Haveil Havalim

This week’s Carnival of the Jews, in two parts. One. Two. Why two? Why not?

Posted in Bloggers, Jews | Tagged | Comments Off on Haveil Havalim

Keep on firing

Meryl charged that last week’s “work accident” would quickly fade down the memory hole and showed it happening.

Update: And now (2:23 p.m. timestamp), all mention of the explosion is gone from AP updates. Move along, nothing to see here.

Any mention of the explosion that destroyed a house and damaged surrounding homes, has been pretty muted. Here’s Time magazine:

It was certainly a noisy prelude to a cease-fire: Just as an Israeli envoy was flying to Cairo on Thursday to negotiate a long-delayed truce with the Palestinian militants of Hamas, a huge explosion rocked a building in Gaza.

Hamas charged that the blast that killed eight people and wounded 40 others had been caused by an Israeli rocket strike, and the militants sprayed over 50 mortar shells and missiles into southern Israel. Later, however, Hamas sheepishly admitted that the Gaza blast had been “an explosion”, or what the Israelis term “a work accident” — when militants blow themselves up while handling explosives in preparation for mounting an attack.

Noisy prelude? How much do they want to play it down? Enough explosives detonated to destroy a city block and it’s just “noisy?” Worse, Hamas admitted that the explosives were to be used in a “quality” terror attack.

Hamas’ Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades confirmed Friday that the operatives who died in Thursday’s explosion in the northern Gaza Strip town of Beit Lahiya were making last-minute preparations for a “special mission”, a Hamas codename for a “high-quality” attack. 

According to the statement, the dead were operatives of a special Hamas unit. The organization promised that its people will “continue following in the path of those killed.”

So while the reporter for Time breathlessly writes about the need for a ceasefire, he ignores the story in front of him. Hamas caused an explosion (his “militants” aren’t freelancers, but working for the government in place in Gaza) then “retaliated” against Israel – actually attacked Israeli civilians unprovoked – for the explosion and is seeking a “ceasefire” with Israel.

It also makes Israel’s actions or inaction baffling. Here’s Ehud Barak, he who would like to be PM:

Speaking at a convention of Labor branch secretaries in Tel Aviv, Barak said that “this government is incapable of making a decision about Hamas, the Syrians, Lebanon, Iran and the US. There is a shadow of primaries…all cabinet discussions are effectively discussions with the media.”

Concerning the Gaza situation, Barak said that eventually, he believed there would be an operation in Gaza, but that a “responsible leadership” must give a truce a chance.

“Responsible leadership?” Can you imagine someone from Hamas saying that you must give the truce a chance and mean it? Of course Hamas supports a truce, because it will allow them a freedom of movement and ability to re-arm, without its leadership having to worry about Hellfire missiles. What does Israel gain from a truce?

And of course Secretary Rice knows what really ails the peace process.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will insist when he meets with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that the U.S. pressure Israel to stop settlement construction, an Abbas aide said Saturday.

Rice, who arrived in Israel late Saturday, appeared more exasperated with the Israeli construction than she has in past condemnations. Israeli announcements of building plans have often come just before or after her visits in the past year and a half of her peace mission.

“Unfortunately there have been a few whether I’m coming or not,” Rice told reporters on her plane. Her clipped tone and arched brows revealed annoyance.

Despite Sec. Rice’s best Jim Baker imitation, the problem with peace in the Middle East isn’t Israeli settlements. It’s the lack of peace. When Palestinians are planning “quality” attacks against Israel and only Israeli actions are preventing the terror, that’s a real problem. And with Palestinian grievances magnified by the American Secretary of State instead of being dismissed, it only serves to encourage more terror.

Meanwhile word has leaked out:

The London-based ‘al-Sharq al-Awsat’ reported on Saturday that Egyptian intelligence chief, General Omar Suleiman, was successful in persuading Israel to separate the demand to release kidnapped solider Gilad Shalit from the ceasefire negotiations with armed groups in the Gaza Strip.

Ehud Barak, though insists:

The release of kidnapped IDF soldier Gilad Schalit is “inseparable” from any truce agreement between Israel and Hamas, an aide to Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Saturday evening.

Frankly, I believe the first report. Israel (specifically Barak) has a reason to lie if it’s true. There wouldn’t be the prior political support for any truce if it didn’t include Shalit.If Israel’s giving up the right to defend its citizens for a specific length of time, it better get something tangible in return. And Hamas needs a “truce” a lot more than Israel does.

A truce with Hamas is a bad deal for Israel. One that doesn’t even include a living, breathing Gilad Shalit is an absolute disaster.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel | Tagged , | Comments Off on Keep on firing

The Stan Lee [Hulk] Solution

This post was first published May 2, 2002.

Regular readers of this blog may have noticed that from time to time, I’ve been taking the Hulk perspective on various problems, specifically the Middle East. Well, when you take a hard look at things, I’ve realized that there is no problem so complex that you can’t apply the Hulk perspective to it. Let’s give it a try:

The problem: The standoff at the Church of the Nativity. Palestinians refuse to come out unless allowed to go to Gaza or stay in the West Bank, no Israeli arrests allowed. Israelis want to arrest or exile to a foreign country known terrorist leaders; the rest may go free.

