Yourish.com

11/07/2009

Hezbollah offended by—Anne Frank’s diary

Filed under: Jew Cooties, Lebanon — Meryl Yourish @ 12:42 pm

It’s not anti-Semitism. They like Jews. Honest they do. Just look how much they like Jews:

Anne Frank’s diary has been censored out of a school textbook in Lebanon following a campaign by the terror group Hezbollah claiming the classic work promotes Zionism.

The row erupted after Hezbollah learned excerpts of “The Diary of Anne Frank” were included in the textbook used by a private English-language school in western Beirut.

Hezbollah’s Al-Manar television channel ran a report slamming the book for focusing on the persecution of Jews.

“What is even more dangerous is the dramatic, theatrical way in which the diary is emotionally recounted,” said the report aired last week and also published on the station’s website.

It questioned how long Lebanon would “remain an open arena for the Zionist invasion of education.”

Got it? Anne Frank’s diary has something to do with Israel. Therefore, Anne Frank was a Zionist, and Lebanese children in a private school should not be learning about how she hid from the Nazis for years and then was murdered in a death camp.

I can only infer that Hezbollah is afraid that Lebanese students might start putting two and two together and figuring out that Jew-hatred is Jew-hatred, whether you call it anti-Semitism or anti-Zionism.

Time for the Yourish.com mantra: Jew haters of the world, just die already. Preferably soon.

11/04/2009

IDF commandos thwart Iranian arms shipment to Syria

Filed under: Israel, Lebanon — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

The IDF is showing Iran that Israel has a very long reach. Commandos took control of a ship carrying weapons for Syria and Hezbollah.

An Israeli Navy commando force seized control over a suspicious vessel in the early hours of Wednesday morning, which was found to be carrying weapons.

The ship is believed to have come for Iran, destined for Hezbollah in Lebanon and meant to dock in Syria.

The incident took place some 150 kilometers off the coast, near Cyprus. A fleet of smaller ships approached the vessel, sailing under the Antiguan flag, and boarded it.

The crew members showed no resistance. The ship was found to be carrying at least five containers of ammunition and weapons, under the guise of a civilian delivery.

The cargo included rockets, grenades, mortar shells and missiles. “This could be bigger than Karin-A,” a military source said.

The firm running the ship says it had no idea it was being used for weapons smuggling.

“We did not know there were weapons on the ship. We knew that we were delivering containers, but we are not legally permitted to check what is inside them. This is the responsibility of the customs authorities at the ports where we anchor. We do not know what happened on the ship. We are waiting, just like you are, for answers.”

How did the arms get on the ship? That is a very good question. Will we get answers? I think we will.

He added, “This is the first time something like this happens to us. I hope this will not damage the relations between Cyprus and Israel, because it is just business for us.”

Will we get UN condemnation? I think we won’t. But all in all: An awesome operation from IDF commandos. Something to give Iran pause, one would think.

10/25/2009

Compare and contrast

Filed under: Israel, Juvenile Scorn, Lebanon — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

This is why Israel has more Nobel prize winners than the entire Arab world combined.

Lebanese chefs prepared a massive plate of hummus weighing over two tons Saturday that broke a world record organizers said was previously held by Israel — a bid to reaffirm proprietorship over the popular Middle Eastern dip.

“Come and fight for your bite, you know you’re right!” was the slogan for the event – part of a simmering war over regional cuisine between Lebanon and Israel, which have had tense political relations for decades.

Lebanese businessmen accuse Israel of stealing a host of traditional Middle Eastern dishes, particularly hummus, and marketing them worldwide as Israeli.

“Lebanon is trying to win a battle against Israel by registering this new Guinness World Record and telling the whole world that hummus is a Lebanese product, its part of our traditions,” said Fady Jreissati, vice president of operations at International Fairs and Promotions group, the event’s organizer.

Yeah, you really have to concentrate on what’s important. Don’t try to break Israeli records in things like numbers of Ph.D’s per capita, or tech companies, or scientific innovation. Instead, let’s concentrate on what’s really important:

A similar attempt to set a new world record will be held Sunday for the largest serving of tabbouleh, a salad made of chopped parsley and tomatoes, that Lebanon also claims as its own.

Way to go, Lebanon. That’ll show ‘em.

10/15/2009

Snarking

Filed under: Iran, Israel, Lebanon, World — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:30 am

Turk to Israel: No, really, we love you, you baby-killing bastards: Yeah, right. The Turkish producer of a film about Palestinians that depicts IDF soldiers murdering young girls for no apparent reason other than they’re Zionist child-killers says that just because the uniform looks like the IDF, and just because it takes place in Gaza, doesn’t mean that the show is about IDF soldiers murdering innocent Palestinian children. He defends his thesis by bringing up Mohammed al-Dura and 300 dead children from the Gaza war. I guess his show must be about Shmisraeli ShmIDF shmoldiers, not Israeli IDF soldiers.

Hezbollah: That was no missile, that was a door! I really want to see their video footage. They’re claiming that the group of Hezbollah terrorists seen loading a long, metallic object onto a truck were carrying a metal door. Uh-huh. I’m also eagerly awaiting UNIFIL’s explanation as to why their men were watching Hezbollah load a “metal door” onto a pickup truck. What? UN peacekeepers ignoring Hezbollah UN Resolution violations? No! You don’t say!

Khameini in a coma? Or dead? I hope it’s true. But if it is, well, Iran ain’t seen nothin’ yet. Revolution? That won’t be the half of it. It might be great news to Israel, depending on who wins the power struggle. We can always dream that client states Syria and Lebanon get left out in the cold.

Those wily Jews: While the Arabs and Muslims in the region continue their important work in improving the many ways you can carry a suicide bomb, Israelis are developing things like a battery that will last thousands of hours in hearing aids and the like. Oh, and the battery will be cheaper and cleaner than those currently on the market. No wonder Israel has more Nobel prizes than the entire Arab world combined.

10/14/2009

Breaking UN resolutions only counts if you’re Israel

Filed under: Israeli Double Standard Time, Lebanon, United Nations — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:30 am

How many times have we heard the tired old argument that Israel is in violation of dozens of UN resolutions? The fact that the resolutions that most people think of are nonbinding makes no difference; Israeli is in violation of that dreaded shibboleth, international law.

Meanwhile, Hezbollah is in plain violation of an actual, binding resolution, and nobody but Israel seems to notice or care. The explosion last month of a weapons depot underneath a home in southern Lebanon raised no angry response from the UN, or even lifted eyebrows from UNIFIL, who are, uh, right there in southern Lebanon. Israel has complained. Nothing happened.

The explosion this week of another house in southern Lebanon has once again raised no apparent concern in the UN, or with UNIFIL, or even with Nobel peace prize winner Barack Obama, who is very, very concerned about peace in the middle east—when it comes to Israel’s actions, anyway. In fact, UNIFIL has sprung into action in the usual UN way.

UNIFIL said it was aware of an explosion and was in contact with the Lebanese army. “We are looking into the circumstances of the incident,” UNIFIL spokeswoman Yasmina Bouziane said.

Ah. They’re investigating. That’ll show Hezbollah.

This time around, Israel is launching an all-out effort to see if the UN and the world will cease its hypocrisy. Instead of imagined war crimes as found in the Goldstone report, this is an actual violation of UN 1701, forbidding Hezbollah from arming south of the Litani. And Israel has proof that was what they were doing.

Of course, the AP has to spin it negatively. Note the language implying that Israel doesn’t really have proof. The IDF just said that’s what happened. It could be any old film of anyone smuggling weapons into any house, right?

The Israeli military released footage it said was shot by one of its drones in the area. It said the video shows Hezbollah members sealing off the explosion site, recovering dozens of rockets from the home and driving them away in two covered trucks.

You can go online and see the footage for yourself. Ynet has it. It’s at the IDF website. Israel isn’t just saying that Hezbollah is smuggling weapons. They’re proving it. But since it isn’t a Palestinian eyewitness supplying the testimony, obviously, it can’t be believed. (I’m feeling very sarcastic this morning, yes. Why do you ask?)

