<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technological enforcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourish.com/2008/05/13/4814/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourish.com/2008/05/13/4814</link>
	<description>Cutting straight to the point</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:03:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maquis</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2008/05/13/4814/comment-page-1#comment-31923</link>
		<dc:creator>Maquis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 03:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=4814#comment-31923</guid>
		<description>I think we need to incorporate facial recognition technology from digital cameras into electronic gunsights.  I mean, you never know when the zombies are coming, and a non-head shot is a wasted bullet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need to incorporate facial recognition technology from digital cameras into electronic gunsights.  I mean, you never know when the zombies are coming, and a non-head shot is a wasted bullet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2008/05/13/4814/comment-page-1#comment-31921</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=4814#comment-31921</guid>
		<description>WeCU reminds me a little bit of Bruce Schneier&#039;s saying &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0205.html#1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;security by obscurity&lt;/a&gt;.  Trust us it works and you do not need to know how.  Those types of systems are always hacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WeCU reminds me a little bit of Bruce Schneier&#8217;s saying <a href="http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0205.html#1" rel="nofollow">security by obscurity</a>.  Trust us it works and you do not need to know how.  Those types of systems are always hacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Charlap</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2008/05/13/4814/comment-page-1#comment-31920</link>
		<dc:creator>David Charlap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=4814#comment-31920</guid>
		<description>One of the most interesting government-surveillance scenarios I ever read is in Greg Bear&#039;s novel &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_of_Angels&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Queen of Angels&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.

In it, a government agency, &quot;Public Oversight&quot; has monitoring devices installed everywhere, including places we&#039;d consider private.  Freedom is maintained by imposing extreme restrictions on what Public Oversight can do with the data they collect.  They release all kinds of information in aggregates, to do what we, today, do with surveys and focus groups.  Any specific information, however, is only released on a need-to-know basis, and they decide who needs to know (and almost nobody has such a need).

In the novel, a police officer requests information about a suspect.  Public Oversight refuses to disclose the information, but provides some other, seemingly trivial, piece of information, saying that normal police work can produce all the remaining evidence needed to solve the case.

A very interesting system, even though we all know it could never exist in reality without being completely abused by a government that would use it to become a tyranny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most interesting government-surveillance scenarios I ever read is in Greg Bear&#8217;s novel <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_of_Angels" rel="nofollow"><i>Queen of Angels</i></a>.</p>
<p>In it, a government agency, &#8220;Public Oversight&#8221; has monitoring devices installed everywhere, including places we&#8217;d consider private.  Freedom is maintained by imposing extreme restrictions on what Public Oversight can do with the data they collect.  They release all kinds of information in aggregates, to do what we, today, do with surveys and focus groups.  Any specific information, however, is only released on a need-to-know basis, and they decide who needs to know (and almost nobody has such a need).</p>
<p>In the novel, a police officer requests information about a suspect.  Public Oversight refuses to disclose the information, but provides some other, seemingly trivial, piece of information, saying that normal police work can produce all the remaining evidence needed to solve the case.</p>
<p>A very interesting system, even though we all know it could never exist in reality without being completely abused by a government that would use it to become a tyranny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatterdemalian</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2008/05/13/4814/comment-page-1#comment-31919</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatterdemalian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=4814#comment-31919</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t mind society being saturated, as long as civilians are allowed to own it too. &quot;Big Brother&quot; happens when the watchers hold themselves above being watched themselves as is sadly the case in the UK, where police-monitored cameras are ubiquitous but civilian-monitored cameras are either illegal or will get your butt kicked by angry cops if they catch you filming them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind society being saturated, as long as civilians are allowed to own it too. &#8220;Big Brother&#8221; happens when the watchers hold themselves above being watched themselves as is sadly the case in the UK, where police-monitored cameras are ubiquitous but civilian-monitored cameras are either illegal or will get your butt kicked by angry cops if they catch you filming them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric J</title>
		<link>http://www.yourish.com/2008/05/13/4814/comment-page-1#comment-31917</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourish.com/?p=4814#comment-31917</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or does this sound suspiciously like Dr. Baltar&#039;s Cylon Detector? 

Don&#039;t let them have any nuclear weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or does this sound suspiciously like Dr. Baltar&#8217;s Cylon Detector? </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let them have any nuclear weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
