The subtleties of the AP anti-Israel bias are always in evidence, no matter who the writer, no matter what the subject. Witness:
The gist of the article is a debate between Israeli president and former Prime Minister Shimon Peres, and the Secretary-General of the Arab League, Amr Moussa. But before we get to all that, we have to have the set-up. First, tar Netanyahu as the one preventing peace because—wait for it—he refuses to stop building settlements.
The difficulty has been compounded by the fact that in March a right-leaning government replaced the previous more moderate one in Israel.
Several months ago, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reluctantly agreed to accept the principle of a Palestinian state – a position his predecessors had already adopted but his Likud party has not – but said it would have to have limits on its rights to have a military or control its airspace.
Next, give Moussa a chance to respond to the above, but don’t have Peres respond to it. Have Peres talk about a completely different topic.
Then, slam Peres and compliment Moussa, almost in the same breath (but while allowing Moussa to accuse the Israelis of duplicity):
Peres – pushing the boundaries on a role that is meant to be ceremonial and somewhat above the political and diplomatic fray – argued that even the borders initially delineated for the Palestinian state could be considered provisional and ultimately expanded.
“You want us to believe that?” thundered the urbane Moussa. “Another one of the tricks!”
Another way of telling which way the article is biased: There are ten paragraphs that contain quotes or paraphrases by Moussa. There are only six containing Peres’ quotes or paraphrases—and the article is titled “Peres: Palestinian state first, full peace later.”
I think, though, the thing that really got me is describing Moussa as “urbane” right after implying that Peres isn’t acting in his government’s best interest. In point of fact, nobody in Israel is complaining that Peres is overstepping his bounds, or if they have, I haven’t seen it. But don’t let the facts get in the way of a good anti-Israel slap.
The Associated Press: the anti-Israel Energizer bunny. They just never stop.
Actually, a lot of people complain about Peres being the de facto Foreign Minister, Peres is routinely insulted by the vast majority of talkbacks every time there is an article about him – maybe you mean the mainstream media does not complain, which is true, but the mainstream media in Israel is often no better than the AP whose material they often use. And since talkbacks in Israel are routinely censored, the worst comments don’t even appear.