Yourish.com

10/28/2009

Briefly

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Terrorism — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:30 am

Hamas to Israel: Your refusal to release our murderers is causing us to keep Gilad Shalit hostage. You know, I pretty much don’t have to describe the article after that headline.

Israel files complaint with UN; complaint goes into circular file. Shyeah, like the UN is going to do something about Lebanese terrorists launching katyushas into Israel. It’s not like UNIFIL is doing anything to stop Hezbullah from building stockpiles of rockets in south Lebanon, even when the stockpiles blow up and UNIFIL can’t pretend they don’t exist anymore. The fact that UNIFIL and the Lebanese army actually found four unfired katyushas is astonishing, as they can’t seem to find their asses with either hand when it comes to Hezbullah arms and munitions.

The Goldstone dividends: Over 1,500 lawsuits are being filed by Gazans over damages from Cast Lead. Yeah, good luck with that. Israeli courts are not the UN. You have to go by actual laws in order to say that the IDF violated them. I anticipate about 1,500 dismissals.

Turkey and Iran: Together again for the very first time. Turkey’s prime minister goes to Iran, stands smiling while Ahmadinejad denounces “the Zionist regime” yet again. Oh, yeah. The honeymoon with Israel is over, and the Islamists have won. Then there’s that little bit about Erdogan saying that Avigdor Lieberman told him he wanted to nuke the Palestinians. I call bullshit on that, but of course, the Guardian printed it anyway.

J-Street is like Kadima like this blog is like J-Street: Shyeah, pull the other leg, Ben-Ami. Gawd. You are such a loser. Your student arm is dropping the words “pro-Israel” to keep people from thinking that, gee, they’re pro-Israel. Yeah, that’s just like Kadima, the party that Ariel Sharon built to keep himself in power long enough to disengage from Gaza (and that worked out so well, too). Sure. Uh-huh. In Bizarro World, maybe.

10/21/2009

The Human Rights Watch bias against Israel

Filed under: Bloggers, Gaza, Israeli Double Standard Time — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:30 am

Matthew Yglesias, who was for Israel before he was against it, takes issue with David Bernstein’s citing of the founder of HRW criticizing its anti-Israel bias in the op-ed pages of the New York Times.

It’s certainly news that Human Rights Watch’s critics were able to get a former HRW chairman to slam the organization for having the temerity to hold Israel to the same standards of international humanitarian law to which it holds every other country. But Bernstein doesn’t appear to have any arguments to make that any of the instances of human rights violations HRW has documented didn’t take place. Instead his view is basically that Israel ought to be exempt from criticism because its enemies are mean:

No, Bernstein’s argument is that HRW is spending far more time and effort portraying Israeli violations than it is the human rights offenders that surround Israel. And Yglesias’ ever-astute commenters (the ones that aren’t slamming Zionism as racism) are comparing search result pages with number of reports, and declaring that since Israel and Egypt have the same number of pages, they have the same number of HRW reports. Argument over.

Except, well, let’s take a look by date, shall we? And include news releases as well as reports. For Israel and the Territories, we have the following press releases dating back to July. I’m going to put in bold those releases that do not concentrate on Israel:

Hamas: Investigate Attacks on Israeli Civilians   Oct 20, 2009
UN Security Council: Demand Justice for Gaza Victims   Oct 12, 2009
Israel: Stop Blocking School Supplies From Entering Gaza   Oct 11, 2009
UN: US Block on Goldstone Report Must Not Defer Justice   Oct 2, 2009
UN Human Rights Council: ‘Traditional Values’ Vote and Gaza Overshadow Progress   Oct 2, 2009
UN: US, EU Undermine Justice for Gaza Conflict   Sep 30, 2009
US: Endorse Goldstone Report on Gaza    Sep 27, 2009
EU: Demand Justice for Victims of Gaza War   Sep 25, 2009
Any chance for justice for victims of the Gaza war?   Sep 11, 2009
Israel: Gaza ‘White Flag’ Deaths Inquiry a Step Forward   Sep 10, 2009
‘Better than’ is not always good enough   Sep 9, 2009
Gaza: Rescind Religious Dress Code for Girls   Sep 4, 2009
Human Rights Watch plays no favorites in probes   Sep 3, 2009
Right of Reply: Don’t Smear the Messenger   Aug 25, 2009
False Allegations about Human Rights Watch’s Latest Gaza Report   Aug 14, 2009
Israel: Investigate ‘White Flag’ Shootings of Gaza Civilians   Aug 13, 2009
Gaza/Israel: Hamas Rocket Attacks on Civilians Unlawful   Aug 6, 2009
Will Arab States help end the Scourge of Cluster Munitions?   Aug 6, 2009
Israel: Ensure Improved ‘Attack Warnings’ to Civilians Are Effective   Aug 3, 2009
Palestinian Authority: Lift the Ban on Al Jazeera   Jul 17, 2009

The total: One release a month on the Palestinians. All the rest about Israel. Now, let’s take a look at the press releases about Egypt from July through the present.

Nobel Spotlights Need for Obama to Act on Rights   Oct 9, 2009
Egypt: Stop Killing Migrants in Sinai   Sep 10, 2009
US/Egypt: Obama Should Highlight Rights at Meeting With Mubarak   Aug 17, 2009
Will Arab States help end the Scourge of Cluster Munitions?   Aug 6, 2009
African Civil Society Urges African States Parties to the Rome Statute to Reaffirm Their Commitment to the ICC   Jul 30, 2009

Now let’s look at the totals. Twenty press releases under the category “Israeli and the Occupied Territories” since July. Four concern the Palestinians. Eighty percent of the HRW press releases in that time period concern Israel. Was Hamas firing rockets at Israeli civilians during that time? Yes. Was Hamas torturing Fatah prisoners during that time? Yes. Was Hamas killing “collaborators” without trial during that time? Yes. Was Hamas shooting at Israeli civilians on their farms during that time? Yes. What does HRW consider newsworthy? Lifting the press ban on Al Jazeera in the West Bank.

Look at the press releases concerning Egypt. Only one of them directly concerns Egyptian human rights abuses—the killing of migrants trying to get into Israel. Egyptian border guards have killed dozens of Africans fleeing over the border, and they’ve been doing it for years. A million African immigrants are poised along the Israeli border, so many that Israel will be building a fence to keep them out. And yet, there is only one news release about the deaths of civilians trying to make a better life for themselves than they can find in the Egyptian refugee camps. Why is that?

The commenters at Yglesias cite the number of pages in a search result as evidence that the reporting is equal. Clearly, their research skills need a little brushing up. HRW released three reports on Israel so far this year. HRW also released two about the Palestinians, one regarding the rockets from Gaza (in August, the first in two years about the nonstop rocket attacks on Israel), one regarding Hamas’ human rights abuses against Fatah and others in Gaza. HRW wrote zero reports about Egypt this year. That’s right. None.

In other words, Matthew, Robert Bernstein’s main point—that Human Rights Watch spends far more time on Israel than it does on the human rights abusers in the neighborhood around her—is true. Bernstein never said that Israel should be exempt, only that HRW should pay more attention to the human rights abusers in the countries without a free judiciary and laws on the books preventing such abuses. It’s a point I’ve been making for years. But when the founder of Human Rights Watch makes it—well, then one would have to think that there’s some validity to it. And if not, there’s always the evidence I’m citing in this post. But why would Yglesias let a little thing like facts get in the way of his opinion?

10/20/2009

Briefly

Filed under: Hamas, Iran, Israel, News Briefs, Terrorism, palestinian politics — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

Hamas’ truce cry: We’ll dismantle Fatah. Really, I just love the Fatah-Hamas relationship. It’s so good for Israel and the world. Here’s what a Hamas “spokesman” says about disarming:

“It is easier to dismantle the Palestinian Authority than it is to dismantle us, and we will take them apart before anyone thinks of touching us.”

Ah, the Hamas/Fatah truce. The snark simply writes itself.

Turkey, the friend of Jews—not. France’s Le Monde polled the Turks, and 53% say they would not want to live next door to a Jew. But really, the Turks luuurve Israelis. Truly. They do. Probably a little more than they love Armenians, but I wouldn’t want to lay odds on that.