10/13/2009

Another 1701 violation

Filed under: Israel, Lebanon — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 9:00 am

Israel Matzav noted that there was an explosion in southern Lebanon and covered it from a Lebanese news source. (via memeorandum)

Ha’aretz reports that Israel is going to the UN.

Israel has demanded that the United Nations investigate the explosion at the Hezbollah official’s house, which it said proved munitions were being stockpiled in violation of a truce.

Hezbollah has denied that the explosion that rocked the south Lebanon house was serving as a munitions bunker, and immediately rejected media reports that a senior group official was killed in the blast.

An Israel Defense Forces source said the explosion indicated the Iranian-backed guerrilla group Israel fought in a month-long war in 2006 was keeping “banned ammunition” in southern Lebanon.

“The Israeli military has asked UNIFIL to open an investigation,” the source said, using the acronym for a United Nations peacekeeping force that has patrolled the troubled Israeli-Lebanese border area for more than three decades.

If this sounds familiar it should. There was an explosion in southern Lebanon three months ago. This was one of a series of incidents in southern Lebanon that led to a UN condemnation of Hezbollah. (via IPF)

For the first time ever, the United Nations on Thursday accused Hezbollah of violating the UN-brokered cease-fire that ended the 2006 Second Lebanon war, fought between Israel and the Shi’ite militant organization.

The UN’s Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, Alain Le Roy, said Hezbollah had been operating a weapons depot in south Lebanon that was the site of an explosion last week.

He told member states there was solid evidence that the cache belonged to Hezbollah, but added that it was not known whether the weapons had been stockpiled there before or after Resolution 1701, which called for the cease-fire, was passed.

(This does not appear to be a formal condemnation, rather a criticism of Hezbollah.)

While the UN criticism of Hezbollah was welcome, it apparently hasn’t much deterred Hezbollah.

Mere Rhetoric expects that the next explosion in southern Lebanon may have a source south of the border.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

09/13/2009

The “U” in UN stands for “Useless”

Filed under: AP Media Bias, Israel, Lebanon — Meryl Yourish @ 10:56 am

UNIFIL was warned ten days beforehand that Lebanese terrorists planned to fire rockets into Israel. They were even told what kind of rockets were going to be used. And so, UNIFIL took that information and warned Israel.

Oh, wait. No they didn’t. They told the Lebanese army that terrorists were going to fire rockets into Israel. And nothing happened.

Lebanese civilians saw the terrorists drive into their area, unload the rockets, set a timer, and leave. Then they notified the authorities.

Oh, wait. No they didn’t. Nothing happened. Except that the rockets flew towards Israel.

The Israelis also filed a complaint about the rocket fire with the UN. I expect the UN to investigate the incident and issue a statement insisting that the Lebanese government is responsible for keeping its terrorists in check.

Oh, wait. No they won’t. Nothing will happen. Unless Israel retaliates, in which case, Ban Ki-Moon will issue a statement urging “all parties” to exercise restraint.

Benjamin Netanyahu warned today that Israel won’t accept these kind of attacks from Lebanon, and won’t hold back if attacked.

But nothing will happen.

Oh, wait. It will. Israel will respond if attacked, and will respond heavily. And the world will come down on Israel’s back, insisting that A) Israel is using disproportionate force; B) The Lebanese people are not responsible for Hezbollah’s action, in spite of the fact that Hezbollah is a fully-participating member of the Lebanese government; and C) Israel is deliberately targeting civilians.

And the way we know this is to check on this spin from the AP, buried deep in the article reporting on Netanyahu’s remarks:

In mid-July, a suspected Hezbollah arms depot exploded near the Israeli border. Israel said this was proof the group was rearming and stashing weapons in populated villages.

An illegal weapons depot explodes a short distance away from Israel’s northern border. UNSCR 1701 forbids Lebanon to have these weapon depots. And yet, the AP says that Israel claims this is proof that Hezbollah is rearming. Not the UN. Not UNIFIL. Israel says it, and therefore, we can question the truth of the claim.

The dates change. But really, the stories remain the same. I should just start recycling my old posts. It would save me a lot of time.

08/27/2009

Thursday SNB

Filed under: Iran, Lebanon, News Briefs, Pop Culture — Tags: , , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

He will fart in your general direction: Nicholas Sarkozy is threatening “severe” new sanctions on Iran if it doesn’t stop enriching uranium and trying to get the bomb. Yeah, like we haven’t heard that before.

No! Not the dreaded letter to the IAEA! Iran has gotten the non-aligned nations to sign onto a letter to the IAEA pushing for a ban on attacks on nuclear plants. Hm. This is a tough one. Israel is not a signatory to the NPT, but it is a member of the IAEA. But then again, the UN General Assembly, under which the IAEA was formed, is a powerless bunch of stuffed shirts with a proven anti-Israel agenda. Israel: Fear the letter! (And by the way, wussy little Iran, after threatening Israel in so many different ways, is running to the UN for protection. Baby.)

The obligatory “Shalit deal is imminent” mention: Yeah, yeah, yeah. We keep hearing that, and yet, Gilad Shalit is still not released. And while some of the things I’m reading do seem to be leading to an actual release, well, I’ll wait until I see some results first.

Hezbullah ascendant: Funny, I thought Hezbullah lost the election, and yet, Sa’ad Hariri, whose father was killed by Syria—which sponsors Hezbullah—says they’re going to be part of the government whether Israel likes it or not. (And a big nyah-nyah to you!) Hokay. Just remember, Israel has let Lebanon know that if Hezbullah attacks again, since they’re now part of the government, it will be considered an act of war by Lebanon. Which is why Lebanese villagers are turning on Hezbullah and throwing them out of their villages.

She was leader of the pack, and now she’s gone: Ellie Greenwich, the songwriter who gave us some of the most memorable pop tunes of the 60s, died yesterday. What would this world be without Da Doo Ron Ron and Do Wah Diddy Diddy? Not to mention Be My Baby and The Look of Love. Let’s all of us take a moment to let our hearts stand still (Da Doo Ron Ron Ron Da Doo Ron Ron).

08/04/2009

Tuesday SNB

Filed under: Israel, Lebanon, Politics, The One — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

Gush Shalom: With friends like these… The background: Israel is looking into making it illegal for foreign countries to fund organizations that actively work against Israel, such as Breaking the Silence, the discredited organization that uses anonymous soldiers without any factual data to accuse Israel of war crimes in Gaza. Gush Shalom is urging the EU to tell Israeli that if that happens, the EU will stop funding programs in hospitals, universities, and other organizations that help people. Way to work for your counry, GS! Wow, with friends like you, who needs enemies? You’re doing the work for them.

Lebanon is circling the drain: So, when Hezbollah launches the next attack, and Israel defends herself, will anyone in the UN, EU, or anti-Israel media notice that the people of Lebanon are choosing to side with the terrorsts? Druze leader Walid Jumblatt says he’s shifting alliances—which would give Hezbollah the power it’s been seeking if he throws his votes in with them. Just remember this over the shouts of disproportional force hitting the poor, innocent Lebanese who want nothing to do with Hezbollah.

If you’ve lost the AP, you’ve lost America:
Even the AP is noticing that Obama isn’t going to be able to pay for all the programs he’s trying to shove down our throats—because tax revenues have dropped the most they have declined since 1932. Three cheers for Congress, eh? At this rate, we’ll be smack-dab in the Hoover Administration before you can say “depression.”

You’ve lost the AP: Yes, that would be two days in a row that the AP has noticed that Obama is not the magician he appeared to be on the campaign trail. Yesterday, tax revenues are down. Today, the AP notes that Obama can’t support his big-spending programs without taxing the middle class. Speaking as a taxable middle class person, I’m damned glad the media are finally noticing that Obama has been lying from the get-go. Stop me if you’ve heard this before: Say, how can you tell when a politician is lying? That’s right, his mouth is open. No hope, no change, just more of the same.

