<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mideast Media Sampler &#8211; 04/19/2013	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.yourish.com/2013/04/19/17885/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.yourish.com/2013/04/19/17885</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dcdoc		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2013/04/19/17885/comment-page-1#comment-49971</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dcdoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=17885#comment-49971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot; Ignored&quot;?!  I don&#039;t recall Shore&#039;s use of that word in her piece, but if she did use it, how was Edelman &quot;ignored&quot;?  He was never unknown to a wider circle of Jews, nor forgotten, nor his death a few years ago unremarked upon or unlamented.  So in what way &quot;ignored&quot;?  &quot;Ignored&quot; because few others were persuaded by him to his form of &quot;anti-Zionism&quot; (or should that be &quot;a-Zionism&quot; or uninterest, disinterest, indifference, or whatever where Zionism is/was concerned, since he seems not to have had the hateful antipathy toward the Jewish state that so many &quot;anti-Zionists&quot; do)?  

What Adam Garfinkle has had to say about remembering the Warsaw Ghetto uprising and the implications of how we do or don&#039;t go about it (http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/garfinkle/2013/04/19/pondering-a-70th-anniversary/) is far more useful and distortion-free than what Professor Shore, a secular Jew whose own attitudes toward Zionism aren&#039;t clear to me, has said about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Ignored&#8221;?!  I don&#8217;t recall Shore&#8217;s use of that word in her piece, but if she did use it, how was Edelman &#8220;ignored&#8221;?  He was never unknown to a wider circle of Jews, nor forgotten, nor his death a few years ago unremarked upon or unlamented.  So in what way &#8220;ignored&#8221;?  &#8220;Ignored&#8221; because few others were persuaded by him to his form of &#8220;anti-Zionism&#8221; (or should that be &#8220;a-Zionism&#8221; or uninterest, disinterest, indifference, or whatever where Zionism is/was concerned, since he seems not to have had the hateful antipathy toward the Jewish state that so many &#8220;anti-Zionists&#8221; do)?  </p>
<p>What Adam Garfinkle has had to say about remembering the Warsaw Ghetto uprising and the implications of how we do or don&#8217;t go about it (<a href="http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/garfinkle/2013/04/19/pondering-a-70th-anniversary/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/garfinkle/2013/04/19/pondering-a-70th-anniversary/</a>) is far more useful and distortion-free than what Professor Shore, a secular Jew whose own attitudes toward Zionism aren&#8217;t clear to me, has said about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.yourish.com @ 2026-05-03 06:31:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->