The solution: Hulk smash Church wall! Hulk smash puny humans with guns! Hulk not smash puny humans without guns! Hulk take puny humans out of Church! (Editor’s Note: If the IDF doesn’t pull back while this happens, Hulk will smash them as well. He never was much good at differentiating between groups of men with guns.)

The problem: Anti-Semitism is rampant throughout France. Synagogues have been burned down, Jewish children attacked, bombs placed in cemeteries. Jean-Marie Le Pen is now a viable candidate for the presidency of France, and French Jews fear for their safety.

The solution: Hulk smash puny Frenchmen! Hulk smash man with woman’s name! (Why man have woman’s name?)

The problem: The United Nations would like to send a “fact-finding mission” to Jenin to determine whether or not “massacres” occurred. The Israelis refuse to allow a committee of people already known to be hostile to Israel into Jenin, and also refuse to allow the committee to interview their soldiers. Kofi Annan wants to disband the committee rather than make any changes suggested by the Israeli Cabinet.

The solution: Hulk smash puny humans! Hulk smash puny UN! Hulk smash Kofi-man! Hulk smash! Wait–didn’t Hulk smash UN before? It near river, right? Uh-oh.

The problem: The world media is extremely biased against Israel, choosing to yammer about massacres without evidence while subsequently ignoring the evidence that there was no massacre. People like Robert Fisk make up facts on a regular basis, while Oxford poets discuss their desires to see “Brooklyn-born Jews” shot. American newspapers ignore major pro-Israel rallies and put on the front page pro-Palestinian rallies, even if only sparsely attended.

The solution: Hulk smash puny newspaper men! Hulk smash puny editors! Hulk hate Daily Bugle! Daily Bugle mean to Hulk! Hulk SMASH!

The problem: Pedophilia is rampant throughout the American Catholic Church. It has seemingly reached epidemic proportions, finally forcing the Church to admit there is a problem and take action to remove the priests responsible. (Editor’s note: Okay, it’s not the Middle East, but it’s hot right now. Shut up.)

The solution: Hulk smash puny men in funny clothes! Hulk smash!

The problem: Yassir Arafat refuses to keep his word, won’t clamp down on terrorist activity, indeed, has been traced to payments to suicide bombers, the importation of 50 tons of weapons on the Karinne A, including C-4 to build more terror bombs, and has not even tried to negotiate in good faith to end the conflict in Israel.

The solution: Hulk smash ugly man in head-scarf! Hulk smash! And–phew–ugly man need bath! He smell worse than Hulk!

The problem: Saudi Arabia fears for its image. Fifteen of the nineteen suicide bombers came from Saudi Arabia, Osama bin Laden is a Saudi Arabian, Saudia Arabia is the largest financier of militant Islam in the world. They’ve hired an American ad agency to improve their image in the United States.

The solution: Hulk smash Saudi Arabia! Hulk smash bad men!

And there you have it. The Stan Lee Solution, starring The Incredible Hulk. If you think my theory doesn’t work, then email me the most complicated problems you can think of, and I will attempt to find the Hulk’s answer to any problem that comes my way.

Posted in Blasts from the past, The Hulk | 3 Comments

Hulk say Hulk movie smash!

The Hulk is guest-blogging here again:

Hulk go to new Hulk movie. Hulk was hoping it better than stupid movie girl took Hulk to last time. Stupid movie had giant dogs. Hulk in movie smash giant dogs, but that just stupid. Hulk like dogs. Hulk not want to smash dogs. New Hulk movie was better. No giant dogs!

Betty in this movie not boring, girl says. Girl says this movie Betty play same role every single movie she in. Hulk not know what “role” means. Girl says movie Betty just has to look pretty and be love interest. Oh. Hulk get that. Movie Betty good at that. But movie Betty not as pretty as real Betty.

Hulk like this movie. Lots more fighting. Hulk wins every fight. Hulk always wins fights. Hulk is the strongest one there is. Movie Hulk fought big ugly monster. Hulk can’t say monster name. Girl say it for me. Girl will speak now.

It’s the Abomination, Hulk.

That stupid name.

Well, uh, yeah. But I didn’t make it up.

Hulk will call him Ugly Monster. What girl think?

I think that’s a great name, Hulk.

Girl always agree with Hulk. Girl smart.

Hell, yeah!

Hulk fought army men, too. Why do soldiers always fight with Hulk? Hulk not bother soldiers. But soldiers always follow Hulk, always try to hurt him. Movie Hulk same as real Hulk. Movie Hulk smash soldiers.

Actually, Hulk, I think they broke the Hulk Smash rule in this one. The movie Hulk killed a bunch of people. Comic book Hulk never does.

That right. Hulk not kill soldiers, even though soldiers always try to hurt Hulk! Hulk just smash soldiers! Where soldiers? Hulk will smash them!

They’re just movie soldiers, Hulk. No soldiers here. No! Wait! Not the door again!

Crap. Now I have to get a new door. Again.

Well, this Hulk movie was excellent. They didn’t waste the first 45 minutes trying to give you Hulk’s raison d’smash. There’s a three-minute backstory while the credits roll, and then you’re in the movie. I liked Ed Norton as Bruce Banner. I liked William Hurt as Thunderbolt Ross. And Liv Tyler was a great Betty. All she really had to do was look lovingly at Bruce/The Hulk, and she’s got that down to a science now. And best of all: No giant mutant poodles. Just the Abomination, with a slightly different origin, but hey, it worked for me.

