<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What is Wrong with 67 Lines with Swaps?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:13:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Meryl Yourish		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533/comment-page-1#comment-43981</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meryl Yourish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=14533#comment-43981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533/comment-page-1#comment-43976&quot;&gt;nzuckerman&lt;/a&gt;.

Let me play Devil&#039;s Advocate: &quot;nzuckerman&quot; is a troll. He did not respond to my response to his first challenge. Now he&#039;s trolling here. I have no desire to keep him around. I&#039;m deleting his posting access. As I&#039;ve said before, I&#039;ve read arguments like his in every other Israel discussion, everywhere I&#039;ve seen it. He uses a fake email address, thus proving he isn&#039;t looking to take part in this blog. So goodbye, troll.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533/comment-page-1#comment-43976">nzuckerman</a>.</p>
<p>Let me play Devil&#8217;s Advocate: &#8220;nzuckerman&#8221; is a troll. He did not respond to my response to his first challenge. Now he&#8217;s trolling here. I have no desire to keep him around. I&#8217;m deleting his posting access. As I&#8217;ve said before, I&#8217;ve read arguments like his in every other Israel discussion, everywhere I&#8217;ve seen it. He uses a fake email address, thus proving he isn&#8217;t looking to take part in this blog. So goodbye, troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cynic		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533/comment-page-1#comment-43980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=14533#comment-43980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[nzuckerman wrote:
&lt;i&gt;In sum, &lt;b&gt;you go ahead and grab land&lt;/b&gt; and then say we can not negotiate this because we have built there.&lt;/i&gt;

Why do you invent a situation when the facts show that there was no &lt;i&gt;land grab&lt;/i&gt; but that Israel implored the little king of Jordan not to enter the war, which he did not heed and so lost that land in the fighting?
The land that Jordan had grabbed in 1948, with British military help, when they invaded the territory the UN had granted the Jews in partitioning what remained from the Ottoman Empire. That was a land grab.
Why is it that successive American administrations, we won&#039;t consider the Europeans for obvious reasons, but American, have consistently reneged on International agreements from the League of Nations, San Remo, Sevrès, UNSC resolutions?
Why didn&#039;t the UN force Jordan and Egypt to devolve the land they had grabbed to the local Arabs who only became Palestinians after 1967?
Why does your President now discard the Quartet&#039;s &quot;Road Map&quot;, accepted by all parties at the time, to invoke his latest dream, &lt;i&gt;Redistributing the Wealth&lt;/i&gt;?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nzuckerman wrote:<br />
<i>In sum, <b>you go ahead and grab land</b> and then say we can not negotiate this because we have built there.</i></p>
<p>Why do you invent a situation when the facts show that there was no <i>land grab</i> but that Israel implored the little king of Jordan not to enter the war, which he did not heed and so lost that land in the fighting?<br />
The land that Jordan had grabbed in 1948, with British military help, when they invaded the territory the UN had granted the Jews in partitioning what remained from the Ottoman Empire. That was a land grab.<br />
Why is it that successive American administrations, we won&#8217;t consider the Europeans for obvious reasons, but American, have consistently reneged on International agreements from the League of Nations, San Remo, Sevrès, UNSC resolutions?<br />
Why didn&#8217;t the UN force Jordan and Egypt to devolve the land they had grabbed to the local Arabs who only became Palestinians after 1967?<br />
Why does your President now discard the Quartet&#8217;s &#8220;Road Map&#8221;, accepted by all parties at the time, to invoke his latest dream, <i>Redistributing the Wealth</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rabbi Kaufman		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533/comment-page-1#comment-43977</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rabbi Kaufman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=14533#comment-43977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Okay. To which nation did the land upon which Israel constructed suburbs of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv belong? If the answer is to none, then the reality is that Israel had the right both the claim the land and to build upon it. There is a false assumption that what was not recognized as being part of Israel pre-1967 was therefore taken away from a Palestinian State. There was no Palestinian state to take it from. Israel took the land from Jordan which later ceded it. That everyone else in the world, it seems, wants that land to be a part of Palestinian state today does not mean that it WAS part of a Palestinian state then. 

The ONLY legitimate place to begin negotiations on any topic is with the status quo. To have negotiations begin with the false assumption that there WAS a Palestinian state and that the Palestinians have the ability to negotiate AS IF that land belonged to a Palestinian state is ludicrous. The negotiations are truly between Israel and the Arab League for the creation of something that has never previously existed, well two things, a Palestinian state and peace between the Arab nations and a Jewish state. THAT is what negotiations should be about and the only assumption should be the status quo because everything else is but vanity.

