Yourish.com

11/04/2009

Snarkly, briefly, Israeli

Filed under: Gaza, Iran, Israel, Syria — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 12:00 pm

Leftist Jewish group nobody ever heard of to Israel: Stop demanding that the Goldstone Report include actual, unbiased facts! Oh, this one’s rich. Hundreds of Jews have signed a letter telling Israel and the worldwide Jewish community to stop “vilifying” the Goldstone Report. Signers include Tony “I’m Jewish but Israel really sucks” Judt, Howard “I’m Jewish too and Israel really, really sucks” Zinn, and then a bunch of tiny Israel-hating Jewish groups that use the word “peace” in their titles so you know they really mean it. Switching to something actually interesting now.

Iran to Syria: Give us back the uranium we illegally sold you. And oh yeah—do it on your own damned dime. Wow, this one’s just awesome. Iran wants Syria to return the uranium it was supposed to use in the nuclear plant that Israel bombed so that, well, Syria couldn’t make a nuclear bomb. I hope they do try it. And the IDF intercepts the ship. That would be fun.

No Security Council resolution on Goldstone: Israel and the White House have apparently reached a “silent understanding” on not letting Goldstone reach the Security Council. How long before the Palestinians and the OIC get noisy about the silence? I figure a day or two.

The Palestinian Lobby trumps the Israel lobby. Hillary Clinton has now been spanked by just about all the major players in the Middle East for daring to suggest that a total settlement freeze should not be a precondition to peace talks. And she has been properly repentant:

US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Washington does not accept the legitimacy of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and wants to see their construction halted “forever.”

That’s funny. I thought it was the Israel lobby that was powerful enough to force the U.S. President to dance to its tune, and yet, here she is, slamming Israel only days after saying that Netanyahu made “unprecedented” steps toward freezing settlement construction. Huh. Go figure. That Walt & Mearsheimer—boy, they really pulled one over on the world, hey?

10/30/2009

Briefly

Filed under: Iran, Israel, Jews, News Briefs, The One, World — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:00 am

Obama administration forces Honduras to let anti-Semitic nutjob back in power: So, the guy who said that Mossad agents were poisoning him is going to be back in charge of Honduras in some fashion, forced there by the United States and the OAS overriding Honduras’ Supreme Court decisions and the laws of the nation. Way to go, Obama! Way to work for the rule of law. Oh, wait. It’s the Chicago Way. I keep forgetting.

Awesome: Congressional nitwit puts private ethics investigation data on public website. You have to love the internet age, because people being people, there are still just as many idiots as there were before everything was online. Only now when they make mistakes, we get to see what’s really going on behind the scenes in Congress.

Postcards from the IDF:
Yossi Klein Halevi on Israeli citizens’ receipt of a postcard that details how much time they have to get to the nearest bomb shelter in the event of a missile attack. A sobering read.

No. Ya think? Best headline yet on the Iran cheat-and-retreat strategy: “Iran accused of playing games on nuclear deal.” The Telegraph wins the Keen Grasp of the Obvious award for that one.

But—but—this totally blows away the “European colonialism” argument! Genetic proof that Jews were from the land of Israel, and the man behind the science. (Of course, he’s a Jew.)

10/22/2009

Briefly

Filed under: Gaza, Iran, Israel, News Briefs — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 2:00 pm

The Gold Standard Debate: Oh, to be at this debate. Richard Goldstone v. Dore Gold at Brandeis. I hope they televise it. Go get ‘im, Dore!

But the Gazans are living in crushing misery: The New York Times is calling Rafah a “shopping mecca,” even as Richard Goldstone, HRW, and the EU and UN insist that Gazans are starving, miserable, and oppressed. Cognitive dissonance? No. The narrative.

It’s on. It’s off. It’s on. It’s off. No, it’s Iran. Yesterday, the news was full of the Iranians accepting the draft agreement to let us enrich their nuclear fuel for them. Today, Iran did their usual thing and said, “What? We never said we’d accept that.” If Iran was a child, I’d put it in permanent time-out.

10/20/2009

Briefly

Filed under: Hamas, Iran, Israel, News Briefs, Terrorism, palestinian politics — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

Hamas’ truce cry: We’ll dismantle Fatah. Really, I just love the Fatah-Hamas relationship. It’s so good for Israel and the world. Here’s what a Hamas “spokesman” says about disarming:

“It is easier to dismantle the Palestinian Authority than it is to dismantle us, and we will take them apart before anyone thinks of touching us.”

Ah, the Hamas/Fatah truce. The snark simply writes itself.

Turkey, the friend of Jews—not. France’s Le Monde polled the Turks, and 53% say they would not want to live next door to a Jew. But really, the Turks luuurve Israelis. Truly. They do. Probably a little more than they love Armenians, but I wouldn’t want to lay odds on that.

Abdullah to Obama: Forget Iran, it’s not that important. Uh-huh. We shouldn’t concentrate on Iran, because the king of Jordan is tired of hearing about Iran, Iran, Iran. It’s the Palestinians that are the key to mideast peace, you see—not the country that’s trying to build nuclear weapons, murdering American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, funding terrorists in Israel, South America, and, well, all over the world, and oh yeah—violently repressig its own people. So yeah, really, Obama—what’s with the Iran obsession?

Bill Maher is a great big idiot: Want to laugh? Watch this video over at Hot Air, where Bill Maher, the world-renowned scientist, tells us how dangerous flu vaccinations are, and vaccinations in general. Biggest laugh-line: It’s not settled science, like global warming. Yes, he really says that. Like Allahpundit says, when Chris Matthews is your voice of reason—well.

10/15/2009

Snarking

Filed under: Iran, Israel, Lebanon, World — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:30 am

Turk to Israel: No, really, we love you, you baby-killing bastards: Yeah, right. The Turkish producer of a film about Palestinians that depicts IDF soldiers murdering young girls for no apparent reason other than they’re Zionist child-killers says that just because the uniform looks like the IDF, and just because it takes place in Gaza, doesn’t mean that the show is about IDF soldiers murdering innocent Palestinian children. He defends his thesis by bringing up Mohammed al-Dura and 300 dead children from the Gaza war. I guess his show must be about Shmisraeli ShmIDF shmoldiers, not Israeli IDF soldiers.

Hezbollah: That was no missile, that was a door! I really want to see their video footage. They’re claiming that the group of Hezbollah terrorists seen loading a long, metallic object onto a truck were carrying a metal door. Uh-huh. I’m also eagerly awaiting UNIFIL’s explanation as to why their men were watching Hezbollah load a “metal door” onto a pickup truck. What? UN peacekeepers ignoring Hezbollah UN Resolution violations? No! You don’t say!

Khameini in a coma? Or dead? I hope it’s true. But if it is, well, Iran ain’t seen nothin’ yet. Revolution? That won’t be the half of it. It might be great news to Israel, depending on who wins the power struggle. We can always dream that client states Syria and Lebanon get left out in the cold.

Those wily Jews: While the Arabs and Muslims in the region continue their important work in improving the many ways you can carry a suicide bomb, Israelis are developing things like a battery that will last thousands of hours in hearing aids and the like. Oh, and the battery will be cheaper and cleaner than those currently on the market. No wonder Israel has more Nobel prizes than the entire Arab world combined.

