<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday briefs (not boxers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2009/12/09/9554/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2009/12/09/9554</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Furman</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2009/12/09/9554/comment-page-1#comment-38621</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Furman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=9554#comment-38621</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Actually, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. . . What they really should be is jihadaphobes, which would be anyone in his right mind.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Spot on, and worth repeating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Actually, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. . . What they really should be is jihadaphobes, which would be anyone in his right mind.</p></blockquote>
<p>Spot on, and worth repeating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabba Hillel</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2009/12/09/9554/comment-page-1#comment-38619</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabba Hillel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=9554#comment-38619</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What? The U.S. backs Israel on Jerusalem negotiations? Seriously? I mean, seriously? The U.S. is telling the EU that Jerusalem is a final-status issue? Seriously? I mean, seriously? Shyeah. Give Obama a day or so to get an earful from the Palestinians and the Arabs. Heâ€™ll cave.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Actually, that depends on the definition of &quot;&lt;i&gt;Final Status Negotiations&lt;/i&gt;&quot; Based on the way Obama has been acting, what he means is that the &quot;negotiations&quot; will be predetermined to come out the way he wants anyway and Israel would probably be forced to give up Jerusalem, while Obama can pretend that he had nothing to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What? The U.S. backs Israel on Jerusalem negotiations? Seriously? I mean, seriously? The U.S. is telling the EU that Jerusalem is a final-status issue? Seriously? I mean, seriously? Shyeah. Give Obama a day or so to get an earful from the Palestinians and the Arabs. Heâ€™ll cave.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, that depends on the definition of &#8220;<i>Final Status Negotiations</i>&#8221; Based on the way Obama has been acting, what he means is that the &#8220;negotiations&#8221; will be predetermined to come out the way he wants anyway and Israel would probably be forced to give up Jerusalem, while Obama can pretend that he had nothing to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

