<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: He&#8217;s just not that into you &#8230; Israel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.yourish.com/2010/04/09/10588/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.yourish.com/2010/04/09/10588</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: yankev		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2010/04/09/10588/comment-page-1#comment-39787</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yankev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=10588#comment-39787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#062;Note the dishonest shift. First the reporter mentions â€œtwo parties,â€ but then only offers the example of Israeli actions that supposedly harm the cause of the peace â€œdespite intense U.S. pressure.â€&#060;

In the reporter&#039;s defense, there has been no particular US pressure against celebrating the killings of innocents, or for that matter against killings the innocents to begin with. The US -- under Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II (though to a lesser extent) and now Obama has always viewed the killing of innocent Israelis as a minor annoyance that must not keep Israel from making ever greater and more irreversible concessions to the killers, so as to enable more killings. Israeli objections to the killings are looked upon as seizing for an excuse not to make peace. Now, if you wanted an example of another action that the AP and the White House sees as harming the cause of peace, you would have to cite Israel killing or imprisoning someone who has killed innocent Israelis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Note the dishonest shift. First the reporter mentions â€œtwo parties,â€ but then only offers the example of Israeli actions that supposedly harm the cause of the peace â€œdespite intense U.S. pressure.â€&lt;</p>
<p>In the reporter&#039;s defense, there has been no particular US pressure against celebrating the killings of innocents, or for that matter against killings the innocents to begin with. The US &#8212; under Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II (though to a lesser extent) and now Obama has always viewed the killing of innocent Israelis as a minor annoyance that must not keep Israel from making ever greater and more irreversible concessions to the killers, so as to enable more killings. Israeli objections to the killings are looked upon as seizing for an excuse not to make peace. Now, if you wanted an example of another action that the AP and the White House sees as harming the cause of peace, you would have to cite Israel killing or imprisoning someone who has killed innocent Israelis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.yourish.com @ 2026-09-14 23:50:12 by W3 Total Cache
-->