<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATE: The AP media bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2008/10/26/5513/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2008/10/26/5513</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccerdad</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2008/10/26/5513/comment-page-1#comment-33994</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccerdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=5513#comment-33994</guid>
		<description>This is something &lt;a href=&quot;http://soccerdad.baltiblogs.com/archives/2008/09/15/savirs_wishful_thinking.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I&#039;ve blogged about in the past&lt;/a&gt;. Netanyahu&#039;s fault was not accepting Arafat but:
&lt;i&gt;Rather than hurting the peace process, Netanyahu probably helped it. First of all, his administration &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/peace+process/guide+to+the+peace+process/israeli-palestinian+economic+relations.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;boasted in late 1998&lt;/a&gt; that more Palestinians were employed in Israel than any time since 1992. Also terror deaths during Netanyahu&#039;s term as PM, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2000/1/Terrorism%20deaths%20in%20Israel%20-%201920-1999&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;were down significantly&lt;/a&gt;. When Israelis voted for Barak over Netanyahu in 1999, they likely didn&#039;t consider terrorism a major problem. Netanyahu&#039;s term in office made it appear safe for Israel to return to the peace process.
So when Israel voted for Netanyahu it was a reaction that the peace process had brought terror, not peace. It was a reasonable conclusion since there was no Israeli government that had been more conciliatory towards the Palestinians (at that time) than Shimon Peres&#039;s and the retreats of the Peres government led to more terror not less.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something <a href="http://soccerdad.baltiblogs.com/archives/2008/09/15/savirs_wishful_thinking.html" rel="nofollow">I&#8217;ve blogged about in the past</a>. Netanyahu&#8217;s fault was not accepting Arafat but:</p>
<p><i>Rather than hurting the peace process, Netanyahu probably helped it. First of all, his administration <a href="http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/peace+process/guide+to+the+peace+process/israeli-palestinian+economic+relations.htm" rel="nofollow">boasted in late 1998</a> that more Palestinians were employed in Israel than any time since 1992. Also terror deaths during Netanyahu&#8217;s term as PM, <a href="http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2000/1/Terrorism%20deaths%20in%20Israel%20-%201920-1999" rel="nofollow">were down significantly</a>. When Israelis voted for Barak over Netanyahu in 1999, they likely didn&#8217;t consider terrorism a major problem. Netanyahu&#8217;s term in office made it appear safe for Israel to return to the peace process.</p>
<p>So when Israel voted for Netanyahu it was a reaction that the peace process had brought terror, not peace. It was a reasonable conclusion since there was no Israeli government that had been more conciliatory towards the Palestinians (at that time) than Shimon Peres&#8217;s and the retreats of the Peres government led to more terror not less.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