A few chuckles, but overall, don’t go into the Hulk expecting the same experience as Iron Man. Iron Man was funny. Hulk is dark, which it rather has to be. The only disturbing part, for me, was breaking the Hulk-never-kills-anyone rule. I know it defies logic that the Hulk never kills anyone, but hey, he’s a comic book character. We get to bend the rules for comic books. (That’s how the Jack Kirby Hulk can grab a chunk of asphalt and make it go up and down in waves like a carpet, instead of just breaking off in his hands, as it would do in reality.)

And yes, we do see a return of the purple pants.

Best news is the cameo at the end of the film. The Avengers movie can’t be very far behind. And word is the next Hulk villain will be: The Leader. Woo-hoo!

No, the best news is the box office estimate: Looking good. $21 million on Friday night.

This is a great summer for comic book movies.

Posted in Movies, The Hulk | Tagged , | 2 Comments

What’s under Meryl’s desk?

A shelf, a dictionary, and…

Tig under the desk

Tig.

Posted in Cats | Tagged | 5 Comments

Anti-Semitism going mainstream

Anti-Semitism has been rising the world over, and now it seems to be going mainstream. Witness this ad campaign in New Zealand:

Billboards pitching a new programme for Prime Television have been removed after complaints from the Jewish community.

One billboard in Wakefield St, Wellington, and two in Auckland were removed yesterday after going up on Tuesday.

The billboards were for Madmen: The Glory Years of Advertising, due out at the end of the month, and bore the slogan: “Advertising Agency Seeks: Clients. All business considered, even from Jews.”

The billboards were removed after a complaint from New Zealand Jewish Council chairman Geoff Levy, who was also angry about a two-page advertisement using the same wording in the latest Time magazine.

So let me get this straight. In an ad for a TV series about a time when there was a fair amount of anti-Semitism (as well as probably anti-black and anti-woman prejudice), the marketers thought that it would be a great idea to use the sentence “All business considered, even from Jews.” Time Magazine saw no problem at all running a two-page ad with that sentence. Imagine the controversy if the word “Muslims” had been substituted for “Jews.”

However, the damage had already been done and 26,000 copies of Time would remain on waiting-room tables and in houses for months to come, he said.

We’re actually used to anti-Semitism from Time, right down to letting us know more than 30 years ago that Menachem Begin rhymes with Fagin. But stories like this make me think that anti-Semitism is, indeed, being mainstreamed.

Prime spokesman Tony O’Brien said approval for the campaign, which was to mirror “archaic” 1960s’ attitudes prevalent in the show, had been given by the marketing department, which had made an error of judgment.

All the billboards were immediately removed and an apology would run in the next edition of Time, he said.

“We take full responsibility for this and we have totally apologised to the Jewish community. The campaign crossed the line from being provocative to being offensive.”

Yes, it did, and the most shocking thing is that no one in the Prime marketing department blinked an eye at letting this campaign go through. Because after all, who gives a damn if a few Jews are offended? It’s not like they’re going to go around blowing up embassies or anything. And anyway, why should they take offense? All we’re doing is reproducing an attitude from the sixties.

Riiiight.

There is a double standard involved, but then, there always has been. The Exception Clause reigns supreme.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Tagged | 15 Comments

The media bias, lessening?

Soccer Dad points to a few bloggers who think the AP media bias against Israel may be easing. I’m not nearly as optimistic as they are, and here’s why. Watch the change in versions as the day progressed.

The first version I saw, out about 7:30 a.m.:

Blast flattens house of Hamas commander in Gaza, killing 3
A powerful blast flattened the two-story house of a militant commander in the northern Gaza Strip on Thursday, killing three people, including a baby girl and a boy, injuring 40 and burying an unknown number of others under the rubble, Gaza’s Hamas rulers and a Palestinian health official said.

Israel, which routinely accepts responsibility for attacks on military targets, denied involvement. But Hamas said the blast was caused by an Israeli airstrike and responded with a heavy barrage of rockets and mortar shells into southern Israel, wounding an Israeli woman.

The spiraling violence threatened to undermine last-ditch efforts to wrest a truce between Israel and Hamas and stave off an Israeli invasion of Gaza.

Note how the AP plays down the Israeli denial and mentions the “spiraling violence” as if Israel did have a hand in destroying the house. Notice also how the AP emphasizes that children were killed (even though in later articles they retracted the baby boy victim and changed it to a teenaged boy). The overall narrative: Big, bad Israel is killing babies in Gaza by targeting Hamas leadership.

Next version, timestamped 9:07:

Blast flattens house of Hamas commander, killing 4
A blast flattened the house of a militant commander in the Gaza Strip Thursday, killing four people, wounding 40 and burying an unknown number of others, Palestinian officials said.

Israel, which routinely accepts responsibility for attacks on military targets, denied involvement. But Hamas said the blast was caused by an Israeli airstrike and responded with a heavy barrage of rockets and mortar shells into southern Israel, wounding an Israeli woman.

The spiraling violence threatened to undermine last-ditch efforts to secure a truce between Israel and Hamas and stave off an Israeli invasion of Gaza.

Israel’s denial raised the possibility that the blast was caused by explosives meant for use against Israel that went off prematurely.

