A decisive loss for Israel?

Really? Is it a decisive loss for Israel when a “progressive” lefty newspaper generously provides a pulpit to the propaganda chief of one of the most reactionary, misogynist and life-hating sects in existence?

Nope, I don’t think so.

Oops, I forget: they are all Hamas now…

Cross-posted on SimpleJews.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on A decisive loss for Israel?

The reports of my demise…

Sorry, folks. I had site issues that caused Bluehost to suspend my account. Something was making me a CPU hog, and apparently, the punishment for that is very severe. Plus, I was at Job in Northern Virginia, so my time to fix things was limited. Which is why I got Jay to update the software for me.

And when I got home from work, the last thing I wanted to do was work on the site. Especially since the premiere of Lost was tonight.

(Wow, they did it again. Bad guys, good guys, who can tell?)

Well, we’re back now. And you’ll have more substantive posts tomorrow. In the meantime, we can all discuss Lost in the comments to this post.

Sawyer. Dude. Lose the extra weight. Or bring back Jin, ’cause you’re just not doing it for me anymore.

(I’m so lying. I’ll take him, flabby belly and all.)

Posted in Site news | Comments Off on The reports of my demise…

Yes, we had some site problems

We had some site problems today.

(And that’s as much as I want to go forward with the “Yes, we have no bananas” theme.)

Fixed, mostly. I’m in NorVA with limited accessibility.

Posted in Site news | 1 Comment

UN Human Rights worker: Pedophile

Yet another UN child sex scandal:

US authorities say a human rights worker with ties to the United Nations was arrested at Kennedy Airport in New York with child pornography in his suitcase. The Queens District Attorney’s office says Clarence Dias was nabbed Tuesday with the child porn in his carry-on while going through security on his way to Bangkok.

Prosecutors say Dias told authorities the material was for research. Dias is president of the International Center for Law in Development. His office is located at the UN. Dias was expected to be arraigned on felony charges of possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child.

Uh-huh. These are the people behind the constant barrage of criticism of Israel. What moral, upstanding citizens.

Posted in Juvenile Scorn, United Nations | 1 Comment

Losing while winning

The New York Times reports Few Israelis Near Gaza Feel War Achieved Much

Elad Katzir, a potato farmer, was nervous as he drove through the lush fields, agreeing to stop the car only behind clumps of trees or bushes as cover in case of sniper fire. By one thicket, nestled among wildflowers, was a memorial to a soldier who was shot dead here while on patrol seven years ago.

“I do not feel any victory,” Mr. Katzir said. “I still do not feel safe.”

I wonder why.

Abe Greenwald comments:

Israel managed to curry an impressive amount of international goodwill throughout the Gaza operation, and perhaps Ehud Olmert determined that an internationally overseen cease-fire could help secure that goodwill – to be capitalized on another day. But when you let global opinion influence operational decisions so directly you end up constrained by the reality that’s been imposed on you from third parties. If Israel continues to simply fight back, they may very well fall from the temporary good graces of the governments that had shown support. In short, Israel may have opened itself up to national security blackmail. That’s not state of affairs one can easily imagine Israel tolerating very long.

Still let’s remember regardless of how Israelis feel, Hamas lost. Badly.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | 1 Comment

New president, old paradigm

The New York Times is happy with the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. And of course the Times draws the wrong lessons.

The Israelis have tough decisions ahead, starting with their vote next month for a new prime minister. We hope that they choose a leader who is truly committed to negotiating peace with the Palestinians. That will require some very difficult concessions. But it is the only way to guarantee their country’s lasting security.

Israel did make a very difficult concession for peace. It withdrew from Gaza. Many of its citizens who were expelled to make that possible have not been made whole. But worse, the withdrawal from Gaza made the nightmare of Katyushas from Gaza a reality.

So what should President Obama do?

The cease-fire gives President Obama some breathing room to consider how the Gaza war affects prospects for a new peace initiative — but not a lot. The new president has said he will work for a peace deal from Day 1 and we hope he means it.

It will require a commitment to be more evenhanded, creative and energetic in encouraging Israelis and Palestinians toward peace. It could also benefit from a diverse American negotiating team with considerable expertise in the Arab and Islamic world.

Towards that end, President Obama seems likely to appoint Senator George Mitchell as his Middle East envoy. What’s Mitchell’s record?

