The NSA is sending security warnings now? Really?
I guess, since I’m not a Costumer, I don’t have to worry about the “critical vulnerability”. Ah, yes. Spelling counts. Our teachers were right.
The NSA is sending security warnings now? Really?
I guess, since I’m not a Costumer, I don’t have to worry about the “critical vulnerability”. Ah, yes. Spelling counts. Our teachers were right.
If any of my blog readers work for a ticket agency, please email me. I have a question for you. Nothing illegal!
A classic case of Israeli derangement syndrome: A New Zealand newspaper slimed the dead by claiming that one of the Israeli backpackers killed in the Christchurch earthquake was a Mossad spy. He wasn’t. But that didn’t stop the New Zealand media from spreading the story far and wide, including stories that said the prime minister wasn’t talking about the incident (thereby proving it must be true). Well, he’s talking now, and says it’s a lie. Way to go, New Zealand. Anti-Semitic tropes passed along by major media outlets, picked up by the world press? Priceless.
Of course the Times will find a negative way to portray Israel: Yeah, the Israeli tent cities protesting for cheaper housing are just like the Arab world protests for democracy. Because they’re both held in public.
And a great big welcome to the UN, South Sudan: Now the UN can totally ignore what’s going on in the north. Israel, meanwhile, is sending a great deal of aid to the troubled Christian nation, which is recovering from decades of abuse by the Muslim north. Don’t think anyone will notice.
Say, look who’s in the Arab and Iranian press: Richard Falk, the supposedly non-biased high something-or-other member of the UN human rights contingent, was published in Al Jazeera and the Tehran Times, accusing Israel of sabotaging Gaza flotilla II. they picked up this Foreign Policy Journal article. No wonder, really. He calls Europe and America terrorists in this one—for the bombing of German and Japanese cities during WWII. No word on whether or not he thinks Pearl Harbor was a terrorist attack. Asshole.
This is what happens when actual activists, not terrorists, are aboard a ship trying to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza.
The Israeli Navy stopped the Gaza-bound flotilla ship Dignite al Karama from reaching the Strip Tuesday afternoon. The Israeli marines met no resistance by the activists.
Around 10:30 am, Israel Navy ships intercepted the French vessel, hailed it and informed it that is was nearing the Gaza blockade lines and must head to Ashdod Port or Egypt.
The Navy stressed that at any time prior to marines boarding the ship, it will allow the vessel to turn around and sail to another destination.
The ship refused to divert its course, prompting IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz to give the Navy the green light to board the vessel.
When the Dignite al Karama was about 12 nautical miles from Gaza, the military hailed in again and told the passengers to prepare for a “calm boarding.” Navy Chief Admiral Eliezer Marom oversaw the operation, which was reportedly over within minutes.
Video at the link. Gee, what a difference it makes when terrorists aren’t lying in wait with clubs, chains, water hoses and guns.
What a day I had yesterday. Started with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2, and ended with Wicked at the Kennedy Center. It was an unbelievably great performance. Glinda was played by the understudy, and she was unbelievably amazing.
What a show. I highly recommend it.
Very busy at work today, so there won’t be much posting until tonight/tomorrow.
My friends and I went this morning, because so many people are in church Sunday mornings, and we figured it wouldn’t be too crowded. It was, and it wasn’t. But we got good seats, and enjoyed the movie immensely.
My favorite line was not, after all, “Not my daughter you BITCH!”
It was: “You and what army?”
Run, don’t walk, to see this one. It’s the best of them all.
The Associated Press covered a poll of incredible significance affecting Israeli-Palestinian peace. In it, we discover that Israelis are deeply divided about a law that allows West Bank Israelis to sue other Israelis who organize boycotts against them and hurt their livelihood. In fact, the AP has had story after story about the boycott bill, and is flooding the zone with news about how undemocratic not allowing people to boycott whomever they want, without penalties, can be.
It’s a very important poll, you see. Of course the AP should cover it. (Yes, that was sarcasm.)
But there’s another very important poll that no new organization outside of Israel is covering. It’s the one that says 6 out of every 10 Palestinians reject the two-state solution, sharing Jerusalem, or indeed, the existence of a Jewish state. Note the wording that was rejected: It could not be any clearer.
Respondents were asked about US President Barack Obama’s statement that “there should be two states: Palestine as the homeland for the Palestinian people and Israel as the homeland for the Jewish people.”
Just 34% said they accepted that concept, while 61% rejected it.
What about the idea of phased destruction that Yasser Arafat said all along was the goal of the Palestinian Authority? Well, the Palestinians are still on board with that.
Sixty-six percent said the Palestinians’ real goal should be to start with a two-state solution but then move to it all being one Palestinian state.