Now the AP raises the thought that maybe Hamas is lying. Absent is the sensationalism of the dead babies in the lead, remaining is the “spiraling violence” meme, even though the AP is now suggesting that maybe Israel didn’t blow up the house, after all.

Now, the 12:54 p.m. update:

A blast flattened the house of a militant commander in the Gaza Strip Thursday, killing seven people and wounding 40, Palestinian officials said.

Israel, which routinely accepts responsibility for attacks on military targets, denied involvement, and Hamas opened an investigation, an indication the militant Islamic rulers of Gaza believe the explosion might have been caused by accidental detonation of explosives in the house.

Earlier, Hamas blamed Israel and unleashed a barrage of rockets and mortars at Israel’s south.

The spiraling violence threatened to undermine last-ditch efforts to secure a truce between Israel and Hamas and stave off an Israeli invasion of Gaza.

Finally, we have the AP blaming Hamas for the “work accident,” but we still have the “spiraling violence” meme. Seems like the AP is heading down the right path, right?

Wrong. Three hours later:

Gaza house blast kills 7; Hamas hints at accident
An explosion flattened a house in the Gaza Strip on Thursday, killing seven people. After blaming Israel and unleashing a barrage of rockets and mortar shells, Hamas suggested the blast was accidental, not an Israeli attack.

By then Israel had carried out an airstrike aimed at a Gaza rocket squad, killing a Palestinian. Two other Israeli military operations in Gaza killed five more militants.

The violence threatened to scuttle Egyptian cease-fire efforts as they approached the finish line. A key Israeli envoy, Amos Gilad, was in Egypt trying to wrap up a deal, but there was no announcement of results.

An Israeli army spokeswoman said the military was not operating in the area of the house at the time of the blast.

Now the AP uses the cause-and-effect (or as they like to put it, “tit-for-tat”) violence meme. Because Hamas launched rockets at Israel, Israel fired against terrorists launching rockets. The AP treats terrorism and defense against terrorism as the same actions—all part of the “spiral of violence”—which is ruining the peace talks. Not Hamas terrorism. “Violence” by Hamas and Israel.

Those were all yesterday’s stories. Now let’s take a look at today’s article, time-stamped 8:52 a.m.

Israel OKs 1,300 east Jerusalem homes

Huh? What? Where’s the Hamas explosion story?

Oh. Five paragraphs down. You know, in the grafs that are most likely not to make it into the World News section of your local paper. Take careful note of what is omitted from these next four paragraphs.

Hamas, meanwhile, claimed responsibility for a house explosion in northern Gaza that killed seven Palestinians, one of them an infant girl.

An announcement Friday on the official Web site of Hamas’ military wing said the group’s “martyrs” died “while putting the final touches on a plan to carry out a special holy war mission.”

Five militants were among those who died in the explosion that flattened the house Thursday.

Immediately after the blast, Hamas blamed Israel. But Israel denied involvement.

What’s missing? The rocket barrage that Hamas launched immediately following the explosion. It’s gone down the AP memory hole, obviously yesterday’s news.

Funny, the BBC managed to put this news into a separate story. Reuters thought it was worth a mention of its own (though they buried the Hamas rocket barrage deep below the cutoff point). Even Monsters and Critics, a vehemently anti-Israel site, managed to run an article that focuses on Hamas’ responsibility for the blast. But not the AP.

I see no reason for hoping the anti-Israel media bias, or the narrative, is changing. I see only the reluctant admission of an anti-Israel writing and editing staff that yesterday’s explosion wasn’t Israel’s fault, and the continuance of the anti-Israel narrative and the whitewashing of Palestinian crimes against Israel. And keep in mind that I am a glass-half-full kind of person.

Update: And now (2:23 p.m. timestamp), all mention of the explosion is gone from AP updates. Move along, nothing to see here.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Gaza, Hamas, Israel | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Make their fears come true

A few weeks ago Moshe Arens observed:

But once the Israel Defense Forces and the security services began to seriously tackle Palestinian terror, following the massacre at the Park Hotel in Netanya in the spring of 2002, it quickly became clear that terror could be defeated by force.

Ari Shavit Nadav Shragai (thanks for the correction Mr Cosmic X) makes a similar observation:

The left has to be reminded of the year 1994 – a black hole in their memories: Israel left Gaza. That event took place 11 years before the disengagement. The left contends that mortars and Qassams were fired even before the disengagement, but they do not mention that the firing started only after 1994 – first at Gush Katif, and then at Sderot and after the disengagement, at Ashkelon.They fire at us from Gaza because we are not there. No one fires at Kfar Sava, which is 700 meters from Qalqilyah, or at the Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo, which is 500 meters from Bethlehem, because the IDF comes and goes whenever it wants, and thus has corrected the mistake of withdrawing from there during the Oslo Accord years.

Shavit’s observation is in the service of a larger point though:

The right must take care not to fall automatically into the trap of patriotism and must not “stand at attention” if the Israel Defense Forces enters the Strip. The right must make it clear that a short-term stay in Gaza would add insult to injury, and that another hasty withdrawal not only would not help us to regain our deterrent power but would smash it. The situation in the south is complicated, but there is no point in making it more complicated for a mere short-term gain that would precede another painful fall. It is necessary to rebuild permanent Israeli security control in Gaza both in the field and via intelligence, and also to consider once again setting up settlements in the northern Gaza Strip along our southern border. It is from the ruins of these settlements that the Grads and the Qassams are being fired in the direction of Ashkelon.