09/25/2009

Iran letter to the IAEA revealed!

Filed under: Humor, Iran — Tags: — Meryl Yourish @ 12:30 pm

I have received a copy of Iran’s letter to the IAEA, revealing the existence of a heretofore undisclosed (don’t you love the word “heretofore”?) nuclear plant that is only a year away from operation. Just remember, even Drudge doesn’t have this scoop!

Dear suckers esteemed inspectors of the IAEA,

Like, we forgot to tell you something on your last visit here. Remember when you asked us if we had anything more to declare, and, we were like, “No way!” and you were like, “Way!” and we were like, “Dudes, no way, and if you don’t stop messin’ with us we’re gonna call the Basij dudes on their bikes and they’re really pissed today ’cause all the hot protest babes are on the other side,” and you were like, “Whoa, Basij, not necessary, bro,” and then you, like, ran to the airport and forgot to give us going-away presents?

Well, like, we kinda forgot to tell you that, uh, yeah, there’s this one more little nuke plant, and it’s, like, near Qom, and it’s like, about a year away from being able to make a bomb, uh, I mean, to power up the holy dudes’ mosques so they can get their mad on at the Zionist Entity every Friday like always. Oh, wait—my buddy Mahmoud just told me to tell you to tell them that it’s just a pilot enrichment program, and it’s barely big enough to make a single—uh, pilot. And anyway, like, we’re only going to enrich it to five percent, and everyone knows that you need to enrich it more to make bombs, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is peaceful, and we don’t want to hurt anyone, except for all you infidels and Zionists and idolators and atheists. And dogs. We really hate dogs, dude.

So, like, this is to let you know that we, like, uh, forgot to tell you—oh, wait, I already said that. Dude. Um, okay, well, then, that’s about it, except, like, death to America and death to Israel, dudes. And we hope you’re not mad that we, like, forgot.

InSincerely,

The dudes in Iran who are going to nuke your asses, uh, I mean, be your best friends.

Friday snarkly

Filed under: Israel, The One, United Nations, palestinian politics — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

NObama: Looks like the Palestinians aren’t going to take Obama’s suggestion and get back to the negotiating table anytime soon. I like how they no longer insist that all settlement activity be frozen first—they don’t dare add a precondition for talks after Obama said they had to stop putting preconditions on the talks. Now they’re saying that there are “fundamental disagreements” about the agenda of the talks. Brilliant. The onus is now on them, not on Netanyahu, to start negotiations. (That’ll last about a week, then the world will blame Israel once again.)

No room at the inn for Mad Mahmoud: Awesome. Another New York hotel canceled the banquet after finding out it was for the proud Holocaust denier. Unfortunately, he still spoke to a mostly full house at the UN.

UNRWA: We want money. That’s what we want. UNRWA is begging for more money to keep the victim class of the Palestinians going into the next generation, because hey, 61 years isn’t nearly long enough to keep paying “refugees.” Why, the UN has also been paying the millions of descendants of Jewish refugees from Arab lands, too. Oh, wait. No they’re not.

AP still doesn’t get the significance of the last name: Leonard Cohen performed in Israel, and I have to laugh at the AP headline and angle of the story: “Leonard Cohen performs in Israel, defies boycott.” Really. Just look at the last name one more time, AP. Or listen to Hallelujah again.

Well, I feel safer now: The One has chaired the UN Security Council, and got it to pass a resolution calling for an end to nuclear weapons. The next agenda calls for kittens, butterflies, and unicorns for everyone. Winged unicorns for seven-year-old girls. What Obama did not do, however, was get a resolution calling for sanctions on Iran, which is trying to build a nuclear bomb. So once again, it’s all for show.

09/24/2009

Yes, it’s anti-Semitism

Filed under: Anti-Semitism, Iran — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 1:00 pm

Exhibit A: The Egyptian minister of culture lost his bid to become the head of UNESCO, after a campaign that showed his viciously anti-Israel feelings, which he insisted weren’t anti-Semitism. How does he respond? By blaming “New York Jews.”

“There are a group of the world’s Jews who had a major influence in the elections who were a serious threat to Egypt taking this position,” he said.

The Arab media, of course, carries the party line, and blames Jews and “the Zionist media” for the failure of their candidate.

Exhibit B: The Supreme Leader of Iran calls Israel “the deadly cancer of Zionism” while his hand-picked president denies the Holocaust and then tells the world he is proud of his Holocaust denial. He repeated the same filthy Jewish conspiracy accusations he raised last year in this year’s speech, and although this year a few Western nations walked out, Sweden (among others) felt that the following was not enough Jew-hatred to make their delegates leave:

The dignity, integrity and rights of the American and European people are being played with by a small but deceitful number of people called Zionists. Although they are a miniscule minority, they have been dominating an important portion of the financial and monetary centers as well as the political decision-making centers of some European countries and the US in a deceitful, complex and furtive manner. It is deeply disastrous to witness that some presidential or premiere nominees in some big countries have to visit these people, take part in their gatherings, swear their allegiance and commitment to their interests in order to attain financial or media support.

This means that the great people of America and various nations of Europe need to obey the demands and wishes of a small number of acquisitive and invasive people. These nations are spending their dignity and resources on the crimes and occupations and the threats of the Zionist network against their will.

The Swedish government also cleared the Aftonbladet of anti-Semitism over their lie-filled article about the IDF killing palestinians for their organs.

Neither am I surprised that the only place you can find the above lines is in articles with the full text of the speech. The media ignored Ahmadinejad’s anti-Semitism last year as well.

Exhibit C: Spain disqualified an Israeli college team from an international solar power contest, not because the team broke the rules—but because the college is located in the West Bank. Apparently, global warming is an urgent cause, but the Palestinian cause is more important than even saving the earth from itself. (No, I don’t believe global warming is happening. But these people do. The Exception Clause reigns.) And of course, we heard only a few days ago that anti-Semitism in Spain is on the rise.

What do all these things have in common? They are claimed to be anti-Zionism. And yet, they resemble nothing so much as anti-Semitism.

You can put a wig and a fancy ball-gown on a pig, add earings and make-up, and yet, in the end, you still have a pig.

Yes, it’s anti-Semitism. Let’s stop pretending that it’s not.

09/22/2009

Snark news briefs, good news edition

Filed under: Iran, Israel, The One, United Nations — Tags: , , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:21 pm

So many wonderful things, so little time. (Actually, there’s plenty of time; work’s done for the day.)

Sucks to be you, Part 1: The anti-Israel (some might say “anti-Semitic” Egyptian minister of culture lost his bid to become the director of UNESCO. Gee, guess building those synagogues for the six Jews left in Egypt just didn’t convince the west that he’s changed. Or maybe it’s just the year of the woman—a Bulgarian woman won the job. I will point out that Israel did not oppose the Egyptian’s election, at least, not publicly. It was a private election. I’m guessing they didn’t vote for the bastard who said that he only wanted Israeli books burned that “insult Islam.” Oh, that makes it all better, then.