08/02/2009

Iran plane crash cause: Exploding bomb parts

Filed under: Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Terrorism — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 9:45 am

The plane that crashed in Iran two weeks ago that killed everyone on board crashed because it was carrying arms to Hezbollah.

According to the sources, the aircraft was carrying a large number of modern fuses composed of 2 kilograms (4.4 pounds) of explosives and electrical instrumentation.

The report is in line with testimonies on explosion sounds heard before the crash. According to the sources, the plane was meant to transfer the fuses from Iran to Armenia, and from there to Syria through Turkey, and then on the ground to Lebanon. This route was chosen, according to exiled opposition sources, so as not to draw attention.

Chalk another one up to our terrorist buddies in Lebanon and Syria. And it’s just lovely that the Turks are complicit in this terror track as well. Why on earth shouldn’t we trust them to negotiate between Israel and Syria?

07/27/2009

Monday SNB

Filed under: American Scene, Israel, Lebanon, News Briefs, Politics, Syria — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

(That’s Snark News Briefs to you, buster.)

Weapons cache? What weapons cache? Lebanon is doubling down on the next war with Israel by (of course) siding with Hezbullah and insisting that the arms cache that exploded was arms “left behind by the Israelis.” Even the UN is unable to cover up this blatant violation of 1701. However, nothing will be done about it. You know it. I know it. The UN will manage to find a satisfactory excuse for allowing Hezbullah to keep arming south of the Litani, in violation of 1701, because, well, the UN is virulently anti-Israel. The Lebanese are placing themselves squarely at fault for anything that happens next. Old Chipmunk Cheeks has emerged (vocally, anyway) from his secure, nondisclosed location and threatened Tel Aviv. Not many people will remember this the next time Hezbullah invades Israel or sends rockets that way, and Israel goes after non-Hezbullah areas. But I will.

Speaking of Lebanon: The IDF built a Hezbullah city to train its troops for the next war. This, of course, is why the IDF will continue to succeed against Israel’s enemies. Well, that, and a little help from above.

U.K. groveling to Arab world: I’m currently reading Benny Morris’ 1948, and you know, the Brits haven’t really changed at all in regards to Israel. They’re currently expressing “regret” that they sold Israel arms that were used to defend herself in the Gaza war. It’s almost as if the Brits are really, really sorry they allowed any Jews to settle in their ancestral homeland at all. Oh. Wait.

U.S. groveling to Arab world: George Mitchell is in Syria, talking to the man who is responsible for the murder of American soldiers in Iraq, asking him to cut a peace deal with Israel. Here’s my prediction: Assad will not closed down the offices of Hamas and other terror groups in Damascus. He will not break ties with Iran. And he will not stop sponsoring Hezbullah and trying to run Lebanon. But he will, of course, blame Israel for the lack of peace in the Middle East, and demand the return of the Golan Heights, plus territory that never belonged to Syria in the first place. Why not? It’s worked all along. The world will not see Syria as part of the problem. Only Israel’s refusal to turn over the Golan. That would be the same Golan from which Assad’s father used to regularly shell Israeli civilians while they were working on their farms and living their lives.

Sarah Palin: Free at last. Sarah’s no longer governor of Alaska. Expect to hear even more from her now that her enemies can’t charge her every move with ethics complaints. Really, the SOB’s actually tried to say that her raising money for her defense against ethics charges was unethical. Can you say, “Set-up”? I knew you could.

Snakes in a drain: Just for something different, a 14-foot python was hiding in a storm drain in Florida. You know, the alligators are bad enough. I may never visit Florida again.

07/21/2009

Tuesday Snark News

Filed under: Hamas, Israel, Lebanon, Movies, News Briefs, The One, United Nations — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

Brits to America: The Israelis don’t listen to us. Meryl to Brits: You anti-Israel, anti-Semitic gits. Why should they?

Barry Rubin cut the bullshit: He did, really. (It’s okay, Barry, I put it back for you.) Seriously, click the link and read his latest essay. It’s one of his best ever.

UNIFIL watched as Lebanese invaded Israel: Okay, they weren’t terrorists—but isn’t it UNIFIL’s job to keep the two sides apart? What’s that you say? On days that end with a “y” it’s Israeli Double Standard Time? Yeah, I knew that.

Oh, please—Hezbollah “sympathizers”? The mainstream media is truly as stupid as you think they are.

A crowd in southern Lebanon threw rocks at U.N. peacekeepers over the weekend, wounding 14 of them in an effort to prevent the investigation of an explosion in the area, the United Nations said.

How many of this “crowd” you figure were Hezbollah soldiers? I’m guessing nearly all of them. Why? Read Michael Totten’s account of what happened when Christopher Hitchens ran afoul of Hezbollah thugs. That’s why.

Pop quiz! Who said this:

“One of the things that I know the blogs are best at is debunking myths that can slip through a lot of the traditional media outlets and a lot of the conventional wisdom,” he said, according to audio of the call posted on Web sites. “And that is why you are going to play such an important role in our success in the weeks to come.”

Your choice: A) Barack Obama. B) John McCain. C) Karl Rove. D) Joe the Plumber.

The answer: Barack Obama, on a call to liberal bloggers. He’s right, but about the wrong side. And while you’re posting against ObamaCare, don’t forget to call and write your Congresspeople.

I know you’re going to be shocked to hear this: NYDN found Harry Potter fans who weren’t happy with the movie. Please. Try to be strong and understanding—really. Not everyone liked the film. Wow, now that’s news!

07/20/2009

Monday morning snark news

Filed under: Hamas, Israel, Jews, Lebanon, News Briefs, The One — Meryl Yourish @ 8:00 am

Despicable, if true: Settlers burn Palestinian fields as a consequence of having illegal outposts removed. I have no snark for this, only contempt.

Labor to Israel: Netanyahu and Obama have their wires crossed, which is detrimental to U.S.-Israel relations. Meryl to Labor: Gee, ya think?

Swiss to Israel: Neutral on Hamas? Hey, they’re a major player. Hey, if the Swiss could stay neutral on the Nazis, why not with the Nazi’s heirs? It’s not like you have to take a stand anymore. Who’s going to invade Switzerland? And besides, there’s still the matter of all that Nazi-era Jewish wealth the Swiss have refused to investigate or give back, so it’s not like they’re doing anything unexpected here.

If the Palestinians fire on the IDF from Gaza, and Israel doesn’t invade, did it really happen? Of course, if the IDF goes into Gaza to kill Palestinian terrorists who are trying to kill them, the “cycle of violence” has been restarted and it is, of course, the fault of the defenders rather than the offenders. Just trying to give you the narrative before it’s even written.

Obama’s advisers: They’re as dumb as he is. Really. Read this:

President Barack Obama’s advisers are urging critics of their health care overhaul to wait for Congress to finish writing legislation before issuing verdicts.

Really? They’re voting on legislation without even reading it, and they’re telling us to wait until they’ve finalized a multi-thousand page bill? Oh, that’s not hypocritical at all, is it?

Obama’s approval ratings drop below 50%: Looks like you can’t fool most of the people most of the time. By the way, if you read the article, check the polling data. The Obamedia tends to skew the figures to say what they want them to say.

Hillary: I broke my elbow, not my larynx. See, I toldja there was no rift between Hillary and Obama. She’s not positioning herself away. She’s just as eager to bash Israel as her boss.

UNIFIL covering for Hezbollah, again: This is no surprise. The UN knew about the arms cache that exploded—months ago. I know you’re just as shocked as I am.

The source said UNIFIL had precise information about the cache and a number of other installations where Hezbollah is storing rockets, but that UNIFIL had done nothing.

And what’s the UN going to do about it? Why, what the UN does best.

A discussion is scheduled in the UN Security Council for late August on renewing UNIFIL’s mandate in southern Lebanon.