Defending Israel from Hamas in Gaza will entail a costly operation (or war). Half measures won’t do. The problem is that short term political considerations can’t come into play as Caroline Glick observed (h/t Seraphic Secret):

Tuesday, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Defense Minister Ehud Barak will meet ahead of Wednesday’s security cabinet meeting to determine their preferred course of action in Gaza. As media reports and statements by the three’s surrogates over the past several days make clear, Israel’s political leaders oppose launching a military campaign aimed at defeating Hamas’s Iranian directed, financed, trained and armed army and dislodging Hamas’s jihadist regime from power.Indeed, as their actions and statements over the past several months make clear, what Israel’s political leaders really aspire to is a cease-fire agreement with Iran’s Palestinian proxy regime. Under the proposed cease-fire, Hamas will suspend or scale back its illegal missile war against Israeli civilians in the South. In return, Israel will effectively accept Hamas rule of Gaza. Israel will allow Hamas to continue to build up its military forces in Gaza and have open access to the Sinai.

If Hamas is afraid why not make those fears come true?

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Terrorism | Tagged , | Comments Off on Make their fears come true

Focused like a laser on inanity

Count on the UN to get its priorities straight:

UN to discuss resolution demanding that Israel halt West Bank settlement construction

Here’s the short reason – via Meryl – that this settlements are irrelevant:

In other words, give us everything we want and then some, and maybe we’ll talk peace after that. The Arab position hasn’t changed. They said no in 1948, again in 1967, and have been saying no to peace with Israel for over 60 years.

Let’s remember that next time some moron insists that it’s “settlements” that are stopping the peace process. No, it’s Arab irredentism and rejectionism of Israel.

Here’s a slightly longer reason – via Barry Rubin:

That’s a pretty horrendous scenario, right? But that is basically the situation we face regarding the absurd belief that the Arab-Israeli, or more immediately, the Israeli-Palestinian, conflict can be resolved at this time.

So let me say it again: despite the mountains of speeches, conferences, articles, committees, foundation grants, projects, currencies of every description, and policies expended on it, there is no solution in sight for the conflict. It will continue for decades, Hamas is not about to become moderate, even Fatah and the Palestinian Authority (PA), which few reporters can even mention without inserting the word moderate before their names, isn’t anywhere near moderate enough to make peace.

If you examine in detail the composition of the PA or Fatah, the nature of its leadership, the articles in its newspapers or the talking heads in its television shows, the slogans at its rallies, the contents of its textbooks, the themes of its officially appointed clerics sermons, and so on, the combined inability and unwillingness to make peace could not possibly be more obvious.

Lest you think that the UN is singularly obsessed with Israel, you’ll be happy to know (thanks to Daled Amos) that the UN has found another horrid violator of human rights.

Somehow though the oppression in Zimbabwe hasn’t warranted their attention.(via memeorandum)

In the meantime the UN will just continue to pass irrelevant resolutions condemning Israel when, in fact, the Palestinians are a greater threat to themselves than Israel is and much greater oppression is going on elsewhere.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Tagged | Comments Off on Focused like a laser on inanity

Because It’s There

Those famous words were spoken by British climber George Mallory in 1924 when he was asked why he wanted to climb Mount Everest. I believe that this is as good an answer as any other – to an unanswerable question.

For some reason I recalled this while reading the CNN article about the book Human Smoke by one Nicholson Baker.

Even the staunchest opponents of the wars in Vietnam and Iraq are loath to take issue with World War II, the quintessential conflict between good and evil that became the model of a morally just war.

This opening sentence of the article is faulty in my opinion: I wouldn’t characterize the WW II as good vs. evil. It was rather less evil vs. more evil, but both Mr. Baker and the author of the article are confined to the Western-centric view of the war – more about it later. Meanwhile, I have realized the reason for recalling Sir Mallory’s words. Baker, as many other revisionists of history, is most probably driven by the same motive – because the history is there. Of course, a strong political belief (pacifism in his case) and unerring 20-20 hindsight, selective to the point of almost total blindness, don’t cause any harm to this endeavor.

In fact, as many of history revisionists have discovered, the business definitely has its perks. Such as the 15 minutes of glory, lucrative publishing contracts and a shoal of supporters, no matter how small a fringe they belong to. Of the seven billions world population even a fringe is enough to create a considerable source of pride, glory and income. But this is less important – after all, the roads to stardom are not paved by model behavior – in most cases.

So what is the main point of the book, according to the CNN article?

Baker said he was surprised and shocked at the way Churchill responded to Hitler’s attacks on Poland and other neighboring states by launching a relentless bombing campaign against German cities as well as a blockade that was designed to starve the enemy into submission.

“He was acting like a bloodthirsty maniac during that period. That has to go back on the record in all of its unpleasantness. We can’t learn from a hero like that. It’s a mistake to say that because Hitler was bad, we have to clean up the image of Churchill. Churchill was also bad,” Baker said.

Baker maintains that Churchill’s bellicose actions and Roosevelt’s eagerness to supply Britain with ships and planes served only to prop up Hitler’s standing with Germans and strengthen his hold on the country.

