Yourish.com

11/06/2008

The Blair sewage project

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 11:00 am

Yesterday’s Qassam attack against Ashkelon didn’t yet make it into the NY Times report about the fighting between Israel and Hamas, but this did:

Military officials said that the initial army raid was a “pinpoint” operation aimed at thwarting a specific threat, and that Israel remained committed to the truce.

The truce has largely held so far, despite some sporadic rocket and mortar fire by Gaza renegades and complaints from Hamas that Israel has not gone far enough in easing the economic embargo on the area.

Note how the violations of the “truce” are attributed to “renegades.” It’s as if Hamas couldn’t stop the attacks if they wanted to. And then without qualification there’s the mention of Hamas’s complaint against Israel, with no context.

How about this
:

Hamas, the dominant faction in the Palestinian government, is building its military capacity in the Gaza Strip, constructing tunnels and underground bunkers and smuggling in ground-to-air missiles and military-grade explosives, senior Israeli officials say.

The officials, including a top military commander who spoke in an interview on Friday, said that Hamas had learned tactics from Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group, which brought in and stored thousands of rockets in bunkers near the northern Israeli border before its war with Israel last summer.

So that was before the truce? Fine, this example have been since the truce.

Everything that goes into Gaza, either from Egyptian tunnels or from Israel, gets taken by Hamas. Hamas takes everything it needs first and then places the rest on the market, heavily taxing it to ensure that the “international boycott” against that terror organization is meaningless.

Cement is a major item that Hamas covets. As the Shin Bet’s Yuval Diskin testified yesterday, Hamas is using the cement it is receiving to build fortified bunkers and tunnels to transport and store weapons.

And why is this relevant? The end of the Times’s report tells us:

On Tuesday, a World Bank delegation opened a sewer project, long delayed by the standoff between Israel and Hamas, in Gaza to prevent raw sewage from spilling into residential areas, The A.P. reported.

The $63 million project is the initiative of Tony Blair, the international envoy for the Middle East, and the opening brought the highest-level World Bank delegation to visit Gaza in three years.

The delegation met with representatives of the Palestinian Water Authority, but not with members of Hamas, which has run Gaza since it seized power in June 2007.

But it doesn’t tell us the rest of the story. Backspin though, didn’t forget.

Israel’s blockade of Gaza is neither capricious nor arbitrary. It may not be airtight, but it is designed to prevent Hamas from building up its capacity to attack Israel. Hamas has shown that it will use anything to build up its fortifications or to attack Israel. The “truce” has simply been downtime as Hamas prepares to attack Israel again. What’s remarkable (if somewhat unwise, in my view) has been Israel’s forebearance.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

07/15/2008

Tony’s tolerance of terror has limits

The other day the Palestinians condemned two men to death for supposedly “collaborating” with Israel to target terrorists. These men weren’t convicted by Hamas, but by the “moderate” Fatah faction that is in charge of Jenin.

Reacting to this story, Elder of Ziyon observed:

It’s been about three years since a death penalty has been carried out
in the PA, and most of them have been for “collaboration with the enemy” (the list is here.)

In other words, the internationally recognized government of the PA, who is supposedly Israel’s peace partner, actively supports and defends known terrorists (”resistance fighters”) , and rather than punishing the actual terrorists, it punishes those who try to stop them.

To put it bluntly, the PA is the enemy and there is no distinction between the Palestinian Authority and the terrorists whom it actively supports and defends.

So if Israel needs to act against terror threats, who can it depend on? Apparently only itself.

Israeli troops arrested seven Hamas figures Tuesday, including two municipal council members, in a widening crackdown on the Islamic militant group in Nablus, residents said.

The Israeli military confirmed that it arrested seven Palestinians in the city but did not elaborate.

And apparently Tony Blair depends on Israeli security too.

Israel’s Shin Beth domestic intelligence agency warned Blair shortly before his arrival at the Gaza border that a “terror organisation” was planning to attack his motorcade, an agency official told AFP on condition of anonymity.

But the Islamist movement Hamas, which had welcomed the visit, said it had made the appropriate security preparations and accused Israel of pressuring Blair into cancelling the trip.

(h/t LGF)

(The headline of this “news” item gives credence to the Hamas claim by enclosing “threat” in scare quotes.)

Tony Blair (the guy pictured doing the Macarena) is someone who has regularly asked Israel to relax its security measures. It absolutely defies belief that he’d heed a warning that he didn’t think was serious. I have no doubt he is concerned about his own welfare; his concern for Israelis is somewhat less certain.

Still Hamas’s claim that Israel was somehow conniving to keep Blair from seeing the utter devastation visited upon Gaza by the Israeli blockade has some credibility with a particular gullible segment of the population: supposedly skeptical reporters.

Plus, we’re talking about Tony Blair here, who even braved untamed Iraq, presumably he doesn’t scare easily..

