The Massachusetts Message: Fanfare from the common man

One of the reasons Scott Brown plowed over Martha Coakley in his pickup truck on Tuesday is because the signals coming from Washington and the media are all about how Americans are too stupid, too uneducated, too ignorant, or too self-absorbed and childish to understand the matters that concern the political and media elite.

David Brooks‘ column of two weeks ago stated this elitism so clearly that we simply couldn’t miss the tone of contempt from the elite to the rest of us. In his view, apparently, Americans who disagree with his “educated class” are petulant teenagers. The fact that they may have legitimate reasons for disagreement? Pshaw. They aren’t smart enough for that.

The educated class believes in global warming, so public skepticism about global warming is on the rise. The educated class supports abortion rights, so public opinion is shifting against them. The educated class supports gun control, so opposition to gun control is mounting.

The story is the same in foreign affairs. The educated class is internationalist, so isolationist sentiment is now at an all-time high, according to a Pew Research Center survey. The educated class believes in multilateral action, so the number of Americans who believe we should “go our own way” has risen sharply.

The reaction to Brown’s win? More elitism. Here’s what Patrick Kennedy, Teddy’s son, had to say:

“It’s like in Roman times, they’d be trotted out to the coliseum and the lions would be brought out,” Kennedy said Tuesday night. “I mean, they’re wanting blood and they’re not getting it so they want to protest. And, you know, you can’t blame them. But frankly, the fact is we inherited this mess, and it’s becoming ours.”

Get it? Americans don’t want to vote for the politicians they feel respond to their needs. They’re just voting against Coakley because they want heads to roll. It’s a reaction, not an action. The fact that voters might be voting for candidates who are giving them what they want doesn’t seem to have entered this entitled, second-generation, wealthy politician’s mind. Apparently, the only Americans who vote with their heads are the elites. The rest of us? Well, bread and circuses, dontchaknow.

Kennedy typifies the Obama crowd: Elitism and a blame-Bush mentality, all rolled into one. And they don’t understand average Americans. Here’s more from Brooks, making you think he may be starting to think twice about the, ah, “uneducated” class:

Go out and say that maybe it’s not a great idea to pass the most complicated and largest piece of domestic legislation in a generation when the American people don’t like it. Show doubt. Don’t show arrogance. If President Obama comes out swinging, it will be his Katrina moment, the moment when the elitist tag will be permanently hung around his neck.

But then he slips right back into elitist mode:

Sometimes you can get away with running directly against public opinion, but it is a very risky maneuver.

Show humility, Democrats, there is some chance that American voters may not be complete idiots.

He’s joking, you say. He’s being sarcastic. Really? I wouldn’t be so sure. Read the part again about why the Tea Party movement is against government health care legislation. We are petulant children. We are against things because they are for them. It’s our lack of “education,” I presume. Or at least, Brooks’ kind of education, which I’m pretty sure doesn’t count my state college (Montclair State, NJ) education.

And there are still more examples. Here’s Terry McAuliffe on why Massachusetts didn’t seat Martha Coakley:

“We have to keep our focus on job creation. Everything we have to do is related to job creation. We have to do a much better job on the message. People are confused on what this health care bill is going to do.”

Translation: Americans are too stupid to understand the health care bill. And it’s what the Obama administration’s message will be. Let’s hear from David Axelrod:

“We are the party in power, and as such there’s an element of responsibility assigned,” he said. “I think people need to know that their challenges and their concerns are the focus of our work every day.”

It’s not the message. It’s the fact that they haven’t done a good enough job selling the message. That’s what you’ll be hearing for some time, apparently.

Finally, along comes Anthony Weiner, Democratic Representative from New York, who does understand the message of Massachusetts:

“When you have large numbers of citizens in the United States of America who believe this is going in the wrong direction, there’s a limit to which you can keep saying, ‘Okay, they just don’t get it. If we just pass a bill, they’ll get it.’ No, no. I think that maybe we should internalize that we’re not doing things entirely correctly.”

Representative Weiner gets it. Whether or not his fellow politicians do remains to be seen.

As for Congress and the Obama administration: Will they stop belittling the voters that sent them to Washington?

Of course, they can continue mocking politicians who drive a pickup truck. Americans will keep voting for the truck drivers, and the political elite will finally understand the message that we are sending them. The chant that went up in town hall meetings all over the nation last summer didn’t register with most of our politicians then. But I’m pretty sure Congress is hearing it now. Remember it, politicos, because you work for us.

This entry was posted in American Scene, Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Massachusetts Message: Fanfare from the common man

  1. sabbahillel says:

    People are confused on what this health care bill is going to do

    Actually, the reason most people are against the bill is that they are very clear about what it will do. He is upset that he and his kind have not been able to confuse everyone about the bill. I still get answers from congress critters who are in denial about what this bill actually says and ignore the evil methods used to pass it.

  2. annoyinglittletwerp says:

    No only don’t I have college degree-but I’m also homemaker who is “GASP!” mildly autistic. No matter-I do “get” the health care bill…and the bailouts…and the weak national defense…and the…
    I get it ALL-and even in a deep blue state like Illinois-I’ll be voting accordingly.

  3. And on cue, the NYTimes backs me up. They simply do not understand the average American. There will be another post on this. At least.

  4. Michael Lonie says:

    Patrick Kennedy sounds incoherent and hysterical. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was both, for Scott Brown winning must look like the kiss of death for his political career.

    The people are against what the “educated classes” are for not out of contrariness or ignorance, they are against them because what the “educated classes” want to do is really, really stupid and counterproductive. All their education doesn’t allow them to recognize that the healthcare monstrosity, the stimulus bill that doesn’t stimulate anything, huge deficits that make the deficits of the Bush Administration look frugal by comparison, cap and tax and other policies intended to meet the nonexistent problem of global warming er climate change, and treating terrorists like they committed infractions of the civil law, are all very stupid policies and will not accomplish what the Obama Administration says they intend to accomplish. Maybe Obama and his comrades are lying about what they intend to accomplish. That’s the logical alternative to dismissing the conclusion that the policies are stupid. Which conclusion do you think Brooks would prefer?

Comments are closed.