And that’s it for today. Time to go to work.

07/17/2009

Thursday Snark News

Filed under: Gaza, Israeli Double Standard Time, Lebanon, News Briefs, Religion, Terrorism, The One — Tags: , , , — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

Religion of Peace blows up two more hotels: Indonesia again, but don’t worry—it’s just a tiny minority of extremists doing all the kabooms.

Palestinians answer Hillary’s request with a kassam rocket: Looks like Hillary’s plea to the Palestinians to refrain from any actions that would make peace more difficult is working. The Palestinians launched a kassam at Southern Israel, because now they’re going to blame Israel for taking action against it. And considering that Netanyahu has stated that he will not tolerate so much as a dribble, expect some tunnels to go boom.

Israel wants UNIFIL to do what? Israel is asking for UNIFIL’s report on the rocket storage depot in southern Lebanon that blew up this week. UNIFIL doesn’t so much as mention the explosion on its site. Ban Ki-Moon hasn’t said anything about the violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701. The General Assembly is not calling for an emergency session to vote on a resolution condemning Hezbollah’s overt violation of 1701. And the Security Council is silent. What’s that you say? It’s a day that ends with a “y,” so it’s Israeli Double Standard Time? Well. I can see you’ve been reading this blog for a long time.

Syria to U.S.: We want the entire Golan. Meryl to Syria [singing]: You can’t always get what you want.

Neturei Karta guarantee their place in Dante’s Seventh Circle: Okay, not really, but it’s a good metaphor, because any Jew that works so hard for Israel’s enemies—they’re meeting Haniyeh, now, and bringing him little statues of Al Aqsa and the Dome of the Mosque, how sweet—cannot possibly be on G-d’s good side. Really, I detest these people more than I detest almost anyone else in the world, except pedophiles. And even that one is a close call. I know there’s no hell in Judaism, but for the Nutty Karta, I’d make an exception.

Senate votes big expansion of federal hate crimes—Can we get a Constitutional challenge, please? Then again, forget about it. Sotomayor is going to be approved, no way is the Supreme Court going to find hate crime laws unconstitutional. Add this to the list of things I’ve changed my mind about since moving to Virginia: I no longer believe hate crimes should be legislated, at all. A crime is a crime is a crime.

Jake Tapper, will you marry me? If the man continues to tell the truth about Obama, I’m simply going to have to have him.

At a rally in Holmdel, New Jersey, today, President Obama continued making a promise about health care reform that he has acknowledged isn’t literally true.

Holmdel. Feh. Where was he, in the Garden State Arts Center? Whoops, sorry, they changed its name to the PNC Arts Center. And yes, he was. You know, I saw a much better act last time I was there. Lilith Fair. The Pretenders, Sarah McLachlan, Sheryl Crow. All of whom probably voted for Obama, come to think of it (except McLachlan, she’s Canadian). But I digress. Tapper:

“Let me be exactly clear about what health care reform means to you,” the president told residents of the Garden State. “First of all, if you’ve got health insurance, you like your doctors, you like your plan, you can keep your doctor, you can keep your plan. Nobody is talking about taking that away from you.”

But last month, as the president acknowledged during a press conference, he doesn’t literally mean that you are guaranteed to be able to keep your health care plan, and your doctor, if and when health care reform passes.

What? Obama lying again? Say it isn’t so! As for the price tag? Go watch Tapper’s report.

Don’t let him succeed. Call your Senator.

07/13/2009

Your Monday Snark News

Filed under: Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Lebanon, United Nations — Meryl Yourish @ 12:00 pm

U.K. determined to lose Israeli arms market: The U.K. is embargoing arms to Israel, while insisting that it’s not an embargo—they’re just refusing to sell replacement parts. Luckily, Israel was smart enough to make sure that the U.K. was only a minor arms supplier. Say, you think the U.K. will start embargoing money to the PA, since it pays Hamas with that money? No? What’s that you say? Smells like hypocrisy? The devil you say!

Establishing the precedent: Palestinians in the West Bank will be getting their mail through Jordan’s postal service. Let’s help them with their slogan: Neither bombs, nor bullets, nor threat of invasion, will stop us from—oh, wait. Yes it will.

Egypt gives up on Hamas-Fatah reconciliation: Yeah, even Egypt’s patience is at an end. Watch for the world media to still blame this on Israel, though.

Syria won’t give up Shabaa Farms fiction: Syria told the UN to take a hike regarding its suggestion that Syria actually define the borders of the territory it says Israel took. The Shabaa Farms, meanwhile, is actually part of Lebanon, not Syria, and the UN states as much years ago, but in its ever-kowtowing-to-Arabs mode, is now pretending that it never said anything of the sort. Because, after all, why would the UN want peace in the region? They’d have to stop classifying Palestinians as refugees and end UNRWA if that happened, and then where would they work?

Solana to Israel: We’ll impose peace on you if you don’t make peace. Israel to Solana: Shut up and retire already, you impotent old fool. I don’t care what you say about Avigdor Lieberman, this quote alone makes his election worth it:

“With all due respect to Solana, he’s about to retire … and we should not overstate the importance of his statement,” Lieberman said.

Perfect. Hilarious.

Hamastan on the Hudson: Actually, not on the Hudson. On Israel’s border. The Hamas morality police are patrolling the beaches, cities, and towns. Women are being forced to wear the hijab (but I thought there was no compulsion under Islam?). And the march to the Talibanization of Gaza continues. But hey, settlements that are the real obstacle to peace.

Both Hamas and its rivals in the Palestinian Authority appear to be satisfied with the fact that the Obama Administration has turned the issue of the settlements into the major problem, shifting attention from the incompetence and corruption in the West Bank and the emergence of the new Islamic state in the Gaza Strip.

The high-profile controversy over Israel’s policy of building new homes for Jewish settlements has in fact facilitated Hamas’s mission.

Read it all.

06/11/2009

The Obama administration’s contribution to the election in Lebanon

Filed under: Lebanon — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 10:00 am

I expressed some skepticism towards the claim that President Obama’s Cairo speech helped boost the prospects of the March 14 coalition. I also offered my own suggestion that perhaps the speech scared Christians into voting for the coaltion.

Max Boot writes that the speech was largely inconsequential as a factor in the election. Boot argues (echoing a sentiment expressed by Robert Satloff):

Kudos to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden for visiting Beirut and reaffirming their support for Lebanese independence. The Obama administration, as Michael Totten noted, has made clear that it will not sell out Lebanon to reach a deal with Syria or Hezbollah. The Obama administration deserves credit for that stance, which is a continuation of the previous Bush policy which made possible the 2005 Cedar Revolution that forced Syrian troops out of the country.

American support perhaps emboldened some Christian voters to vote for anti-Syrian, anti-Hezbollah candidates.

If the administration deserves credit, there’s no reason to ignore that it got Lebanon right. Michael Totten in his must-read analysis of the election writes:

I was slightly worried myself about other potential aspects of the president’s Lebanon policy before it developed, but he deserves support here from conservatives as well as from Democrats who understand that the United States can’t support a terrorist army that says, “Death to America is a policy, a strategy, and a vision.”

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

06/10/2009

The morning after the morning after three years later

Filed under: Lebanon — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 10:00 am

Snoopy noted a Bradley Burston column in the wake of Israel’s war with Hezbollah in 2006 in which Burston wrote (the link to Ha’aretz has expired):

When this war is over and Israel’s troops are gone from Lebanon, and when the rage at Israel begins to subside, it will be Nasrallah’s turn – like Nasser’s four decades ago – to answer to fellow Arabs for his actions.

I was dismissive, as it appeared that Hezbollah had no intention of keeping its side of the deal – and it didn’t. I was also dismissive because Thomas Friedman had made a very similar point in “The morning after the morning after.”