Abdullah to Obama: Forget Iran, it’s not that important. Uh-huh. We shouldn’t concentrate on Iran, because the king of Jordan is tired of hearing about Iran, Iran, Iran. It’s the Palestinians that are the key to mideast peace, you see—not the country that’s trying to build nuclear weapons, murdering American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, funding terrorists in Israel, South America, and, well, all over the world, and oh yeah—violently repressig its own people. So yeah, really, Obama—what’s with the Iran obsession?

Bill Maher is a great big idiot: Want to laugh? Watch this video over at Hot Air, where Bill Maher, the world-renowned scientist, tells us how dangerous flu vaccinations are, and vaccinations in general. Biggest laugh-line: It’s not settled science, like global warming. Yes, he really says that. Like Allahpundit says, when Chris Matthews is your voice of reason—well.

10/19/2009

Snarkly

Filed under: Gaza, Israel, Media Bias, News Briefs, The One, United Nations — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

The Russians were for Goldstone before they were against it: Let’s see how this one plays out—Russia says it will not push the Goldstone report to the Hague from the Security Council. I will believe it when I see it. Oh, to be a fly on the wall during that session.

Obama abandons the victims of genocide: Now our president is turning his back on Darfur. He’s committing to a “softer” approach to Sudan. Because hey, it totally fits with the Obama foreign policy: Screw our allies, and give breaks to all our enemies. Even the ones that like to rape, torture, and murder with impunity. So, to the 78% of Jewish voters who voted for Obama, how’s that feeling about now? I mean, Jewish voters make up a large part of the save Darfur movements. Feeling proud of your guy, still?

Only Israel can violate UN resolutions: UNIFIL is still “investigating” those explosions in southern Lebanon, trying to determine if they’re in violation of UN Resolution 1701, which forbade Hezbollah from arming south of the Litani. But there is no such hesitation whatsoever in calling out Israel.

Williams said the use of drones was an obvious violation of Lebanese sovereignty and resolution 1701 “and not particularly helpful at a time of obvious tension in the south”.

Israel supplies evidence that Hezbollah is stocking arms, but UNIFIL must investigate. Uh-huh. No bias here. Move along. Nothing to see.

You know what isn’t brave? Criticizing Israel. Hell, everybody does it, and everybody seems to think that it’s a difficult thing to do. Jimmy Carter, Walt & Mearsheimer, and now, the president of Turkey. Because there’s so much negative impact from his countrymen for criticizing Israel. Now, if he stood up and supported Israel—well, that’d be very courageous. Also only in Bizarro World, so let’s not even pretend it might happen someday. It won’t.

Another kassam attack, another day of silence from the MSM: You won’t read about this kassam attack in the AP or Reuters until after Israel bombs a smuggling tunnel or three. Or unless Israel gets a rocket squad. Because it’s obvious that unprovoked attacks on civilians in Israel aren’t newsworthy—only Israel’s response to the unprovoked attacks. This is also one of those things that the Goldstone report didn’t bother to cover—you know, the reason why Israel went into Gaza in the first place. That’s unimportant. Well, maybe if it fell short and killed some Palestinians. I’m sure they’d blame Israel for that.

10/16/2009

UNHRC: Ignoring human rights abuses (unless they’re Israel’s)

Filed under: Israeli Double Standard Time, United Nations — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:30 am

The UN Human Rights Council voted to send the Goldstone Report to the UN Security Council for further consideration. Of course they did. The fix has been in since the biased mandate was given last year—the mandate that the news media all pretend was evenhanded.

The resolution – which also condemns recent Israeli actions in the Palestinian territories and East Jerusalem – endorses the report’s recommendation that both sides in the conflict should show the Security Council within six months that they are carrying out credible investigations into alleged abuses. If they are not, the matter should then be referred to prosecutors at the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands.

Both sides are in violation of… well, something. Both sides must carry out “credible” investigations. And if not, both sides will be referred to the ICC. Shall we start a pool now on how, in six months, Hamas doesn’t even come up in the resolution to refer Israel to the ICC?

But let’s step back a moment and see exactly how the UNHRC works. In particular, let’s take a look at part of the report on the review of the Central African Republic. (For some light background reading, you can read this 23-page report at Human Rights Watch. Or just read the summary here.)

Here are a few choice bits of the draft of the UNHRC report from the current (12th) session:

219. In relation to recommendation 35, the delegation indicated that all press offences had been abolished, while noting that journalists may be guilty of common law offences, such as defamation and press offences defined by the High Communication Council.

221. Regarding recommendations 25 and 33, the delegation underlined that, in accordance with the Constitution, the judiciary was a branch power which independence was guaranteed through a number of management bodies. Despite some problems, such as arbitrary arrests, corruption and other irregularities, several projects were being undertaken, with the financial assistance of the United Nations Development Programme.

223. In relation to recommendations 11, 16-19, 27-29, and 30, the delegation underscored that the Central African Republic had ratified the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Female genital mutilations are not practiced throughout the territory and are prohibited by law. However, cultural beliefs/practices and the interests of practitioners made its full implementation challenging. The Family code was being reviewed to ensure its compliance with international standards, and with a view to either maintaining or abolishing polygamy. The delegation stressed that due to cultural concerns, the Central African Republic was not ready to sign a declaration on discrimination based on sexual orientation, adding that no law prohibited or authorized it.

Let us note that the Central African Republic is shutting down press freedom, making arbitrary arrests, has a thoroughly corrupt judiciary, refuses to end discrimination against homosexuals, and insists that female genital mutilation is not a state problem, but rather a cultural phenomenon. Hold those thoughts, though, because this is my personal favorite part of the report:

224. On the recommendation to remove reference to the crime of witchcraft in the penal code, the delegation indicated that witchcraft was a reality in Central Africa. The Government envisaged training prison wardens who committed violence against women suspected of witchcraft and developing sensitization programmes to modify behaviours of the population and of the justice system.

Now, remember this. The representatives of the CAR told the UNHRC that witchcraft is a reality in Central Africa, and therefore, they will not remove the laws against witches on the books. They might, however, educate prison guards to stop raping women who are in prison for being accused of witchcraft. That is, they “envisage” it. Could happen. Someday.

What was the result of this review of a major human rights offender?

228. The Russian Federation congratulated the Central African Republic for having given its consent to approximately two thirds of the recommendations and for having expressed its willingness to study others. It noted the voluntary commitments taken by the State including the adoption of the national plan of action for the promotion and protection of human rights and a new criminal code. It wished the Central African Republic maximum success in realizing all accepted commitments and future progress in promoting and protection of human rights.

229. Egypt welcomed the comprehensive presentation by the Central African Republic. It stressed that despite many challenges and constraints, the government had made efforts to promote human rights, which resulted in considerable progress and the attainment of stability since the adoption of the 2004 Constitution. It appreciated the responses given to recommendations and reiterated its call that the State continue its efforts to promote all universally agreed human rights and fundamental freedoms and to resist attempts to enforce any values or standards beyond the universally agreed ones. It also encouraged the State to implement its penal code in conformity with the universally agreed human rights standards, including the application of the death penalty.

230. The Libyan Arab Jamahiriya commended the government for its efforts, including regarding poverty reduction, economic reforms, ratification of most human rights international instruments and reforms aimed at guarantying women’s rights. It stressed that support from the international community was important to reach the Millennium Development Goals and to promote human rights. It considered that voluntary commitments made by the State during the presentation of its national report were highly important.

232. The United States welcomed the Central African Republic’s efforts to improve human rights. It remained concerned about the impunity enjoyed by perpetrators of human rights abuses in the security forces, including the presidential guard. It strongly supported the recommendations to investigate abuses and hold those responsible of violations accountable, and to incorporate human rights training into the military training. It appreciated the State’s efforts on the issue of child soldiers and to undertake reforms of the justice system, its willingness to work with human rights organizations and encouraged the State to continue allowing special procedures to visit the country. It welcomed the national action plan on gender-based violence.

Compare this to what the same states say about Israel on a regular basis. And then, tell me there is no anti-Israel bias in the United Nations. No, I’m not speaking to my regular readers, who already know that. I’m speaking to the rest of the world. J’accuse.