Now, the point is not necessarily new. In fact, the “pacifist” movement that protested any attempts to curb the Nazis’ expansionist moves was quite strong in pre-war Britain and fairly sizable in US as well. That some of the “pacifists” were quite overt in their support of Nazi ideology is another point worth remembering. I don’t know whether Mr Baker touches upon it in his book.

So – the main, and not too revolutionary, point of Mr Baker’s book is: why, oh why, haven’t Churchill and Roosevelt talked to Hitler, why haven’t they tried to understand an pacify him?

Yeah. Indeed, why haven’t people tried to talk with Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, Pol Pot, why don’t they talk enough to Kim Jong-Il, not to mention Sheik Nasrallah, Mugabe and myriad other tyrants and mass murderers throughout the history? Surely, given some frank and convincing talking-to, all these people could have been persuaded to become no more harmful than lambs. After all, Hitler has done no more than “attacks on Poland and other neighboring states”. That could have been a result of temporary indigestion which is an occasional burden for a vegetarian like Hitler.

Hmm… there must be some snag in the above logic. Somehow Mr Baker forgot that Poland and “other neighboring states” happened to become occupied as a result of these “attacks”. With well-known consequences. Unless, of course, Mr Baker thinks that the consequences could have been avoided as well by talking to Hitler in a right way. Or, as it may happen, Mr Baker just isn’t interested very much in the fate the befell all these Eastern heathens.

And this is the second important point: for some reason, as I have mentioned at the start of the post, Mr Baker focuses on Hitler – Churchill – Roosevelt trio, disregarding the Eastern side of the map. Whether it comes from ignorance or from some intentional oversight I wouldn’t know. The CNN article disregards the issue as well. But I couldn’t.

You see, my problem with Baker’s theory is of a practical nature. Given, for the purpose of the exercise, that by cuddling up to Hitler instead of confronting him, Churchill and Roosevelt could have prevented Nazis’ westward expansion, what about the Operation Barbarossa? Conceived and planned in meticulous detail long before the beginning of WW II, this operation eventually failed and was the ultimate cause of the downfall of the most evil regime in history.

But what if Baker’s villains, Churchill and Roosevelt, have decided to stay away from assistance they have generously provided to the Soviet Union, as Baker’s guidance would have been? What if the Red Army failed in its resistance? For me the answer is quite simple – I wouldn’t have been born and somebody else would have had to respond to Mr Baker’s well-meaning drivel.

On the other hand, both Baker and his readers would have been exemplary citizens of the Third Reich and a post like this one would have hardly be possible in the circumstances.

Oh well. The post is getting too long, the weather outside is getting too attractive. Time to forget Mr Baker and his crapola and deal with more pleasant matters.

Only… maybe later in the day I could raise Kim Jong-Il on Skype and talk him into stopping the starvation of his people and accumulation of all kinds of Dongs – medium or long range as they may happen to be. After all, he is so ronely, and a good talking-to may just be what the doctor recommends.

Peace…

Cross-posted on SimplyJews.

Posted in Juvenile Scorn, World | 2 Comments

Explosive narrative

The NYT reports:Disputed Blast in Gaza Kills 5

Hamas, the Islamist group that controls Gaza, initially blamed an Israeli airstrike for the blast, and it fired a hail of rockets and mortar rounds at Israeli towns and villages around the Gaza periphery.

But the Israeli military vehemently denied any involvement in the explosion, saying that it had not been active in the area at the time.

A spokesman for the Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, said later that the group would carry out an investigation, a tacit acknowledgment that the blast could have been caused by explosives being handled by militants in the house.

In a speech on Thursday evening for the anniversary of Hamas’s takeover of Gaza, the Hamas leader there, Ismail Haniya, made no mention of the explosion in Beit Lahiya, strengthening the supposition that it was an internal affair.

Snapped Shot also observed some honesty in the AP report on the explosion:

Is it possible that the press is finally showing some good, old-fashioned restraint in its Middle East reporting? Perhaps letting the facts on the ground tell the story, rather than shoe-horning events into some traditionally awful anti-Western viewpoint? Or perhaps that members of our esteemed media establishments have finally noticed that Hamas is a rather brutal, totally corrupt regime?

Media sources a bit farther to the left are leading with the Hamas claims, but they are acknowledging reports that an “internal explosion” could be responsible, too.

And if Israel’s getting fair treatment, he suggests that maybe Israel is doing a better job of hasbara:

Maybe this means, instead, that the Israeli military finally putting some actual effort into getting its official storyline out to the media in a timely manner.

The Muqata illustrates his post with pictures from a Palestinian source and observes wryly:

With over 50 rockets hitting Southern Israel today, I’m rather underwhelmed by the destruction in Gaza.

My suspicion is that internal explosions (work accidents) would have different patterns of destruction from external explosions (missile attacks) and that the pictures (especially this one) would show conclusively the source of the explosion.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Media Bias | Tagged , | 1 Comment

55 years a prisoner

Passage from Iraq

“I am Jewish, I want to go to Israel,” she said in fluent Arabic and with great excitement. The embassy found it hard to believe her story; but when she named her relatives in Israel, the embassy officials realized the truly incredible nature of the story unfolding before their very eyes and quickly contacted the Ministry of Interior’s population administration.