On the morning after the morning after, Lebanese war refugees, who had real jobs and homes, will start streaming back by the hundreds of thousands, many of them Shiites. Tragically, they will find their homes or businesses badly damaged or obliterated. Yes, they will curse Israel. But they and other Arabs will also start asking Nasrallah publicly what many are already asking privately:

“What was this war all about? What did we get from this and at what price? Israel has some roofs to repair and some dead to bury. But its economy and state are fully intact, and it will recover quickly. We Lebanese have been set back by a decade. Our economy and our democracy lie in ruins, like our homes. For what? For a one-week boost in ‘Arab honor?’ So that Iran could distract the world’s attention from its nuclear program? You did all this to us for another country?”

(Not a surprising sentiment since Hezbollah wasn’t founded to fight Israel as much as it was to create an Islamic state in Lebanon.)

Frankly, I thought that Friedman was trying to be too cute, but he seems to be somewhat on target in this case. As the Washington Post reported the other day.

But the events of the past few years, voters said, made the campaign a broad referendum on Hezbollah. The group’s militia in 2008 briefly seized control of downtown Beirut in a bid to boost Hezbollah’s political power, a move reminiscent of the country’s 15-year civil war. And Hezbollah’s 2006 war with Israel was cited by some voters as showing the danger of allowing the group to keep its arms stockpiles.

What are some of the other factors leading to Hezbollah’s defeat? Now, Thomas Friedman even gives some credit to ex-President Bush.

While the Lebanese deserve 95 percent of the credit for this election, 5 percent goes to two U.S. presidents. As more than one Lebanese whispered to me: Without George Bush standing up to the Syrians in 2005 — and forcing them to get out of Lebanon after the Hariri killing — this free election would not have happened. Mr. Bush helped create the space. Power matters. Mr. Obama helped stir the hope. Words also matter.

“People in this region have become so jaded by the ability of their states to dominate everything and hold sham elections,” said Paul Salem, analyst of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “And mostly the world never cared. And then here came this man [Obama], who came to them with respect, speaking these deep values about their identity and dignity and economic progress and education, and this person indicated that this little prison that people are living in here was not the whole world. That change was possible.”

As I mentioned before I wonder if President Obama’s speech spurred Christians to vote in greater numbers, realizing that he was reaching out too much to the likes of Hezbollah. (I was happy to see that Michael Ledeen feels the same way.

My thinking is more along the lines of the editors of the Wall Street Journal:

This being Lebanon, talks on building a governing coalition are bound to be difficult. But in the bigger picture, this election marks a step forward since the 2005 Cedar Revolution ended the Syrian occupation. And it’s a vindication of America’s policy of democracy promotion. In Pakistan, Turkey, Iraq and now Lebanon, extremist Muslim parties didn’t fare as well as feared at reasonably free polls, and often lost ground. The outcome in Lebanon is another good reason for the Obama Administration to make democracy a priority of its so-called new relationship with the Muslim world — even if George W. Bush also happened to think it was a good idea.

Democracy promotion was decidedly not a part of President Obama’s Cairo speech.

The usually frivolous Dion Nissenbaum recalls another incident that may have hurt Hezbollah.

At the end of the day, in the battle between the pro-Western March 14 coalition and the Iran-backed March 8 rivals, the date that may have mattered more was May 7th.

That was the day last year when Hezbollah fighters easily stormed through West Beirut in a military takeover that Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah later called “a glorious day.”

What Nasrallah touted as a great day many Lebanese voters saw as a betrayal.

While Sunday’s election doesn’t signal an end to the Hezbollah threat, it is a welcome development.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

06/08/2009

Hezbollah loses (for now)

Filed under: Lebanon — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 9:00 am

Tony Badran has a complete roundup of the results of the Lebanese election. It features of names that I’m unfamiliar with, but will be of interest with those who have a detailed knowledge of Lebanese politics. This is from his conclusion:

This balance of power will now be transferred to the battle over the cabinet formation. M14 has a clear victory, and so will pick the Prime Minister. The battle, however, will be over the heresy of the “veto third” — which has no existence in the constitution or the Taef Accord. Hariri has been consistently rejecting its continuation in the future cabinet, and he got support today from Jumblat as well, who called it a “fallacy.” M14 will agree to a national unity government, though its principled position now is that it rejects the “veto third” formula. They are making plenty of noise about giving a boost to Suleiman, and how that will materialize remains to be seen. M8 is almost certainly going to reject it and will cite the relatively weak performance of the so-called independents/centrists as support for their position.

via Barry Rubin who writes:

Whatever the result, Hizballah and its allies, including Iran and Syria, will keep up the pressure on the moderate regime, and this could mean crises ahead. One result could be that an attack on Israel from Lebanon is less likely, at least over the next year, as Hizballah and its allies don’t want to disrupt their efforts to bring Lebanon closer to their control. I hate to say this but political assassination–or at least attempts–and other terrorism could continue to be a method of intimidation.

The West is going to be challenged to provide support for the March 14 coalition government.

Legal Insurrection posts some pictures (via Instapundit).

The New York Times reports:

The tentative victory may have been aided by nearly unprecedented turnout. The preliminary results showed that about 55 percent of the 3.26 million registered voters cast ballots. Lebanese television reported that the March 14 coalition, a predominantly Sunni, Christian and Druze alliance, held at least 67 seats out of 128 in Parliament.

The Washington Post reports:

Heavy turnout in Christian districts returned to power a Western-backed coalition in the Lebanese parliament on Sunday, thwarting a bid by the Islamist Hezbollah party to increase its influence.

and

But the events of the past few years, voters said, made the campaign a broad referendum on Hezbollah. The group’s militia in 2008 briefly seized control of downtown Beirut in a bid to boost Hezbollah’s political power, a move reminiscent of the country’s 15-year civil war. And Hezbollah’s 2006 war with Israel was cited by some voters as showing the danger of allowing the group to keep its arms stockpiles.

In a statement to Agence France-Presse, Hezbollah member of parliament Hassan Fadlallah did not acknowledge the group’s defeat, but said it was important that Lebanon “turn a new page, one based on partnership, cooperation and understanding.”

I noted the emphasis on the heavy voting by Christians and wonder if it’s possible that President Obama’s Cairo speech had anything to do with the result. President Obama made it clear that he was reaching out to the Muslim/Arab world; did Lebanese Christians worry more about their future after that and thus vote in greater numbers than projected?

While this victory is good, in that it’s a setback for Iran and Syria, Hezbollah still remains a force.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

06/05/2009

Experts know best

Filed under: Lebanon — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 9:30 am

Barry Rubin has some fun critiquing credulous reporting on the upcoming Lebanes elections.

More seriously, Amir Taheri considers the possibility of a Hezbollah victory:

If Lebanon comes under Iranian control it could become one arm of a pincer — the other being Hamas-controlled Gaza — designed to subject Israel to low-intensity warfare that would, in time, sap its will to resist. With the completion of the Israeli security fence along the West Bank within the next few months, suicide attacks would become increasingly difficult to organize. The fight, therefore, would shift to the skies with “an endless storm of rockets and missiles raining on Israel from Lebanon and Gaza,” as Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said in an election campaign message last month.

With its clients in control of Lebanon, Iran would build a naval presence in the Mediterranean for the first time since the seventh century. Experts from the Revolutionary Guards have visited the port of Beirut and prepared plans for a visit by an Iranian flotilla before the end of the summer. Six Iranian warships are already on their way to the Red Sea, ostensibly to help combat pirates operating from the Somali coast. In Tehran, there is also talk of helping Hezbollah to develop its own naval units for “resistance operations” against Israel.

And that’s not even considering how Iran would act if it would develop nuclear weapons that President Obama is anxious to convince them not to build with lots of nice words.

Crossposted on Yourish.

05/27/2009

Der Spiegel, Zionist tool

Filed under: Lebanon — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 9:00 am

In case you’re wondering why Nasrallah’s response to the charge in Der Spiegel that Hezbollah was responsible for Rafiq Hariri’s murder, is that Der Spiegel is a Zionist tool, read Michael Totten’s take.