10/15/2009

Mia Farrow: Newest member of Legion of Morons

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israeli Double Standard Time — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 12:00 pm

It almost makes you like Ruth Gordon in Rosemary’s Baby. Mia Farrow joined the Legion of Morons by denouncing Israel for the Gaza blockade while whitewashing the reason for it. The direct quote about firing rockets into civilian areas (which, by the way, devastated especially Sderot’s children, but Israeli children aren’t on the UN goodwill ambassador’s list of needy children.

In criticizing militant rockets, Farrow advised Gazans not to “give the international community ammunition to view you in a negative way.” Stopping them, she said, could lead to greater international aid.

Got it? Don’t stop firing rockets at Sderot’s schoolchildren because it’s immoral, illegal, and outright wrong. Stop firing rockets so that you can get more money.

Way to be a goodwill ambassador.

Asshat.

09/17/2009

Goldstone report ignores Israelis injured by rockets

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israeli Double Standard Time, Terrorism, United Nations — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 6:00 am

I know my readers will be shocked, shocked to hear stories like this:

Some of the Israeli witnesses who testified before the committee were injured by rocket fire before Operation Cast Lead, but their testimonies were left out of the report.

Dr. Mirela Siderer, a resident of Ashkelon, was severely injured by a Grad missile and is about to undergo her eighth operation.

“I didn’t have high hopes, so I wasn’t very disappointed, but I still feel awful after reading the report,” she said. “They didn’t refer to incidents that occurred before Operation Cast Lead, including my injury.”

Don’t you understand, Mirela? It’s not about Israeli suffering. The narrative can only take into account Palestinian suffering. They, the victims, and only they, the victims, can have testimonies embedded into the report. Israelis, the oppressors, are not counted when they are killed or injured, except as victims of what is, ultimately, their own fault—for stealing Palestinian land and causing untold misery.

That would be the misery in Gaza like the misery of having to smuggle brand-new 2009 vehicles into Gaza. Oh, the misery! They have to cut the cars into four pieces and weld them back together for the wealthy Gazan owners.

Eight thousand rockets flying into civilian areas of Gaza? Pshaw! Not worth paying much attention to in the Goldstone report.

“When I stood up and started to testify before the judges, Justice Goldstone fell asleep in front of me. It was an embarrassing moment but I continued talking, realizing that I should not have high hopes,” he added.

Bedin said the testimony had felt pointless. “One of the judges on the committee had already expressed the very clear opinion that Israel was committing war crimes against the Palestinians,” he said.

When the outcome of the report is determined by its mandate, one cannot be surprised to hear that the author of the report fell asleep while listening to testimony of rockets injuring and killing Israeli civilians.

The kangaroo court’s verdict is partially in. Next comes the General Assembly, then the ICC. The delegitimization of Israel continues apace.

09/11/2009

The Goldstone commission: A kangaroo court report

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel Derangement Syndrome, United Nations — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:00 am

In the next couple of weeks, the UN will be releasing the results of the inquiry by Richard Goldstone into what they will determine are war crimes committed by Israel in Gaza. Goldstone has been insisting that although the UN mandate was anti-Israel enough that even Mary Robinson turned down an offer to head the commission (yes, really), he will have an evenhanded report on the Gaza war.

This is impossible.

The mandate itself declared that war crimes were committed by Israel. This is a case of a court issuing a guilty verdict before any facts are in.

“Human Rights Council… Decides to dispatch an urgent, independent international fact-finding mission, to be appointed by the President of the Council, to investigate all violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the occupying Power, Israel, against the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip, due to the current aggression, and calls upon Israel not to obstruct the process of investigation and to fully cooperate with the mission”.

This is not a mandate to investigage if war crimes occurred. This is a mandate that states its purpose, and the commission’s responsibility is to document the war crimes that were already declared.

UN Watch has a history of the judges, many of whom are—surprise—biased against Israel.

Christine Chinkin signed a letter dated January 11, 2009, which appeared in The Times, stating: “Israel’s bombardment of Gaza is not self-defence – it’s a war crime.”

The jury is already in. Israel is going to be accused of war crimes by a UN commission. And they’re releasing the report sometime during the ten Days of Awe, just for a little extra added insult.

The UN decided the defendant was guilty as charged before examining a single fact. And so the UN’s obsession with Israel continues, and yet another anti-Israel resolution will come of it. Watch for it.

08/13/2009

A tale of two headlines

Filed under: AP Media Bias, Gaza, Hamas, Israeli Double Standard Time — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 3:00 pm

The AP anti-Israel bias, exhibit 4,678:

First, the AP report on the HRW report on Hamas war crimes:

Rights group: Hamas may have committed war crimes

Next, the AP report on the current HRW accusation that Israely committed war crimes:

Rights group: Israel killed unarmed Palestinians

No, no bias there. Let us check the leads.

A prominent human rights group said there is “strong evidence” that Gaza’s Hamas rulers committed war crimes by allowing militants to fire rockets from the territory that killed civilians in Israel, according to a report released Thursday.

The 31-page report by the New York-based Human Rights Watch focuses on Hamas’ actions in connection with Israel’s three-week offensive in Gaza that ended in late January. Human Rights Watch, as well as other groups, have previously accused Israel of committing war crimes during the offensive aimed at stopping Palestinian rocket fire.

“Hamas rocket attacks targeting Israeli civilians are unlawful and unjustifiable, and amount to war crimes,” said Iain Levine of Human Rights Watch. But the report stopped short of accusing Hamas militants of war crimes, with officials saying only a court could make that determination.

Note that in the article about Hamas war crimes, the AP writers and editors put accusations of Israeli war crimes in the second paragraph. And note the quote that says even though Hamas sent rockets into civilian areas, HRW isn’t really saying they’re war crimes because, well, an actually court hasn’t stated them as such. Will there be such even-handedness regarding Israel?

A new report by Human Rights Watch charged Thursday that Israeli soldiers killed eleven unarmed Palestinian civilians who were carrying white flags in Shooting incidents during Israel’s offensive in Gaza earlier this year.

The report says the civilians included five women and four children. The group urged Israel to conduct investigations into the deaths, which it said occurred when the civilians were “in plain view and posed no apparent security threat.”

The group says at least three witnesses confirmed the details in each of the seven separate shootings.

The report is the latest in a slew of charges from human rights groups alleging that Israel violated the rules of war in its Gaza offensive. The reports on the Gaza war have focused on Israeli violations, but Human Rights Watch has also said Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups violated the rules of war by firing thousands of rockets at Israeli civilians.

Look at the two bolded sections of each lead, and figure out which one is the more damning. Here’s a hint: It ain’t the one about how Hamas “violated the rules of war.” Funny how they use the phrase “war crimes” so easily when applied to Israel, and yet can’t seem to muster the same phrase when applied to terrorists using human shields, children in combat, and based themselves in hospitals to protect themselves.

What time is it again? Of course. It’s Israeli Double Standard Time, which, luckily, only occurs on days that end with a “y.”

07/28/2009

UN demands Israel supply terrorists in Gaza

Filed under: Gaza, Israel, United Nations — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 12:00 pm

Once again, the UN is demanding that Jews contribute to their own destruction.

I particularly like this insistence by John Ging that there’s no way, really, no way in hell, that the concrete and iron rods would be diverted by Hamas and turned into tunnels and rockets. No way.

“We account for every sack of flour and we can equally account for every bag of cement,” he said. “It’s just a matter of political will to move forward on this issue. We’d like to get on with the job, and then be held accountable on whether we are achieving it or not.”

All right, John. Kindly explain this Reuters video, taken years ago, of Palestinian terrorists in Gaza using UN ambulances to escape from the IDF.

You don’t get to be the ones accountable for Israeli deaths. That would be the Israelis themselves, who have the responsibility to protect their citizens. Urge away, UN and NGOs. Just don’t issue the dreaded strongly-worded statement.

07/17/2009

Thursday Snark News

Filed under: Gaza, Israeli Double Standard Time, Lebanon, News Briefs, Religion, Terrorism, The One — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

Religion of Peace blows up two more hotels: Indonesia again, but don’t worry—it’s just a tiny minority of extremists doing all the kabooms.

