So first I find a story in the Daily Mail that says the unemployment rate in Great Britain is actually six times higher than official government figures.
Nearly ten million people in Britain are out of work - more than six times the official unemployment rate - it was revealed last night.
The ‘hidden army’ of jobless accounts for a quarter of the working-age population.
Critics said the staggering numbers represented a ‘huge pool of wasted talent’ and fuelled concerns about the drain on the economy.
Ya think? 25% of the working population is a “huge pool of wasted talent”? And yet, how is it that 1 out of every four working-age Brit is able not to, well, work for a living?
They are not listed as unemployed but do not go to work because they are sick, looking after family or simply refuse to find a job.
While they are not claiming unemployment benefits, many rely on other handouts such as incapacity benefit.
The ‘economically inactive’ currently form 21.2 per cent of the working-age population - 124,000 more than a year ago and the second highest figure on record.
The highest figure was in May 1997 - the month that the Conservatives lost the General Election after a severe economic downturn - when 21.6 per cent were inactive.
Some 1.89million of the current total are students, 2.35million are carers for elderly relatives or stay-athome mothers, and 2.04million are on long-term sickness.
A further 198,000 are on temporary sickness leave, 619,000 have retired early and 35,000 are classed as ‘discouraged workers’, meaning they are not interested in finding work.
So that tax rate in the U.K. is supporting 25% of the working age population, as well as the uniform health care system, the BBC, and those Big Brother cameras all over the nation. Now let’s take a look at another interesting story out of Great Britain:
But men in their late-30s and early-40s are the least content of all of us, it seems.
Whether they are mourning the passing of their prime or struggling to cope with the demands of a job and young family, those aged 35-44 invariably hit a mid-life crisis when their happiness level plunges lower than at any other age, according to a study for the Government.
Let’s see… age 35-44… now what would that make them? That’s right. Working age men. Who can’t find work.
Most men rated their carefree teenage years between the age of 16-24 as one if their happiest periods, with an average score of 7.55 out of ten.
But halfway through their careers, satisfaction levels dipped to a low of 6.8, only rising again to nearly 7.8 once they had crested retirement age.
Granted, I’m making a huge cognitive leap here. But compared to what some bloggers do, hell, I’m practically writing a fact-based thesis on why unemployed men in Britain are unhappy.
And with that caveat, I find it interesting that British men get unhappier in their middle years, which would be about the time a man feels most useless if he hasn’t got a job. Meantime, women of that age are still caring for their children and starting to re-enter the workforce. As for unemployed kids, well, twentysomethings don’t care. It gives them more time to party.
Another factor of that depression statistic is that the older you get, the tougher it is to recover from tough times, physically and mentally. And if you lose a large chunk of your working life, it affects you financially for a long time, and takes a long time to recover.
So maybe the real reason British men are so unhappy is simply that they can’t find a decent job. But sure, U.K. You keep on importing more immigrants. No doubt they’re doing the jobs that Britons won’t do. Meantime, Brits are talking about emigrating (and doing it) in record numbers.
Time was when Brits would work on fixing their nation, not fleeing it.
Times change.