<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Harry Potter movie	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.yourish.com/2007/07/11/3418/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.yourish.com/2007/07/11/3418</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:07:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: physics geek		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2007/07/11/3418/comment-page-1#comment-27449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[physics geek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/07/11/3418#comment-27449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad that the reviews of the movie have been very good overall. Frankly, since OTP was what I thought the least of the series so far, I&#039;m glad that they were able to make good movie out of it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that the reviews of the movie have been very good overall. Frankly, since OTP was what I thought the least of the series so far, I&#8217;m glad that they were able to make good movie out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John F. MacMichael		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2007/07/11/3418/comment-page-1#comment-27445</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John F. MacMichael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2007/07/11/3418#comment-27445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I saw it yesterday and then reread the book.  I was rather impressed with the way they distilled the 800+ page book into a movie running a little over two hours.  They got the main plot lines in very effectively (I cannot say that I missed the Quidditch sub-plot.)

Of course, that zero screen time was spent on explanation helped.  I guess the producers figured that everyone in the audience had both read the books and seen the previous movies and hence would know who was who and what was going on without having it spoonfed to them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it yesterday and then reread the book.  I was rather impressed with the way they distilled the 800+ page book into a movie running a little over two hours.  They got the main plot lines in very effectively (I cannot say that I missed the Quidditch sub-plot.)</p>
<p>Of course, that zero screen time was spent on explanation helped.  I guess the producers figured that everyone in the audience had both read the books and seen the previous movies and hence would know who was who and what was going on without having it spoonfed to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.yourish.com @ 2026-08-06 19:48:41 by W3 Total Cache
-->