Just before Mr. Clinton left office, in late 2000, he asked Mr. Mitchell to prepare a report on steps necessary to end newly erupted violence between Israelis and Palestinians, in what became known as the second intifada. The report, which came out the following year, recommended a freeze on new Israeli settlements on Palestinian land and dismantling the Palestinian terror infrastructure. Neither has been achieved.

In response to Arafat’s “Aqsa intifada” MItchell recommended that Israel stop building settlements. Actually the second part – the dismantling of the Palestinian terror infrastructure – was achieved in Judea and Samaria. But it was done by Israel. Through force of arms. I now that the Times does not believe that the military can defeat terrorism, but Israel did. By declaring a ceasefire, Israel might have missed a chance to destroy Hamas.

There’s a new president and the Times wants him to go back to the Middle East and attempt to do what has always failed in the past. What’s needed is not more American involvement, but a change of heart in the Arab world, and among the Palestinians in particular.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | 2 Comments

Better than them: Israeli relief efforts for Gaza

Israelis are already launching private drives to help Gaza’s civilians.

As Operation Cast Lead draws to an apparent close, hundreds of Israelis, including those from rocket-battered communities in the Gaza periphery, are mobilizing to help suffering civilians on the opposite side of the border.

What started on Thursday as the private initiative of two young women – Lee Ziv, an activist in peace organizations, and Hadas Balas, a student at Sderot’s Sapir Academic College – has mushroomed into a countrywide drive to help the civilians of Gaza.

“There is no connection to politics,” said Ziv. “We don’t represent a side, we just see an immediate need for blankets for people who have nothing to cover them at night and milk for infants who have nothing to eat.”

This won’t get much play outside the Israeli media, because it doesn’t fit the narrative of the racist, apartheid Israeli monsters.

Since a short radio interview on Sunday morning, Ziv said her phone had been ringing off the hook. “Within two minutes of the interview, I had 40 voice messages. The response has been overwhelming. Schools have called asking how they can help. A father called who had three sons serving in the IDF in Gaza. A woman called who had a mortar fall on her house.”

That’s why Israel deserves the support of the so-called peace movement (which isn’t a peace movement when it supports Hamas). Not that they’ll ever acknowledge the good in Israel. But Israel doesn’t need the acknowledgment. That’s not why Israelis are helping Gazans before the IDF is over the border. They’re doing it because it’s the right thing to do.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Better than them: Israeli relief efforts for Gaza

Yes, barrister!

Every time I think that anti-Israeli rhetoric cannot stoop lower (for fear of breaking its back or for fear of hitting its head on the (basement) floor), the rhetoric surprises me again. This time it’s Michael Paulin, a barrister and a philosopher, in the Guardian’s CiF:

It is true that Israel has suffered from Hamas rocket attacks. Insofar as these attacks indiscriminately target civilian areas, Hamas would be guilty of war crimes under the Geneva Conventions of 1949. Yet, in the past eight years, Palestinian rockets fired from Gaza have killed around 20 people in southern Israel. Israel’s response is neither necessary nor proportionate.

It is great to know that Mr Paulin allows that Israel has suffered from Hamas rockets. But this is where the free ride on Mr Paulin’s generosity ends. Read the next sentence:

Insofar as these attacks indiscriminately target civilian areas, Hamas would be guilty of war crimes under the Geneva Conventions of 1949.

What the heck does this legalese mean in mean in plain language? “Insofar” means “To the degree or extent that…”. Meaning that for Mr Paulin the truth of the matter is not established firmly enough to be absolutely certain. I am not sure whether he said it as a barrister or as a philosopher. “Would be” definitely means that Mr Paulin keeps its mind open to the possibility of Hamas not being exculpated of this, purely theoretical, accusation.

In short: at this stage of his article Mr Paulin doesn’t absolutely exclude the possibility that Hamas could be possibly suspected of an alleged breach of military etiquette that, taken under further consideration by Mr Paulin or person(s) he entrusts with this mission of objectively and dispassionately taking the whole subject into consideration, could possibly lead to recognition of the necessity of … under Geneva conventions of… I hope it’s clear to you now.

But wait, it become curiosier and curiosier as we continue:

Yet, in the past eight years, Palestinian rockets fired from Gaza have killed around 20 people in southern Israel.

Aside of this “yet”, the sentence above could be taken at its face value – a dry recording of a fact. So what is the role of that “yet”? Of all possible uses, this one is, probably, the most fitting: “Used in negative statement to describe a situation that has existed up to this point or up to the present time“.

