Comments on: Moral equivalence from the Economist

By: Ted

Ted — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 03:57:09 +0000

The Economist is an English news paper. And, as such, its editors can be classed as anti-Semites.

The truth needs to be told.

All the elite of England, starting with it’s official state sanctioned religion, the ‘Church of England’ are vicious anti-Semites. Melanie Phillips (http://www.melaniephillips.com/) makes that crystal clear in her post on the rampant anti-Semitism in the UK. In point of fact, the elites there are PROUD of the fact that they are Jew haters.

So you shouldn’t be surprised that the Economist’s editors, no doubt fearful of backlash if they wrote the truth, join with the other elites goose stepping their way to fascism.

It is time for the Jews of England to come home to Eretz Yisroel. If they do so now they may be allowed to keep at least some of their wealth. If they wait too long the English will not even allow them to escape with their lives.

By: Ed

Ed — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:15:00 +0000

Point is, the criticism that Jewish groups don’t like is not at all like that in Israel. Criticism by Israelis of their government assumes it has the right to exist. Anti-Zionist criticism does not, and is indeed a form of anti-semitism, because it denies the Jews, among all peoples, their own historic homeland.

By: John M

John M — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:06:45 +0000

I’ll never understand how people fail to see the moral diffence between intentionally targeting civilians, and refraining from committing national suicide by failing to respond.