Palestinians answer Hillary’s request with a kassam rocket: Looks like Hillary’s plea to the Palestinians to refrain from any actions that would make peace more difficult is working. The Palestinians launched a kassam at Southern Israel, because now they’re going to blame Israel for taking action against it. And considering that Netanyahu has stated that he will not tolerate so much as a dribble, expect some tunnels to go boom.

Israel wants UNIFIL to do what? Israel is asking for UNIFIL’s report on the rocket storage depot in southern Lebanon that blew up this week. UNIFIL doesn’t so much as mention the explosion on its site. Ban Ki-Moon hasn’t said anything about the violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701. The General Assembly is not calling for an emergency session to vote on a resolution condemning Hezbollah’s overt violation of 1701. And the Security Council is silent. What’s that you say? It’s a day that ends with a “y,” so it’s Israeli Double Standard Time? Well. I can see you’ve been reading this blog for a long time.

Syria to U.S.: We want the entire Golan. Meryl to Syria [singing]: You can’t always get what you want.

Neturei Karta guarantee their place in Dante’s Seventh Circle: Okay, not really, but it’s a good metaphor, because any Jew that works so hard for Israel’s enemies—they’re meeting Haniyeh, now, and bringing him little statues of Al Aqsa and the Dome of the Mosque, how sweet—cannot possibly be on G-d’s good side. Really, I detest these people more than I detest almost anyone else in the world, except pedophiles. And even that one is a close call. I know there’s no hell in Judaism, but for the Nutty Karta, I’d make an exception.

Senate votes big expansion of federal hate crimes—Can we get a Constitutional challenge, please? Then again, forget about it. Sotomayor is going to be approved, no way is the Supreme Court going to find hate crime laws unconstitutional. Add this to the list of things I’ve changed my mind about since moving to Virginia: I no longer believe hate crimes should be legislated, at all. A crime is a crime is a crime.

Jake Tapper, will you marry me? If the man continues to tell the truth about Obama, I’m simply going to have to have him.

At a rally in Holmdel, New Jersey, today, President Obama continued making a promise about health care reform that he has acknowledged isn’t literally true.

Holmdel. Feh. Where was he, in the Garden State Arts Center? Whoops, sorry, they changed its name to the PNC Arts Center. And yes, he was. You know, I saw a much better act last time I was there. Lilith Fair. The Pretenders, Sarah McLachlan, Sheryl Crow. All of whom probably voted for Obama, come to think of it (except McLachlan, she’s Canadian). But I digress. Tapper:

“Let me be exactly clear about what health care reform means to you,” the president told residents of the Garden State. “First of all, if you’ve got health insurance, you like your doctors, you like your plan, you can keep your doctor, you can keep your plan. Nobody is talking about taking that away from you.”

But last month, as the president acknowledged during a press conference, he doesn’t literally mean that you are guaranteed to be able to keep your health care plan, and your doctor, if and when health care reform passes.

What? Obama lying again? Say it isn’t so! As for the price tag? Go watch Tapper’s report.

Don’t let him succeed. Call your Senator.

07/06/2009

Snarky briefs

Filed under: Gaza, Israel, United Nations — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

If it’s Monday, that means it’s time for Snarky News Briefs. (I just made that up, actually, and if anyone can think of a way to mix the words “snark” and “news” that doesn’t sound stupid, suggest it in the comments.)

Hamas is Argus Filch: There was a point in the Harry Potter books where the Hogwarts caretaker goes around trying to punish children for “acting happy.” Well, Hamas tried to arrest someone because she was laughing out loud. Yes. Really. Instead, they detained her for not wearing a headscarf. But don’t think that Hamas is trying to create a Taliban-like state in Gaza, because that just shows you’re a neocon who doesn’t believe Hamas wants peace and peaceful relations with Israel.

Pull the other leg: Salaam Fayad says Jews would be welcome to live in the Palestinian state. Even in Hebron. Sure, because that’s why now, the PA imprisons people who sell land to Jews, and Palestinian law carries a death penalty for the offense. But hey, Jews are going to be welcome in Palestine. Really. Honest. Scout’s honor!

Gilad who? The UN is going to hear testimony by Noam Shalit that the abduction and continued detention of his son is a war crime. But don’t worry. We’re pretty sure the UN will ignore him.

The crude, homemade rockets: The UN is now hearing testimony from Israelis injured by kassam rockets. Still, don’t expect their investigation into Gaza war crimes to include anything much about Hamas war crimes. Tea and sympathy is the best Israeli witnesses can expect. (Read the article in full.)

Netanyahu: Two states for two people. World: YOU DON’T WANT A PALESTINIAN STATE! Sorry, I spent all the snark in the subhead on this one.

07/03/2009

Israel, the battered wife of the world

Filed under: Gaza, Israel — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 8:53 am

Read this and weep:

The defense establishment recommends easing the siege on Gaza, mainly at the crossings, in order to advance the talks aimed at securing kidnapped soldier Gilad Shalit’s release.

The recommendations – some of which have already been approved by the defense minister and will be brought to the political echelon’s approval – have been obtained by Ynet and are revealed here for the first time. They include allowing the transfer of coffee, tea, soup and canned food into Gaza, as well as fuel for electricity production.

[...] Beyond the aim of securing the kidnapped soldier’s release, the ease of restrictions is a response to the increasing international pressure to improve the situation in Gaza, repeated appeals by Egypt, the ongoing smuggling of humanitarian equipment through underground tunnels at the Philadelphi route, and US President Barack Obama’s historic speech in Cairo.

The AP puts it this way:

Israel’s Defense Ministry has recommended a partial lifting of the embargo on the Gaza Strip as a goodwill gesture toward the Palestinians to spur talks to free a long-held captive soldier, an Israeli news site reported Friday.

When have goodwill gestures ever worked? The Palestinians take these “gestures” and then demand more before they will do anything on their side. Really, name one that worked. Just one.

Of course, this is going to get done. Israel has removed most of the checkpoints in the West Bank, the Palestinians are armed again, and there are no Israelis in Gaza. This will be the second time in recent history that the Palestinians have been given a chance at self-government. The last time, they launched the Al-Aqsa Intifada after Arafat refused the offer at Camp David in 2000, which would have given Palestinians control of more than 95% of the West Bank, all of Gaza, and eastern Jerusalem. Not in bantustans—that is a lie that Israel’s opponents spread. Israel offered peace, the Palestinians chose war.

Make no mistake about Palestinian intentions. There are no peacemakers on their side. They insist on the “right of return,” which would flood Israeli with millions of third- and fourth-generation descendants of the original refugees. The Arab world’s refugees were not settled anywhere by the UN—most of them move to Israel. Fifty percent of Israel’s population is made up of the original refugees and their descendants.

The blockade will be eased. And violence will resume. Hamas is restocking its weapons and has called off its rocketeers—proof that they have always had the ability to stop terror attacks, in spite of their pretense otherwise (and the uncritical media acceptance of such claims). So the calm right now has a purpose.

And one more warning: Hamas is now saying that they can’t guarantee that Gilad Shalit wasn’t harmed in the Gaza war. Prepare for the worst, because when have terrorists ever returned a live captive soldier to Israel?

07/02/2009

The “imminent disaster” Gaza meme is back

Filed under: Israel Derangement Syndrome, United Nations — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 8:30 am

In November of last year, I wrote a post titled “UN on Gaza: An “imminent” disaster years in the making.” In it, I detailed how the UN has declared an imminent “humanitarian crisis” that would lead to mass starvation and death—all the way back to May of 2006. And yet, I must point out, Gaza’s cemeteries have not been burgeoning, Hamas is not displaying corpse after corpse of undernourished children, and, well, the people in Gaza are seemingly getting all they need to survive quite well. Except, of course, if you’re in the United Nations and want to slam Israel.

Apparently, it’s time for the UN to bring up the imminent disaster meme again. And it’s by our old friend, the viciously anti-Israel Karen AbuZayd.

Plight of Palestinians getting worse, UN warns
The blockade of Gaza is causing severe humanitarian hardship and the situation is getting worse every day, the head of the U.N. aid agency for Palestinian refugees warned on Wednesday.

[...] “Because there’s been no change and the borders are not open, things are deteriorating,” said Karen Koning AbuZayd, commissioner-general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees.

“People are in worse and worse condition every day, especially those who were affected by the conflict in late December and in January.”

