<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethnic smearing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2009/08/06/8486/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2009/08/06/8486</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Rostrom</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2009/08/06/8486/comment-page-1#comment-37251</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Rostrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=8486#comment-37251</guid>
		<description>Sorry, this is not a mundane case. It goes to the heart of the Arab-Israeli dispute.
Personally, I question the propriety of enforcing a pre-1948 property claim in territory lost then, but occupied in 1967, when the Israeli government does not recognize pre-1948 Arab property claims in Israel.
I&#039;ve said for years that &#039;48 and what came after (such as expulsion of Jews from Arab countries) are water under the bridge. The wrongs and injuries on all sides roughly balance (_very_ roughly). If everyone accepted this, the conflict would end. But the core basis of Arab rejectionism is the perpetuation of their ancient grievances.
It is thus very dangerous for Israel to say now that a pre-1948 claim can be enforced: it opens up a very big can of worms. At the very least, it confirms the Palestinian delusion that they should seek to conquer Israel to regain what is &quot;rightfully&quot; theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, this is not a mundane case. It goes to the heart of the Arab-Israeli dispute.</p>
<p>Personally, I question the propriety of enforcing a pre-1948 property claim in territory lost then, but occupied in 1967, when the Israeli government does not recognize pre-1948 Arab property claims in Israel.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said for years that &#8217;48 and what came after (such as expulsion of Jews from Arab countries) are water under the bridge. The wrongs and injuries on all sides roughly balance (_very_ roughly). If everyone accepted this, the conflict would end. But the core basis of Arab rejectionism is the perpetuation of their ancient grievances. </p>
<p>It is thus very dangerous for Israel to say now that a pre-1948 claim can be enforced: it opens up a very big can of worms. At the very least, it confirms the Palestinian delusion that they should seek to conquer Israel to regain what is &#8220;rightfully&#8221; theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bensky</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2009/08/06/8486/comment-page-1#comment-37248</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=8486#comment-37248</guid>
		<description>In absolutely any other country in the world a mundane case about land title would be of no interest to anyone but the parties involved. When it comes to Israel and Arabs, even the decision by an independent Supreme Court is an international scandal. The US Secretary of State criticizes it. Tell me again how Obama really has Israel&#039;s best interests at heart.
Meanwhile, I was in Washington, DC last week and read in the newspaper that a conservative estimate of the number of lives lost in the Congo&#039;s civil war is five million...five million. Nobody gives a damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In absolutely any other country in the world a mundane case about land title would be of no interest to anyone but the parties involved. When it comes to Israel and Arabs, even the decision by an independent Supreme Court is an international scandal. The US Secretary of State criticizes it. Tell me again how Obama really has Israel&#8217;s best interests at heart.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I was in Washington, DC last week and read in the newspaper that a conservative estimate of the number of lives lost in the Congo&#8217;s civil war is five million&#8230;five million. Nobody gives a damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

