Seems to me that deliberately firing on any civilian bus is a war crime. It does not matter whether it is a bus of seniors going to gamble in Jericho, a city bus, a tour bus or a school bus. WAR CRIME.

The weapon used by Hamas for the bus attack was a Kornet anti-tank rocket, laser guided directly to the target. It was not a mortar blindly lobbed over the border that happened to hit the bus. Even then, the likelihood that it would hit a civilian target, if it hit anything, would make it a war crime. All of the mortar and rocket attacks coming from Gaza are war crimes. In this case, however, a member of Hamas decided to fire upon the civilian bus and guided the weapon to the target. WAR CRIME.

Hamas claimed responsibility for the attack. They did not apologize for wrongly attacking a school bus, if you were wondering. They did not say that charges will be filed against the people responsible either, in case you were wondering. Hamas policy is to commit war crimes against Israel, to attack civilians deliberately. WAR CRIME.

I wonder when the UN will look into Hamas’ war crimes. I’m not holding my breath.

An explosion was heard near the western Negev community of Gabim, but a search for a rocket or mortar landing site came up empty.

The Karni crossing is expected to be reopened by Israel on Sunday for the transfer of goods to the Strip within the framework of the agreed upon ceasefire between Israel and the armed Palestinian organizations in the coastal enclave.

The AP isn’t even reporting the mortar fire. Apparently, only kassams count. They still haven’t acknowledged the mortar that first broke the truce.

And I’m tired of writing about it.

Meantime, Hamas is taunting Israel.

The current Israeli government is the weakest in the country’s history,” Hamas spokesman Mushir al-Masri said Wednesday ahead of the national security cabinet’s crucial meeting regarding possible Israeli responses to the situation in Gaza.

“The Israelis are unable to deal with the Palestinian organizations and the rockets,” he said, “they know they cannot launch a wide-scale operation in Gaza because (if they do) the Strip will become a graveyard for Israeli soldiers.”

And in spite of the fact that Hamas is daily trying to kill Israelis, they’re ready for a cease-fire. No, really.

Despite the threats, al-Masri stressed that Hamas was willing to reach a ceasefire agreement with Israel “that would include the lifting of the blockade on Gaza”.

Even the AP has noticed that Hamas wants the truce only for logistic reasons. But you have to look at the very end of this article, which of course focuses on Palestinian civilian casualties (as a result of terrorists firing rockets from civilian areas, barely noted by AP), not on the daily barrage that brought the IDF fire on the area. These are the last three paragraphs of the AP’s latest article on the “truce” efforts:

Still, Israel is suspicious of Hamas’ motives in seeking a truce, especially since the militant group has declared it would take advantage of any lull in fighting to rearm.

Adding urgency to Israel’s decision are assessments by its military intelligence that Hamas is rapidly upgrading its arsenal with Iranian assistance.

Brig. Gen. Yossi Baidatz, a senior intelligence officer, told the Cabinet on Tuesday that Hamas now has rockets with a range of 12 miles, endangering a significant swath of southern Israel. Militants are also increasingly using deadlier 120mm mortar shells instead of smaller ones, Baidatz said, according to a participant in the meeting.

Don’t you just love the AP bias? And that’s actually the most balanced part of the article. Get a load of this:

The decision against a broad invasion came the same day an Israeli shell aimed at a group of militants in the southern Gaza Strip slammed into a nearby house, decapitating a 6-year-old girl in her back yard, Palestinian medical officials and a relative said.

And that’s an upgrade from this:

The decision came despite a new spike in fighting with Palestinian militants. Hours earlier, an Israeli shell aimed at a group of Gaza militants slammed into a nearby house and killed a 6-year-old Palestinian girl. A 55-year-old Palestinian civilian and a militant were also killed in clashes across the territory, while two Israeli civilians were lightly wounded by Palestinian mortar fire.

Funny how every time Ibrahim Barzak’s byline hits an article, the anti-Israel tone deepens while the Palestinian sympathy meter tops out.

And of course, the Palestinian casualty is identified, quotes are gotten from her relatives, and when Israeli deaths and injuries are mentioned, well, they just happen to unspecified people. Because that’s the narrative. Only the Palestinians can be victims.

Also Wednesday, an Israeli was lightly wounded when a mortar shell fired from Gaza hit a paint factory at Nir Oz, an Israeli collective village less than a mile from the Gaza border, the military said. An Israeli man was killed in a mortar attack there last week.

His name was Amnon Rosenberg. He was 51 years old, and he left behind three children and a wife to mourn him. Not that the AP noticed he had a name, even when his death was fresh news.

The bombardment is evidently going to continue. I suppose the Cabinet thinks they’re close to getting Gilad Shalit back. That’s the only reason I can think of for not authorizing an operation, and something I read yesterday that Ehud Barak said indicated as much to me.

I hope they’re right. In the meantime, there will be more rockets fired into Israel. Because there is currently no real deterrence. The jihadis are laughing at the IDF.