Comments on: Michael Moore and proof of deity’s existence

By: Dick Stanley

Dick Stanley — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:33:55 +0000

Better you run his face than I do. I’ve had an informal image ban on that bag of wind since his first “epic.”

By: Pamela

Pamela — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:59:02 +0000

Looking at MM’s slovenly visage suddenly brings to mind a ladies quilting bee and the comments that would ensue once he left the room.

The look-over-glasses, shaken heads and “what in the name of God was his mamma thinking?” kind of comments.

By: Maquis

Maquis — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:36:22 +0000

Considering the entertaining subject I thought I’d share this:

http://extremecentre.org/2008/08/30/moore-la-grosse-ordure-persiste-et-signe/

Not quite as repulsive somehow, but fitting.

By: SnoopyTheGoon

SnoopyTheGoon — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:01:52 +0000

Nope, it is just that there were two words Meryl would have beheaded me for. That simple ;-)

By: Russ

Russ — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:45:16 +0000

re: item 6… is that a five-word message in Monty Python counting?

By: Meryl Yourish

Meryl Yourish — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:23:04 +0000

If by “rocketing” you mean “farting,” no. I thought it was coming back, but I’ve come to the conclusion that Mr. Tig needs a hygiene clip. He has a very fuzzy butt, and he’s still a baby, and doesn’t clean very well down there.

I should buy baby wipes.

By: SnoopyTheGoon

SnoopyTheGoon — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:14:35 +0000

He he, I know it’s ugly. The easier to argue against him, even if it is unfair.

Anyway, time for another Tig’s picture.

Is he still …er …rocketing around?

By: Meryl Yourish

Meryl Yourish — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:06:21 +0000

Oh, gross. You put that blivit’s face on my blog.

Now I have to go put something much nicer up to counteract the grossitude of Moore’s ugly mug.