David Hazony (h/t) wonders:

The story is shocking and moving — and one wonders how many more stories there are like this one coming out of the new Iraq.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged , | Comments Off on 55 years a prisoner

AP media bias, Walt-Mearsheimer version

Astonishing. The AP managed to write an article that utterly contradicts its lead. Here’s the lead:

Israeli students slam American ‘Israel Lobby’ authors
Two prominent American professors, who have recently been causing an uproar with their best-selling book critical of the powerful pro-Israel lobby in Washington, faced a raucous reception Thursday at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

About 200 students and faculty members crammed into a stuffy lecture hall and grilled John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt for more than two hours about the harsh findings in their book, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy,” published last year.

Makes you think there are going to be some hard-hitting questions by Israeli students to the W-M team, doesn’t it? That opening makes you think you’re going to get some really nasty responses from the students at the lecture. Were W-M shouted down? Booed? Did anyone throw a pie in their faces?

I wouldn’t know. The AP didn’t inform me of anything other than that W-M spoke at Hebrew University, that they’re martyrs of the “Israel Lobby,” and that a lot of people disagree with them but some people don’t.

You won’t find a single question in the paragraphs that follow. Not one. You’ll get a statement by a student sympathetic to the W-M smear. You’ll get a very long explanation by the AP writer on how W-M have been attacked by people who disagree with their thesis. And you’ll get a quote at the very end of the article by someone from the ADL who, I think, is critical of them. It’s hard to tell in context. But most of the article is like this:

Since Mearsheimer, a University of Chicago professor, and Walt, of Harvard University, published their working paper of the same title in 2006, they have drawn the wrath of Jewish American groups and US Administration officials.

“If you bring up the Israel lobby, you are asking for trouble,” Walt said as he opened his lecture. He said he knew he was “playing with fire” when he wrote the book, but said he would not be deterred by personal attacks against him.

There is not a single quote of a question from the “raucous reception”. There is nothing but this description:

They said AIPAC wields disproportionate power because of deep financial resources and heavy-handed tactics. They were then showered with questions, as the classroom erupted in excited conversation. The exchange was mostly cordial, with the American professors eliciting some laughs from the crowd, but at times it got testy.

Gee. It got “testy.” But “the exchange was mostly cordial.” And yet, the scary lead talks about the “raucous reception” W-M got. You know, like this one:

Not all in the audience were hostile. Korina Kagan, a political science lecturer, said she essentially agreed with their thesis and was appalled by the attacks against them, especially from academic circles.

“The smear campaign against them is worse than anything they have ever written,” she said, adding that many of their positions are shared by commentators in the Israeli media. “We need to have a free academic exchange.”

Hm. That’s awfully raucous, Korina. You want to control yourself. You may suffer an aneurism if you’re not careful.

Here’s my question to the AP: Was this article written entirely from the Walt-Mearsheimer press release, or did you actually have someone in the audience for the student quote above?

The Chronicle of Higher Education managed to find a completely different angle for the same lecture:

‘Israel Lobby’ Professors Get Hospitable Greeting in Israel
Jerusalem — The first appearance in Israel by Stephen M. Walt and John J. Mearsheimer since the publication of their controversial book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, impressed a largely student audience at the Hebrew University, but left some faculty members wondering about their honesty.

A threatened boycott failed to have any effect, and the talk passed off with nothing more dramatic than some lively debate and repeated declarations from the pair that they are neither anti-Semitic nor Israel-haters.

So, gee, the AP is what, lying?

Yeah, I’m thinking.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Israel, Juvenile Scorn | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Bombardment of Israel continues while Olmert fiddles

The daily bombardment of Israel continues.

A 59-year-old Israeli woman was lightly-to-moderately wounded in the Yad Mordechai area on Thursday afternoon as Palestinian terror groups launched a barrage of mortar shells and Qassam rockets against Israeli communities near the Gaza border.

At least 10 mortars and eight Qassams landed in Israel, primarily in the Hof Ashkelon Regional Council. No further injuries have been reported, though a number of fired have broken out as a result. A member of Kibbutz Nahal Oz told Ynet that residents have currently been instructed to remain in bomb shelters and fortified rooms.

Hamas blames their own work accident for the bombardment. In Bizarro Arab World, when Hamas bombmakers blow up themselves and their families and neighbors, Hamas must “retaliate” by blowing up Israelis.

Hamas threatened it would respond to the explosion that occurred in Beit Lahiya earlier in the day, in which three people were killed and over 40 were wounded. However Israel continues to maintain its forces did not launch the alleged airstrike and military officials estimated the explosion was likely the result of a Palestinian ‘work accident.’

As usual, the work accident is being blamed on Israel.

The incident occurred in the home of Ahmed Hamouda, a member of the Izz al-Din al Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas. Witnesses reported the explosion was caused by an Israeli airstrike, though the IDF made clear no forces had launched an attack in the area.

And of course, the AP spin is completely anti-Israel. Look at the lead to this story, where the AP describes the Gaza explosion and the resulting barrage of rockets and mortars as “spiraling violence.” Hamas is responsible for both, and yet this is “spiraling violence” that will prevent the “truce.”

A blast flattened the house of a militant commander in the Gaza Strip Thursday, killing four people, wounding 40 and burying an unknown number of others, Palestinian officials said.

Israel, which routinely accepts responsibility for attacks on military targets, denied involvement. But Hamas said the blast was caused by an Israeli airstrike and responded with a heavy barrage of rockets and mortar shells into southern Israel, wounding an Israeli woman.