“[I]f (the majority) uses the report against Hezbollah,” said former Carnegie Endowment scholar and Hezbollah expert Amal Saad-Ghorayeb, “then of course we’re going to see instability in Lebanon, and that’s putting it mildly.” “One word,” said Fadia Kiwan at Saint Joseph University, “could set the streets on fire.” “If the Special Tribunal for Lebanon comes out and confirms the report,” Carnegie Middle East Center Director Paul Salem said, “we could be facing an all-out civil war.” “If these rumors are true,” my own source in Lebanon added, “expect some extremely dark times ahead in Lebanon. After all, the Sunni street hates Hezbollah enough to begin with. Once Hezbollah is officially accused of assassinating Hariri, all bets are off.”

All this raises the question: if Lebanon could plunge into war should “March 14” cite an unsourced report prematurely, what might happen if the UN officially indicts Hezbollah later?

Totten doesn’t seem convinced that the rumors are true. There does seem to be an element of whitewashing Syria’s role in the assassination attached to the rumor. (Of course, given that both Hezbollah and Syria are clients of Iran, would proof of Hezbollah’s involvement necessarily exonerate Syria?)

It does seem that Hezbollah is scared. That’s why Der Spiegel’s credibility must be undermined.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

05/23/2009

U.S. arming Hezbullah for next war with Israel

Filed under: Lebanon — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 10:46 am

America has apparently learned nothing since training and arming the PLO, which then used that training and those weapons to murder Israelis. Now, we’re going to send some pretty intense weaponry that will end up in the hands of Hezbullah.

US Vice President Joe Biden promised that Washington will provide the Lebanese army with 42 fighter jets, helicopters, UAVs and tanks, Arab media outlets reported on Saturday.

On Friday Biden concluded a brief one-day visit to Lebanon, during which he met mostly with leaders affiliated with the anti-Syrian camp, including Defense Minister Elias Murr.

Murr said tat the American vice president pledged to have the said weapons delivered to Lebanon, and that the aid package would be given to the country unconditionally, although Biden on Friday said that the aid hinges on the outcome of the upcoming general elections.

How do we know this will end up in Hezbullah’s hands? This is how:

The sources attribute the recent arrests to improved cooperation between Lebanon’s many security agencies, saying that with the help of better-trained personnel and access to more sophisticated equipment, the Internal Security Forces have been intensifying their efforts to uncover espionage networks as part of an attempt to develop a pan-Lebanese image.

[...] The United States has provided $1 billion in aid since 2006, including $410 million in security assistance to the Lebanese military and police.

So yes, great idea, let’s give Lebanon advanced tanks, fighter jets, and military equipment. Because it’s not like they’re going to go to war with Israel again, or are a pawn of the Iranians and Syrians.

Words fail.

05/22/2009

Nasrallah blames Israel for all the ills of the region

Filed under: Israel, Lebanon — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 11:00 am

These are the words of the man who, in the coming months, you can expect the EU, UN, and left-leaning US crowd to call for Israel to negotiate with. Because Hezbollah, they will say, is moderating. Or because Hezbollah is part of the Lebanese government, and it can no longer be ignored.

These are his words:

In a speech on occasion of the 61st anniversary of the occupation of Palestine broadcast on Monday, Secretary General of Hezbollah Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah said the Israeli entity which is based on usurpation, massacres, displacement and occupation isn’t a legitimate entity and cannot be legitimate in any way.

Nasrallah affirmed that the Israeli entity is the cause of all wars, disasters and crises in the region, forcing the past, current and future generations to bear the repercussions and effects of this tumor festering in the region.

He stressed that the wars that happened in the region were imposed by this entity, and that the actions of the region’s governments, peoples, armies and resistance movements were reactions to the occupation of Palestine, which is the source of conflict in the Middle East, with the enemy counting on the Palestinian cause being forgotten and on forcing the Palestinian people to despair and abandon their land and rights.

If someone can explain to me how you can reach an agreement with the man who spoke those words, I’d appreciate it. Because from where I’m sitting, the only agreement you can reach with Nasrallah is the business end of a hellfire missile.

05/01/2009

I’m kinda fonda Jane, I’ll missa

Filed under: Anti-Semitism, Israel, Israel Derangement Syndrome, Lebanon — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 10:00 am

Earlier this month delegates from all over the world got together in Geneva for a conference on xenophobia, racial discrimination and racism.

When the United States and some European nations boycotted the proceedings, Representative Barbara Lee objected:

Those who supported the Obama administration’s attending the conference said their attitude was not altered by Mr. Ahmadinejad’s remarks. “It is unfortunate that the inappropriate and out-of-line remarks of Ahmadinejad would obscure the only international forum to address racism, racial discrimination and xenophobia,” Representative Barbara Lee, Democrat of California, said in a statement by the Congressional Black Caucus.

So the question is, left to their own devices, did the delegates, dedicated to their essential work, look into this at all?

A professor at the American University here recently ordered copies of “The Diary of Anne Frank” for his classes, only to learn that the book is banned. Inquiring further, he discovered a long list of prohibited books, films and music.

This is perplexing — and deeply ironic — because Beirut has been named UNESCO’s 2009 “World Book Capital City.” Just last week “World Book and Copyright Day” was kicked off with a variety of readings and exhibits that honor “conformity to the principles of freedom of expression [and] freedom to publish,” as stated by the UNESCO Constitution, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the UNESCO’s “Florence Agreement.” The catch is that Lebanon has not signed the Florence Agreement, which focuses on the free circulation of print and audio-visual material.

Even a partial list of books banned in Lebanon gives pause: William Styron’s “Sophie’s Choice”; Thomas Keneally’s “Schindler’s List”; Thomas Friedman’s “From Beirut to Jerusalem”; books by Philip Roth, Saul Bellow and Isaac Bashevis Singer. In fact, all books that portray Jews, Israel or Zionism favorably are banned.

And you can’t even get a Jane Fonda movie. Why not? Because she visited Israel once in 1982!

Interestingly, Samir Kuntar visited Israel and is quite a celebrity in Lebanon. But that’s different because he went to Israel to kill Jews.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

04/30/2009

Hariri suspects freed

Filed under: Lebanon, Syria — Tags: — Soccerdad @ 10:00 am

The BBC reported yeterday that the UN’s special tribunal investigating the assassination of Rafiq Hariri has released four Lebanese generals it had been holding as suspects in the assassination.

The UN court was set up to investigate the bomb attack which killed Mr Hariri and 22 others in February 2005.

The decision to free the generals comes less than two months before a finely-balanced legislative election that pits the pro-Syrian bloc against their pro-Western rivals, including Mr Hariri’s own political movement now led by his son.

While the BBC observes that this will likely help Hezbollah in the upcoming Lebanese elections, it claims that according to its sources the tribunal is making progress on other fronts.

The New York Times gives some more background.

The first prosecutor in the case, Detlev Mehlis, released a report in 2005 that said that the assassination had been planned by high-level Syrian and Lebanese officials, including some in the inner circle of the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad. At the time, the tribunal was seen by many as a vehicle for the widespread anger here and in the West over Syria’s role in Lebanon. A string of other political assassinations took place in the following years, and they could still be included as part of the tribunal’s work if they are proved to be related to the attack on Rafik Hariri, in which 22 others also died.

The tribunal has always been controversial in Lebanon. Many supporters have seen it as a way to punish Syria and its proxies here, which they tend to blame for all the assassinations since 2005. By contrast, those in the political opposition, including Hezbollah, see it more as a political weapon aimed at their Syrian ally. They also ask why such a tribunal is warranted for the death of a billionaire politician, Mr. Hariri, and not for the deaths in the many massacres and other assassinations that have taken place here in recent decades.

One question is whether the new judge, Daniel Fransen is as scrupulous and incorruptible as Mehlis had been. The key event leading to the release of the suspects was the recanting of the witness who had accused them. Still it was reported that Mehlis had developed a pretty strong case.

