Whitewashing the Muslim Brotherhood

The Muslim Brotherhood, which is being whitewashed by the world media as having given up on using violence to establish an Islamic state (pure bullshit, by the way; the Brotherhood has never given up on violence), has an interesting AP label: “fundamentalist.”

Example one:

If Egypt’s opposition groups are able to truly coalesce – far from a certainty for an array of movements large and small that include students, online activists, old-school opposition politicians and the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood – it could sustain and amplify the momentum of the week-old protests.

Example two:

This Mediterranean coastal city is a bastion of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, and perhaps nowhere else are the strengths – and the weaknesses – of the powerful fundamentalist movement clearer as Egypt explodes with protests aimed at removing its long-ruling president.

Interesting, how the word “fundamentalist” is used to describe an organization that wants to establish sharia law worldwide, by stealth if it must, but by force if need be. I defy you to find a single AP article without the modifier “hardline” attached to “Likud” or “Netanyahu.” But I digress. This is how the WaPo chooses to describe the Brotherhood:

Inspired by the YMCA when it was founded in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood has been under a ban since 1948, and its real size is difficult to gauge. The group was brutally repressed by President Gamal Abdel Nasser in the 1950s and 1960s. Since then, it has at times been propped up as a foil – especially for Western audiences – with periodic crackdowns that have sent many of its members to prison.

Akef, sentenced to death in 1954, served 20 years in prison before emerging as a leader of the group.

For most of its existence in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood has refrained from violence against the state. It is not the organization of radical jihadists that it is sometimes made out to be. But its caution in dealing with Mubarak has made it appear recently that it is more concerned with protecting itself than with improving the nation.

Really? It was inspired by the YMCA? The brotherhood wants something like this?

Founded on June 6, 1844 in London, England by Sir George Williams, the goal of the organization was putting Christian principles into practice, achieved by developing “a healthy spirit, mind, and body.”

I can’t find a cite anywhere that states the Brotherhood was inspired by the YMCA. But I can find the thoughts of its founder over at Wikipedia, the source that even anti-Zionists generally don’t have issues with:

To help consecrate the Islamic order, al-Banna called for banning all Western influences from education and ordered that all primary schools should be part of the mosques. He also wanted a ban on political parties and democratic institutions other than a Shura (Islamic-council), and wanted all government officials to have a religious study as main education.

Hasan al-Banna saw Jihad as a God-ordained defensive strategy, stating that most Islamic scholars: “Agree unanimously that jihad is a communal defensive obligation imposed upon the Islamic ummah in order to broadcast the summons (to embrace Islam), and that it is an individual obligation to repulse the attack of unbelievers upon it.” As a result of unbelievers ruling Muslim lands and humbling Muslim honor: “It has become an individual obligation, which there is no evading, on every Muslim to prepare his equipment, to make up his mind to engage in jihad, and to get ready for it until the opportunity is ripe and God decrees a matter which is sure to be accomplished.[9]

Yes, that’s just like the YMCA. To this day, the world lives in fear of the YMCA crusade to put the entire world under the Christian faith, by force if necessary.

That same Mahdi Akef, whom the WaPo is quoting as such a reformer, was quoted a bit earlier, by Barry Rubin:

Akef said that Hamas should be supported, “By any means necessary.” The implication is, since the Brotherhood has always favored abrogation of the Egypt-Israel peace treaty that Egypt should go to war with Israel on behalf of the Palestinians. A Brotherhood government would probably do just that.

That was in 2009. Today, we have proof of their amiability even in the whitewash. Even the AP acknowledges that the fiercest fighting is in the Brotherhood’s stronghold.

After weekly prayers last Friday, tens of thousands spilled into the streets of Alexandria, calling for the end of Mubarak’s rule. Clouds of tear gas billowed, fistfights broke out between protesters and riot police, and after hours of street battles, police retreated leaving nearly 100,000 people marching all day.

