<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: I can&#8217;t keep up with these guys	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.yourish.com/2006/01/26/653/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/01/26/653</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:34:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: scottage		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/01/26/653/comment-page-1#comment-2171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2006/01/26/653#comment-2171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link, Meryl, great site. I don&#039;t agree with some of their views, but I have to respect their perspective.  One more site I need to read daily :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Meryl, great site. I don&#8217;t agree with some of their views, but I have to respect their perspective.  One more site I need to read daily :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben F		</title>
		<link>https://www.yourish.com/2006/01/26/653/comment-page-1#comment-2167</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben F]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/2006/01/26/653#comment-2167</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great site; thanks for the flag.

I&#039;ve been reading a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2006/01/25/DI2006012501478.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Q&#038;A with a WaPo reporter&lt;/a&gt;; best line was the commenter who observed that &quot;the dog finally caught the car,&quot; reflecting the consensus view that HAMAS neither expected nor wanted to win the election.

The WaPo thread also gave a link to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elections.ps/english.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;official election site&lt;/a&gt;, where you can see the actual results, which are staggering.

HAMAS won 76 seats in the new legislature, 30 of the 66 &quot;national list&quot; seats and 46 of the 66 &quot;local&quot; seats. HAMAS actually won over 75% of the local seats that it was eligible to contest, as six seats were reserved for Christian candidates.

FATAH took 27 of the &quot;slate&quot; seats and 16 of the &quot;local&quot; seats, including all six seats reserved for Christian candidates.

HAMAS and FATAH were not the only terror groups running national slates; the third highest vote-getter, winning three seats, was the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Three of the other eight lists on the ballot--the leftist &quot;Badil,&quot; Mustafa Barghouti&#039;s &quot;Independent Palestine,&quot; and the Fayyad/Ashrawi &quot;Third Way,&quot; won two seats apiece.

The four local seats not won by HAMAS or FATAH went to &quot;independent&quot; candidates.

By my count, that&#039;s a 91% vote for the terror factions on the national ballot, with at most 10 of 132 legislators unaffiliated with terror groups.

Hooray for democracy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site; thanks for the flag.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2006/01/25/DI2006012501478.html" rel="nofollow">Q&amp;A with a WaPo reporter</a>; best line was the commenter who observed that &#8220;the dog finally caught the car,&#8221; reflecting the consensus view that HAMAS neither expected nor wanted to win the election.</p>
<p>The WaPo thread also gave a link to the <a href="http://www.elections.ps/english.aspx" rel="nofollow">official election site</a>, where you can see the actual results, which are staggering.</p>
<p>HAMAS won 76 seats in the new legislature, 30 of the 66 &#8220;national list&#8221; seats and 46 of the 66 &#8220;local&#8221; seats. HAMAS actually won over 75% of the local seats that it was eligible to contest, as six seats were reserved for Christian candidates.</p>
<p>FATAH took 27 of the &#8220;slate&#8221; seats and 16 of the &#8220;local&#8221; seats, including all six seats reserved for Christian candidates.</p>
<p>HAMAS and FATAH were not the only terror groups running national slates; the third highest vote-getter, winning three seats, was the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Three of the other eight lists on the ballot&#8211;the leftist &#8220;Badil,&#8221; Mustafa Barghouti&#8217;s &#8220;Independent Palestine,&#8221; and the Fayyad/Ashrawi &#8220;Third Way,&#8221; won two seats apiece.</p>
<p>The four local seats not won by HAMAS or FATAH went to &#8220;independent&#8221; candidates.</p>
<p>By my count, that&#8217;s a 91% vote for the terror factions on the national ballot, with at most 10 of 132 legislators unaffiliated with terror groups.</p>
<p>Hooray for democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.yourish.com @ 2026-05-03 08:11:43 by W3 Total Cache
-->