Noah Pollak comments:

Don’t you see? The Israelis, hoping to cover up their crimes, invented a “security threat” — they lied, in other words — to prevent Blair from going to Gaza and drawing attention to the “catastrophe” for which Israel is responsible. McGirk’s evidence of this? Literally none.

No evidence, but McGirk was parroting the words of Hamas.

“The Israeli occupation exerted great pressure to prevent Tony Blair from visiting the Gaza Strip because they did not want him to see the size of the disaster caused by the unjust blockade,” Hamas spokesman Taher al-Nunu said.

(McGirk’s credibility takes another hit for writing:

Abbas is already playing second banana to Hamas in Gaza and is sulking over the fact that Hamas in large part has managed to keep up its end of the bargain and stop militants from lobbing rockets into southern Israel –upping their credibility among Palestinians and Arab states.

- emphasis mine – Hamas has control of Gaza, other than this week’s ostentatious arrest of three Fatah affiliated rocket launchers, Hamas has taken no action to prevent attacks on southern Israel. Like Sunday.

Palestinians on Sunday fired two mortar shells into Israel from the Gaza Strip, the Israel Defense Forces said, in another violation of the fragile truce between Israel and Hamas in the coastal territory.

The shells, which Israel Radio said landed near the security fence, caused neither casualties nor damage. There was no word if Israel would retaliate for the mortar strike.

h/t Rubicon3)

Of course if Gaza’s so badly off how can they afford to maintain horses for racing? What catastrophe is there for Tony Blair to see?

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

06/24/2008

No [blank] Tony

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Israeli Double Standard Time — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 7:00 am

From Ethan Bronner’s Israel in the Season of Dread:

Mr. Sara’s use of the word “calm” (”regiah” in Hebrew) was telling. No one quite knows what to call the current accord. Many use the Arabic word “tahadiya,” which is what Hamas has chosen; the word means not quite a truce, not quite a cease-fire, but some temporary cessation of hostilities.

Later on Bronner quotes a famous former Prime Minister who can’t seem to avoid the limelight, though he seems to miss the obvious:

Tony Blair, the former prime minister of Britain, who has spent part of the past year as an international envoy to the Palestinians, said on Thursday that it could be very hard for everyone involved to gain a grasp on this conflict.

“The view of what is happening here tends to lurch between unjustified optimism — pretty rare, actually — to unnecessarily bleak pessimism, which is more common,” he said in a conversation in his Jerusalem offices. “There is a cease-fire now and both sides think the other’s commitment is tactical rather than strategic.”

Given that Hamas itself by the way it defines the “ceasefire” deems it temporary, it’s not an Israeli perception is it?

And of course Blair (not to mention Bronner) seem blissfully unaware that indeed, Hamas is violating the terms (not just the spirit) of the recent ceasefire. Noah Pollak writes:

How are Ehud Olmert’s various diplomatic gambits going? Yuval Diskin, the head of the Shin Bet — he was against the Hamas cease-fire in the first place — tells Haaretz that both arms smuggling and terrorist training in Gaza have increased since the cease-fire took effect.

Not all that surprising considering the Haniyeh said that smuggling would continue:

According to a Reuters report, Haniyeh – speaking to worshipers ahead of Friday prayers in Gaza City – said: “We cannot talk about stopping smuggling because it is something beyond our ability as a government and we did not give a commitment in this regard.”

Haniyeh added that Hamas would not force other organizations in Gaza to abide by the truce, but added that they had nevertheless agreed to it voluntarily.

As if Hamas didn’t have the ability to police its own borders. It isn’t a “perception” that Hamas will not keep all the terms of the ceasefire, it’s the reality.

Crossposted on Yourish.

05/23/2008

Oh, c’mon, he’s not that bad

Filed under: Israel — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

The British papers are having a field day with this one: The IAF threatened to shoot down Tony Blair’s jet Wednesday.

Two Israeli fighter aircraft threatened to shoot down a private jet transporting Tony Blair after coming under the misapprehension that the aircraft was staging a potential terrorist attack.

Blair, who has served for 11 months as the Middle East “quartet” envoy, was en route to Israel from a World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting at Sharm el Sheikh, in Egypt, on Wednesday morning when the warplanes were scrambled to intercept the jet, according to a report in the Times.

It is understood air traffic controllers noticed what they thought was a suspicious aircraft heading into Israeli airspace from the Sinai peninsula and tried to make contact.

Receiving no response, Israel sent out two fighters which flew above the civilian aircraft to indicate to the pilot he was being considered a suspect target.

It was only after the warplanes were positioned in attack mode that the aircraft’s crew made contact, informing air traffic control that Blair was on the flight.

Look, we know he’s really not the most pro-Israel of people, and he’s interfering trying to help negotiate some kind of deal between Israel and the PA, but he’s not that bad. No need to shoot his plane out of the sky.

Heh.

Powered by WordPress