AbuZayd, speaking to reporters in the Austrian capital, said many people were still living in the rubble of their homes. She also lamented the limited list of items the Israelis allowed in, saying it was making it impossible for people to lead normal lives.

“This is an urban environment, multistory buildings, people need all kinds of things in their homes – they need light bulbs, they need washing powder, children need new shoes – there’s no shoes allowed in,” she said.

Um—I thought we’re talking “severe humanitarian hardship.” Shoes? Light bulbs? These are the things that a person needs or s/he will die? But wait, let’s see what the AP chooses to put in the very last paragraph, the one that gets cut off in most newspapers:

AbuZayd added that while the Israelis were “very careful” to provide food and medicine, the amount of food coming in only covered about 60 percent of people’s needs.

So she admits that Israel is supplying humanitarian needs, but then qualifies that by saying Gazans are getting only 60% of what they need. Which means that Gazans should be starving, on almost half-rations. And yet, they are not. Imagine that.

Yet another one-two punch by the anti-Israel media and the anti-Israel UN. But not to worry. Israel Derangement Sydrome happens only on days that end with a “y.”

07/01/2009

Ship of predictable fools

Filed under: Gaza, Israel Derangement Syndrome — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

Can I call it, or what?

Me:

Expect to hear about how they were stopped in international waters. By mean ol’ Israeli navy boats that tried to ram them. And since Cynthia McKinney was on board, expect to hear more Jew-hatred from her.

CNN:

According to the Free Gaza group, McKinney said, “This is an outrageous violation of international law against us. Our boat was not in Israeli waters, and we were on a human rights mission to the Gaza Strip,” before authorities confiscated cell phones.

“President Obama just told Israel to let in humanitarian and reconstruction supplies, and that’s exactly what we tried to do. We’re asking the international community to demand our release so we can resume our journey,” McKinney said, according to the group.

They’re being deported as soon as Israel can get rid of them.

I was also right about the lameness of the Free Gaza servers. I was a little off about the lameness of the Free Gaza idiots. Here’s how lame they are: Their tweets from yesterday.

Waiting to hear from attorneys about kidnapped passengers. Boat going to Ashdod. Israel continuing to commit war crimes, now against us.

Website overwhelmed. Boat towed. Passengers turned over to immigration, ironic since we don’t WANT to be in Israel. They were kidnapped.

Shyeah. I’m betting their attorneys told them they weren’t kidnapped.

Wait for the Jew-hatred. It’ll come.

06/30/2009

Ship of Fools: Fooled twice

Filed under: Gaza, Israel Derangement Syndrome — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

The Israeli Navy stopped the Free Gaza “peace” activists. Expect the usual lies about ramming, random cruelty of the IDF, and other ridiculous stories.

At around noon Tuesday the Israeli Navy intercepted and took control of a boat that had set sail for the Gaza Strip with three tons of medical supplies, Palestinian sources said, adding that the Navy jammed the boat’s radio signals.

The IDF Spokesperson’s Office confirmed the report. Israeli military sources said there was no violence after the small ferry, sailing from Cyprus with activists from the US-based Free Gaza Movement, was intercepted off Gaza.

Here’s the Israeli side of the story:

Earlier Tuesday, “Free Gaza” founder Greta Berlin told Ynet that at around 11:00 am six Navy vessels approached the boat and ordered it to stop some 50 kilometers off Gaza’s coastline. Despite the order, the boat continued to sail towards the Hamas-ruled territory, said Berlin, who is currently in Cyprus.

Berlin said that the communication with the boat had been disrupted from 1:40-6:00 am, adding that its GPS and navigation systems had been blocked by the Navy, forcing the crew to navigate with the use of a compass alone.

Yeah, well, all they used to use were compasses, and sailors of old managed to do quite well without GPS systems.

Expect to hear about how they were stopped in international waters. By mean ol’ Israeli navy boats that tried to ram them. And since Cynthia McKinney was on board, expect to hear more Jew-hatred from her.

For what it’s worth, the Free Gaza website is not responding. Either it’s so lame that it can’t handle the extra traffic today’s incident brings, or someone hacked it. I suspect the former.

06/23/2009

Palestinian rejectionism

Filed under: Gaza, palestinian politics — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

I saw this headline at Ynet, and my heart leaped.

Israelis, Palestinians call for Shalit’s release

Solidarity at last?

Protest on both sides of fence: Hundreds of demonstrators from all over the country began blocking the Karni, Erez and Kerem Shalom crossings on the Gaza Strip border on Tuesday morning, in protest of the fact that Gilad Shalit has been held by Hamas for three years and in a demand for a sign of life from the Israeli soldier.

Nope.

On the Israeli side, the protestors planned to prevent the transfer of goods into the Strip. Dudu Gilboa, chairman of the People in Blue and White organization, said that the activists were blocking the crossings “in the hopes that this will send a message to the other side, that without a sign of life from Gilad we will only intensify our activities.”

The Palestinian protestors, on the other hand, are calling on Israel to open the crossings. “Shalit is one prisoner, but the lives of so many people are being run around him, and this blockade cannot continue,” said Sami Abed, a Palestinian journalist who organized the protest.

Business as usual.

The Palestinian rally was initiated by Sami Abed, who heard about the Israeli protest organized by Yoel Marshak. According to Abed, the demand to keep the crossings closed until the Shalit affair is solved is unfair and inhumane.

“We also want the Shalit affair to end and the siege on the Strip to be lifted. People say they cannot live like this for hundreds of years more,” he said, adding that the blockade was “a crime against Palestinian children.”

I wonder what the AP spin will be on this one.

01/24/2009

About that Hamas “victory”…

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel, World — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 8:55 am

The victors seem to be acting a little less like victors these days, in spite of their rhetoric. According to this, Israel is going to get at least some of what it wants.

Hamas is prepared to agree to the deployment of Fatah forces at the crossings between the Gaza Strip and Israel, London based newspaper Asharq Alawsat reported on Saturday morning.

The group’s delegation in Cairo apparently told diplomats that the group would authorize such a move with the opening of the Rafah crossing on the condition that the personnel of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas were themselves residents of the Strip.

They only want Fatah forces who live in Gaza, presumably so they can threaten their families if they stray off the Hamas line. Of course, it’s still not good enough. Meantime, Europeans are promising to help.

But it all boils down to one thing: Egypt refuses to have foreign troops on her soil, and Egypt also refuses to truly stop the smuggling.

Egypt may be holding out on the nature of a foreign presence on its soil as a way to negotiate for increasing its own troops in Sinai; their numbers are limited by the 1979 Israel-Egypt peace treaty. For now, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and senior officials say a foreign presence on Egyptian soil is a “red line” they are not willing to cross.

No amount of help is going to do anything but reinforce the status quo. Europeans refuse to send in troops that will have the power to fire on smugglers if necessary—you’ll get exactly what you have in Lebanon, instances where Hezbollah threatens UNIFIL troops and UNIFIL runs away and then rarely bothers filing an official report.

Hamas violated the cease fire again this morning by firing a mortar at Israel that fell short.

Moshe Ya’alon says it will take Hamas only a year to restock its weapons. The tunnels are already back in operation. And Israel is considering letting some of the worst Hamas murderers go in exchange for Gilad Shalit.

So one has to ask: What was the war for, again? Because I’m starting to come down on the side of the cynics who say it was launched to keep Kadima in charge of Israel.

01/23/2009

Hamas re-establishes iron rule

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Media Bias — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 12:30 pm

Think the UN Human Rights organizations will notice these things happening?

Hamas has seized control of all the smuggling tunnels under the Philadelphi Corridor in southern Gaza and has been moving additional arms into the Strip since Operation Cast Lead ended on Sunday morning.

[...] The tunnels in Rafah are usually run by local Palestinian clans, and Hamas’s decision to take control is believed to be part of the group’s attempts to reestablish its regime in Gaza. Hamas can now decide what is smuggled into the Strip and give priority to weapons and explosives.

[...] Also on Wednesday, Hamas commandeered the trucks carrying humanitarian supplies into the Gaza Strip as part of its effort to show that it is providing for the Palestinian people.

Defense officials told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday that Hamas had also taken over a mental hospital in Gaza City and had kicked out the patients to use the facility as a jail for Fatah supporters.

