with an entire house filled with bombs might merit a little more notice than this guy is getting.

What’s going on? Where’s the rest of the story? Is he just a nutcase, or was he working with someone?

Posted in Terrorism | 7 Comments

Traveling

I’m in NJ for two occasions: My mother’s 80th birthday (today; dinner celebrations tomorrow and Saturday), and my one-month Lasik checkup.

Posting will be a bit off-kilter, as I’m also working half-days.

Posted in Life | Comments Off on Traveling

Thursday funny

The most awesome Broadway play sneak peek, ever:

Posted in Humor, Pop Culture | Comments Off on Thursday funny