Comments on: Anti-semantic

By: Herschel

Herschel — Mon, 17 May 2010 21:57:35 +0000

A few days ago I was reading some Middle East related comments in the UK rag the “Guardian.” A reader had commented on the nyt being pro Israel in this left wing rag sh**t! It really makes you wonder about the intelligence level of someone able to navigate the internet and still believe in something so absurd as calling nyt pro israel. People of this ilk probably also believe that 911 was an inside operation!

By: anon

anon — Mon, 17 May 2010 14:42:18 +0000

oh … I forgot … doesn’t the banner proudly declare on each edition:

“All the news that fits, we print!”

By: Gary Rosen

Gary Rosen — Mon, 17 May 2010 04:31:17 +0000

Some people classify the New York Times as a once-proud newspaper now reduced to a pathetic propaganda rag run by an Episcopalian halfwit who loudly rejects his Jewish heritage.

By: anon

anon — Sun, 16 May 2010 19:22:09 +0000

Of course the New York Times won’t consider ANY Islamic organization terrorists. Their editors wet their pants at the very thought of violence – COMMITTED AGAINST THEM. Jew murdering, on the other hand, when not directed at THEM, is gleefully supported by all members of the NYT staff.

Must be something in their coffee.

By: Alex Bensky

Alex Bensky — Sun, 16 May 2010 17:11:08 +0000

Some people classify Hamas as terrorist. Some people also classify water as wet.