Sucks to be you, Part 2:
What’s a dictator to do? First, the Helmsley Hotel chain cancels Mad Mahmoud’s banquet reservations and tells him he’s not welcome in any of their hotels. Then the Libyan mass-murderer-slash-dictator finds himself barred from most hotels in the city (on top of being banned in NJ, and yay, Garden State!). So he’s decided to sleep at the Libyan embassy. And Mad Mahmoud is going to be staying at the Essex House—unless the protests get too overwhelming for the hotel.

Sucks to be you, Part 3: Lowered expectations you said, lowered expectations you got! Obama told Israel that it needed to make “important steps to restrain settlement activity.” I do believe that goes into Netanyahu’s column as a “win.” Poor, poor Stephen Walt. He must be so disappointed today. Then again, he can use this as more proof of that invincible Israel Lobby in his next book. And I’m thinking that Barack Obama’s having a very, very bad day today overall. Not that I think that’s a good thing, because his screwing up international relations is a very bad thing for America. Maybe he’ll use this as a teachable moment, and learn from it.

Naaaaaaaah. Just kidding.

Shimon Peres to schoolkids: Beware of Mad Mahmoud!

Filed under: Iran, Juvenile Scorn — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:45 am

This is hilarious, and absolutely true:

President Shimon Peres told schoolchildren in the north that “the prime minister will be demonstratively absent from a meeting with one of the most evil and horrible people of modern history, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who lies through his teeth about the existence of the Holocaust and curses Israel”.

It’s not quite juvenile scorn, but it’s close enough.

09/21/2009

Your morning snark

Filed under: Anti-Semitism, Iran, The One, World — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

I know you are, but what am I? Ahmadinejad exhibits the grown-up attitude we’ve come to expect from the Holocaust Denier-in-Chief: He flips the bird to the world in response to the worldwide denunciations of his Holocaust-denying speech on Quds Day. (And “quds” is so not the Arabic word for Jerusalem. It is the Arabic name for the city that everyone else in the world calls Jerusalem. I’m so sick of the media using that narrative.) Expect a doozy of a one-two speech from Ahmadinejad and Ghaddafi next week at the UN.

Hypocrites of the world, unite! So, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for the end of Israel, called the Holocaust a “myth,” and uttered myriad statements against Israel and Jews, and the world has basically stood back and tut-tutted in ones and twos, maybe in threes. Suddenly, the whole world is down on Mad Mahmoud? The EU issues a condemnation? Russia too? So, where were they last year when he was issuing the most anti-Semitic speech in the history of the United Nations—at the United Nations? I find this sudden anti-Iran bandwagon extremely suspicious. If they think this is the quid pro quo for settlement freeze, I’m thinking Bibi is laughing his ass off.

Peaceful, peace-seeking Palestinians burn down Israelis’ fields: Yeah, they want to live in peaceful coexistence. Just ask The One. Countdown to lefty NGOs saying that this is payback for Israelis cutting down olive trees in 3, 2….

ACORN? That’s a little nut, isn’t it? Obama is on record denying he knows much about ACORN. Huh. Funny, considering he defended them as a lawyer, steered funds to their coffers, and traded donor lists with them. But he has no idea how much federal money they get. Uh-huh. Sure. Right.

09/18/2009

Briefly

Filed under: Hamas, Holocaust, Iran, News Briefs, The One, palestinian politics — Tags: , , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 8:01 am

Germans to Israel: Shut up if you want Gilad Shalit to come home. To be fair, he wants all parties involved to shut up, but really—this is what the mediator thinks is a necessary ingredient to getting Hamas to release their hostage for hundreds of convicted terrorists? A press blackout? Yeah, that’s what’s important.

Abbas to Obama: Stick it in your very big ears. Wow, look at what all those preconditions Obama demanded did for the peace process. It worked! The Palestinians now think they don’t have to do anything and Israel will be handed to them by the U.S. Great job, Obama! (Is it racist to say that he has big ears?)

If it’s Quds Day, this must be Holocaust Denial: And not just Holocaust denial from Ahmadinejad—his thugs attacked ex-president Khatami. Hey, if they kill Khatami, will Iranians rise up and not stop this time? Here’s what they chanted:

“Death to the dictators,” and “Not Gaza, Not Lebanon, We are ready to die for Iran,” chanted protesters.

The normal chant, if you have forgotten, is “Death to Israel” or “Death to America.”

If this is a holiday, it must be high terror alert in Israel: But gee, Obama told me that the Palestinians want peace. So did the Saudis. So do the Egyptians. Huh. Go figure. And 75,000 Muslims attended Ramadan prayers, unmolested, in Jerusalem—in their mosque deliberately built on the Temple grounds—that was not destroyed when Israel took control of Jerusalem. Exactly which of us is the Religion of Peace, do you think?

09/10/2009

Netanyahu’s visit to Russia

Filed under: Iran, Israel — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:00 am

There is much speculation as to why the Israeli Prime Minister would visit Russia secretly, renting a private jet to keep his actions quiet.

He could be discussing Iranian weapons deals with Russia, as the story says:

Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper on Wednesday alleged that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Moscow earlier this week, where he is believed to have discussed new weapons deals between Russia and Iran.

Or perhaps he had something to say about the Russian ship that went missing in July. According to Time magazine, the ship was carrying S-300 anti-aircraft missiles, which would make it much more difficult for Israel to take out Iranian nuclear reactors.

And now a Russian paper is publishing a report that Netanyahu was in Russia to tell the Kremlin that Israel is going to go after the reactors.

The paper then quoted what it called an “informed” Israeli source, who wished to remain anonymous, as saying, “Such a visit could be related to new information and could threaten the Iranian nuclear program. It should not be ruled out that Israel may be ready to move on to decisive actions with regards to Iran, and Netanyahu has decided to inform the Kremlin of this.”

I’m more than a little skeptical, because when did Russian media ever tell the truth about anything? But there is a big, big mystery: Why did Bibi go to Russia secretly? Why go to such great lengths to hide his trip?

One thing is certain: Benjamin Netanyahu is not underestimating the Iranian nuclear capability. He’s been on TV many, many times in the past few years urging the world to stop Iran’s march to nuclear power. In this regard, Bibi has the backing of the overwhelming majority of the Israeli people. Their survival is at stake, and they know it. And Jews have learned over the centuries not to trust in others to protect us.

As Prime Minister, Netanyahu has access to intel that you and I could only dream about. Which makes this secret trip to Russia even more interesting. Did he go to tell them to get their technicians out of Dodge before the bombs fall? Did he go to tell them that the Mossad picked up a cargo of S-300 missiles on its way to Iran and that Russia needs to stop arming Israel’s enemy or Israel will bring the evidence to the UN? Did he try to make a deal with the Russians that will stop the Iranian nuclear progress?

One’s thing for sure: He didn’t visit Russia just to pick up a new set of Matryoshka dolls.