If you still wonder about the “yet”, here comes a smasher that rounds up the built-up tension:

Israel’s response is neither necessary nor proportionate.

That’s it – simple and elegant. The response wasn’t necessary – after all, what is a measly 20 (twenty) people killed between neighbors? Now, I am more than sure, it was not the barrister’s half but the philosopher’s one talking…

Anyhow, here is the barrister cum philosopher – I would spit on neither:

Bleh…

P.S. The learned barrister/philosopher forgot to compare that tiny number 20 with the number of people killed in road accidents in Israel during the same period. I can help: it’s between 4,000 and 5,000.

Cross-posted on SimplyJews.

Posted in Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | 3 Comments

A.B. Yehoshua vs. Gideon Levy

It is an interesting public debate: A.B. Yehoshua trying to get some sense into the head of our Mr self-assigned Conscience Of the Nation (CON) – Gideon Levy of Haaretz. The discussion is rather long, so I will quote only two more or less randomly chosen pieces. Says A.B.:

I asked you whether you truly believe that if they fire missiles the crossings will be opened, or the opposite. And whether you truly believe that it is right and just to open crossings into Israel for those who declare openly and sincerely that they want to destroy our country. I did not get an answer from you. And even though the crossings were in fact opened many times, and were closed in the wake of the missile attacks, regrettably I still did not see you standing firmly behind a moral position which says: Now, people of Gaza, after you expelled the Israeli occupation from your land, and justly so, you must hold your fire.

I hope you didn’t expect an answer from G.L., because none are forthcoming. Instead, here is an example of the typical G.L. tirade (comments in square brackets are mine):

We left Gaza because of our own interests and needs [This is also something we should be blamed for? That our interests and Palestinian interests coincided? Mmm…], and then we imprisoned them [Lie – the imprisonment was gradual – all because of the shooting]. We cut the territory off from the rest of the world [Lie – it came only as a result of the shooting and weapon smuggling] and the occupied West Bank [Lie – a link between Gaza and West Bank was seriously considered before the shooting started], and did not permit them to construct an air [Lie – an airport was constructed and even became functional for a short time – before the shooting started] or sea port [Another lie – a sea port was planned as well – before the shooting started]. We control their population registrar and their currency – and having their own military is out of the question [Now who is trying to play a village idiot here – or making his readers to look like ones?] – and then you argue that the occupation is over?

It is fine with me to have a Mr Conscience, although I would prefer to have one in the government’s employ but if Haaretz must…

Only – does our conscience have to be of a lying kind?

Cross-posted on SimplyJews.

Posted in Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | 1 Comment

Hamas’ hollow victory claims

Khaled Abu Toameh has a devastating analysis of Hamas’ claim of victory over the IDF.

Hamas’s claim that it has emerged victorious from Operation Cast Lead is reminiscent of the fiery statements of Ahmed Said, the famous Egyptian radio announcer who, during the Six Day War, continued to report the fictional downing of dozens of Israeli warplanes after Israel destroyed the Arab air forces.

[…] Hamas’s claim that the movement lost only 48 of its gunmen and that the IAF had used half of its ammunition in air strikes on the Gaza Strip is not being taken seriously by many Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

Nor are many Palestinians taking seriously Hamas’s claims that its men destroyed 47 tanks and armored vehicles, killed 80 IDF soldiers and wounded hundreds of others.

Not many people believe Hamas’ casualty count, either.

Various sources in the Gaza Strip, including medics, journalists and a few Hamas supporters are convinced that the movement is not telling the truth about its human losses and the damage done to its security and civilian infrastructure.

One medic said he believes at least 250 Hamas militiamen died in the fighting, while a journalist put the figure at over 400.

The sources agreed, nevertheless, that it was difficult to come up with accurate figures because it was difficult to distinguish between a civilian and a Hamas militiaman.

And here is why I don’t believe the UN’s casualty count:

According to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, on the first day of the war Hamas ordered its gunmen to take off their uniforms to avoid being detected by the IDF. The Hamas gunmen who participated in the fighting against the IDF were all dressed as civilians and the majority arrived at hospitals without their weapons or any other signs revealing their status as gunmen.

This is standard operating procedure—it protects the terrorists from arrest, and also inflates the civilian casualty count, as the UN is quick to believe any Palestinian “official” count, and pass it along to the news media—who then use it as if it is written in stone. The IDF estimates that at least three-quarters of the death toll are Hamas terrorists and related fighters.