Hariri’s son, Saad seemed untroubled (according to the news reports) by the turn of events, however not everyone was.

But many Lebanese seemed to view the officers’ release as a sign that the tribunal might never bring Mr. Hariri’s killers to justice.

“It is a shock,” said Samir Frangieh, one of Saad Hariri’s parliamentary allies. “Everyone knows who these men were and what they did.”

Is Saad scared to be too vocal about how he really feels? I can’t say that I’d blame him.

In a book review about Syria, Fouad Ajami writes:

The very dynasticism of the succession was a rebuke to all that the Baathists had once thought about themselves. The succession would stick, but the son, a pampered child of privilege, lacked his father’s touch. His coming-out, the defining act by which the outside world came to know him and his style, was the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, in February 2005. In the days leading up to Hariri’s brazen murder, which happened in broad daylight, outside Beirut’s seafront hotels, Bashar and his principal lieutenants had openly bullied and threatened Hariri.

Bashar himself had warned that he would “break Lebanon” over Hariri’s head if Hariri ran afoul of his wishes. The Syrians did not even bother with a convincing cover-up; an early United Nations investigation, led by a meticulous German prosecutor, Detlev Mehlis, made official and public the involvement of both the Syrian regime and its closest Lebanese satraps. (An unedited version of the report named Bashar’s younger brother Maher, his brother-in-law, Assef Shawkat, and high functionaries of the Syrian intelligence services.) Hafez, it was understood, would have gotten his way without outright murder. The father had secured hegemony over Lebanon in a meticulous, deliberate drive that took well over a quarter century. The son lost that dominion in the blink of an eye. He had misjudged the world around him. Pax Americana was right next door, in Iraq, determined to punish the Syrian regime for its subversion of the Iraqi-Syrian border, and Hariri was a friend of powers beyond — France and Saudi Arabia.

Five years earlier, there had been hopes that the young man, who had had some exposure to the West, would open up his country: U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who had turned up for the father’s funeral, returned from Damascus with praise for Bashar — he was a “modernizing reformer,” part of the Internet generation, she and her advisers said. The inquiries into Hariri’s murder shone a floodlight on the workings of the Syrian regime. This was less an organized government than a huge criminal and financial enterprise held together by a security apparatus built around the children and in-laws of Hafez al-Assad and the intelligence barons. In Damascus, it is the rule of the Sopranos.

The Daily Star has many more details and an editorial supportive of the tribunal’s decision. I’m curious what Michael Young and Michael Totten will write. Assad apologist, Helena Cobban is absolutely delighted.

I can’t help thinking that this is a revolting development.

UPDATE: A few months ago there was a report that members of Hezbollah were photographing the site at the Hague where the tribunal would be meeting. Though that report was subsequently denied there was this incident too.

UN chief prosecutor of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) Daniel Bellemare met Hezbollah officials in Beirut before heading to the Hague for launching the tribunal, local As-Safier daily reported Tuesday.

The STL was launched Sunday in Hague to try suspects in the murder of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, who was killed in a car bomb along with 22 others on Feb. 14, 2005 in Beirut.

Sources from the UN investigation committee were quoted describing the meeting between Bellemare and the Shiite armed group Hezbollah, as “fruitful and very positive,” the daily said.

Something about the release doesn’t smell right.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

04/13/2009

You look like a monkey…

Filed under: Juvenile Scorn, Lebanon — Meryl Yourish @ 7:00 am

Egypt’s war of words with Hassan Nasrallah is escalating, and the laughs just keep on coming.

An Egyptian state-controlled newspaper escalated Egypt’s dispute with Hizbullah on Sunday by calling its leader, Hassan Nasrallah, a “Monkey sheikh.”

The state-owned al-Gomhouria newspaper said: “We do not allow you, monkey sheikh, to mock our judiciary, for you are a bandit and veteran criminal who killed your countrymen, but we will not allow you to threaten the security and safety of Egypt …and if you threaten its sovereignty, you will burn!”

If they start singing “And you smell like one, too,” I want the audio.

03/14/2009

Israel and the media: Tunnel vision, blindness, or outright bias?

Filed under: Lebanon, Media Bias — Meryl Yourish @ 9:56 am

Yesterday, the Israeli press carried Hassan Nasrallah’s recorded speech released on Mohammed’s birthday. It’s a pretty important speech, you would think, since Britain has recently announced that it is seeking to establish ties to Hizbullah. And it’s a very important speech in light of that fact, since the head of Hizbullah had this to say:

“I’m telling you that today, tomorrow, even in 1,000 years, we, our children and our offspring will never be able to recognize Israel. We are capable of defeating this entity (Israel) and can make it disappear, if we join forces and work together.”

This quote, doubtless, will not find its way into the next AP article about how the U.K. is seeking to talk with Hizbullah’s “political wing.” Because I can’t find it anywhere in any current AP article. Here’s what the AP finds more important in Israel news:

American wounded by Israeli troops has surgery
An American activist struck in the head by a tear gas canister fired by Israeli troops in the West Bank was in serious condition Saturday after undergoing surgery, hospital officials said.

And this:

Israeli police fatally shoot Palestinian
Israeli police say an officer in Jerusalem has fatally shot a Palestinian man who allegedly tried to harm police with his car.

The fatal shooting occurred during a botched robbery. But it comes after a string of attacks against Israelis by Palestinians who have used bulldozers to try to run them over.

Clearly, the AP has its priorities over what gets reported regarding Israel. And the fact that the leader of a group that is set to take an even bigger role in the Lebanese government stated explicitly that it will never recognize the Jewish State is not as high a priority as reporting on the latest ISM tool to get hurt at an anti-barrier protest, or an internal police matter that would otherwise not require any mention.

The BBC reported Nasrallah’s speech. The Canadian press had it (because the AFP had it). An Australian paper had the BBC clip. Sturdy, anti-Israel Xinhua had it. Reuters didn’t. Except for the AFP, no major wire service felt that this statement by the leader of Hizbullah was important enough to send out on the wires.

Now, you might say that the news services have a ton of things to consider before deciding what is newsworthy and what is not. But let me repeat that Hizbullah is setting itself up to increase its presence in the Lebanese government this spring. The U.K. is currently initiating “low-level” contacts with Hizbullah’s “political wing.” And there have been many who think that talking to Hizbullah is a good idea—that it could move the terrorist organization towards a more moderate viewpoint. (These are the same people who think that Hamas will moderate as well.)

Let me put paid to those theories with the words of Hizbullah’s leader:

“The U.S. condition of acknowledging Israel to open dialogue with us is rejected,” Nasrallah told crowds of Shiite Moslems gathered in the southern suburbs of Beirut this evening to mark the birthday of Prophet Mohammed.

“As long as Hezbollah exists, the generations of our people could never acknowledge the state of Israel which is a hostile terrorist entity,” Nasrallah vowed.

He said that the U.S. set two conditions to start talks with Hezbollah, “acknowledging Israel and abandoning violence,” and what they meant by abandoning violence is giving up the resistance.

“The resistance is our dignity, our honor and our existence,” he stressed.

Gordon Brown needs to read the translation of the speech. Hizbullah will never accept Israel. It will never moderate. Britain’s low-level talks are a waste of time and effort.

And so I wonder—why is this speech not important enough to be broadcast around the world by the world’s major wire services?

02/21/2009

Your weekend AP anti-Israel bias

Filed under: Israel, Lebanon, Media Bias — Meryl Yourish @ 12:55 pm

A headline is worth a thousand words. See if you can find the AP headline without using your mouse. Second prize for anti-Israel media bias goes to CNN.

2 rockets fired from Lebanon towards Israel

Rocket from Lebanon wounds three Israelis: medics

Katyusha hits Galilee community; 3 lightly hurt


Israel claims woman hurt in rocket attack

That last is CNN. That’s the headline going around on the main and international websites. Yes, Israel “claims” that a woman was hurt. Palestinians state; Israel claims. That’s one of the biggest anti-Israel biases in the media—questioning everything that Israel says, buying every Palestinian “medic” or “witness” as the truth. Witness lies like the one about the UN school (which was never hit, and which did not have 42 people killed in the strike.)

