Comments on: The Miller’s tale (again)

By: Michael Lonie

Michael Lonie — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:51:09 +0000

Once the cheering is over Meryl, the Eurotwits will be the first ones wondering “Are we next?” Europe cannot or will not defend itself against any outside threat. Much of it is likely to collapse in the face of any significant internal threat, like the threatening jihad, too. And the answer to their question will be: Yes.

If the USA rats on Israel, colluding, even if only passively, in a renewed genocide of the Jews, some especially horrible disaster will come upon us, and we will deserve it.

By: eaglewingz08

eaglewingz08 — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:06:43 +0000

With all the money and ‘spiritual support’ that Iran is pouring into Syria and Lebanon, and with the US noticeably short of an excess of funds to replace Iranian terrorist monies, due to financial circumstances brought on by feckless democrat policies (Hello Fannie, Hello Freddie, Hello Rubin, stock market’s spaghetti) and with a dove in hawk’s clothing about to enter the White House, what incentive does Syria have to tow a soft line or to link up with the US than 5,000 centrifuges Amamadjihadi? That was rhetorical.

By: Meryl Yourish

Meryl Yourish — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:11:02 +0000

Actually, Michael, I think selling out Israel WILL get us more friends—in Europe, where they’re very fond of selling out the Jews.

By: Michael Lonie

Michael Lonie — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:51:13 +0000

The only thing that will “wean” Syria from its alliance with the Pharaohs of Tehran is the 4th Infantry Division rolling into Damascus and standing Bashir and his consiglieri against the nearest wall. Why should he move away from Iran? The more he clings to Iran the more Westerners try to give him stuff to encourage him to move away, the more they come down on Israel to give him stuff, and the greater his importance in the eyes of the outside world for his troublemaking.

Syria has given no evidence of wanting peace with Israel, only regaining its firing position against the Hulah Valley. Syria has not given up on colonizing Lebanon either, although Iran may prevent that by colonizing it herself.

Selling out Israel will make us no friends either in the Middle East or elsewhere. It will gain us only the justified contempt of our enemies for ratting on an ally, and the distrust of our allies who may well conclude “We’re next.”

By: David Lewis

David Lewis — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:02:33 +0000

Israel should tell the syrians “tough luck we took it fair and square.”
The US would not give Russia back Alaska just because we are more friendly now. It would jepordize the US’ national security and so would returning the Golan Heights for Israel.

By: Sabba Hillel

Sabba Hillel — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:33:52 +0000

Actually, it should be given back to Syria becaue the shelters have not been used in a long time. Also, modern Israeli children need to get used to sleeping in shelters so that they will be used to the conditions when the UN forces Israel to move 50 miles west of Tel Aviv.

By: soccer dad

soccer dad — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:18:13 +0000

It’s not just to make the world like Israel again, but to make the world respect the United States again. Just like it did after the successfully concluded the Camp David summit in 2000.

Oh it wasn’t successful?

Never mind.

By: Meryl Yourish

Meryl Yourish — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:08:46 +0000

To make people like Israel again.

Really. That’s their logic.

By: Yankev

Yankev — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:23:06 +0000

Israel uses the Golan for Vineyards. The Syrians used the Golan Heights as an artillery and sniper platform to target Israeli children in their schools and homes, and Israeli farmers working their fields. Anyone who has seen the fields near the former Syrian pill boxes can tell you the Syrians never cleared the area for farming — it is all half-buried rocks.

A generation of Israeli children grew up sleeping in underground shelters every night, until Israel captured the Golan in the 1967 war of defense. Why on earth should it be given back to Syria?