As for the brave, brave Hamas mujahadin, there were “victory rallies” all over Gaza today—but there was something decidedly absent from the parties. There was no sign of the Hamas leadership. Ismail Haniyeh? In hiding. Mahmoud al-Zahar? In hiding. Senior Hamas leadership? All in hiding.

As for the Hamas leadership “proving” they can still fire mortars and rockets, well, the IAF can still fire their weapons, too.

IAF planes struck a Kassam rocket launcher in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday evening, hours after two incidents of gunfire and mortar shell fire were reported against IDF troops in the area.

The discontent is beginning.

“We can’t talk about real victory because there were thousands of martyrs and we didn’t liberate anything,” said Jawdat Abu Nahel. “It’s no time for a parade.”

Let’s hope it spreads.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Israel | Tagged , , | 10 Comments

War crimes in Gaza not covered by the MSM

Hamas is committing war crimes in Gaza, but these crimes aren’t interesting to the world—because they’re not being performed by Israelis.

Hamas militiamen have rounded up hundreds of Fatah activists on suspicion of “collaboration” with Israel during Operation Cast Lead, Fatah members in the Gaza Strip told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

[…] The Fatah members and eyewitnesses said the detainees were being held in school buildings and hospitals that Hamas had turned into make-shift interrogation centers.

Hamas has also renewed house arrest orders that were issued against thousands of Fatah officials and activists in the Gaza Strip shortly after the military operation started.

The brave mujahadin of Hamas, who were too terrified to face the IDF, have no such qualms over murdering old men:

In a more recent incident, Hamas gunmen shot and killed 80-year-old Hisham Tawfik Najjar after storming his home and beating his four sons – all Fatah activists.

Apparently, smiling in public is now a crimninal offense, punishable by kneecapping.

The Fatah men said that in a number of incidents, Hamas militiamen had kidnapped Fatah activists while they were attending the funerals of people killed during the war. In other cases, activists were detained and shot in the legs after they were spotted smiling in public – an act interpreted by Hamas as an expression of joy over Israel’s military offensive.

And yet, we have no reports by the AP or Reuters of any such activities. It’s as if their reporters are afraid to report negatively about Hamas, or something. But that couldn’t be. It’s only the Israelis that fetter the international press. Right?

Right.

Posted in Gaza, Hamas, Media Bias | Tagged , | Comments Off on War crimes in Gaza not covered by the MSM

False claims of victory and peaceful intentions

From Israel Speeds Withdrawal From Gaza (via memeorandum):

It remained unclear what impact the conflict had had on Hamas’s popularity in Gaza. Israeli officials said Hamas had been harmed politically. Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz suggested that Hamas was rapidly losing its public support given the extensive damage. “In addition to the diplomatic isolation, I think Gazans understand today that it is Hamas that led them to this reality,” he said during a tour of southern Israel.

But Palestinians here showed little evidence of that attitude.

“I think Hamas is stronger now and will be stronger in the future because of this war,” said Eyad el-Sarraj, a psychiatrist here who is an opponent of Hamas. “This war has deepened the people’s feeling that it is impossible to have peace with Israel, a country that promotes death and destruction.”

From the Jerusalem Post’s Analysis: Trumpets of victory strike false note:

Listening to the commanders of Hamas’s armed wing, Izzadin Kassam, who held a press conference in Gaza City on Monday, one is left with the impression that it was the Israelis, and not the Palestinians, who suffered thousands of casualties and lost nearly half of their weapons during the war.

Hamas’s claim that the movement lost only 48 of its gunmen and that the IAF had used half of its ammunition in air strikes on the Gaza Strip is not being taken seriously by many Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

(I will admit that this article suggests Hamas a relatively small portion of its fighters. Yesterday I argued that Hamas likely lost a significant portion of its most effective fighters. Still I don’t think the reason they didn’t fight was tactical, I believe it was cowardice.)

The Times also reports:

King Abdullah exhorted Arab nations to overcome their divisions and urged Israel to embrace an Arab peace plan put forward in 2002 or risk its being withdrawn. He said the peace plan, offering Israel broad Arab recognition in return for significant territorial and political concessions on the Palestinian issue, was “still on the table” but would not always be.

I have no idea why this is even reported. The Saudi peace plan is an ultimatum, demanding a lot and promising nothing concrete in return. Meryl summarizes it nicely:

By the way, the link above, under “Refuse to make any compromise”? It’s from over a year ago. The Saudis have not budged an inch on their insistence that Israel accept their plan, or never have peace. Sound familiar? It should. That’s the Arab way of dealing with Israel. “We lost, so you have to do what we say.”