09/04/2009

Friday SNB

Filed under: Israeli Double Standard Time, News Briefs, United Nations, World — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:00 am

Never mind about those 16 deaths per month; war’s over: The outgoing UN peacekeeping head of the Darfur reason says the war’s over, because only 16 people per month are dying, as opposed to 130 per month last year. Two observations: One would think that when nobody’s dying, the war is over. Also, imagine them saying that about the Palestinians—even though fewer Palestinians are dying. Oh, and then there’s the 300,000 dead and millions displaced—but what’s the worst problem facing world peace? That’s right. Israeli settlements.

International pressure rises, but not on Iran: Funny, isn’t it, how the world can’t seem to find a way to pressure Iran into stopping work on its nuclear weapons program, but everyone is jumping on the STOP ISRAELI SETTLEMENTS!1!!1 bandwagon? France. Germany. And, of course, The One. Because it’s far more important to stop Israelis from moving into the eastern side of Jerusalem—the city that Jews built—than it is to stop Iran from getting the bomb.

He was for the settlements before he was against them: Netanyahu is going to approve building additions to the suburbs of Jerusalem (which is another name for “West Bank settlements”) before freezing settlement building. Countdown to outraged Palestinian reaction in one.

The fabled Arab love for their Palestinian brethren: Get out. The UAE is expelling all Palestinians from within their borders, regardless of whether they’ve lived their all of their lives. The Palestinian population of the UAE is about 140,000. And oh yeah—no reason was given. But hey, that Muslim umma? It’s really working for them, isn’t it?

09/02/2009

Wednesday SNB

Filed under: Hamas, Iran, Israel, News Briefs, The One — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

How to get around 1701: Say you’re supporting the Lebanese army. Iran is offering to shore up Hezbollah by selling arms to the Lebanese army. Since there is no UN resolution against arming the Lebanese army, I can see this one actually working. I wonder if this has something to do with the North Korean ship that was heading for Iran with arms and munitions.

Work accident kills two Hamas terrorists: No word on whether or not they were planting the bombs where the sun doesn’t shine.

Gilad Shalit’s release: Don’t hold your breath. Every time there is a rumor that the release is imminent, Hamas never fails to disappoint. Every time an Israeli says they will not pay too high a price for Shalit’s remains release, Hamas says without that price, there will be no release. And may I say: Bastards.

Arms and the Russians: Time magazine is reporting that Israel was behind the hijacking of a Russian ship in July—the one that the Russians say was filled with timber, and that two sources so far have said were filled with missiles heading for Iran. This is the second source to say that the ship was hijacked by Israel. One of those sources is a Russian journalist. Hmmm. Update: Ynet says the Russians hijacked the ship themselves. No wonder they told the EU source to shut up.

No joking about The One: Time magazine noticed how wussy comedians are regarding making jokes about Obama. Yeah, we kind of noticed that while he was on the campaign trail. Jokes? Obama? Sacrilege!

08/27/2009

Thursday SNB

Filed under: Iran, Lebanon, News Briefs, Pop Culture — Tags: , , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

He will fart in your general direction: Nicholas Sarkozy is threatening “severe” new sanctions on Iran if it doesn’t stop enriching uranium and trying to get the bomb. Yeah, like we haven’t heard that before.

No! Not the dreaded letter to the IAEA! Iran has gotten the non-aligned nations to sign onto a letter to the IAEA pushing for a ban on attacks on nuclear plants. Hm. This is a tough one. Israel is not a signatory to the NPT, but it is a member of the IAEA. But then again, the UN General Assembly, under which the IAEA was formed, is a powerless bunch of stuffed shirts with a proven anti-Israel agenda. Israel: Fear the letter! (And by the way, wussy little Iran, after threatening Israel in so many different ways, is running to the UN for protection. Baby.)

The obligatory “Shalit deal is imminent” mention: Yeah, yeah, yeah. We keep hearing that, and yet, Gilad Shalit is still not released. And while some of the things I’m reading do seem to be leading to an actual release, well, I’ll wait until I see some results first.

Hezbullah ascendant: Funny, I thought Hezbullah lost the election, and yet, Sa’ad Hariri, whose father was killed by Syria—which sponsors Hezbullah—says they’re going to be part of the government whether Israel likes it or not. (And a big nyah-nyah to you!) Hokay. Just remember, Israel has let Lebanon know that if Hezbullah attacks again, since they’re now part of the government, it will be considered an act of war by Lebanon. Which is why Lebanese villagers are turning on Hezbullah and throwing them out of their villages.

She was leader of the pack, and now she’s gone: Ellie Greenwich, the songwriter who gave us some of the most memorable pop tunes of the 60s, died yesterday. What would this world be without Da Doo Ron Ron and Do Wah Diddy Diddy? Not to mention Be My Baby and The Look of Love. Let’s all of us take a moment to let our hearts stand still (Da Doo Ron Ron Ron Da Doo Ron Ron).

08/18/2009

Tuesday Snark News Briefs

Filed under: Israel, Pop Culture, Television, Terrorism, The One, World — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

Britain’s FM: Hey, terrorism can be useful sometimes! He was talking about South Africa, not the U.K., so it must be okay, right? (And of course, he probably doesn’t shed a tear for any Jews killed in terrorist attacks. What do you expect from a guy who’s father was a Marxist?

Netanyahu caves: There is a freeze on all new settlement construction. Oh, and the reason he’s freezing construction? He’s hoping to get Europe and America to recognize Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem. Because they’ve all indicated that that’s what they want to see happen, right? Epic fail, Bibi. Epic fail.

Time for the latest round of Iranian running out the clock: Iran says it’s ready for nuclear negotiations without preconditions. I think this makes the tenth or eleventh time they’ve said they’d talk about their nukes with the west. But this time, they really mean it. Honest. You betcha! (And watch the Obama spin machine on this one. It should be a laff-riot.)

Death at Disney World! Here’s news you almost never see: Three workers have died at Disney World so far this year. Wow, the Disney PR flacks have really dwindled in talent. Oh, wait—three people died at Disney world so far this year? And this is the first you’re hearing about it? I stand corrected. (Actually, I read about the monorail crash. But I really have no desire to visit Disney World ever again. Crowds. Ugh.)

But the stimulus is working! Eric Cantor sponsored a job fair in my neck of the woods yesterday. The Times-Dispatch says more than 2,000 people showed. Cantor’s office says it was 3,200. I’m not at all surprised. We lost Circuit City, had massive layoffs at places like Capital One and Genworth, and are also affected by the overall dreadful economy.

Dancing with the exterminator:
Ew. Tom Delay is going to be on “Dancing with the Stars.” Mind you, I’ve never really cared for the show, watched it for, at best, a minute at a time, and don’t care at all about the show. But ew—Tom Delay? Tom “the Exterminator” Delay? Now that’s reaching. And a little bit gross. (I don’t care how far to the center I move, I will always loathe Tom Delay.)

08/10/2009

Monday SNB

Filed under: AP Media Bias, Gaza, Israel, Religion, Terrorism, The One, palestinian politics — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

Funny how the AP keeps on missing these tidbits: Fatah has approved adding “the right to resist occupation in all its forms” to its new platform. (This is on top of insising that all of Jerusalem is theirs.) They further explain:

“we won’t abandon any of our options, and we believe that resistance, in all forms, is a legitimate right of occupied people in confronting their occupiers.”

