Comments on: Saudis: Religious freedom for me, but not for thee

By: Michael Lonie

Michael Lonie — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:59:46 +0000

Those seabed natural gas resources might come in handy for that ,Alex. If the Euros can get natural gas from the Israelis in the future, to replace the gas the Russians hold up from sending them for political purposes, perhaps they’ll act a bit less antisemitic.

By: Alex Bensky

Alex Bensky — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:02:50 +0000

Al-Hussain says that there must be no debate on the topic so there isn’t. Damn, the Israelis should have thought of that. Now all they have to say when they’re charged with crimes against humanity is “there will be no debate on the matter.” Should work, especially if they can suddenly discover huge oil reserves.

By: Michael Lonie

Michael Lonie — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:09:42 +0000

How about this? All funding for mosques and other Islamic centers and purposes coming from the Wahhabbist Entity must cease. Any such centers funded by the Wahhabbist Entity (that’s about 80 percent in America) must close or find local funding. Christians and Jews in America pay for their own churches and synagogues, let Muslims pay for their own mosques.

There’s no interference with freedom of religion here. I think we could legitimately go farther, but this will do or now. Do not expect such a ban to be implemented, though.

By: cliff was from montreal

cliff was from montreal — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:46:37 +0000

Opps, I mean they seem to exhibit a huge amount of bigotry.

By: cliff was from montreal

cliff was from montreal — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:45:37 +0000

What is it with islam? Anyone who subscribes to this death cult theology soon seems to exhibit a complete loss of logic, decency and bigotry.
Do we in the west have the guts to tell these putzes where to eff-off?
Maybe Avigdor Lieberman can! It’s good start.