[…] The strong Brotherhood presence in Alexandria marches was a contrast with those in capital, Cairo, where Brotherhood members were generally not overt in the participation until Sunday. Their appearance among the thousands camped out for days in Cairo’s central Tahrir Square raised the suspicion of some secular protesters, who worried that the rallies could start to take a more fundamentalist look.

There’s that word again. The men who would re-establish the Islamic Caliphate, segregate men and women, bring back medieval laws of stoning, cutting off the hands of thieves, hanging homosexuals, and much, much more… and they’re just “fundamentalist.”

Yeah. And denial is just a river in Egypt.

This entry was posted in Media Bias, Religion and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Whitewashing the Muslim Brotherhood

  1. soccer dad says:

    Same wavelength. Couldn’t believe the YMCA line. I figured if it was true I’d find it in Wikipedia; but it’s not there.

    The Muslim Brotherhood is a non-threatening fraternal organization which has been repressed by evil Egyptian totalitarians (but who were American allies pushing Israel to be more flexible regarding the Palestinians) and who (the MB, that is) had nothing to do with the assassination of Anwar Sadat and no ties to Nazism. And if that didn’t lull us into a sense of warm and fuzziness, the Post tells us that the Brotherhood is but a “minor player” in the uprising. So nothing to worry about; nothing to see here; move on.

    Banna the founder of the MB is the grandfather of that famed moderate, Tariq Ramadan.

    This vein is so rich, it’s amazing that the media is unwilling to mine it.

    And could you imagine the Village People singing “Muslim Brotherhood?”

  2. Doug Payton says:

    Just what I was thinking. They were inspired by the *song* YMCA. :)

  3. joetote says:

    I have just seen numerous reports of a leading Iman there warning Israel to prepare for war.
    And one would be shocked by this? I repeat! This appears to be the lion going after the wounded prey!
    Could all the turmoil we are seeing in Muslim countries be an offshoot of perceived weakness on the part of the United States and her allies! I for one have always felt this President is firmly on the side of the Muslim world as a whole. Certainly he is the most antagonistic President as in his stance on Israel I have ever seen. This new Iranian poster boy feels the President WILL NOT do anything other than to warn Israel to stand back and let the events take their course.
    As we now are at the point in which we have elected officials telling the Muslim world this country is full of racist hate and an administration that in almost every stance is extremely ” Anti-American ideals” why should one be surprised that these radical Muslim Fundamentalists are taking their shots now? After all, this is the administration that just the other day as an example declared the Egyptian government was stable. No surprise from the blind mice running the show in D.C. now is it?
    It is my understanding Iran is ecstatic about the coming regime change in Egypt. If so, what does this do to the region? It in fact puts another knife at Israel’s throat along with another one aimed squarely at the U.S. which we know for sure will threaten oil supplies and therefore raise oil prices thus causing more economic problems.
    And for one to be “surprised that the Anti-Israel rhetoric has started to emanate from the Egyptian protesters only shows how far up their rears this administration and the apologists for the Radical Muslims have their heads stuck! Combine that with El Baradei, another poster boy from Iran and one has to expect the worst case scenario.
    One can agree that this has been something that has been festering in Egypt for quite sometime. However, as we have learned with the failed feel good Socialist policies being shoved down out throats here, there is always the law of unintended consequences. One feels in this case, the consequences can and will be disastrous.

  4. Herschel says:

    For many years the Muslims and their left wing enabler propaganda has focused on a “powerful” Israel fighting against only the weak Palestinians, the fact that Israel was surrounded by a hostile Muslim world and cold peace Egypt and Jordan never seemed to penetrate their sense of logic. Now that Egypt and Jordan may go from “cold peace” to become a staging ground for terror attacks against Israel and possible later wars, the sense of David vs. Goliath may once again become Israel’s mantle, but with the age of missiles and rockets it would come at a serious price.

  5. Pablo Schwartz says:

    “In June 1975, Mark Chapman volunteered to work in the YMCA office in Beirut, Lebanon, as the civil war erupted ..”

    BINGO !

Comments are closed.