And yet, we never seem to see the AP articles that emphasize the Palestinian refusal to compromise. Only Israel’s. Funny, that.

What AP media bias? Yesterday, Palestinians fired mortars at the Erez crossing while sick Palestinians were being transferred from Palestinian ambulances to Israeli ones. So Israel bombed a smuggling tunnel (should have bombed a lot more of them). The AP, which can’t seem to notice that Fatah is turning into Hamas Lite, found its voice again, against Israel. The headline: Israeli warplanes bomb tunnel along Gaza border. Just in case you thought maybe it was sightseeing planes that bombed the tunnel.

The “Judaization” of Jerusalem includes rebuilding synagogues: Jews rebuilt a synagogue that was built in Jerusalem in 1867, but because it’s on the “wrong” side of the line, Ehud Barak has come under fire for attending the ceremony to welcome the return of the Torah to a 142-year-old Jewish house of worship. Jews were forced out of there in 1938, and yet, we never seem to read about that aspect of Jerusalem anywhere but in the Jewish press. The synagogue is 100 yards from the Temple Mount. And it was nearly destroyed, of course, when Jordan controlled Jerusalem from 1948 to 1967. Sure, give Jerusalem back to the Muslims. Because they did such a great job safeguarding other religious sites before.

Bibi to Beirut: L’etat, c’est Hezbullah. Benjamin Netanyahu warned Lebanon that Israel will hold the entire country responsible for whatever Hezbullah does. Which makes sense, considering that Druze leader Walid Jumblatt has thrown in with Hezbullah and declared that he was wrong about Iran, so they’re going to be making policy with a voting majority soon. Right now, it’s just a war of words. I hope it stays that way, but it looks like Iran is placing its ducks in a row to respond to any attack on its nuclear facilities. And speaking of Iran:

Iran to Obama: No fist unclenching until we say so. Iran is bent on running out the clock. I know my regular readers are going to be shocked to hear this, but they’re not going to adhere to any U.S. deadline for talks—not even the one set by The One. And the clock ticks closer to Israeli action. Say, Iranian opposition: Faster, please. Oh, wait. They’re all in jail now.

07/05/2009

Uzi Mahnaimi lying about Israel again

Filed under: Iran, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Media Bias — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:23 am

If it’s a Sunday Times of London piece that declares Israel is about to attack Iran, and the byline contains Uzi Mahnaimi, it must be a bunch of garbage. Filled yet again with anonymous sources—because of course, our old pal Uzi can’t possibly be bothered to find someone who will go on record to back up his incredible claims—we have, once again, a story that is absolutely false. And yet, the Times continues to publish this man. Witness the bullshit:

The head of Mossad, Israel’s overseas intelligence service, has assured Benjamin Netanyahu, its prime minister, that Saudi Arabia would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets flying over the kingdom during any future raid on Iran’s nuclear sites.

Amazing! What a story! And to whom can we credit this fantastic story?

“The Saudis have tacitly agreed to the Israeli air force flying through their airspace on a mission which is supposed to be in the common interests of both Israel and Saudi Arabia,” a diplomatic source said last week.

Although the countries have no formal diplomatic relations, an Israeli defence source confirmed that Mossad maintained “working relations” with the Saudis.

John Bolton, the former US ambassador to the United Nations who recently visited the Gulf, said it was “entirely logical” for the Israelis to use Saudi airspace.

Uh-huh. Notice that he did not actually quote anyone but his anonymous source as saying this is true. Rumors, lies, bullshit—call it what you will, but here’s what the Prime Minister of Israel had to say about it:

The Prime Minister’s office issued a statement in response Sunday morning, saying that “the Sunday Times report is fundamentally false and completely baseless.”

There you go. It’s about as reliable as the lies he published years ago about the “genetic weapon” that Israel was supposedly developing that would kill Arabs and leave Jews alive (both a lie and an impossible weapon to build) that is still being used as a modern blood libel against Israel, and also, he had several articles published about “imminent” attacks that, well, never happened.

My suggestion: If Uzi Mahnaimi tells you it’s sunny out, bring an umbrella. Shame on the Times of London, again, for publishing this serial liar.

06/23/2009

If everyone else jumped off a bridge…

Filed under: Iran, The One — Tags: — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

One of the things I keep seeing on lefty blogs—particularly Nico’s, the one I’m following at HuffPo for Iran news—is statements like this:

Obama’s Iran policy. Americans approve of it 52 percent vs. 36 percent who disapprove, according to a new Washington Post/ABC poll

Sully is using those numbers to crow that he, and Obama, are right not to call for Iranian freedom in stronger terms.

Which brings me back to something I learned a very long time ago: Just because everyone says you should do something, doesn’t make it right.

Morality should always trump popularity.

By the way, it took the UN a week to make a statement on Iran. Imagine how quickly Ban Ki-Moon would have spoken up had there been Palestinian protests in Israel.

06/21/2009

Mad Mahmoud to us: MYOB

Filed under: Iran, Juvenile Scorn — Tags: — Meryl Yourish @ 10:00 am

Do these people ever speak in conversational English? Or is Farsi really as fuddy-duddy a language as this quote makes it seem?

“Definitely by hasty remarks you will not be placed in the circle of friendship with the Iranian nation. Therefore I advise you to correct your interfering stances,” Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying in a meeting with clerics and scholars.

I mean, really. Mahmoud could have shortened it to four words. No, seven, to qualify who he was talking to: “Britain and America, mind your own business!”

Anytime you guys want English lessons, feel free to come to me for help.

I suppose we should be grateful they’ve decided that blaming Zionists isn’t really going to work this time. Khameini made only one reference so far to the nefarious Grand Zionist Conspiracy, and it didn’t seem to stick.

All kidding aside, Ahmadinejad is in the fight for his career, and maybe his life. If the people are successful, well, leaders of the old guard have been known to be executed by the winners of the revolution.

One can always hope.

06/15/2009

On Iran

Filed under: Iran — Tags: — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

Here’s what I think is going to happen: The same thing that happened several years ago, when young people across Iran protested, well, the exact same leader of their nation.

The students are going to lose.

Of course, I would absolutely love to be eating these words a few days from now. But you don’t keep a totalitarian regime going without being able to brutally, ruthlessly crack down on dissent. And the reporting of dissent.

There’s very little coming out of the White House about this. Unless you call this statement on Saturday something other than pure crap:

Like the rest of the world, we were impressed by the vigorous debate and enthusiasm that this election generated, particularly among young Iranians. We continue to monitor the entire situation closely, including reports of irregularities.

The Mullahs will win. Sadly.

06/12/2009

It’s Mad Mahmoud by a whisker

Filed under: Iran — Tags: — Meryl Yourish @ 4:53 pm

Or so the Iranian state news agency says.

Iran’s state news agency reported that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won re-election Friday, but his main reformist challenger also confidently claimed victory at a news conference moments earlier.

The rival claims came even before the close of polls, which authorities permitted to stay open an extra six hours, until midnight, to allow long lines of voters to cast ballots. Official results were not expected until Saturday.

