Comments on: Steps in the right direction https://www.yourish.com/2006/03/30/973 Cutting straight to the point Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:09:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: kathy fitzner https://www.yourish.com/2006/03/30/973/comment-page-1#comment-3650 Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:09:52 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=973#comment-3650 So why hasn’t the US stopped sending money to them,too? That they might understand.

]]> By: Laurence Simon https://www.yourish.com/2006/03/30/973/comment-page-1#comment-3646 Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:50:08 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=973#comment-3646 They’ll redirect the cash into UNRWA and other front organizations. And as Peter Hansen said, they never check what affiliations their locals are a part of, so the cash and materials will end up with Islamic Jihad, Hamas, PFLP, and Al-Aqsa as usual.

]]> By: Sabba Hillel https://www.yourish.com/2006/03/30/973/comment-page-1#comment-3641 Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:24:00 +0000 http://www.yourish.com/?p=973#comment-3641 m going to see the glass as half-full.</blockquote> However, we must remember that the <i>humanitaria</i> aid is fungible even if they actually did spend it on what it is ostensibly for. If they continue witht he way they have acted in the past, they will <b>define</b> the <i>humanitarian</i> aid to include direct funding of terrorists.]]>

Those are two good steps in the right direction. It remains to be seen how much aid from humanitarian organizations winds up being funneled to the Hamas-led PA, but for now, I’m going to see the glass as half-full.

However, we must remember that the humanitaria aid is fungible even if they actually did spend it on what it is ostensibly for. If they continue witht he way they have acted in the past, they will define the humanitarian aid to include direct funding of terrorists.

]]>