Traveling briefs

What? The AP is talking terrorism? Yes, really. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy released a report today saying the Obama Administration’s refusal to acknowledge Islamism as the driving ideology behind Islamic terrorism is a very bad idea. And the news item is picking up steam and looks like it’s going to be very well read. Cue the CAIR news release shrieking about “Islamophobia” because Daniel Pipes is a part of the institute.

Germany bans the IHH: Germany has determined that the IHH is linked to Hamas, and banned it accordingly. Why is it the world media can’t figure it out?

Just words? Not really. Hezbollah does have a list of targets in Israel, and will fire at them in a war. The question is, does Hezbollah have the stomach for another war? That was the reason for the IDF’s release of classified material showing Hezbollah arms caches. By the way, when I told you that the AP passed along Hezbollah propaganda, I wasn’t kidding. Compare this story to the first AP article that reported the IDF evidence showing the arms caches in civilian areas. Oh, and it’s yet another AP news story about UNSCR 1701 that does not report that it also demanded that Hezbollah be disarmed. That’s, what, three in a week?

This entry was posted in Hamas, Israel, Lebanon, Media Bias, News Briefs, Terrorism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Traveling briefs

  1. Michael Lonie says:

    “The question is, does Hezbollah have the stomach for another war?”

    The question is, when will the Ayatollahs jerk Hezbollah’s chain and order them to start another war? “Sic ’em Hezzie.” It’s the Pharoah of Tehran who will decide, not Hezbollah. If, at that time, the Hezzies and the Lebs do not have the stomach for another round with Israel, too bad. Iran will order them to immolate themselves for the greater glory fo the 12th Imam.

Comments are closed.