The spiraling violence threatened to undermine last-ditch efforts to secure a truce between Israel and Hamas and stave off an Israeli invasion of Gaza.

Israel’s denial raised the possibility that the blast was caused by explosives meant for use against Israel that went off prematurely.

Note the words in bold, and see the subtle bias. Israel’s denial raises the possibility that it was a work accident, thus leading the reader to believe that Israel is lying. And what’s with the “went off prematurely” bit? It was a weapons lab. The terrorists making bombs effed up.

And then there’s the headline:

Blast flattens house of Hamas commander, killing 4

It’s a mystery blast. I suppose we should be grateful the AP doesn’t blame Israel in the headline, instead of waiting until the second graf in the lead.

Just another day in Israel news.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Media Bias, Terrorism | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bombardment of Israel continues while Olmert fiddles

Stayin’ Alive

The Washington Post reports that Israel’s Olmert Clears Way for Party Primaries.

Under an ethics cloud and facing the possible collapse of his governing coalition, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Wednesday cleared the way for his party to hold early primaries that could end his political career.The move may temporarily ease dissension within his coalition. But it also could mean that Olmert’s Kadima party will choose a successor later this summer, which would effectively end his premiership.

However the Jerusalem Post reports that the maneuver may not delay elections as Olmert and Kadima hoped:

Olmert’s associates said that one of the goals of his decision was to try to prevent the passage of Likud MK Silvan Shalom’s bill that would disperse the Knesset and set a November 11 election date. But that goal appeared to have backfired, as both Labor and Shas officials said they would still vote for Shalom’s bill unless a date was set for the primary.

Hanegbi said there was no chance of a date being set by the time the bill was expected to be brought to a preliminary vote, on June 28. He said that due to the challenges of changing Kadima’s charter, it was also unlikely a primary date would be set before the cross-examination of American Jewish financier Morris Talansky, the main witness in the investigation that is undermining support for Olmert, on July 17.

Apparently Netanyahu saw this coming (via memeorandum)

Benjamin Netanyahu may hire former White House adviser Karl Rove.

Citing sources close to Netanyahu, Israel’s Channel 10 reported Thursday that Rove’s name has come up on a roster of strategic consultants that the Israeli opposition leader is thinking of hiring as he prepares for a possible leadership challenge against the embattled Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

Well it wouldn’t exactly be a leadership challenge. It would be a general election. This suggests that in this case anyway, Shalom was doing Netanyahu’s bidding.

However the Washington Post also reports:

Israel’s political crisis comes as the government faces tough choices over how to handle daily rocket fire from the Gaza Strip, as well as apparently fruitless U.S.-backed negotiations with the Palestinian Authority over a possible peace deal.

On Wednesday, Israel’s security cabinet, a select group of ministers, announced it would continue to work with Egypt toward a cease-fire with Hamas but would also instruct the military to prepare for major operations if the talks break down.

“We are giving the Egyptian initiative every chance to succeed,” Regev said.

The NYT similarly reports:

Israel carries out frequent air and ground strikes and small-scale incursions into the small coastal territory to try to contain the rocket and mortar fire that has killed four Israeli civilians so far this year. Many here say they believe that a broad military offensive is inevitable; Mr. Olmert and Defense Minister Ehud Barak threatened last week that one was close.

But for now, the preference is for the Egyptians to try to broker a cease-fire that fulfills Israeli conditions. Those include a cessation of all attacks from Gaza, an end to arms smuggling into the territory and some progress toward the release of Gilad Shalit, an Israeli corporal who was captured and taken to Gaza in June 2006.

Hamas has demanded an end to Israeli military operations in Gaza and an easing of the year-long economic blockade of the territory as part of any cease-fire deal. Israeli officials say that some sanctions could be lifted once there is calm.

Haaretz provides some more details:

To date, the Islamic group has agreed to a cease-fire with Israel but has refused to include in the deal the return of abducted IDF soldier Gilad Shalit.

Israeli sources said Monday it was possible that Hamas’ decision to hand Israel a letter apparently written by Shalit was an expression of “goodwill,” in an effort to show that the group was willing to take some steps toward a truce deal.

In recent weeks Israel has demanded that any agreement for calm in the Gaza Strip, and the lifting of its blockade on the Strip, would also include progress on the question of Shalit, who has been held in Gaza since his abduction in June 2006.

Hamas has also rejected Israel’s demand it cease smuggling weapons into Gaza. Egypt has pledged to fight the arms smuggling, but Olmert and Livni have expressed their disapproval of reaching an agreement that would leave Hamas free to continue amassing a weapons stockpile.

Hamas is in a fine position to make demands on Israel as Elder of Ziyon found:

Sources in the Hamas movement say that the movement expects Israel to make a number of assassinations of prominent leaders of the movement at the last minute that precedes approval of the “calming” proposal from Egypt.

The Al-Hayat of London newspaper quoted sources as revealing that “a number of Hamas leaders finally vanished from sight for fear that Israel carried out its threats of military action in the sector before accepting the calm”, in a reference to the statements of Minister Ehud Barak, the Israeli army, which threatened to implement a military operation in the sector before the truce.

It would appear that the Israeli government is working harder to stay in power than it is in trying to remove the threat to the country’s south.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Hamas, Israel | Tagged , | Comments Off on Stayin’ Alive