<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The media and national security	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Meryl Yourish		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495/comment-page-1#comment-10472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meryl Yourish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495#comment-10472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why, thank you, Doug.

Thus proving that I can write circles around all those conservative lawyers.

The liberal ones, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why, thank you, Doug.</p>
<p>Thus proving that I can write circles around all those conservative lawyers.</p>
<p>The liberal ones, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug Purdie		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495/comment-page-1#comment-10471</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Purdie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495#comment-10471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well put Ms. Yourish.  I saw the same story covered by Captain Ed, who had the same basic comments, but I think yours drive the point home even better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put Ms. Yourish.  I saw the same story covered by Captain Ed, who had the same basic comments, but I think yours drive the point home even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Laurence Simon		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495/comment-page-1#comment-10446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurence Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495#comment-10446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sounds like an eat your own dogfood moment: forcibly move the Jerusalem bureau of the New York Times to Sderot and make them take buses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like an eat your own dogfood moment: forcibly move the Jerusalem bureau of the New York Times to Sderot and make them take buses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sabba Hillel		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495/comment-page-1#comment-10438</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sabba Hillel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2006/06/23/1495#comment-10438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;[â€¦] Because of privacy concerns and the potential for abuse, the government sought the data only for terrorism investigations and prohibited its use for tax fraud, drug trafficking or other inquiries, the officials said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And the reason that drug trafficking being excluded is a good thing?  I would say that drug trafficking, arms deals and other things of that ilk should be included in anti-terrorism investigations.

BTW perhaps the &quot;request&quot; not to publish was part of a Brer Rabbit &quot;don&#039;t throw me into the briar patch&quot; ploy.  They probably knew that the Times would publish it anyway.  Now they have all the terrorists, drug traffickers and tax evaders looking over their shoulders and  getting paranoid.  After all, there is probably too much data to actually get everyone so the fear of being caught may make it even more difficult for them.  I doubt that the bad guys would believe the US government is actually restricting the operation as the spokesman claims.

It is like spreading the rumor that Al Zarqawi was turned in by a member of his own organization, whether it was true or not.  That reminds me of a &quot;mob chaser&quot; film where the good guy is forced to turn loose a low level villain.  He publicly shakes the villain&#039;s hand and thanks him for his cooperation in front of &quot;his&quot; lawyer.  Soon the mob is after the bad guy and he has to go running to the police for protection.

Sabba Hillel
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7637/544/640/SabbaHillel.jpg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>[â€¦] Because of privacy concerns and the potential for abuse, the government sought the data only for terrorism investigations and prohibited its use for tax fraud, drug trafficking or other inquiries, the officials said.</p></blockquote>
<p>And the reason that drug trafficking being excluded is a good thing?  I would say that drug trafficking, arms deals and other things of that ilk should be included in anti-terrorism investigations.</p>
<p>BTW perhaps the &#8220;request&#8221; not to publish was part of a Brer Rabbit &#8220;don&#8217;t throw me into the briar patch&#8221; ploy.  They probably knew that the Times would publish it anyway.  Now they have all the terrorists, drug traffickers and tax evaders looking over their shoulders and  getting paranoid.  After all, there is probably too much data to actually get everyone so the fear of being caught may make it even more difficult for them.  I doubt that the bad guys would believe the US government is actually restricting the operation as the spokesman claims.</p>
<p>It is like spreading the rumor that Al Zarqawi was turned in by a member of his own organization, whether it was true or not.  That reminds me of a &#8220;mob chaser&#8221; film where the good guy is forced to turn loose a low level villain.  He publicly shakes the villain&#8217;s hand and thanks him for his cooperation in front of &#8220;his&#8221; lawyer.  Soon the mob is after the bad guy and he has to go running to the police for protection.</p>
<p>Sabba Hillel<br />
<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7637/544/640/SabbaHillel.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7637/544/640/SabbaHillel.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.yourish.com @ 2026-05-02 13:36:53 by W3 Total Cache
-->