It isn’t Israeli hearts and minds that need changing. It is the Palestinians. And settlements don’t seem to be the real obstacle to peace. Look at these findings:
Asked about the fate of Jerusalem, 92% said it should be the capital of Palestine, 1% said the capital of Israel, 3% the capital of both, and 4% a neutral international city.
Seventy-two percent backed denying the thousands of years of Jewish history in Jerusalem, 62% supported kidnapping IDF soldiers and holding them hostage, and 53% were in favor or teaching songs about hating Jews in Palestinian schools.
These findings were utterly ignored by the mainstream media. Time Magazine’s Karl Vick, who authors most of their anti-Israel fare, could find only good things to say about the poll, with a few exceptions:
Palestinians are trudging down the same long road as Israelis. Yes, they want peace. No, they don’t think the other side will play ball. So for now their priority is private life: Getting food on the table and keeping the kids safe. That, at least, is the picture painted by a new survey of 1,010 Palestinians interviewed face to face in both the West Bank and Gaza over the last two weeks. It was conducted by a Palestinian firm working for Stan Greenberg, famed as Bill Clinton’s pollster but who did this work for The Israel Project, a well-funded private U.S. group that promotes the positions of Israel’s government.
Note how he dismisses the pollster’s work because of the group that hired him to do it. Note also that he utterly dismisses the work of The Israel Project by claiming it is a shill for the Israeli government. I’m going to guess he never describes a single pro-Palestinian group as one that “promotes the positions of the Palestinian Authority.”
No wonder his blog is called “Global Spin”. Witness:
But by the same 2 to 1 margin they also oppose the two-state solution that’s been the stated goal of negotiations. Most prefer ending up with a single state, in which Palestinians presumably would outnumber Jewish Israelis. The poll numbers shift some (to 44 percent positive) when the question becomes whether they “will accept a two-state solution.” Greenberg says the difference is simply a matter of asking what people want versus what they can live with. “I polled in Great Britain a lot during the negotiations on Northern Ireland,” he says. “What people say they want and what people will ultimately agree to are two different things.”
Yes, it’s “presumable” that a single-state solution would make Jews the minority in their own homeland. The question of how they become a minority is not raised. Violence? Pshaw. All they really want is to make money. Funny how that’s now a desirable goal. This, remember, is the same Karl Vick that wrote about how Israelis aren’t interested in peace, only in making money. It’s amazing how he can spin the data and discredit the pollster, who is used frequently by Democratic organizations (and who is praised to the hilt when not working for The Israel Project).
Reuters and the AP didn’t bother writing up the results of this poll. The AFP whitewashed it, completely ignoring the information above. It would change the current media narrative that it is Israel obstructing the peace process. Publishing news about this poll would force the mainstream media to acknowledge that after 63 years, the Palestinian Arabs still want the end of the Jewish state. They still deny that Jews have a 3,000-year history in Israel. And they believe that Jerusalem must not be shared.
If it were Israelis polled who said that they wanted a Greater Israel from the river to the sea, no Palestinian state, and no peace with the Palestinians, this poll would be approaching 5,000 news items on Google News. I could find only three more: Vick’s drek, a Turkish news source, and a New York Post blog item.
Once again, we see the very active anti-Israel media bias in action. The media never defy the commandment “Thou Shalt Not Speak Ill Of The Palestinians.” Note the whitewash and spin in the quotes above. This is why Israel’s reputation in the world is so awful.
This is why I write my blog, and why I’m coming off my retro-blogging hiatus for this one post. This is the news that the anti-Israel media does not want you to know.
Spread the word.
You know, when I first started blogging, I actually never put up cat posts because they were so cliched. Little-known fact about Yourish.com.
Here’s a great one I got of Tig the other day, on his kitty condo. He loves that thing, but it’s starting to sag, and I think it’s ultimately going to rip. With him on it. At which I will laugh, and then feel guilty for having laughed.
And here’s one of Gracie, because Rahel would never forgive me if I didn’t include both my kitties.
That’s my antique Chinese screen she’s behind. It’s currently her favorite spot in the house. I suspect it must be the coolest place in my office, because cats are very smart about picking the coolest places in the summer and the warmest ones in the winter. Extra vacuuming is required over there now.
Happy Caturday!
Congress voted years ago to ban incandescent light bulbs. The reason? To save Americans as much as—hold onto your hats here—$85 a year! Also to save energy, and of course, the savings were exaggerated. It’s that global warming state of mind. Facts? Facts are for suckers.
