<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The purple prose of Cairo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.yourish.com/2009/05/10/7468/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.yourish.com/2009/05/10/7468</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:38:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Lonie		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2009/05/10/7468/comment-page-1#comment-36616</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Lonie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=7468#comment-36616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obama could have made his big speech from Baghdad, which would have emphasized support for Arab liberalization.  Obama and his cronies are no more fond of Arab liberalization than Amr Moussa and his Arab League cronies are.  It&#039;s so much easier to deal with dictators, dontcherknow.  Any member of the US Foreign Policy Elite will tell you that.  As for not being at war with Islam, Bush spent the entire time of his administration saying that.  And proving it too. Not to put too fine a point on it he acted on that basis, for he actually liberated Muslims from tyranny, forty million of them.  But liberation is exactly what the jerks we hear from the Middle East through the news media, both here and there, object to.

Going back to Clinton the US also saved millions of Muslims in the Balkans from mass murder and ethnic cleansing.  That&#039;s hardly being at war with Islam.  When was the last time some Muslim spoke favorably of the US for that?  In Kossovo they do, but damn few other places.  All we hear is how the US is at war with Muslims because we won&#039;t let them destroy Israel and commit genocide on its Jewish inhabitants.  Well boo hoo, go cry me a river, Muslims.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama could have made his big speech from Baghdad, which would have emphasized support for Arab liberalization.  Obama and his cronies are no more fond of Arab liberalization than Amr Moussa and his Arab League cronies are.  It&#8217;s so much easier to deal with dictators, dontcherknow.  Any member of the US Foreign Policy Elite will tell you that.  As for not being at war with Islam, Bush spent the entire time of his administration saying that.  And proving it too. Not to put too fine a point on it he acted on that basis, for he actually liberated Muslims from tyranny, forty million of them.  But liberation is exactly what the jerks we hear from the Middle East through the news media, both here and there, object to.</p>
<p>Going back to Clinton the US also saved millions of Muslims in the Balkans from mass murder and ethnic cleansing.  That&#8217;s hardly being at war with Islam.  When was the last time some Muslim spoke favorably of the US for that?  In Kossovo they do, but damn few other places.  All we hear is how the US is at war with Muslims because we won&#8217;t let them destroy Israel and commit genocide on its Jewish inhabitants.  Well boo hoo, go cry me a river, Muslims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.yourish.com @ 2026-04-30 18:53:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->