Really, just when you think they can’t get any lower, Hamas manages to prove you wrong.

And of course, this is also a fact that won’t get very high play in the non-Israeli media:

Some of the tunnels were not destroyed – like the one that was filmed by foreign media on Wednesday – out of humanitarian considerations.

Several tunnels have pipes that transfer fuel from Sinai to Gaza. The concern in the IDF was that if it bombed such a tunnel, a huge explosion would result – possibly also on the Egyptian side – and civilian casualties.

The IDF was also concerned that if a fuel tunnel were bombed, Hamas would respond by attacking the Nahal Oz fuel depot where there are gas canisters and fuel tankers, which if detonated would cause major collateral damage in Gaza and Israel.

Of course they would have retaliated by attacking Nahal Oz. They’ve already tried to blow it up, and thankfully, failed.

If any of my readers finds a non-Israeli source that discusses the Hamas takeover of all the tunnels, send me a link. I’m betting this goes completely unnoticed by all the big guns in the MSM.

01/21/2009

Better than them: Israeli relief efforts for Gaza

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:00 am

Israelis are already launching private drives to help Gaza’s civilians.

As Operation Cast Lead draws to an apparent close, hundreds of Israelis, including those from rocket-battered communities in the Gaza periphery, are mobilizing to help suffering civilians on the opposite side of the border.

What started on Thursday as the private initiative of two young women – Lee Ziv, an activist in peace organizations, and Hadas Balas, a student at Sderot’s Sapir Academic College – has mushroomed into a countrywide drive to help the civilians of Gaza.

“There is no connection to politics,” said Ziv. “We don’t represent a side, we just see an immediate need for blankets for people who have nothing to cover them at night and milk for infants who have nothing to eat.”

This won’t get much play outside the Israeli media, because it doesn’t fit the narrative of the racist, apartheid Israeli monsters.

Since a short radio interview on Sunday morning, Ziv said her phone had been ringing off the hook. “Within two minutes of the interview, I had 40 voice messages. The response has been overwhelming. Schools have called asking how they can help. A father called who had three sons serving in the IDF in Gaza. A woman called who had a mortar fall on her house.”

That’s why Israel deserves the support of the so-called peace movement (which isn’t a peace movement when it supports Hamas). Not that they’ll ever acknowledge the good in Israel. But Israel doesn’t need the acknowledgment. That’s not why Israelis are helping Gazans before the IDF is over the border. They’re doing it because it’s the right thing to do.

Hamas’ hollow victory claims

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

Khaled Abu Toameh has a devastating analysis of Hamas’ claim of victory over the IDF.

Hamas’s claim that it has emerged victorious from Operation Cast Lead is reminiscent of the fiery statements of Ahmed Said, the famous Egyptian radio announcer who, during the Six Day War, continued to report the fictional downing of dozens of Israeli warplanes after Israel destroyed the Arab air forces.

[...] Hamas’s claim that the movement lost only 48 of its gunmen and that the IAF had used half of its ammunition in air strikes on the Gaza Strip is not being taken seriously by many Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

Nor are many Palestinians taking seriously Hamas’s claims that its men destroyed 47 tanks and armored vehicles, killed 80 IDF soldiers and wounded hundreds of others.

Not many people believe Hamas’ casualty count, either.

Various sources in the Gaza Strip, including medics, journalists and a few Hamas supporters are convinced that the movement is not telling the truth about its human losses and the damage done to its security and civilian infrastructure.

One medic said he believes at least 250 Hamas militiamen died in the fighting, while a journalist put the figure at over 400.

The sources agreed, nevertheless, that it was difficult to come up with accurate figures because it was difficult to distinguish between a civilian and a Hamas militiaman.

And here is why I don’t believe the UN’s casualty count:

According to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, on the first day of the war Hamas ordered its gunmen to take off their uniforms to avoid being detected by the IDF. The Hamas gunmen who participated in the fighting against the IDF were all dressed as civilians and the majority arrived at hospitals without their weapons or any other signs revealing their status as gunmen.

This is standard operating procedure—it protects the terrorists from arrest, and also inflates the civilian casualty count, as the UN is quick to believe any Palestinian “official” count, and pass it along to the news media—who then use it as if it is written in stone. The IDF estimates that at least three-quarters of the death toll are Hamas terrorists and related fighters.

As for the brave, brave Hamas mujahadin, there were “victory rallies” all over Gaza today—but there was something decidedly absent from the parties. There was no sign of the Hamas leadership. Ismail Haniyeh? In hiding. Mahmoud al-Zahar? In hiding. Senior Hamas leadership? All in hiding.

As for the Hamas leadership “proving” they can still fire mortars and rockets, well, the IAF can still fire their weapons, too.

IAF planes struck a Kassam rocket launcher in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday evening, hours after two incidents of gunfire and mortar shell fire were reported against IDF troops in the area.

The discontent is beginning.

“We can’t talk about real victory because there were thousands of martyrs and we didn’t liberate anything,” said Jawdat Abu Nahel. “It’s no time for a parade.”

Let’s hope it spreads.

01/20/2009

War crimes in Gaza not covered by the MSM

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Media Bias — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

Hamas is committing war crimes in Gaza, but these crimes aren’t interesting to the world—because they’re not being performed by Israelis.

Hamas militiamen have rounded up hundreds of Fatah activists on suspicion of “collaboration” with Israel during Operation Cast Lead, Fatah members in the Gaza Strip told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

[...] The Fatah members and eyewitnesses said the detainees were being held in school buildings and hospitals that Hamas had turned into make-shift interrogation centers.

Hamas has also renewed house arrest orders that were issued against thousands of Fatah officials and activists in the Gaza Strip shortly after the military operation started.

The brave mujahadin of Hamas, who were too terrified to face the IDF, have no such qualms over murdering old men:

In a more recent incident, Hamas gunmen shot and killed 80-year-old Hisham Tawfik Najjar after storming his home and beating his four sons – all Fatah activists.

Apparently, smiling in public is now a crimninal offense, punishable by kneecapping.

The Fatah men said that in a number of incidents, Hamas militiamen had kidnapped Fatah activists while they were attending the funerals of people killed during the war. In other cases, activists were detained and shot in the legs after they were spotted smiling in public – an act interpreted by Hamas as an expression of joy over Israel’s military offensive.

And yet, we have no reports by the AP or Reuters of any such activities. It’s as if their reporters are afraid to report negatively about Hamas, or something. But that couldn’t be. It’s only the Israelis that fetter the international press. Right?

Right.

AP: Passing along Palestinian white phosphorus lies

Filed under: AP Media Bias, Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:30 am

The AP is helping the world to charge Israel with war crimes. They’re accusing Israel of dropping white phosphorus shells on Gaza without finding any physical evidence whatsoever—but they have plenty of Palestinian experts telling them it happened. Hey, even the Palestinian children are able to tell you when a shell is made of white phosphorus and when it’s just another shell. And the headline? Sheer propaganda.

Gaza family returns home after phosphorus blast
All were victims of a single white phosphorus shell dropped on their home, survivors and doctors said.

“It’s been two weeks and it’s still burning,” said Mahmoud Abu Halima, 20, picking up a bit of phosphorus shrapnel in the hallway. He rubbed the brownish fragment against the floor and it gave off an eery green glow followed by acrid smoke that sent everyone coughing.

White phosphorus is an incendiary agent used to illuminate targets at night or create a smoke screen for day attacks. When a person comes into contact with it, it can cause horrific injuries. It ignites upon striking the skin and burns straight through or until it is cut off from oxygen.

Interesting. The Palestinian picked up a fragment that supposedly ignites upon striking the skin, and yet it did not ignite when he picked it up. It did, however, ignite against the floor as he rubbed it. Why it didn’t burst into flame on contact with his hands, the writer didn’t say. But later in the article, white phosphorus was doing exactly what it’s supposed to do:

In the town of Beit Lahiya, boys exposed a lump of white phosphorus previously covered by sand. It burst into flames as they kicked it playfully down the road.

Really, make up your mind, AP. Is it white phosphorous, or isn’t it?

Yes:

The United Nations says white phosphorus was fired at two U.N. schools packed with refugees during the fighting.