This is why I read the Israeli papers regularly. To find out what really happened.

02/12/2009

Briefly

Filed under: Hamas, Israel, Lebanon, Terrorism — Meryl Yourish @ 9:00 am

Hamas feeling the PR pinch, 1: Hamas gave back the aid it stole from the UN, mostly because for the first time ever, the UN complained about it. Oh, and UNRWA stopped all aid going into Gaza because of the theft. Of course, they’re starting up again. If they didn’t supply the Palestinians, what use would there be for the organization?

Hamas feeling the PR pinch, 2: The world is finally starting to publicly admit that Hamas is a terrorist organization that cares nothing for the Palestinians. No, not really. But the world is starting to realize that if it continues to ignore Hamas’ egregious human rights violations, people are going to notice that it only blames Israel and not, say, the group that fires rockets at civilians on a regular basis. So Amnesty Intl. finally accused Hamas of war crimes (but not against Israel) and Hamas is complaining about Amnesty. Elder notes that Amnesty has not issued a statement condemning Hamas’ war crimes against Israel, but only against Palestinians. That would suggest that Amnesty still has no real problems with the constant rocket fire by the “resistance.” I used to have such respect for Amnesty, back in the day. Then again, I voted for Jimmy Carter when I had that respect. And look at them both now.

Egypt cracks down on the wrong kind of smuggling: Egypt stopped some 40 trucks filled with goods going into Gaza. But none of the trucks were carrying weapons, so who cares? (Unless the goods were bomb-making materials, which I doubt.) Call me when Egypt stops arms and weapons from going through the tunnels.

Tuna for terrorists: The IDF is on high alert today, which happens to be the anniversary of the assassination of Imad Mugniyah. Last month, a Hezbollah terrorist attack in Europe was thwarted by Israeli intelligence. Scuttlebutt is that Hezbollah is too terrified of the Israeli response to leave a trail to Lebanon. Although the 2006 Lebanon War was not a success, I’m starting to think it wasn’t a failure, either. Not if deterrence has been achieved. And oh yeah—Chipmunk Cheeks is still in his secure, undisclosed location. Because he’s not afraid of the IDF.

Okay, now you’re just being stupid: The JPost says Avigdor Lieberman may recommend himself for PM. Can you say, “Believing his own PR?” I knew you could. Now can you say, “Not a chance in hell?” I knew you could.

Israel hits the jackpot: The natural gas field off the coast of Israel is even larger than they first thought. It’s big enough to supply Israel for over 20 years—and still have enough left over to sell to Europe. Or maybe Ukraine. By the way, Hamas already tried to say that Israel was stealing the gas from the one off the coast of Gaza. Perhaps they should look at a map. The Tamar gas field is off the coast of northern Israel.

01/08/2009

Iran opens a second front?

Filed under: Israel, Lebanon, Terrorism — Tags: , — Meryl Yourish @ 2:00 am

Did Iran order Hezbullah to shell northern Israel yesterday?

A Katyusha barrage was fired Thursday at the Nahariya area in the Western Galilee. Police reported that two people were lightly wounded and evacuated to the local hospital. Several residents were treated for shock.

[...] Residents rushed to take cover in shelters and fortified areas, as children throughout the town were making their way to school.

It’s a typical terrorist tactic. They deliberately aim to kill as many children as possible.

Israel returned fire.

The IDF shelled the areas in southern Lebanon from which Katyusha rockets were fired at Israel’s north Thursday morning. There were no initial reports of injuries.

Military sources estimated that the attack was carried out by a Palestinian organization and not by Hizbullah, in light of the type of rockets used.

It could easily have been Iran’s orders. Hezbullah doesn’t sneeze without asking the mullahs’ permission. And Iranian orders were given yesterday.

A senior Iranian politician met Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal in Damascus on Wednesday as the Palestinian Islamist group considered an Egyptian proposal for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

Ali Larijani, speaker of parliament and one of the major figures in the Islamic Republic, met Mashaal and several high level officials from Hamas at the Iranian embassy in the Syrian capital, witnesses said.

The meeting stretched into the early hours of Thursday, with no details emerging from the deliberations. Larijani earlier met leaders of Islamic Jihad, a smaller Palestinian group with close links to Iran.

Iran thinks it’s time to up the ante for Israel, since Hamas hasn’t been able to do much against the IDF. It’s not too difficult to make the rocket attack look like it isn’t Hezbullah. But both UNIFIL and the Lebanese army increased border patrols. Yes, there was that incident in December where the Lebanese army defused eight rockets ready to launch at Israel. But I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find out that this is Hezbullah.

Time will tell.

12/31/2008

Is the price of oil keeping Hezbullah peaceful?

Filed under: Iran, Israel, Lebanon — Tags: , , — Meryl Yourish @ 8:00 am

Oil is sticking around $40 a barrel (it closed at $39 and change today). Iran is in trouble.

Iran’s president presented parliament with a sweeping economic package Tuesday that calls for scrapping costly state subsidies for fuel, water and electricity and raising taxes to make up for the steep slide in world oil prices.

The move is a risky one for President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who already is facing public disenchantment over Iran’s economic problems as he heads into June elections. Economists have warned that his plan will push up prices, worsening inflation now running at 28 percent.

But it’s even better (or worse) than that.

Iran relies on oil for 60% of its budget, half of which is spent on welfare. Starved for money, Mr. Ahmadinejad proposes to free some consumer prices and cut spending. Corruption, mismanagement (inflation at 25%) and unmet populist promises already made Mr. Ahmadinejad unpopular at home. Now the austerity talk is raising the domestic temperature. In October, a strike by bazaar merchants forced the government to delay a sales tax. The universities are restive again (see “Iran’s YouTube Generation,” Dec. 15) and the government wants to push through a hated gasoline rationing plan.

Apparently, Iran’s budget has oil pegged at $60/bbl. Ouch. Sucks to be you, Mad Mullahs. And will the Mullahs loosen the pursestrings of their Swiss bank accounts? Of course not. Let the peasants eat—um. What’s an Iranian delicacy?

Here’s what I find most satisfying right now: The price of oil went up a dollar or two since the start of Israel’s war on Hamas. Then it pretty much went back down again on the news that demand is going nowhere. When you have a land awash in a commodity that isn’t as desirable today as it was a mere six months ago, well, you either have to utilize other parts of your economy, or you have to just suck up the $100/bbl difference. But when oil revenues make up 60% of your budget—well, then you don’t get to do the things you really want to do.

Is the price of oil stopping the mullahs from ordering Hezbullah to open a second front against Israel? Perhaps. It could also be that they’re keeping Hezbullah in reserve for a possible attack on their nuclear facilities. Omri says it’s because the IDF flat-out stated not long ago that the next time Hezbullah attacks Israel, the IDF will flatten Lebanon. Not just the Hezbullah sections of Beirut. The entire country. Here’s the article he cited:

In any future conflict with Hizbullah, Israel will likely cite the Shi’ite group’s increasing influence within the Lebanese cabinet as a legitimate reason to target Lebanon’s entire infrastructure, government sources have told The Jerusalem Post.

So. Is the price of oil affecting Iran’s decision? Is it the desire to hold Hezbullah in reserve in case Hamas does get totally chewed up and spit out by the IDF? Or is it because the Lebanese know that Israel isn’t making idle threats about infrastructure?

Once again, Omri:

Evaluating Hezbollah – The consensus seem to be that they won’t attack lest the IAF flatten southern Lebanon. There were several mentions about the noticeable lack of activity in the south.

I’ll go with the Israeli sources on this one. They’re better informed. The fact that Iran is going to be facing probable riots in the near future because the price of oil has dropped? Well, that’s just a nice little extra.

Powered by WordPress