Yourish.com

10/16/2009

The descent of “human rights” into parody

Filed under: Israel — Tags: , — Soccerdad @ 6:12 pm

There’s something perverse about a group of tyrants – who deny their own people the right to vote – claiming the mantle of moral legitimacy on account of achieving a majority vote. But that’s what happened today at the UN Human Rights Council, where the member nations voted to implement the recommendations of the Goldstone Commision Report. The New York Times reports:

The resolution endorsing the report, which took place after two days of debate, passed by a vote of 25 to 6, with 11 nations abstaining. The resolution, virtually identical to a Palestinian proposal introduced earlier in the week, gained a slimmer margin in the 47-member council than its backers had hoped. Both the United States and Israel have warned that any progress on the report would undermine the prospects for peace talks with the Palestinians.

The six nations that voted against the resolution included the Netherlands, Italy and the United States. Five others, including France and Britain, both of which had asked for the vote to be delayed, were officially recorded as absent and not included in the vote totals at all, according to the secretariat of the council.

The Washington Post includes some information that the Times omits:

The Palestinians’ allies plan to press the U.N. Security Council and the U.N. Secretary General early next week to support prosecution by the international court if Israel does not act. But Sudan’s U.N. ambassador Adbalhaleem Mohamad, who is acting as this month’s chairman of the UN bloc of Arab nations, conceded that there was little support for such action within the Security Council, and that the matter would likely be addressed in a special session of the U.N. general assembly, possibly late next week.

“I think any intransigence, especially by the United States, will be looked on as if its it is only perpetuating the view that the Israelis are always above the law,” Mohamad said. “If you follow the debate in the Security Council, and read between the lines, there is a reluctance to deal with this issue,” he said.

The Sudanese diplomat said that an alliance of third world organizations, including the Non-Aligned Movement, the Arab Group, and the Organization of the Islamic Conference, have already begun discussions on a General Assembly resolution that would seek a ruling on Israel’s conduct by the court.

This is unbelievable chutzpah. The man who represents a country whose leader is an indicted war criminal declares that Israel is above the law.

Back in April in an editorial the Washington Post observed:

So it was interesting to see what else was in the latest statement issued by the kings, princes and authoritarian presidents of the Middle East and North Africa. First there was a call on “the international community to prosecute those responsible” for alleged “war crimes” committed by Israel in its recent offensive in Gaza. Then came an ardent defense of Sudanese dictator Omar Hassan al-Bashir — who was welcomed to the Doha summit despite an outstanding arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court on multiple war crimes charges.

“We stress our solidarity with Sudan and our rejection of the decision” of the ICC, said the communique, which Mr. Bashir welcomed in a bombastic address to the summit plenary. Leader after leader declared fealty. “We must also take a decisive stance of solidarity alongside fraternal Sudan and President Omar al-Bashir,” said Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. Mr. Abbas is hoping that the Obama administration will pressure Israel to stop building “illegal” settlements in the West Bank; the next time he utters the phrase “double standard” in the presence of a U.S. diplomat, we suggest a query about Mr. Bashir.

The Arab world and its allies have embraced a genocidal tyrant. It is not justice they seek but the destruction of Israel. And all those who continue to bash Israel in the name of human rights have to explain why they ignore the vast crimes of Mr. Bashir and focus on the mistakes of Israel.

Human rights is no longer about the protection of innocents from tyranny, but about the demonization of Israel. The term has be stripped of all meaning.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

03/27/2009

Who struck the mighty convoy?

Filed under: Iran, Israel — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 9:00 am

Sudan is alleging that another country struck a convoy. According to the Washington Post, “foreign” planes, suspected to be American or Israeli killed hundreds of people.

Mubarak Mabrook Saleem, Sudan’s transportation minister, told the Associated Press he believed American planes were behind the bombings, which took place about a week apart in early February, and said hundreds were killed. A Foreign Ministry spokesman confirmed Saleem’s account but said there were discrepancies on casualties.

The U.S. military denied any recent airstrikes in or around Sudan.

A more recent report in the New York Times gets information from American officials claiming that it was an Israeli air strike and explains why Israel would have struck the convoy.

American officials said the airstrike took place as Israel sought to stop the flow of weapons to Gaza during the weeks it was fighting a war with Hamas there.

Two American officials who are privy to classified intelligence assessments said that Iran had been involved in the effort to smuggle weapons to Gaza. They also noted that there had been intelligence reports that an operative with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps had gone to Sudan to coordinate the effort.

(Press TV hasn’t updated its account from Wednesday and still blames the U.S.)

The Lede (at the NYT) covers the genesis of the story.

There still seems to be a measure of uncertainty. The Washington Post reports that the attacks occurred in February, the New York Times refers to January. There is also uncertainty as to the death toll.

Israel Matzav (via memeorandum) has a report from Israel Radio that may clear up the contradictions about the timing of the attacks.

Israel Radio reported this morning that there was an attack on a weapons ship off the Sudanese coast in recent months and that there were three or four strikes during January and February. The strike that was reported yesterday and confirmed by the New York Times today took place in January during Operation Cast Lead.

According to Israelly Cool, Hamas denies that the convoy was carrying arms. (Elder of Ziyon finds an implicit acknowledgment of Iranina aid for Hamas.)

The Weekly Standard has more.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

08/13/2008

Iran and it allies *heart* Sudan

Filed under: Hamas, Iran, Terrorism — Tags: , — Soccerdad @ 10:30 am

Last week I noted that Hamas and Hezbollah, both proxies of Iran, support the genocidal regime of Sudan.

Writing in the Weekly Standard, Jonathan Schanzer gives the history behind the relationship. It started with:

The story begins in1989, when an Islamist-inspired coup brought Brigadier Omar al-Bashir to power. Within months, Islamists tied to the National Islamic Front (NIF) held key posts in the government, security services, and other important sectors. As journalist Judith Miller noted, Sudan became “the only Sunni Arab state to have embraced absolutist, militant Islamic rule.” Weapons and oil supplies began to arrive from Iran. The two states, despite the Sunni-Shiite divide, became fast allies.

It didn’t take long for those ties to expand:

In December 1991, Iranian President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani paid an official visit to Khartoum, accompanied by more than 150 Iranian officials. “The Islamic Revolution of Sudan,” he proclaimed, “alongside Iran’s pioneer revolution, can doubtless be the source of movement and revolution throughout the Islamic world.” Iran pledged $17 million in financial aid to Sudan, and arranged for an additional $300 million in Chinese weapons to be delivered there. Iran further pledged one million tons of oil each year.

Schanzer concludes:

The three-way ties over nearly two decades explains the current Hamas and Iranian support for Bashir, and why they ignore the incontrovertible evidence of genocide. This yields two key observations.

First, both Sunni and Shiite Islamists are hypocritical and inconsistent when they proclaim that they seek justice.

More broadly, the Islamist support for the Darfur genocide reveals much about the dangers of Islamism, and must not be ignored.

(h/t Smooth Stone at her new digs)

Perhaps when experts try to assure us that Iran has not thoughts of destroying Israel, they could explain why Iran and its allies have this love for the genocidal regime in Khartoum.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

Powered by WordPress