The fix, she is in. Don’t expect the “reformist” candidate to take away the win. In a close race, the man the Mad Mullahs want gets the job.

I’m wondering how much this so-called competition was staged. Aside from the maneuvering for power between one mullah and another, there’s no real difference between the candidates. All of them were thoroughly vetted by the mullahs. No one gets to run that Khameini didn’t approve. So maybe he wanted Mad Mahmoud to sweat a little.

I was reading something somewhere by someone saying that this would lead to a president-for-life thing with Ahmadinejad. Here’s a clue for that person: Iran is ruled by someone whose title is Supreme Leader, and who doesn’t run for re-election once he’s fought his way to that position. Anyone who calls Iran any kind of democracy is a dreamer or a liar. When every candidate is vetted by the mullahs, there is no true democracy. Here in America, all you need is the requisite number of signatures on the petition, the right age and residency requirements, and you can run for anything. No one can disapprove your candidacy. That is democracy. Not Iran.

Vote for Ahmadinejad—please.

Filed under: Iran — Tags: — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

I want Ahmadinejad to win today.

Yes, really. Because his replacement will be worse.

Why worse? Because he pretends that he doesn’t have the same goals as Ahmadinejad. Because the world media will call him a “moderate.” Because he will have the veneer of civility when underneath, he is just another tool of the Mad Mullahs, chosen by the Mad Mullahs, to move forward the Mad Mullah agenda—which is Iranian domination of their region, and ultimately the world, as part of the fabled Caliphate that will control the world when we are all submissive to only their god.

Note the AP label for the “reformist” who actually started Iran’s illegal nuclear program:

Iranians packed polling stations from boutique-lined streets in north Tehran to conservative bastions to choose Friday between keeping hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power or replacing him with a reformist who favors greater freedoms and improved ties with the United States.

And notice that even as the AP says there will be no great change, they push the reformist angle:

The outcome will not sharply alter Iran’s main policies or sway high-level decisions – such as possible talks with Washington. Those crucial policies are all directly controlled by the ruling clerics headed by the unelected Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

But Mousavi has offered hopes of more freedoms at home. If elected, he could try to end crackdowns on liberal media and bloggers and push for Iran to embrace President Barack Obama’s offer of dialogue after a nearly 30-year diplomatic freeze. He favors talks with world powers over Iran’s nuclear program, which the United States and others fear is aimed at making weapons. Iran says it only seeks reactors for electricity.

Of course he favors talks with world powers. Talks have achieved what the Iranians want: Time to complete nuclear enrichment, pretend actions towards stopping the nuclear march, all the while enlarging the program and getting enough material for a nuclear weapon. And in spite of what you read in the papers, the Iranian presidency is a puppet presidency. He does what the Supreme Leader commands him to do. And “reformists”—well, they don’t really matter.

For all the reforms made during the Khatami era, real power in Iran never left the hands of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The supreme leader’s conservative allies retained control over the security forces, as well as the judiciary and the media, and simply circumvented the rule of law when their stranglehold on the country was challenged.

The author of the above was one of the founders of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. That didn’t stop them from torturing him when he got on the Mullahs’ bad side. And this is why.

On June 4, Iran will mark the twentieth anniversary of Ali Khamenei’s appointment as the leader of Iran. While international attention is focused on the June 12 presidential elections, the winner of that contest will remain subordinate to Khamenei in power and importance, despite the latter’s low profile. Lacking the charisma and religious credentials of his predecessor, Khamenei has managed to attain his powerful position by taking control of key government agencies and building a robust bureaucracy under his direction. Understanding Khamenei’s role in Iran’s complicated governmental system and how he wields his understated power will be key for the United States as it undertakes a new strategy for dealing with Tehran.

[...] By bringing in a new generation of politicians and gradually marginalizing the veteran Islamic Republic officials who were not willing to work for him, Khamenei concentrated power under his authority. He became head of all three branches of the government and the state media, as well as the commander-in-chief of all armed forces, including the police, the army, and the IRGC. In the process, he has transformed the clerical establishment from a traditional religious institution into an ideological apparatus and government proxy. As leader, he also controls the country’s most lucrative institutions, such as the Imam Reza Shrine and the Oppressed Foundation. He has used the funds they generate to advance a political agenda both inside Iran and abroad, building dozens of centers, foundations, and Islamic banks with political, cultural, social, and economic missions.

Iran will not change. The only difference, if Mousavi wins, is that he will be more politic in what he says to the world, while advancing the same goals as his predecessor. He has criticized Ahmadinejad’s Holocaust denial not because it’s wrong, but because it brings bad publicity for Iran. He has stated that he will not stop Iran’s nuclear program, either. He has criticized Ahmadinejad’s economic policies, but so what? That doesn’t affect Iran’s attitudes towards Israel (which will remain unchanged if Mousavi is elected).

I want Ahmadinejad to pull out this election. Because if he loses, the world will give Mousavi ovations and flowers, all the while ignoring that he will be doing exactly what his predecessor was doing—only with more outward finesse.

The media have already accepted this narrative:

The United States said in April it would join five powers — Russia, China, France, Germany and Britain — in nuclear talks with Iran. Ahmadinejad last week ruled out any such discussions and rejected a Western proposal for Iran to freeze expansion of its nuclear work in return for a freeze on any new sanctions.

In contrast, moderate candidate Mirhossein Mousavi said if he wins, Iran would pursue talks with big powers to assure them its nuclear activity was peaceful, although the work would go on. Iran says it aims to generate electricity, not make bombs.

So yes, I hope Ahmadinejad wins. Better the open enemy than the secret one.

05/25/2009

Note to AP: Debate is not dialogue

Filed under: AP Media Bias, Iran — Tags: — Meryl Yourish @ 4:30 pm

A dialogue is a conversation between two people. A debate is an exercise in rhetoric between opposing viewpoints. But the AP apparently does not have writers or editors knowledgeable enough to tell the difference between the two, nor between a publicity stunt by the Mad Mullahs’ mouthpiece. Witness the cognitive dissonance:

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad proposed on Monday a face-to-face debate with President Barack Obama at the United Nations if he is re-elected next month as Iran’s president.

But he balanced the offer with a sharp rebuke to Washington and its allies over Iran’s nuclear program. He reiterated that Iran would never abandon its advances in uranium enrichment in exchange for offers of easing sanctions or other economic incentives.

The nuclear issue “is closed,” he told a news conference.

Got that? Issue closed, end of discussion. But wait—here’s the fig leaf for the western media which, of course, is all too happy to use as a cover for Iran:

His offer of to debate Obama could also be campaign posturing before the June 12 vote. But it does put Ahmadinejad on record as supporting a potentially groundbreaking encounter following Obama’s offer for dialogue.

Dialogue, AP. Not debate. And as we have seen in the past, Ahmadinejad simply turns the hard questions aside and reverts to his anti-Israel, anti-Western rhetoric, over and over again.

There is nothing groundbreaking here. Ahmadinejad offered to debate Bush three years ago, as you can see by clicking on the link to the AP story. Apparently, AP news writers don’t even know what’s in their own archives.