No:

Israel says it only used the explosive as flares or smoke screens to protect tanks during heavy combat, and does its best to avoid civilian injuries. The international Red Cross said last week that it had no evidence to suggest the incendiary agent was being used improperly or illegally.

Yes:

But a human rights group condemned its use in places filled with civilians such as Gaza.

There is absolutely no scientific evidence that these are white phosphorous burns. There is only anecdotal evidence from people who have no proof whatsoever, and that includes the Palestinian doctors. Look at this doctor’s quote, which is placed in the article in such a way as to make you think it is about the burn victim’s wounds, but reads like a reporter asking the doctor to describe white phosphorous burns.

His mother, Salima, 44, lay badly wounded in a ward of Shifa Hospital in central Gaza City. “I was burned by the smoke, it came like a fountain,” she said, describing how the chemical burst in all directions after hitting her living room.

Doctors at Shifa Hospital said Salima’s wounds at first appeared superficial when she was brought in.

“But it eats at the flesh, it digs deeper and gets to the bone,” said doctor Nafiz Abu Shahbah. “The whole body becomes toxic,” said the doctor, who heads the hospital’s burn unit.

That sounds like white phosphorus all right. And the AP adds the doctor’s qualifications to make you think that he really, really knows what he’s talking about. Except he still hasn’t conducted any tests to find out whether or not the burns were caused by white phosphorus.

Abu Shahbah, a doctor trained in Egypt, Scotland and Virginia who’s headed the Shifa ward for the past 15 years, said he believes the wounds of the Abu Halimas and hundreds of similar cases treated here were inflicted by white phosphorus shells.

Belief is not proof. There are tests that can be done that will prove whether or not the woman is suffering from white phosphorus burns. Those same tests could be made on the burning chunks that give off that “eerie glow.” Or maybe they could just look things up on Wikipedia.

Burning WP produces a hot, dense white smoke. Most forms of smoke are not hazardous in the kinds of concentrations produced by a battlefield smoke shell. Exposure to heavy smoke concentrations of any kind for an extended period (particularly if near the source of emission) does have the potential to cause illness or even death.

WP smoke irritates the eyes and nose in moderate concentrations. With intense exposures, a very explosive cough may occur. However, no recorded casualties from the effects of WP smoke alone have occurred in combat operations and to date there are no confirmed deaths resulting from exposure to phosphorus smoke.

Interesting. Once again, it takes almost no effort to actually research a subject and disprove the claims of the Palestinians that are passed along uncritically passes on the accusations of Palestinians as if they were scientific fact.

As for that “eerie green glow”? I’m calling bullshit on it.

Phosphorus exists in several allotropic forms including white (or yellow), red, and black (or violet). White phosphorus has two modifications. Ordinary phosphorus is a waxy white solid. When pure, it is colourless and transparent. It is insoluble in water, but soluble in carbon disulphide. It catches fire spontaneously in air, burning to P4O10, often misnamed as phosphorus pentoxide. When exposed to sunlight, or when heated in its own vapour to 250°C, it is converted to the red variety. This form does not ignite spontaneously and it is a little less dangerous than white phosphorus.

There is, however, one piece of solid evidence that a white phosphorus rocket was fired during the Gaza war. By Hamas, at Israel.

Palestinian militants fired a phosphorus rocket at Israel for the first time yesterday, one of 17 fired into Israel as fighting entered its 19th day. The phosphorus rocket exploded in an open field in the western Negev. No injuries or damage were reported.

The world media assault on Israel continues. Watch this story take wings and fly, in spite of its blatant lack of facts.

01/17/2009

IDF concludes deterrence has been achieved

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:14 am

Ha’aretz has an analysis that says those of us who think Hamas hasn’t been cowed are wrong.

His soldiers explained that, if it boils down to choosing between their own lives and Palestinian houses, the choice is clear. Lt. Col. Cohen of Givati told Haaretz that, in his view, Hamas is at fault, for having booby-trapping populated buildings.

The IDF’s progress this week was evident mainly in the sector where the regular Paratroops brigade is operating, in northern Gaza City – the place where the forces encountered the toughest resistance. Paratroop officers described the house-to-house searches: Everywhere they turned, they found an opening to a tunnel, a Qassam launcher, an RPG (rocket-propelled grenade) launcher or a booby-trapped door.

The brigade commander is Col. Hertzi Halevy, a former Sayeret Matkal commander. When Halevy, who transferred from the Paratroops to the unit in the early 1990s, returned to the Paratroops as their commander, he was maligned by some for his rigidity and aloofness. This war has highlighted the usefulness of his cool temper and thoughtful leadership. Other brigade commanders have also cemented their leadership in Gaza.

The officers in the field see eye to eye with Military Intelligence officials: Deterrence has been achieved. This is the “Dahiya Doctrine,” which GOC Northern Command Maj. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot spoke of a few months before the war. The destruction in Gaza is reminiscent of what the air force did to Beirut’s Shi’ite Dahiya quarter two and a half years ago. Israel has made it clear that it is capable of inflicting enormous damage if provoked in such a way that it feels compelled to respond.

Read the whole thing. It’s a world of information and fascinating analysis:

The Israeli operation in Gaza was completely disproportional. But though it might not meet the criteria of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, in the tough neighborhood we live in, the message appears to have gotten across. The deterrence that has worked in Lebanon for the past two and a half years, after a failed war, may also work in Gaza, where the results have been completely different, and much better from Israel’s standpoint.

This matches what Israel Network News reports a captured terrorist said:

“Hamas took a gamble. We thought, at worst Israel will come and do something from the air – something superficial. They’ll come in and go out. We never thought that we would reach the point where fear will swallow the heart and the feet will want to flee. You [Israel] are fighting like you fought in ‘48. What got into you all of a sudden?”

It is 1948. World leaders are calling for the end of Israel, for Israel to be thrown out of the UN, and for boycotts and the delegitimization of Israel. Jews all over the world are being threatened. And the Jewish State is fighting for its existence. Hamas isn’t an existential threat? Yes it is. When a terrorist group that has launched thousands of rockets since it took over the Gaza Strip can draw the world’s sympathy instead of its opprobrium, Israel’s existence is at stake. When “protesters” all over the world call Israel an illegitimate state, Israel’s existence is at stake. When Iran rushes on to a nuclear bomb, and the world does nothing—Israel’s existence is at stake.

01/16/2009

Hamas refuses truce, media refuses to notice

Filed under: AP Media Bias, Gaza, Hamas, Israel — Tags: , , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

It’s amazing how the AP can supply the Jerusalem Post with the information that Hamas will not accept the cease fire in a small item, but cannot put that same information in its main story that goes out over thousands of newswires.

Hamas’s top political chief says his movement will not accept Israel’s demands for a cease-fire and insists the siege on Gaza must be lifted before Hamas will halt rocket attacks.

Khaled Mashaal has asked a gathering of Arab leaders in the Qatari capital on Friday to back Hamas in its demands, to announce a boycott of Israel and cut off any ties with the Jewish state.

Mashaal says Hamas is sticking by its demands that a border openings into the Gaza Strip must be opened immediately before it will stop rocket attacks.

He says Hamas “will not accept Israel’s conditions” for a cease-fire. Israel has demanded a total halt to Hamas rockets and guarantees Hamas cannot rearm.

The AP can, however, include in its main story the call by the UN Secretary General for a unilateral Israeli cease fire. In fact, it titles that story “UN chief urges unilateral Israeli cease-fire.” Just in case you missed the fact that the world is calling on Israel to cease its fire, but not Hamas. And the AP also make sure that it drops the Israeli reasons for refusal down below the third paragraph, knowing full well that most local papers include only the first three to five paragraphs of an AP wire story in their “World News” sections. Take a look at the first three grafs.

The U.N. chief urged Israel Friday to declare a unilateral cease-fire in Gaza, but Israel rebuffed the idea as its diplomats headed for Egypt and the United States in what appeared to be a final push toward a truce.

United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon floated the idea during a visit to the West Bank on his Mideast mission to try to stop Israel’s three-week-old offensive against Hamas militants who have been firing rockets from Gaza for years.

“I strongly urge Israeli leadership and government to declare a cease-fire unilaterally,” Ban said from Ramallah, the seat of the West Bank government of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, a fierce rival of Hamas. “It’s time to think about a unilateral cease-fire from the Israeli government.”

Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev dismissed the idea.

“I don’t believe that there’s a logical expectation in the international community that Israel unilaterally cease fire while Hamas would continue to target cities, trying to kill our people,” he said.

Interestingly, the AP does not quote Ban on calling on Hamas to cease its fire unilaterally. Nor is there any report of Ban going to Syria to talk to Khaled Mashaal about stopping the rocketing of the Israeli civilian population. Not that I expect him to. The world has never really tried to stop the enemies of the Jews from destroying the Jews, and it never will. That would be why the State of Israel was established.

But the good news is: Hamas’ irredentism is going to allow the IDF to do its job properly this time around. The rockets hit more Israeli civilians today. And they show no signs of stopping. The job isn’t finished.

01/15/2009

The Egyptian truce: Hamas wins

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 6:40 pm

Israel and Hamas have supposedly agreed to a two-week truce.

According to the sources, the two sides are expected to agree on a ceasefire which will likely begin within 72 hours and last up to two weeks.

During this period of time, the parties will discuss the Israel Defense Forces’ withdrawal from Gaza and the withdrawal’s timing. Palestinian sources estimated that the pullback into Israel would be swift.

According to the sources, on the issue of the supervision mechanism it has been agreed that the international forces’ presence would be on the Palestinian side of the Philadelphi route.

If this is true, then Hamas won.

The sources said that the renewed lull will last at least a year, and is expected to last even longer. According to the sources, a “weakened” Hamas will agree to a longer lull in order to recover from the current conflict.

If the agreement is executed, the agreement is expected to provide an answer to the Israeli demands in terms of the smuggling issue, the rocket fire and a serious discussion on the Shalit issue.

Hamas will gain the reopening of the crossings, the removal of the blockade and an official role at the crossings. Abbas will receive renewed access to the Strip, only at the crossings at first, and Egypt will be able to open the Rafah crossing.

That’s everything they asked for. What was the point of the Gaza war, then? To kill a few Hamas terrorists? To make the world hate Israel even more? If this is true, if Israel is lifting the blockade and allowing Hamas to run the crossings, then it truly is the beginning of the end of the State of Israel, because her leaders have lost all heart to defend their nation against the Iranian Islamists. How can the Egyptians stop smuggling if Hamas has a role in the crossings? Why does Israel think that anything will be different when the Philadelphi corridor is controlled by international forces? That’s what happened three years ago. Hamas took it over then, and will take it over now.

Israel is defeated. All I can hope for is that this article is wrong.

Hamas: Still hurting, still needing to be destroyed

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 1:30 pm

The IDF got a big fish.

Hamas’ interior minister, Said Siam, considered one of the most senior members of the Palestinian group’s leadership, was killed Thursday afternoon in an Israeli air strike on his brother’s home in Gaza City, the Israel Defense Forces said.

I’d give my kitties tuna for the Tuna for Terrorists program, but they already got some for the Gracie Went to the Vet program.

But wait, that’s not all:

The defense establishment said Siam’s brother Ayad and the head of Hamas’ security organization in Gaza, Salah Abu Sharah, were also killed in the strike. Hamas members confirmed that Siam and his brother were killed, but claimed that the third casualty was Siam’s son.

So who was this guy, and what did he do? A lot.

Siam, 50, is the most senior Hamas figure assassinated in Operation Cast Lead so far, and is the most senior Hamas figure killed by Israel since the assassination of Dr. Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi in April 2004.

Siam was the person who built Hamas’ special executive force, which was the main focus of friction and dispute between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas as the Hamas government took power, and he officially led the organization’s takeover of the Gaza Strip.

Israel should refuse a cease fire until they get the rest of the leadership. Of course, they won’t refuse.

According to diplomatic sources in Egypt, Israel gave the ceasefire offered in Cairo a “green light”, just one day after Hamas approved the plan’s principle points.

Gilad is set to brief Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni on his the visit.

Sources in Jerusalem said the briefing may yield a decision on whether to approve the Egyptian initiative and a subsequent withdrawal from Gaza, or to continue the offensive in the Strip. The security cabinet is scheduled to debate the decision Friday morning.

Stupid. Stupid, stupid, stupid. The IDF has the chance to do some real damage to Hamas, damage that could be permanent. Hamas is still shelling Israeli cities, and they’re still using long-range missiles. They finally got lucky and hurt a woman and child badly. There’s a picture at the link of the car that got hit. This is what a Grad rocket does. Hamas has many more—the IDF hasn’t destroyed Hamas rocket stockpiles yet.

The only good news about all this is that Hamas has managed to refuse to abide by all cease fires to date. Here’s hoping they do the same, and let the IDF go on about its business.

In the wake of a progressively materializing ceasefire, IDF commanders in Gaza told soldiers Thursday to continue to seek out their targets and destroy them with full force.

[...] Despite reports that Israel was leaning towards accepting the Egyptian ceasefire proposal in Gaza, the army appeared to be stepping up its offensive, and an officer and two soldiers were lightly injured in the operations. They were evacuated to Israel for treatment.

Too bad the IDF can’t go into the basement of the Shifa Hospital, where most senior Hamasniks are hiding. Or in tunnels, like rats in sewers. And sometimes, in their own homes. Where the IDF can get them. That was good intel. May the Gazans continue to inform on the leadership that brought this war on them.

Mark Regev responds to biased CNN anchor

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 1:00 pm

Watch this video, and see how many times the CNN anchor takes as truth the Palestinian claims that the IDF deliberately targeted the UN building that was hit earlier today.

For instance, the anchor says that Israel was using white phosphorous shells. Mark Regev denies this, points out that the ICRC has documented that Israel is not using white phosphorous illegally, and that Hamas fired a white phosphorous shell at Israel. The anchor then says, “But only Israel is firing white phosphorous shells” immediately after Regev just told him Hamas is firing them.

Barak told Ban that “Hamas was using Palestinian civilians as human shields and is opening fire at IDF forces from areas that are adjacent to UN facilities.

Not that it will make a difference.

No cease fire yet

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 8:00 am

The IDF has a lot more work to do, but there doesn’t seem to be a willingness from Hamas to agree to a cease fire yet.

Muhammad Nazal, a member of Hamas’ political bureau, told al-Jazeera, “We have not accepted the Egyptian ceasefire initiative, but we have not rejected it either. We presented our reservations about the proposal and if they are not taken into account – we cannot accept it.”

Nazal said that in his opinion “the talk of progress only exists in the media,” and stressed that “Hamas is unwilling to agree on a permanent ceasefire because the significance of this would be to halt the resistance.”

Good. Because the job isn’t finished.

IDF officers testified to the destruction in Gaza. Staff-Sergeant Oron Pinto said Hamas operatives “are running away, afraid to fight us face to face or have any contact with us.”

Sergeant Avi Aschal said the damage “may be excessive”, but that Hamas could only blame itself. “They booby trapped all of the houses and the yards and even their own explosive devices. For me it’s a simple dilemma: Either my soldiers or their buildings, and you can see for yourselves what the answer is.”

However, according to assessments Hamas is still far from the obliteration many had hoped for. GOC Southern Command Yoav Galant heard from various brigade commanders leading the offensive, who told him their troops were motivated and willing to continue the operation.

This is one case where Hamas’ intransigence is actually working for Israel.

01/14/2009

Catch-22 on ICC in Gaza

Filed under: Gaza, Israel, United Nations — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 2:30 pm

You really do have to love the irony. Because Gaza is not a territory or state of any official entity, the ICC prosecutor says the ICC has no jurisdiction over it.

The International Criminal Court prosecutor in The Hague said on Wednesday it lacks jurisdiction to investigate war crimes allegedly committed in the Gaza Strip.

The prosecutor’s statement came after a Palestinian rights group called on the ICC to investigate Israel for committing war crimes during its 19-day-old offensive in Gaza. The office of the prosecutor said the court’s jurisdiction is limited to war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of genocide committed on the territory of, or by a national of, a state party.

Look at that. Israel wins this one without even trying.

However, I won’t be surprised if the ICC doesn’t reverse this decision and decide that it does, indeed, have jurisdiction in this case.

Powered by WordPress