Crossposted on Yourish.

Posted in Israel | Tagged | Comments Off on False claims of victory and peaceful intentions

AP: Passing along Palestinian white phosphorus lies

The AP is helping the world to charge Israel with war crimes. They’re accusing Israel of dropping white phosphorus shells on Gaza without finding any physical evidence whatsoever—but they have plenty of Palestinian experts telling them it happened. Hey, even the Palestinian children are able to tell you when a shell is made of white phosphorus and when it’s just another shell. And the headline? Sheer propaganda.

Gaza family returns home after phosphorus blast
All were victims of a single white phosphorus shell dropped on their home, survivors and doctors said.

“It’s been two weeks and it’s still burning,” said Mahmoud Abu Halima, 20, picking up a bit of phosphorus shrapnel in the hallway. He rubbed the brownish fragment against the floor and it gave off an eery green glow followed by acrid smoke that sent everyone coughing.

White phosphorus is an incendiary agent used to illuminate targets at night or create a smoke screen for day attacks. When a person comes into contact with it, it can cause horrific injuries. It ignites upon striking the skin and burns straight through or until it is cut off from oxygen.

Interesting. The Palestinian picked up a fragment that supposedly ignites upon striking the skin, and yet it did not ignite when he picked it up. It did, however, ignite against the floor as he rubbed it. Why it didn’t burst into flame on contact with his hands, the writer didn’t say. But later in the article, white phosphorus was doing exactly what it’s supposed to do:

In the town of Beit Lahiya, boys exposed a lump of white phosphorus previously covered by sand. It burst into flames as they kicked it playfully down the road.

Really, make up your mind, AP. Is it white phosphorous, or isn’t it?

Yes:

The United Nations says white phosphorus was fired at two U.N. schools packed with refugees during the fighting.

No:

Israel says it only used the explosive as flares or smoke screens to protect tanks during heavy combat, and does its best to avoid civilian injuries. The international Red Cross said last week that it had no evidence to suggest the incendiary agent was being used improperly or illegally.

Yes:

But a human rights group condemned its use in places filled with civilians such as Gaza.

There is absolutely no scientific evidence that these are white phosphorous burns. There is only anecdotal evidence from people who have no proof whatsoever, and that includes the Palestinian doctors. Look at this doctor’s quote, which is placed in the article in such a way as to make you think it is about the burn victim’s wounds, but reads like a reporter asking the doctor to describe white phosphorous burns.

His mother, Salima, 44, lay badly wounded in a ward of Shifa Hospital in central Gaza City. “I was burned by the smoke, it came like a fountain,” she said, describing how the chemical burst in all directions after hitting her living room.

Doctors at Shifa Hospital said Salima’s wounds at first appeared superficial when she was brought in.

“But it eats at the flesh, it digs deeper and gets to the bone,” said doctor Nafiz Abu Shahbah. “The whole body becomes toxic,” said the doctor, who heads the hospital’s burn unit.

That sounds like white phosphorus all right. And the AP adds the doctor’s qualifications to make you think that he really, really knows what he’s talking about. Except he still hasn’t conducted any tests to find out whether or not the burns were caused by white phosphorus.

Abu Shahbah, a doctor trained in Egypt, Scotland and Virginia who’s headed the Shifa ward for the past 15 years, said he believes the wounds of the Abu Halimas and hundreds of similar cases treated here were inflicted by white phosphorus shells.

Belief is not proof. There are tests that can be done that will prove whether or not the woman is suffering from white phosphorus burns. Those same tests could be made on the burning chunks that give off that “eerie glow.” Or maybe they could just look things up on Wikipedia.

Burning WP produces a hot, dense white smoke. Most forms of smoke are not hazardous in the kinds of concentrations produced by a battlefield smoke shell. Exposure to heavy smoke concentrations of any kind for an extended period (particularly if near the source of emission) does have the potential to cause illness or even death.

WP smoke irritates the eyes and nose in moderate concentrations. With intense exposures, a very explosive cough may occur. However, no recorded casualties from the effects of WP smoke alone have occurred in combat operations and to date there are no confirmed deaths resulting from exposure to phosphorus smoke.

Interesting. Once again, it takes almost no effort to actually research a subject and disprove the claims of the Palestinians that are passed along uncritically passes on the accusations of Palestinians as if they were scientific fact.