Score another one for the feckless media.

03/03/2009

The four suggestions

Filed under: Israel — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 8:00 am

Barry Rubin writes at the end of Helping Hillary while keeping Israel safe:

Of course, the two governments must begin to reach understandings about Iran. The new administration is determined to try engaging Teheran. Israel must convey the point that Washington should be alert to Iranian efforts to bully or fool the new president. The goal of stopping Iran’s nuclear weapons’ drive has to be the top priority; unilateral concessions in exchange for nothing should be avoided.

And the White House will hopefully not be shy in admitting when it finally concludes that Iran doesn’t want to be friends. President Barack Obama has spoken of opening Iran’s clenched fist. The danger is that Iran will do so only to slap America silly.

Presumably towards that end, according to Haaretz, Israel has drawn up suggestions for the American administration (via memeorandum):

1. Any dialogue must be both preceded by and accompanied by harsher sanctions against Iran, both within the framework of the UN Security Council and outside it. Otherwise, the talks are liable to be perceived by both Iran and the international community as acceptance of Iran’s nuclear program.

2. Before the dialogue begins, the U.S. should formulate an action plan with Russia, China, France, Germany and Britain regarding what to do if the talks fail. Specifically, there must be an agreement that the talks’ failure will prompt extremely harsh international sanctions on Iran.

3. A time limit must be set for the talks, to prevent Iran from merely buying time to complete its nuclear development. The talks should also be defined as a “one-time opportunity” for Tehran.

4. Timing is critical, and the U.S. should consider whether it makes sense to begin the talks before Iran’s presidential election in June.

According to Ha’aretz, these suggestions or “red-lines” were drawn up by the Foreign and Defense mininstries, and approved by outgoing PM Olmert. Apparently PM designate Netanyahu has also been briefed on these suggestions.

(The Washington Note writes that Israel is going too far in presenting “red lines” to the Secretary of State. But is “red line” an Israeli term or the terminology of the reporter?)

Not one of these suggestions seems unreasonable. And I have a hard time believing that Israel would dictate anything to the United States. Hopefully the new Secretary of State, will be amenable to Israel’s ideas.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

01/14/2009

Iranian ship turned back by Israel and Egypt

Filed under: AP Media Bias, Gaza, Hamas, Iran — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:30 am

The Israelis turned back an enemy nation’s ship from entering Gaza. Watch this get spun as an anti-humanitarian move by Israel.

An Iranian aid ship tried to break the blockade imposed on the Gaza Strip for the second time Wednesday. Israel Defense Forces sources confirmed that Navy ships contacted the boat’s crew and ordered them to turn back.

Funny, the AP report doesn’t include this information at all:

The boat was making its way to Gaza through the Suez Canal. It docked at Egypt’s Port Said on Tuesday evening and the crew attempted to unload the goods on the deck, but the Egyptians turned them down. The ship then continued towards Gaza.

But the AP does spin this anti-Israel in the lead. It takes as fact the Iranian state claims that there are only “humanitarian” supplies on this ship. Uh-huh. Wonder how many Fajr missiles you can hide in a 2,000 ton cargo?

The Israeli navy intercepted an Iranian ship loaded with medicine, food and clothing destined for Gaza and forced the vessel to Egypt instead, Iran’s state television reported Wednesday.

Meanwhile, in a gesture of support with the Palestinians in Gaza, Iran’s top leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, issued a religious opinion, or fatwa, declaring the purchase of any Israeli goods or trade with Israeli companies to be forbidden.

Israel’s offensive in Gaza, which Palestinian medical officials say has killed more than 940 Palestinians since Dec. 27, has sparked outrage in Iran and throughout the Muslim world. Israel has said it launched its campaign to stop rocket fire aimed at civilians in southern Israeli towns by the militant group Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip. Iran is Hamas’ main backer, providing it political and financial support, though Tehran denies sending the organization weapons.

Right. Tehran denies it, but there is ample proof that the terrorists in Gaza use Iranian-supplied weapons to kill Israelis.

The Egyptians deny the Iranians permission to unload the cargo, but it’s Israel that’s keeping “humanitarian equipment” out of Gaza. It’s a war zone.

Israeli military officials said the ship was prevented from reaching Gaza as part of a general naval blockade meant to prevent weapons smuggling, and not due to the boat’s Iranian origins.

All right, someone’s lying there. Let’s face it. No way an Iranian ship will ever get Israeli permission to land in Gaza. Nor should it.

01/12/2009

Iranians pulling Hamas strings

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Iran, Israel — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

The news you read about Israel always seems to be missing a vital component: The major force behind Hamas is Iran, and Hamas takes its orders from Iran. When the media does mention Iran, it always downplays the Iranian role in this war.

Analysts in the mainstream media always seem to get it wrong. Fareed Zakaria has a piece in Newsweek that insists that Iran is actually winning something out of the current war with Hamas.

First, Hamas is not Iran’s pawn. For decades Iran actually preferred and funded another Palestinian faction, Islamic Jihad. Recently, Hamas has been taking funds and weapons from Iran, but that does not mean it also takes orders from it. Hamas’s provocations and its decision not to renew the ceasefire probably took place without direction from Tehran.

That’s just laughable. But I’m not laughing, because it’s in Newsweek, and it will be repeated by the anti-Israel crowd. Who will never read this:

Iran is exerting heavy pressure on Hamas not to accept the Egyptian proposal for a cease-fire with Israel, an Egyptian government official said on Sunday.

The official told The Jerusalem Post by phone that two senior Iranian officials who visited Damascus recently warned Hamas leaders against accepting the proposal.

[...] The Egyptian official said that the two Iranian emissaries, Ali Larijani, Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, and Said Jalili of the Iranian Intelligence Service, met in the Syrian capital with Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal and Islamic Jihad Secretary-General Ramadan Shallah.

“As soon as the Iranians heard about the Egyptian cease-fire initiative, they dispatched the two officials to Damascus on an urgent mission to warn the Palestinians against accepting it,” the Egyptian government official told the Post.

“The Iranians threatened to stop weapons supplies and funding to the Palestinian factions if they agreed to a cease-fire with Israel. The Iranians want to fight Israel and the US indirectly. They are doing this through Hamas in Palestine and Hizbullah in Lebanon”.

There are also the Israeli analysts, who have written time and again of Iran’s influence over and financial backing of Hamas.

What may be said with certainty is that Iran knew in advance of the decision by Khaled Mashal to reject renewed terms for a ceasefire. Teheran thus evidently considered that its protégés were ready to bear the likely consequences.

Iranian military aid to Hamas has been steady and vital to Hamas since its coup of July, 2007. The movement has been equipped with dozens of Iranian Fajr-3 missiles – the longest range ordnance it is currently thought to possess. The 122mm Grad rockets with which it has been firing at Israeli towns in the last days are in its possession because of the Iranian connection.

Reva Bhalla, an analyst at the private intelligence firm Stratfor, recently described the role played by Hizballah operatives in transferring weaponry into Gaza. She noted arms purchases in Sudan, and the involvement of Hizballah men in transferring weaponry through Egypt, bribing officials and employing the services of Beduin smugglers along the way.

