Gone with the enemy

While it may not be the official Obama administration policy, apparently there is no longer a “Global War on Terror.” (via memeorandum) The Washington Post reports:

In a memo e-mailed this week to Pentagon staff members, the Defense Department’s office of security review noted that “this administration prefers to avoid using the term ‘Long War’ or ‘Global War on Terror’ [GWOT.] Please use ‘Overseas Contingency Operation.’ ”

While the article suggests that this particular e-mail may have been the work of a single career civil servant, it explains:

Coincidentally or not, senior administration officials had been publicly using the phrase “overseas contingency operations” in a war context for roughly a month before the e-mail was sent.

I guess this has been coming. After all if we don’t have enemies, I guess we can’t very well have a war.

Give diplomacy a chance? Good luck with that. Sanctions might be worth a try.

Crossposted on Soccer Dad.

About Soccerdad

I'm a government bureaucrat with delusions of literacy.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Gone with the enemy

  1. Veeshir says:

    And the victims of these not to be named types will probably be called “unrequested population reductions”

  2. Pamela says:

    Ah gee willikers! George would be so proud, newspeak is here!

  3. Tom Frank says:

    I wonder if they will stop paying the military folks the little bit extra they get for being in a war zone/combat pay?

    After all, if it isn’t a war any longer, then there isn’t a war zone. And there isn’t any combat. Just police actions.

    I wonder…

Comments are closed.