Comments on: This is why they call him “Dhimmi” Carter

By: Ted

Ted — Tue, 09 May 2006 13:56:29 +0000

Is this the same military genius who decided that he could invade Iran using only 8 helicopters?

And the same intellectual giant who forgot that there is “a lot of sand” in the Iranian desert?

And the same Economic wizard who gave us the highest inflation rate in US history?

And people pay attention to him because….?

By: Gary Rosen

Gary Rosen — Tue, 09 May 2006 06:25:47 +0000

One thing that always should be kept in mind is that Carter is absolutely a dyed-in-the-wool fanatic antisemitic hatemonger. I saw him once in an interview with Bill Moyers when he let the mask drop completely and let fly.

First he berated American Jews for not being more sympathetic to the Palestinians. That was bad enough, but then it got worse, much worse. He began sarcastically referring to Jews as the “Chosen People”, his voice dripping with venom and contempt. I couldn’t believe I was hearing this from a former President of the United States. Louis Farrakhan or David Duke would have done a better job of concealing their bigotry.

So when Carter supports Hamas, it’s not because he’s a “dhimmi” or an “idiotarian”. It’s not because he is naive or misguided. He knows full well that he’s supporting a group whose purpose is to threaten the lives of Jews everywhere.

By: Michael Lonie

Michael Lonie — Tue, 09 May 2006 04:36:26 +0000

I wonder if Carter bothered to find out a wee bit more about the supposed respect of Muslims for Jesus? Their view is that he was teaching Islam and the stupid Christians and Jews didn’t understand it, or deliberately corrupted his teachings. Also the Muslims hold that Jesus did not die on the cross. Since this is the central event of Christianity, and Jesus’ death is what atones for mankind’s sins, that is tantamount to saying Christianity is a load of superstitious garbage. Some respect.

By: chsw

chsw — Mon, 08 May 2006 23:27:26 +0000

Unfortunately, the Jackass Party of that time controlled Congress and emasculated the intel and defense establishments. In fact, JC Himself was considered a relatively conservative Jackass. So, who knows whether Ford would have allowed the dying Shah (a bloody dictator in his own right)to shoot and bribe mullahs. Once the “human rights” angle was played, the hostages were taken, and human rights in Iran have been steadily winnowed away.

chsw

By: Sabba Hillel

Sabba Hillel — Mon, 08 May 2006 22:55:37 +0000

Carter's backers would not have let anything be done even if Dhimmi had not been in office. He probably is trying to forget that it was his micromangement that messed up the rescue mission to begin with.

By: Jack Rich

Jack Rich — Mon, 08 May 2006 20:45:28 +0000

This man should be an embarrassment to any loyal American.

However, the sad fact is that many of his fellow Democrats (and some Republicans) are just recognizing the Islamic threat to the West.

Except folks like John Kerry call it “nuance.”

By: Joel

Joel — Mon, 08 May 2006 19:16:22 +0000

Electing Jimmy Carter President of the United States was as close as the American people have ever come to picking a name out of the phone book and giving him the job.