So the status of the Hamas enclave as a fully paid up member of the Iran-led regional alliance is not in doubt.

Or perhaps Zakaria should just read AP reports (not that this one was published anywhere the average anti-Israel creep would read):

Israeli military officials said Monday that dozens, perhaps hundreds, of Hamas militants recently left the Gaza Strip to receive advanced military training in Iran.

The training is similar to that received by thousands of Hezbollah guerrillas from Lebanon over the past few years, and Israel fears it will greatly improve Hamas’ military capability in any future battle with Israel Defense Forces troops in Gaza, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the matter.

That was from 2006. And there’s more of it.

Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas returned last week from a visit to Iran, which has already funded the cash-strapped Palestinian government with $120 million and pledged millions more.

Haniyeh met with the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and hardline Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Haniyeh hailed Iran for providing Palestinians with “a strategic depth.”

Abu Obayda, a spokesman for Hamas militants, declined to confirm whether the militants were training in Iran.

“But I confirm that we have the right to train inside or outside the country,” he said.

Iran has been calling the shots for years. Hamas has completely copied the Hezbullah model—which was developed with Iranian training and financing. To say that Hamas is not Iran’s pawn is to deny the reports of dozens of sources and news reports. And that’s exactly what Zakaria does.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vowed Friday to keep supporting the Palestinian militant group Hamas until the “collapse of Israel.”

The Iranian news agency Khabar quoted Ahmadinejad as telling Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh that Iran views the support of the Palestinian people as part of its religious and national duty and that Iran will stand behind the Palestinian nation “until the big victory feast which is the collapse of the Zionist regime.”

You don’t invest hundreds of millions of dollars in weapons, training, and equipment just so you can make flowery statements to the press. This report is from May of last year:

An Iranian source told the paper that in light of Mashaal’s fears, Iranian regime officials promised the head of Hamas’s political bureau that Iran would continue supporting Hamas financially, materially and morally, even if Syria would turn its back on the organization for the sake of an agreement with Israel.

According to the source, the Iranians had even elaborated what that support would be: Newer, upgraded rockets and an increase in the budget allotted to Hamas to $150 million in the second half of 2008.

From 2007:

On Saturday, Hamas hardliner Mahmoud Zahar was quoted as telling a German news magazine that he had personally carried $42 million in cash from Iran across the Gaza-Egypt border.

Money. Training. Materiel. All this, but Hamas doesn’t take orders from Iran? Really?

I’m so glad the mainstream media is full of so many highly-paid analysts that can’t be bothered to do a little research, or maybe, since they’re not lowly bloggers, talk to some sources that might know a little more about the topic than they do.

Iran isn’t winning as Hamas loses. If Israel succeeds in pushing Hamas from power, it will be a huge blow against Iranian hegemony in the Middle East. Zakaria doesn’t seem able to piece that together from his read of the situation.

He’s not all that bright, is he?

01/10/2009

70,000 Iranian suicide bombers: Duck, Israel!

Filed under: Iran, Israel, Juvenile Scorn — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 4:29 pm

You know those 70,000 Iranians who signed up to become suicide bombers in Israel? First it’s on.

Then it’s off.

Then it’s on again.

You know what I say? Every time Iran does this—and they do it every time there’s some kind of major battle between Israel and the terrorists surrounding her—it doesn’t seem to come to anything more than signing up to go to Israel to become a suicide bomber. And just imagine the logistics of getting 70,000 Iranians and their bomb vests and their handlers smuggled into Israel, because Lord knows, the current Hamas/Al Aqsa/Fatah/PIJ handlers can’t get their own people past the separation fence.

So basically, this is the Iranian version of an internet petition.

And it’s just as valuable.

Omri’s worried, too:

Although since Iran doesn’t actually border Israel I think the current plan is to fly them over Jordan on the backs of magical ponies. The ponies will then deposit them on the ground, wait for them to blow themselves up, and immediately carry them off to heaven.

Stay strong, Omri!

12/31/2008

Is the price of oil keeping Hezbullah peaceful?

Filed under: Iran, Israel, Lebanon — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 8:00 am

Oil is sticking around $40 a barrel (it closed at $39 and change today). Iran is in trouble.

Iran’s president presented parliament with a sweeping economic package Tuesday that calls for scrapping costly state subsidies for fuel, water and electricity and raising taxes to make up for the steep slide in world oil prices.

The move is a risky one for President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who already is facing public disenchantment over Iran’s economic problems as he heads into June elections. Economists have warned that his plan will push up prices, worsening inflation now running at 28 percent.

But it’s even better (or worse) than that.

Iran relies on oil for 60% of its budget, half of which is spent on welfare. Starved for money, Mr. Ahmadinejad proposes to free some consumer prices and cut spending. Corruption, mismanagement (inflation at 25%) and unmet populist promises already made Mr. Ahmadinejad unpopular at home. Now the austerity talk is raising the domestic temperature. In October, a strike by bazaar merchants forced the government to delay a sales tax. The universities are restive again (see “Iran’s YouTube Generation,” Dec. 15) and the government wants to push through a hated gasoline rationing plan.

Apparently, Iran’s budget has oil pegged at $60/bbl. Ouch. Sucks to be you, Mad Mullahs. And will the Mullahs loosen the pursestrings of their Swiss bank accounts? Of course not. Let the peasants eat—um. What’s an Iranian delicacy?

Here’s what I find most satisfying right now: The price of oil went up a dollar or two since the start of Israel’s war on Hamas. Then it pretty much went back down again on the news that demand is going nowhere. When you have a land awash in a commodity that isn’t as desirable today as it was a mere six months ago, well, you either have to utilize other parts of your economy, or you have to just suck up the $100/bbl difference. But when oil revenues make up 60% of your budget—well, then you don’t get to do the things you really want to do.

Is the price of oil stopping the mullahs from ordering Hezbullah to open a second front against Israel? Perhaps. It could also be that they’re keeping Hezbullah in reserve for a possible attack on their nuclear facilities. Omri says it’s because the IDF flat-out stated not long ago that the next time Hezbullah attacks Israel, the IDF will flatten Lebanon. Not just the Hezbullah sections of Beirut. The entire country. Here’s the article he cited:

In any future conflict with Hizbullah, Israel will likely cite the Shi’ite group’s increasing influence within the Lebanese cabinet as a legitimate reason to target Lebanon’s entire infrastructure, government sources have told The Jerusalem Post.

So. Is the price of oil affecting Iran’s decision? Is it the desire to hold Hezbullah in reserve in case Hamas does get totally chewed up and spit out by the IDF? Or is it because the Lebanese know that Israel isn’t making idle threats about infrastructure?

Once again, Omri:

Evaluating Hezbollah – The consensus seem to be that they won’t attack lest the IAF flatten southern Lebanon. There were several mentions about the noticeable lack of activity in the south.

I’ll go with the Israeli sources on this one. They’re better informed. The fact that Iran is going to be facing probable riots in the near future because the price of oil has dropped? Well, that’s just a nice little extra.

Powered by WordPress