Meanwhile, the REALITY is that there are hundreds of thousands of Jewish Israelis on the other side of those lines. We can argue about the sanity of the decision to build isolated settlements, but some of the areas settled are legitimate suburbs of major population centers and other areas are legitimately security concerns. Negotiations have to deal with that reality.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. To which nation did the land upon which Israel constructed suburbs of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv belong? If the answer is to none, then the reality is that Israel had the right both the claim the land and to build upon it. There is a false assumption that what was not recognized as being part of Israel pre-1967 was therefore taken away from a Palestinian State. There was no Palestinian state to take it from. Israel took the land from Jordan which later ceded it. That everyone else in the world, it seems, wants that land to be a part of Palestinian state today does not mean that it WAS part of a Palestinian state then. </p>
<p>The ONLY legitimate place to begin negotiations on any topic is with the status quo. To have negotiations begin with the false assumption that there WAS a Palestinian state and that the Palestinians have the ability to negotiate AS IF that land belonged to a Palestinian state is ludicrous. The negotiations are truly between Israel and the Arab League for the creation of something that has never previously existed, well two things, a Palestinian state and peace between the Arab nations and a Jewish state. THAT is what negotiations should be about and the only assumption should be the status quo because everything else is but vanity.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the REALITY is that there are hundreds of thousands of Jewish Israelis on the other side of those lines. We can argue about the sanity of the decision to build isolated settlements, but some of the areas settled are legitimate suburbs of major population centers and other areas are legitimately security concerns. Negotiations have to deal with that reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nzuckerman		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533/comment-page-1#comment-43976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nzuckerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=14533#comment-43976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let me play the Devil&#039;s Advocate:
You object to the lines because there are now settlements there. But how many times
has Israel been warned NOT tio build settlements there because that was contested land?
In sum, you go ahead and grab land and then say we can not negotiate this because we have built there.  
And then you blame the Pals for losing land because they lost the war. But since there was no Palestinian nation, it was in fact other Arabs from nations that lost that land--Egypt and Joran.

Bibi came to the US, delivered a speech in which he said we will not negotiate on Jerusalem etc etc. and now let us negotiate all things that are no longer off the negotiating table. So negotiations!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me play the Devil&#8217;s Advocate:<br />
You object to the lines because there are now settlements there. But how many times<br />
has Israel been warned NOT tio build settlements there because that was contested land?<br />
In sum, you go ahead and grab land and then say we can not negotiate this because we have built there.<br />
And then you blame the Pals for losing land because they lost the war. But since there was no Palestinian nation, it was in fact other Arabs from nations that lost that land&#8211;Egypt and Joran.</p>
<p>Bibi came to the US, delivered a speech in which he said we will not negotiate on Jerusalem etc etc. and now let us negotiate all things that are no longer off the negotiating table. So negotiations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Lonie		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2011/06/12/14533/comment-page-1#comment-43973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Lonie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=14533#comment-43973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When you start a war intending the destruction of a neighboring country and the genocide of its people, as the Arabs did, and lose, as the Arabs did, you may expect to lose some land, and thank Allah, or whomever, that you did not lose more.  Ask the Germans in re: Poland.  That goes for the Syrians too.

Israel is willing to let the Palis have most of Judea and Samaria, under certain security safeguards, which is more than the Palis deserve, especially after decades of terrorism.  Let them be content with that, or let Jordan take those areas over again.  Yah Falastini, if you cannot live at peace with Jewish neighbors go find neighbors with whom you can live at peace.  That might be difficult for you, since your &quot;Arab Brothers&quot; treat you like dirt, worse than the Israelis do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you start a war intending the destruction of a neighboring country and the genocide of its people, as the Arabs did, and lose, as the Arabs did, you may expect to lose some land, and thank Allah, or whomever, that you did not lose more.  Ask the Germans in re: Poland.  That goes for the Syrians too.</p>
<p>Israel is willing to let the Palis have most of Judea and Samaria, under certain security safeguards, which is more than the Palis deserve, especially after decades of terrorism.  Let them be content with that, or let Jordan take those areas over again.  Yah Falastini, if you cannot live at peace with Jewish neighbors go find neighbors with whom you can live at peace.  That might be difficult for you, since your &#8220;Arab Brothers&#8221; treat you like dirt, worse than the Israelis do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.yourish.com @ 2026-04-30 01:41:16 by W3 Total Cache
-->