<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Prepping the battlefield	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.yourish.com/2006/07/16/1687/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/07/16/1687</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric J		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/07/16/1687/comment-page-1#comment-13928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2006/07/16/1687#comment-13928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most of the analysis I&#039;ve read doesn&#039;t seem to be able to comprehend tis lasting more than a week. (A news cycle?) This analysis makes more sense, and gives me more hope than just about anything else I&#039;ve seen.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the analysis I&#8217;ve read doesn&#8217;t seem to be able to comprehend tis lasting more than a week. (A news cycle?) This analysis makes more sense, and gives me more hope than just about anything else I&#8217;ve seen.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel Rosenberg		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/07/16/1687/comment-page-1#comment-13924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Rosenberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2006/07/16/1687#comment-13924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s obviously battlefield prep, sure.  Smart money is on an incursion into Lebanon, a small buffer zone (maybe as much as 20 kilometers), clearing out Hizbullah while negotiating some way for Lebanese forces to come in and take responsibility for their own damn country.

I&#039;m hoping that the smart money is wrong, and that they&#039;re prepping the battlefield for a move on Damascus.  An attack on Syria doesn&#039;t have to go all the way to Damascus -- or occupy it -- to call Iran&#039;s bluff, and show that Iran can&#039;t protect their ally; but Baby Assad either has to be scared, or killed.  Or scared then killed.

The mistake would be to think that the Israelis are improvising strategically; the only worse mistake would be if the Israelis were improvising strategically. 

I don&#039;t think that they are.  I think that they may be making a mistake in taking too small a bite, but I think there&#039;s every reason to believe that this isn&#039;t an improvisation.  If the point is to use &lt;em&gt;appropriate&lt;/em&gt; force to persuade the Lebanese that they&#039;ve got a choice of facing Hizbollah or the IDF, that&#039;s only going to work if Plan B involves a lot more destruction of Lebanon when (not, alas, if) the Lebanese don&#039;t get the point.

And maybe they should&#039;t; maybe the non-Hezbollards in Lebanon are right to be more scared of the Shiite-heads.  Hezbollah isn&#039;t going to tell other factions &quot;hey, we&#039;re about to bomb you right about here; time to move out.&quot;  Israel, for good or ill, does. 

I&#039;m hoping that the short-term goal is Hizbollah in south Lebanon and Syria in about 2-3 days.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obviously battlefield prep, sure.  Smart money is on an incursion into Lebanon, a small buffer zone (maybe as much as 20 kilometers), clearing out Hizbullah while negotiating some way for Lebanese forces to come in and take responsibility for their own damn country.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that the smart money is wrong, and that they&#8217;re prepping the battlefield for a move on Damascus.  An attack on Syria doesn&#8217;t have to go all the way to Damascus &#8212; or occupy it &#8212; to call Iran&#8217;s bluff, and show that Iran can&#8217;t protect their ally; but Baby Assad either has to be scared, or killed.  Or scared then killed.</p>
<p>The mistake would be to think that the Israelis are improvising strategically; the only worse mistake would be if the Israelis were improvising strategically. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that they are.  I think that they may be making a mistake in taking too small a bite, but I think there&#8217;s every reason to believe that this isn&#8217;t an improvisation.  If the point is to use <em>appropriate</em> force to persuade the Lebanese that they&#8217;ve got a choice of facing Hizbollah or the IDF, that&#8217;s only going to work if Plan B involves a lot more destruction of Lebanon when (not, alas, if) the Lebanese don&#8217;t get the point.</p>
<p>And maybe they should&#8217;t; maybe the non-Hezbollards in Lebanon are right to be more scared of the Shiite-heads.  Hezbollah isn&#8217;t going to tell other factions &#8220;hey, we&#8217;re about to bomb you right about here; time to move out.&#8221;  Israel, for good or ill, does. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that the short-term goal is Hizbollah in south Lebanon and Syria in about 2-3 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.yourish.com @ 2026-05-03 12:09:19 by W3 Total Cache
-->