As for that “eerie green glow”? I’m calling bullshit on it.

Phosphorus exists in several allotropic forms including white (or yellow), red, and black (or violet). White phosphorus has two modifications. Ordinary phosphorus is a waxy white solid. When pure, it is colourless and transparent. It is insoluble in water, but soluble in carbon disulphide. It catches fire spontaneously in air, burning to P4O10, often misnamed as phosphorus pentoxide. When exposed to sunlight, or when heated in its own vapour to 250°C, it is converted to the red variety. This form does not ignite spontaneously and it is a little less dangerous than white phosphorus.

There is, however, one piece of solid evidence that a white phosphorus rocket was fired during the Gaza war. By Hamas, at Israel.

Palestinian militants fired a phosphorus rocket at Israel for the first time yesterday, one of 17 fired into Israel as fighting entered its 19th day. The phosphorus rocket exploded in an open field in the western Negev. No injuries or damage were reported.

The world media assault on Israel continues. Watch this story take wings and fly, in spite of its blatant lack of facts.

Posted in AP Media Bias, Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Feuded? Try aided and abetted

Last week the Washington Post reported Israel, Aid Groups Have Long Feuded:

Many Israeli officials, however, have long nurtured suspicions that U.N. agencies and other aid groups, which are supposed to be politically neutral, favor the Palestinian cause.

They say the organizations are quick to accuse Israel of mistreating Gazans but slow to criticize Hamas for targeting Israeli civilians. They also argue that Hamas draws little scrutiny for tactics that place noncombatant Palestinians in harm’s way.

There’s a bit of an understatement in those paragraphs. It isn’t just that Israel accuses the UN, the International Red Cross and others of favoring the Palestinian cause. But Israel accuses those organizations of aiding and abetting terrorists. Like this (h/t Larwyn, Barry Rubin):

I’d also observe that when first three people who enter the ambulence (at about 00:54) two are escorting a third who is being held by each arm. That suggests that the ambulance didn’t just ferry terrorists from one location to another, it might have abetted in an abduction. Given what we know about Hamas, if I’m correct, the fellow being grabbed likely wasn’t headed for a hospital, unless we’re talking about the morgue.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Posted in Israel | Tagged , | Comments Off on Feuded? Try aided and abetted

AP headline writers whitewashing anti-Semitic Israel protests

Look at the choice of headline the AP gave this story:

Jewish leaders object to Nazi imagery at rallies

Sounds like those whiny Jews complaining about anti-Semitism again, huh? Now let’s look at the lead.

The use of Nazi imagery at recent anti-Israel demonstrations across Europe has fanned the flames of anti-Semitism and incited violence against Jews, the head of Israel’s Holocaust memorial said Monday.

Protests against Israel’s Gaza offensive have included signs and slogans comparing Israeli soldiers to German troops, the Gaza Strip to the Auschwitz death camp and the Jewish Star of David to the Nazi swastika.

The protests have come amid a dramatic increase in anti-Semitic acts, including attacks on synagogues, beatings of pro-Israel demonstrators and proposed boycotts of Jewish businesses, according to the U.S.-based Anti-Defamation League.

So apparently, the angle of the story is not that Jewish leaders are objecting to the imagery, but that they are charging protesters with fomenting anti-Semitic actions by using this imagery. But you can’t tell that by the headline, which ignores, gee, the first sentence of the article.

You think maybe the headline should be, oh, I dunno, something like it is in Ynet?

Jewish leaders: Nazi imagery incites violence

Because that’s what the AP article is saying. Someday, I’d really like to sit down with the main AP headline writers, and I’d like to be holding a sharp stick that I can poke them with every so often.

Avner Shalev, chairman of the Yad Vashem museum and memorial, said the comparisons were “manipulative distortions of history” and called for the Holocaust to be left out of contemporary political discourse.

“It is legitimate to constructively criticize the policies of any nation, including Israel. However, the baseless use of Holocaust imagery and terminology as a weapon against Israel has incited a tangible surge of anti-Semitism,” he said. “That is the danger inherent when people cynically use the Holocaust to distort a present political conflict.”

Not that that stops the scumbags who keep using it, including my buddy Shane, who just can’t get enough of the Israel-Nazi references (and a hearty eff you to you, Shane!).

I do get rather tired of writing the same posts, over and over again. I’ll make you a promise: I’ll stop when the haters stop.

Yeah, that probably won’t be in my lifetime.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on AP headline writers whitewashing anti-Semitic Israel protests