Another issue: The fact that they will most likely be replaced with CFL bulbs, all of which contain mercurcy, and few of which will be recycled properly (do you recycle your batteries properly? Do your neighbors?), doesn’t seem to concern the EPA overmuch, because, hey, we’re going to cut down on energy use! And the nanny-staters don’t want us to waste any of our own money, because, well, it’s OUR money to waste, not theirs, right? So we can’t waste it if they don’t want us to.
Well, the second attempt to repeal the ban is underway, and it seems likely to win. (The first one failed.) And I think I can proudly tell you why this is going to happen: Last weekend, I went to Home Depot and bought dozens of incandescent light bulbs. I stocked up. Screw the nanny staters. I like incandescent bulbs. I can afford the $85 a year (which is apparently a really high estimate). So of course, the minute I finally decided to stock up, the need for stocking up disappears.
Update: It passed.
So there. It’s all my fault.
You’re welcome.
Just read a few of the news sites and my blood pressure about doubled. So I’m sticking with my decision to not write about the news for the foreseeable future.
It’s my very own watermelon-rind helmet. (You’ll have to click here to find out why; but you won’t know until Sarah posts the pictures. I have no idea when she’ll be getting to that.)
Update: And the picture is now up. Yep, Max is wearing a watermelon-rind helmet.
There’s a saying about how a person’s knowledge of a subject is a mile wide and an inch deep. I say that my knowledge is generally a mile wide and a foot deep, because I am fortunate enough to retain information on a broad range of subjects. Not enough to get me on Jeopardy (not that I even want to go on), but enough that I know a little about a very many subjects.
So I was getting into a discussion with some people on a friend’s Facebook page (I’m totally intending to show them the full Meryl debater; I just set the hook and will be reeling in the lines sometime tonight), and I started thinking about my work experience.
I have worked for nearly every kind of company you can think of. I’ve worked for small mom and pop shops. I’ve worked for Fortune 500 companies, including a Fortune 50 company. I’ve been hourly. I’ve been salaried. I’ve been a contractor. I’ve gone temp-to-perm. I’ve been self-employed. I’ve worked in the public sector. I’ve worked in the private sector. I’ve worked for a private sector company that gets most of its work from government contracts. I’ve worked for temporary agencies. I’ve worked for family-owned businesses owned by my own family members. I’ve done just about everything but janitorial work—no, wait, I forgot. One of my jobs included mopping floors and cleaning the bathrooms (the rock climbing gym). Hell, I was even a dog washer in a grooming shop back when I was nineteen years old and living in Tacoma with my cousin to see if I liked the area enough to go to U of Seattle (I didn’t).
It occurs to me that I have more business experience, by far, than the current president of the United States.
Yeah, I’m totally going to ignore most of the news and post personal bloggy things.
For instance, I’m glad I didn’t really want to see a midnight showing of Harry Potter DH2. I’m tired enough to go to bed now; no way I’d be able to last for a two-and-a-half hour movie starting at 12.
I’ll be seeing it Sunday morning. Then it’s off to NorVA, as I have tickets to see Wicked at the Kennedy Center Sunday night. Then work on Monday. That’ll be a busy, but fun day.
So, when are you going to see Harry Potter?
Okay, so I had Lasik surgery in November, and I don’t need glasses for anything but reading and close-up work now. In fact, I can actually blog without my glasses (though it feels a bit weird). And lately, I’ve been noticing—sunbeams. More often than ever. Every time there was a significant cloud cover, and holes in it, I could see the sunbeams. Now, it’s not that I couldn’t see them when I wore glasses; I could. But not nearly as frequently. So I was wondering—did my surgery not just correct my vision, but make it so good I was seeing things I never really saw before?
And then, last week, the answer struck me on the way home from work with my friend Chris. Polarization.
I bought new sunglasses, a different kind from the clip-ons I’ve been using for my prescription glasses. They enable me to see the light beams more clearly.
Ooooooooooh.
What do you think of going to all cat pictures* and personal blogging for a week or two?
I really can’t stand watching/reading the news anymore.
*Yes, Rahel, we know where you stand on this question. It’s directed at everyone else who reads this blog.
You can’t make this shit up: Palestinians are going to boycott companies that don’t boycott settlement products by obeying the new anti-boycott law in Israel. Seriously.
And the Russians like to pretend to be honest brokers: The Russians, at the Palestinian behest, prevented the Quartet from issuing a statement demanding that the PA recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Note that they won’t do that even if asked to do so while demanding Israel return to the 1949 Armistice lines. Seriously.
Oh noes! Israel is recruiting “collaborators” through online games! Seriously.
So long, Sherwood: Sherwood Schwartz, creator of Gilligan’s Island and the Brady Bunch (both staples of my childhood), is no more. His name will be remembered as long as there are reruns. Seriously.